The Effectiveness of the Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) Cooperative Learning Model Compared to the Jigsaw Type on Students' Science Learning Outcomes

Authors

Siti Nur Faiqoh , Sri Sami Asih

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v11i2.10491

Published:

2025-02-28

Issue:

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): February

Keywords:

Effectiveness, Learning Outcomes, Social Science, Jigsaw, Two Stay Two Stray

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Faiqoh, S. N., & Asih, S. S. (2025). The Effectiveness of the Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) Cooperative Learning Model Compared to the Jigsaw Type on Students’ Science Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(2), 937–945. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i2.10491

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

The mismatch of models and objectives causes students' learning outcomes to vary. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) cooperative learning model compared to the Jigsaw type in improving the learning outcomes of science students on the human digestive system material for class V SDIT Mutiara Hati Rembang. This study uses an experimental research type with a quasi-experimental research design in the form of Non-Equivalent Control Group Design. The sample in this study amounted to 54 students. The sampling technique used purposive sampling. Class VB as the control class and class VA as the experimental class. The data collection technique used a test technique in the form of pretest and posttest questions; non-test techniques in the form of interviews, observations, and documentation. The data analysis technique consists of initial data analysis in the form of normality tests and homogeneity tests and final data analysis in the form of t-tests and N-Gain tests. Based on the t-test, the sig. value is 0.013 (<0.05) meaning that Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. So, there is a significant difference in the effectiveness of the application of the TSTS and Jigsaw learning models on the learning outcomes of science students for class V SDIT Mutiara Hati Rembang. Furthermore, based on the results of the N-Gain test, the control class was 0.46 and the experimental class was 0.56. In conclusion, the TSTS learning model is more effective than Jigsaw on social science learning outcomes

References

Adler, I., Warren, S., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2025). Leveraging opportunities for self-regulated learning in smart learning environments. Smart Learning Environments, 12(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00359-w

Aji, T. P., & Wulandari, S. S. (2021). Analisis Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Journal of Office Administration : Education and Practice, 1(3), 340–350. https://doi.org/10.26740/joaep.v1n3.p340-350

Alti, R. P., Chatri, M., Irdawati, I., & Vauzia, V. (2023). Effect of the Two Stay Two Stray Learning Model Based on a Scientific Approach to Student Competence in Biology Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(2), 884–890. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i2.2933

Antara, I. K. N., Wibawa, I. M. C., & Sukmana, A. I. W. I. Y. (2024). Optimizing Student Learning Outcomes Through the Jigsaw Type Cooperative Learning Model Assisted by Mind Mapping Media. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 7(2), 334–344. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v7i2.81984

Astuti, Y. T., & Radia, E. H. (2023). Perbedaan Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw dan Tipe To Stay To Stray terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Kelas V SD. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(12), 10032–10037. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v6i12.2446

Azzahra, I., Aan Nurhasanah, & Eli Hermawati. (2023). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Pada Pembelajaran IPAS di SDN 4 Purwawinangun. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 9(2), 6230–6238. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v9i2.1270

Brown, C. E. B., Richardson, K., Halil-Pizzirani, B., Atkins, L., Yücel, M., & Segrave, R. A. (2024). Key influences on university students’ physical activity: A systematic review using the Theoretical Domains Framework and the COM-B model of human behaviour. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 418. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17621-4

Chaudhary, P., & Singh, R. K. (2022). A Meta Analysis of Factors Affecting Teaching and Student Learning in Higher Education. Frontiers in Education, 6, 824504. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.824504

Darling-Hammond, L., Schachner, A. C. W., Wojcikiewicz, S. K., & Flook, L. (2024). Educating teachers to enact the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 28(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2022.2130506

Dasmo, Okyranida, I. Y., Fitrian, A., Mulyaningsih, N. N., Widiyatun, F., & Astuti, I. A. D. (2023). Level of Readiness for Implementation of the Independent Curriculum in Senior High Schools in Depok City, West Java. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(7), 4901–4908. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.4158

Diza Jusriani & Ibrohim Muchlis. (2023). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw Terhadap Mata Pelajaran Akidah Akhlak Dalam Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Peserta Didik Di Mts Al Mustaqim Parepare. Al-Ibrah : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Keilmuan Islam, 8(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.61815/alibrah.v8i2.278

