E-Learning Materials Assisted by Augmented Reality in the Subject of Natural Sciences, Circulatory System Material for Grade V Elementary School

Authors

Tri Andika Rahman , Novi Setyasto

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v11i2.10318

Published:

2025-02-25

Issue:

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): February

Keywords:

Augmented reality, Circulatory system, E-teaching materials, Science

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Rahman, T. A., & Setyasto, N. (2025). E-Learning Materials Assisted by Augmented Reality in the Subject of Natural Sciences, Circulatory System Material for Grade V Elementary School. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(2), 1079–1092. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i2.10318

Downloads

Metrics

PDF views
17
Feb 25 '25Feb 28 '25Mar 01 '25Mar 04 '25Mar 07 '25Mar 10 '25Mar 13 '25Mar 16 '25Mar 19 '25Mar 22 '25Mar 25 '258
|

Abstract

Natural and Social Sciences (IPAS) at the elementary school level still faces a number of challenges that affect the achievement of student learning outcomes. This study was conducted using a research and development (R&D) method based on the Borg and Gall model with the aim of developing and testing the feasibility, practicality and effectiveness of e-learning materials assisted by augmented reality (AR). Researchers collected data using test techniques (pretest-posttest) and non-tests in the form of observations, interview results, surveys and document data. The e-learning materials assisted by AR developed by researchers obtained very feasible criteria results from material, media and language validator experts. E-learning materials assisted by AR have proven effective in improving student learning outcomes, as seen from the increase in the average score between the pretest and posttest achieved by students so that a high N-gain score of 0.76 can be obtained. Based on the results of the questionnaire responses given, very positive responses can be obtained from teachers and students. From these results, it can be concluded that AR-based e-teaching materials are declared feasible and practical to use and effective in improving student learning outcomes in the subject of science with the topic of the circulatory system in class V of SD Negeri Ngaliyan 03

References

Aisyah, S., Noviyanti, E., & Triyanto, T. (2020). Bahan Ajar Sebagai Bagian Dalam Kajian Problematika Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Salaka : Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya Indonesia, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.33751/jsalaka.v2i1.1838

Al-Ansi, A. M., Jaboob, M., Garad, A., & Al-Ansi, A. (2023). Analyzing augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) recent development in education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100532

AlGerafi, M. A. M., Zhou, Y., Oubibi, M., & Wijaya, T. T. (2023). Unlocking the Potential: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Education. Electronics, 12(18), 3953. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12183953

Arena, F., Collotta, M., Pau, G., & Termine, F. (2022). An Overview of Augmented Reality. Computers, 11(2), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers11020028

Arsita, G. A. M. L., & Astawan, I. G. (2022). Improving Student Learning Outcomes in Online Learning by Using Electronic Teaching Materials. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 5(2), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v5i2.48067

Bottani, E., & Vignali, G. (2019). Augmented reality technology in the manufacturing industry: A review of the last decade. IISE Transactions, 51(3), 284–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725854.2018.1493244

Bryant, L., Stubbs, P., Bailey, B., Nguyen, V., Bluff, A., & Hemsley, B. (2025). Interacting with virtual characters, objects and environments: Investigating immersive virtual reality in rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 20(1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2353284

Byers, T., Imms, W., & Hartnell-Young, E. (2018). Comparative analysis of the impact of traditional versus innovative learning environment on student attitudes and learning outcomes. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.003

Chang, H.-Y., Binali, T., Liang, J.-C., Chiou, G.-L., Cheng, K.-H., Lee, S. W.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2022). Ten years of augmented reality in education: A meta-analysis of (quasi-) experimental studies to investigate the impact. Computers & Education, 191, 104641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104641

Cipresso, P., Giglioli, I. A. C., Raya, M. A., & Riva, G. (2018). The Past, Present, and Future of Virtual and Augmented Reality Research: A Network and Cluster Analysis of the Literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2086. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02086

Festiyed, Daulay, H., & Ridhatullah, M. (2023). Influence of Interactive Multimedia Teaching Materials on Cognitive Learning Outcomes of Students in Science Lessons: A Meta-Analysis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(8), 387–396. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.2693

Flavián, C., Ibáñez-Sánchez, S., & Orús, C. (2019). The impact of virtual, augmented and mixed reality technologies on the customer experience. Journal of Business Research, 100, 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.050

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

Haryono, H. E., Marzuqi, I., Kaniawati, I., & Maryani. (2023). Student Learning Outcomes on Heat Material Using E-Learning-Based Collaborative Learning (KABEL). Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 10273–10279. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5066

Hendajani, F., Hakim, A., Sudiro, S. A., Saputra, G. E., & Ramadhana, A. P. (2019). Tracking Visualization Of 3 Dimensional Object Natural Science Learning Media In Elementary School With Markerless Augmented Reality Based On Android. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1192, 012055. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1192/1/012055

Hite, R. L., Jones, M. G., & Childers, G. M. (2024). Classifying and modeling secondary students’ active learning in a virtual learning environment through generated questions. Computers & Education, 208, 104940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104940

Hollister, B., Nair, P., Hill-Lindsay, S., & Chukoskie, L. (2022). Engagement in Online Learning: Student Attitudes and Behavior During COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 7, 851019. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.851019

