The Profile Analysis of Prospective Elementary Teacher’ Scientific Literacy as an Initial Strategy to Conduct Science Courses

Authors

Hanifah Mulyani , Rizki Hadiwijaya Zulkarnaen , Yanda Hernisa

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v11i1.9822

Published:

2025-01-31

Issue:

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): January

Keywords:

Prospective elementary teacher, Science course, Scientific literacy

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Mulyani, H., Zulkarnaen, R. H., & Hernisa, Y. (2025). The Profile Analysis of Prospective Elementary Teacher’ Scientific Literacy as an Initial Strategy to Conduct Science Courses . Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(1), 1215–1223. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i1.9822
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Metrics

PDF views
35
Jan 31 '25Feb 01 '25Feb 04 '25Feb 07 '25Feb 10 '25Feb 13 '25Feb 16 '25Feb 19 '25Feb 22 '25Feb 25 '25Feb 28 '25Mar 01 '253.0
|

Abstract

Scientific literacy is one of the most important aspect students should have to help them in making decisions toward any problem and to understand all the changes that probably occurred in society. According to last PISA results, scientific literacy of Indonesian students categorized as low. Educational institutions and teachers have responsibilities to improve this scientific literacy. This research was conducted to analyze the scientific literacy of prospective elementary teachers. Descriptive qualitative method was used and involve research subjects as much as 120. The data taken by giving scientific literacy test. questionnaire, and interview to some research subjects. The data analysis was inductive technique, consisted of collecting, reducing, displaying, and verifying data. The result was was 47,5 and categorized as moderate. This result indicated that the lecturer may implement learning strategies where science process skill of students could be well-developed, integrate science and mathematics courses, and engage students in scientific reading

References

(NCTM) National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. VA: Author.

(NRC) National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. National Academies Press.

(NSTA) National Science Teachers Association. (2009). NSTA Position Statement: Parent Involvement in Science Learning.

(OECD) Organisation for Economic Co-operation Development. (2003). The PISA 2003 Assessment Framework—Mathematics, Reading, Science and Problem Solving Knowledge and Skills.

Adriyawati, U., Rahmawati, Y., & Mardiah, A. (2020). STEAM-project-based learning Integration to Improve elementary school students’ scientific literacy on alternative energy learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5), 1863–1873. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080523

Amar, G. I., Suranto, S., & Sajidan, S. (2020). The Use of a Creative Problem Solving Based Genetic Mutation Module in Higher Education. International Journal of Higher Education, 10(3), 33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v10n3p33

Baxter, J. A., Ruzicka, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Livelybrooks, D. (2014). Professional development strategically connecting mathematics and science: The impact on teachers’ confidence and practice. School Science and Mathematics, 114(3), 102–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12060.doi:10.1111/ssm.12060 .

Berlin, D. F., & Lee, H. (2005). Integrating Science and Mathematics Education: Historical Analysis. School Science and Mathematics, 105(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18032.x

Bosse, S., Jacobs, G. & Anderson, T. L. (2019). Young Children. Science in the Air.

Bradley, P., & Wallace, C. (2008). Deep reading, cost/. 36, 125–140.

Braten I, Stromso HI, S. L. (2011). Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change. Learn Instr, 21, 180–192.

Bright, G. W., & Friel, S. N. (1998). Graphical representations. In S. P. Lajoie (Ed.), Reflections on statistics: Learning, teaching and assessment in grades K-12. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Burghardt, M. D., Lauckhardt, J., Kennedy, M., Hecht, D., & McHugh, L. (2015). The effects of a mathematics infusion curriculum on middle school student mathematics achievement. School Science and Mathematics, 115(5), 204–215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12123.doi:10.1111/ssm.12123 .

Chen, A., Darst, P. W., & Pangrazi, R. P. (1999). What constitutes situational interest? Validating a construct in physical education. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 3, 157–180. https://doi.org/doi:10.1207/ s15327841mpee0303_3

Czerniak, C. M., & Johnson, C. C. (2014). Interdisciplinary science teaching. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.). Handbook of Research on Science Education, 2, 395–411.

Engelmann, K., Neuhaus, B. J., & Fischer, F. (2016). Fostering Scientific Reasoning in Education – Meta-analytic Evidence from Intervention Studies. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(5–6), 333–349.

