Development and Validation of a Self-directed Learning Scale for Pre-Service Science and Technology Teacher
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v11i2.10000Published:
2025-02-25Issue:
Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): FebruaryKeywords:
Pre-service teacher, Science and technology, Self-directed learningResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
The ability of prospective science and technology teachers to engage in Self-Directed Learning (S-DL) is essential for their professional growth in an evolving educational landscape. However, existing instruments to assess S-DL readiness often lack comprehensive validation. This study aims to develop and validate an instrument to measure S-DL readiness among prospective science and technology teachers. The research followed a structured process, including instrument design, expert validation, pilot testing, and psychometric evaluation. A sample of 100 students participated in the validation process, ensuring the instrument's reliability and validity. Content validation was conducted with expert judgment, while statistical analyses, including factor analysis, were used to assess construct validity. The final instrument consists of 42 items, demonstrating strong validity and reliability. These findings confirm that the developed S-DL instrument is an effective tool for measuring students' readiness for self-directed learning. The results provide valuable insights for improving teacher education programs by integrating self-directed learning strategies and supporting further research in this field.
References
Acar, C., Kara, İ., & Ekici, F. T. (2015). Development of Self Directed Learning Skills Scale for Pre-Service Science Teachers. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2(2), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.239562
Alemdar, M., & Anılan, H. (2020). The Development and Validation of the Emotional Literacy Skills Scale. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 7(2), 258–270. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.757853
Brandt, W. C. (2020). Measuring Student Success Skills: A Review of the Literature on Self-Directed Learning (Issue Maret). Dover, NH: National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment.
Chen, S., & Fan, J. (2023). Validation of the psychometric properties of the Self‐Directed Learning Readiness Scale. Nursing Open, 10(3), 1639–1646. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1418
Cheng, S., Kuo, C., Lin, K., & Lee-hsieh, J. (2010). Development and preliminary testing of a self-rating instrument to measure self-directed learning ability of nursing students. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(2010), 1152–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.02.002
Eliyawati, E., Widodo, A., Kaniawati, I., & Fujii, H. (2023). The Development and Validation of an Instrument for Assessing Science Teacher Competency to Teach ESD. Sustainability, 15(3276), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043276
Firdaus, L., Masiah, M., Ibrohim, I., Lestari, S. R., Dewi, I. N., Mahsul, A., & Muliadi, A. (2021). Translation of Reflective Thinking Questionnaire: A Structural Equation Model. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(SpecialIssue), 305–311. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7ispecialissue.1036
Fisher, M., King, J., & Tague, G. (2001). Development of a self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 21, 516–525. https://doi.org/10.1054/nedt.2001.0589
Fisher, W. P. (2007). Rating Scale Instrument Quality Criteria. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 21(1), 1095. Retrieved from http://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt211m.htm.
Gao, Z., Zhang, L., Ma, J., Sun, H., Hu, M., Wang, M., Liu, H., & Guo, L. (2023). Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of hte self-directed learning instrument in Chinese nursing students. BMC Nursing, 22(51), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01201-3
Guglielmino, L. M. (1977). Development of the self-directed learning readiness scale. University of Georgia.
Gusmanida, G., Sujati, H., & Herwin, H. (2024). Testing the Construct Validity and Reliability of the Student Learning Motivation Scale Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(7), 4227–4234. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i7.7518
Hew, K. F., Law, N., Wan, J., Lee, Y., & Kwok, A. (2016). Self-directed learning in science education: Explicating the enabling factors. Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS, 1, 679–686. https://doi.org/10.22318/icls2016.88
Huda, N., Rohaeti, E., & Ikhsan, J. (2023). Investigating the Attitudes of Chemistry Students Towards Blended Learning: A Survey Cross Sectional. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(4), 1621–1631. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i4.2784
Ismail, I. A., Jhora, F. U., & Insani, M. (2024). Enhancing Science Learning Activities through the Implementation of Discovery Learning and Teaching at the Right Level Method. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(4), 1886–1895. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i4.7359
Jin, M., & Ji, C. (2021). The correlation of metacognitive ability, self-directed learning ability and critical thinking in nursing students: A cross-sectional study. Nursing Open, 8(2), 936–945. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.702
Joa, C. Y., Abuljadail, M., & Ha, L. S. (2023). YouTube self-directed learning in the US and Taiwan: an application of the personal responsibility orientation model. Online Information Review, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-01-2021-0051
Kamp, A. (2019). Science and Technology Education for 21st Century Europe: Discussion Paper. CESAER, 2019. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3582544
Kırıkkaya, E. B., & Yıldırım, İ. (2021). Investigating the Effect of Using Web 2.0 Tools on 7th-Grade Students’ Academic Achievements in Science and Self-Directed Learning with Technology. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(3), 439–460. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.83
Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self Directed Learning. Cambridge: Englewood Cliffs.