Hunaidah, M., Erniwati, E., & Mahdiannur, M. A. (2022). CinQASE E-module: Its Effectiveness to Improve Senior High School Students’ Physics Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(2), 641–648. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1413

Jaruševičius, P., Paulauskas, L., Drungilas, V., Jurgelaitis, M., & Blažauskas, T. (2024). Transforming Interactive Educational Content into Immersive Virtual Reality Learning Objects. Applied Sciences, 14(14), 6366. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14146366

Kharisma, A. I., Ati Mz, A. F. S., Eko Handoyo, & Wiwid Widiyanti. (2023). The “7 Wonders of the World-APP” Augmented Reality-based Media to Improve Elementary School Students’ Conceptual Understanding. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 7(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v7i1.54642

Krestanova, A., Cerny, M., & Augustynek, M. (2021). Review: Development and Technical Design of Tangible User Interfaces in Wide-Field Areas of Application. Sensors, 21(13), 4258. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21134258

Lee, S., Kang, E., & Kim, H.-B. (2015). Exploring the Impact of Students’ Learning Approach on Collaborative Group Modeling of Blood Circulation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2–3), 234–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9509-5

Marougkas, A., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2023). Virtual Reality in Education: A Review of Learning Theories, Approaches and Methodologies for the Last Decade. Electronics, 12(13), 2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12132832

Maulida, F., Fitriani, A. D., & Darmayanti, M. (2024). Development of Teaching Materials Based on Differentiated Learning to Improve Critical Thinking Dimensions of The Pancasila Learner Profile. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 10(1), 125. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i1.10420

Pandita, A., & Kiran, R. (2023). The Technology Interface and Student Engagement Are Significant Stimuli in Sustainable Student Satisfaction. Sustainability, 15(10), 7923. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107923

Patra, J. K., Das, G., Fraceto, L. F., Campos, E. V. R., Rodriguez-Torres, M. D. P., Acosta-Torres, L. S., Diaz-Torres, L. A., Grillo, R., Swamy, M. K., Sharma, S., Habtemariam, S., & Shin, H.-S. (2018). Nano based drug delivery systems: Recent developments and future prospects. Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 16(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-018-0392-8

Rahmawati, I. G. A. Y., & Tirtayani, L. A. (2021). Media E-Scrapbook untuk Menstimulasi Kreativitas Anak Usia Dini. Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Undiksha, 9(2), 141. https://doi.org/10.23887/paud.v9i2.35404

Rauschnabel, P. A., Felix, R., Hinsch, C., Shahab, H., & Alt, F. (2022). What is XR? Towards a Framework for Augmented and Virtual Reality. Computers in Human Behavior, 133, 107289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107289

Ribosa, J., & Duran, D. (2022). Do students learn what they teach when generating teaching materials for others? A meta-analysis through the lens of learning by teaching. Educational Research Review, 37, 100475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100475

Rogti, M. (2024). The Effect of Mobile-based Interactive Multimedia on Thinking Engagement and Cooperation. International Journal of Instruction, 17(1), 673–696. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2024.17135a

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Šorgo, A., Ploj Virtič, M., & Dolenc, K. (2023). The Idea That Digital Remote Learning Can Happen Anytime, Anywhere in Forced Online Teacher Education is a Myth. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(4), 1461–1484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09685-3

Susanti, D., Sari, L. Y., & Fitriani, V. (2022). Increasing Student Learning Motivation through the Use of Interactive Digital Books Based on Project Based Learning (PjBL). Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 2022–2028. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1669

Tene, T., Marcatoma Tixi, J. A., Palacios Robalino, M. D. L., Mendoza Salazar, M. J., Vacacela Gomez, C., & Bellucci, S. (2024). Integrating immersive technologies with STEM education: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1410163. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1410163

Teplá, M., Teplý, P., & Šmejkal, P. (2022). Influence of 3D models and animations on students in natural subjects. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00382-8

Tiwari, A. S., Bhagat, K. K., & Lampropoulos, G. (2024). Designing and evaluating an augmented reality system for an engineering drawing course. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00289-z

Tong, D. H., Uyen, B. P., & Ngan, L. K. (2022). The effectiveness of blended learning on students’ academic achievement, self-study skills and learning attitudes: A quasi-experiment study in teaching the conventions for coordinates in the plane. Heliyon, 8(12), e12657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12657

Van Dulmen, T. H. H., Visser, T. C., Pepin, B., & McKenney, S. (2023). Teacher and student engagement when using learning materials based on the context of cutting-edge chemistry research. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(4), 1617–1638. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2070147

Wusqo, I. U., Khusniati, M., Pamelasari, S. D., Laksono, A., & Wulandari, D. (2021). The Effectiveness of Digital Science Scrapbook on Studentsâ€TM Science Visual Literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(1), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i1.27130

Zhang, A., Olelewe, C. J., Orji, C. T., Ibezim, N. E., Sunday, N. H., Obichukwu, P. U., & Okanazu, O. O. (2020). Effects of Innovative and Traditional Teaching Methods on Technical College Students’ Achievement in Computer Craft Practices. Sage Open, 10(4), 2158244020982986. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020982986

Author Biographies

Tri Andika Rahman, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Novi Setyasto, Universitas Negeri Semarang

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Tri Andika Rahman, Novi Setyasto

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).