Faize, F. A., Husain, W., & Nisar, F. (2017). A Critical Review of Scientific Argumentation in Science Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 475–483.

Fan, Y., Wang, T., & Wang, K. (2020). Studying the Effectiveness of An Online Argumentation Model for Improving Undergraduate Students’ Argumentation Ability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(4), 1–14.

Garfield, J., & Ooms, A. (2015). Using assessment items to study students ’ difficulty reading and interpreting graphical representations of distributions. November.

Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lutz, M. (2012). Developing a Test of Scientific Literacy Skills ( TOSLS ): Measuring Undergraduates ’ Evaluation of Scientific Information and Arguments. 11, 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026

Gresnigt, R., Taconis, R., van Keulen, H., Gravemeijer, K., & Baartman, L. (2014). Promoting science and technology in primary education: A review of integrated curricula. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 47–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.877694

Howes, A., Kaneva, D., Swanson, D., & Williams, J. (2013). Re-envisioning STEM education: Curriculum, assessment and integrated, interdisciplinary studies, a report for the Royal Society. https://royalsociety.org/~/media/education/policy/vision/reports/ev-2-vision-research-report-20140624.%0Apdf .

Husna, N., Halim, A., Evendi, E., Syukri, M., Nur, S., Elisa, E., & Khaldun, I. (2022). Impact of Science Process Skills on Scientific Literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 2123–2129. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1887

Jamilah, Astuti, Y.P. & AR., M. . (2023). Implementation of the Campus Teaching Program Batch 3 in Building Scientific Literacy in Elementary Schools. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(7), 5140–5149.

Juhji, J. (2016). Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa melalui Pendekatan Peningkatan Inkuiri Terbimbing. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 2(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v2i1.419

Kähler, J., Hahn, I., & Köller, O. (2020). The development of early scientific literacy gaps in kindergarten children. International Journal of Science Education, 42(12), 1988–2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1808908

Kızılaslan, A. (2019). The development of science process skills in visually impaired students: Analysis of the activities. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(1), 90–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i1.17427

Komikesari, H. (2016). Peningkatan keterampilan proses sains dan hasil belajar fisika siswa pada model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe student team achievement division. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 1(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v1i1.886

Kruea-In, C., Kruea-In, N., & Fakcharoenphol, W. (2015). A Study of Thai In-Service and Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Understanding of Science Process Skills. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 197, 993–997. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.291

Nugraha, E.S., Hartono, Nuswowati, M. (2019). Improving science process skills through the sociocultural inquiry model. Journal of Primary Education, 8(2), 192–199. https://doi.org/https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe/ar ticle/view/25990

OECD. (2018). PISA for Development Assessment and Analytical Framework: Reading, Mathematics and Science. OECD Publishing.

Pratono, A., Sumarti, S.S., Wijayati, N. (2018). Contribution of assisted inquiry model of e-module to student science process skill. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jise/a rticle/view/20633

Rahmadani, Y., Fitakurahmah, N., Fungky, N., Prihatin, R., Majid, Q., & Prayitno, B. A. (2018). Profil Keterampilan Literasi Sains Siswa di Salah Satu Sekolah Swasta di Karanganyar. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 7(3), 183. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpb.v7i3.10123

Rennie, L., Venville, G., & Wallace, J. (2012). Integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Issues, reflections, and ways forward. Routledge.

Roseno, A. T., Carraway-Stage, V. G., Hoerdeman, C., Díaz, S. R., Geist, E., & Duffrin, M. W. (2015). Applying mathematical concepts with hands-on, food-based science curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 115(114–21).

Sari, I. J., & El Islami, R. A. Z. (2020). The Effectiveness of Scientific Argumentation Strategy towards the Various Learning Outcomes and Educational Levels Five Over the Years in Science Education. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 1(2), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v1i2.17

Umar, S. dan C. M. M. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif di Bidang Pendidikan (A. Mujahidin (ed.); 1st ed., Issue 0). CV. Nata Karya.

Yusuf, A. M. (2014). Metode Penelitian: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Penelitian Gabungan. Prenadamedia Group.

Author Biographies

Hanifah Mulyani, Universitas Perjuangan Tasikmalaya

Rizki Hadiwijaya Zulkarnaen, Universitas Perjuangan Tasikmalaya

Yanda Hernisa, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Hanifah Mulyani, Rizki Hadiwijaya Zulkarnaen, Yanda Hernisa

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).