Kumar, A. P., Omprakash, A., Kumar, P., Mani, C., Swaminathan, N., Maheshkumar, K., Maruthy, K. N., Sathiyasekaran, B. W. C., Vijayaraghavan, P. V, & Padmavathi, R. (2021). Validation of Internal structure of Self ‑ Directed Learning Readiness Scale among Indian Medical Students using factor analysis and the Structural equation Modelling Approach. BMC Medical Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03035-6
Kuo, H. (2019). Promoting college student’s learning motivation and creativity through a STEM interdisciplinary PBL human-computer interaction system design and development course. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.09.001
Li, J., Zhang, L., Zhou, J., Wang, G., Zhang, R., Liu, J., Liu, S., Chen, Y., Yang, S., Yuan, Q., & Li, Y. (2022). Development and validation of self ‑ management scale for tuberculosis patients. BMC Infectious Diseases, 22(502), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07483-3
Loeng, S. (2020). Self-Directed Learning : A Core Concept in Adult Education. Hindawi Educational Research International, 2020, 12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3816132
Lufri, Verina, F., Razak, A., & Sholichin, M. (2023). Analysis the Implementation of the Active Learning Learning Process in MTs Negeri Throughout Tanah Datar Regency. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 11401–11406. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.5115
Mercado, J. (2024). Self-Directed Learning in STEM Teaching and Learning: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence. Scientechno: Journal of Science and Technology, 3(1), 53–84. https://doi.org/10.55849/scientechno.v3i1.739
Morris, T. H. (2019). Self-directed learning: A fundamental competence in a rapidly changing world. International Review of Education, 65(4), 633–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-019-09793-2
Morris, T. H. (2020). Creativity through self-directed learning: three distinct dimensions of teacher support. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 39(2), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2020.1727577
Naqsyahbandi, F., & Prodjosantoso, A. K. (2023). Instrumental Analysis of Student Perceptions of Chemistry Learning with the STEM Approach at the end of the Covid-19 Pandemic using Second Order Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(3), 1480–1485. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i3.2186
Nugroho, O. F., Permanasari, A., Firman, H., Riandi, R., Teacher, P., Program, E., Unggul, U. E., Program, S. E., & Indonesia, U. P. (2021). The Urgency of STEM Education in Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 7(2), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v7i2.5979
Pacheco, C. S., & Herrera, C. I. (2023). Development and validation of the Complex Thinking Assessment Instrument (CTAI). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 48(December). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101305
Penfield, R. D., & Giacobbi, P. R. (2004). Applying a Score Confidence Interval to Aiken ’ s Item Content-Relevance Index. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 8(4), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15327841mpee0804_3
Pimdee, P., Ridhikerd, A., Moto, S., & Siripongdee, S. (2023). How social media and peer learning influence student-teacher self-directed learning in an online world under the ‘ New Normal .’ Heliyon, 9(3), e13769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13769
Prihartina, Y., Salirawati, D., & Wiyarsi, A. (2023). Measuring Student Learning Activities Through Articulate Storyline 3-Based Mobile Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(4), 2252–2258. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i4.3113
Radovic, S., & Seidel, N. (2024). Self-regulated learning support in technology enhanced learning environments: A reliability analysis of the SRL-S Rubric. Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 675–698. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1502786
Rashifah, H., Rahmawati, Y., & Riyadi. (2023). Development of Instrument of Emotional Climate and Attitude Measurement on Science Learning Environment. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 9313–9323. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5029
Robinson, J. D., & Persky, A. M. (2020). Developing self-directed learners. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(3), 292–296. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe847512
Salleh, U. K. M., Zulnaidi, H., Rahim, S. S. A., Zakaria, A. R. Bin, & Hidayat, R. (2019). Roles of self-directed learning and social networking sites in lifelong learning. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12411a
Sari, U., Duygu, E., Şen, Ö. F., & Kirindi, T. (2020). The Effects of STEM Education on Scientific Process Skills and STEM Awareness in Simulation Based Inquiry Learning Environment. Journal of Turkish, 17(3), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.34
Suharlan, L. S., Arsyad, M., & Palloan, P. (2023). The Influence of Problem Based Learning and Self Directed Learning Models on Students ’ Problem Solving Abilities. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 11386–11393. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.4730
Sultana, S., Panda, B. K., & Sinha, M. (2024). Evaluating Self-directed Learning of Students across different Educational Level. Educational Quest: An International Journal of Education and Applied Social Sciences, 15(01), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.30954/2230-7311.1.2024.3
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch pada Assessment Pendidikan [Application of Rasch Modeling in Educational Assessment] (1st ed.). Penerbit Trim Komunikata.
Swarni, A., Herwin, & Sujati. (2024). Testing the Construct Validity and Reliability of the Student Learning Interest Scale Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(9), 6322–6330. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i9.8794
Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 2018(48), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Tan, L., & Ling, J. K. H. (2014). Self-directed learning: Learning in the 21st century. Educational Technology Division, The Singapore Ministry of Education.
Torres-Malca, J. R., Vera-Ponce, V. J., Zuzunaga-Montoya, F. E., Talavera, J. E., & De La Cruz-Vargas, J. A. (2022). Content validity by expert judgment of an instrument to measure knowledge, attitudes and practices about salt consumption in the peruvian population. Revista de La Facultad de Medicina Humana, 22(2), 273–279. https://doi.org/10.25176/rfmh.v22i2.4768
Van Lankveld, W., Maas, M., Van Wijchen, J., Visser, V., & Staal, J. B. (2019). Self-regulated learning in physical therapy education: A non-randomized experimental study comparing self-directed and instruction-based learning. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1484-3
Williamson, S. N. (2007). Development of a self-rating scale of self-directed learning. Nurse Researcher, 14(2), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2007.01.14.2.66.c6022
Author Biographies
Wahyudi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Agus Setiawan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Andi Suhandi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Achmad Samsudin, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Wahyudi, Agus Setiawan, Andi Suhandi, Achmad Samsudin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).