Dzemidzic Kristiansen, S., Burner, T., Johnsen, B. H., & Yates, G. (2019). Face-to-face promotive interaction leading to successful cooperative learning: A review study. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1674067. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1674067

Ekayani, N. P. S., Suarjana, I. M., & Jayanta, I. N. L. (2020). Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) Learning Model Assisted with Mind Mapping Improving Students’ Social Studies Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Elementary Education, 4(3), 337. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v4i3.25786

Gede Widayana & Kevin Balsono. (2023). Jigsaw Learning Model Improves Student Learning Outcomes In Mechanical Engineering Basic Knowledge. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(1), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v6i1.61166

Gligorea, I., Cioca, M., Oancea, R., Gorski, A.-T., Gorski, H., & Tudorache, P. (2023). Adaptive Learning Using Artificial Intelligence in e-Learning: A Literature Review. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1216. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121216

Hasanah, Z., & Himami, A. S. (2021). MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF DALAM MENUMBUHKAN KEAKTIFAN BELAJAR SISWA. Irsyaduna: Jurnal Studi Kemahasiswaaan, 1(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.54437/irsyaduna.v1i1.236

Hollenstein, L., & Brühwiler, C. (2024). The importance of teachers’ pedagogical-psychological teaching knowledge for successful teaching and learning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 56(4), 480–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2024.2328042

Hortigüela Alcalá, D., Hernando Garijo, A., Pérez-Pueyo, Á., & Fernández-Río, J. (2019). Cooperative Learning and Students’ Motivation, Social Interactions and Attitudes: Perspectives from Two Different Educational Stages. Sustainability, 11(24), 7005. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247005

Kamaludin, K., & Sundarasen, S. (2023). COVID-19 and online distance learning in Malaysia: A blessing or a curse? Frontiers in Education, 8, 1062219. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1062219

Kwangmuang, P., Jarutkamolpong, S., Sangboonraung, W., & Daungtod, S. (2021). The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in Thailand junior high schools. Heliyon, 7(6), e07309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309

Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: Teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389

Mahayanti, N. K. A., Widiana, I. W., & Jayanta, I. N. L. (2024). Design Thinking-based Learning Assessment Guidelines to Improve Students’ Independent Learning Capability. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 7(1), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v7i1.74595

Maielfi, D., & Wahyuni, S. (2020). The Influence of Jigsaw Type Cooperative Models on Communication Skills of Elementary School Students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 6(2), 205–209. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v6i2.431

Otto, S., & Pensini, P. (2017). Nature-based environmental education of children: Environmental knowledge and connectedness to nature, together, are related to ecological behaviour. Global Environmental Change, 47, 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.09.009

Rahayu, M., Sudarma, I. K., & Dibia, I. K. (2020). Enhancement Of Science Learning Outcomes Through Two Stay Two Stray Learning Model Assisted With Mind Mapping Media. Journal of Education Technology, 4(3), 218. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v4i3.25688

Respati, P., & Qohar, A. (2021). Implementation of two stay two stray (TSTS) learning model to improve college students’ learning activities on geometry course. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 012112. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012112

Sari, C. W. P., & Indarini, E. (2021). Meta Analisis Komparasi Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Jigsaw dan Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) Ditinjau dari Hasil Belajar Pembelajaran Tematik Siswa SD. Jurnal Pedagogi Dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.23887/jp2.v4i1.33251

Sejati, A. E., Kasmiati, S., & Ikhsan, F. A. (2019). The relationship between learning process interactions and student’s learning outcomes in environmental sustainability matter geography-social science education subject. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 382(1), 012026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/382/1/012026

Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: What works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 4–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007

Sjølie, E., Espenes, T. C., & Buø, R. (2022). Social interaction and agency in self-organizing student teams during their transition from face-to-face to online learning. Computers & Education, 189, 104580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104580

Sri, S. A. (2022). Implementasi Pendidikan Karakter Di Sekolah. Al-Riwayah : Jurnal Kependidikan, 14(2), 214–226. https://doi.org/10.47945/al-riwayah.v14i2.705

Sukmawati, A., Khamalia, N. A. N., & Zuhroh, N. E. (2023). Efektivitas Metode Jigsaw pada Peserta Didik Abad 21. TSAQOFAH, 3(4), 568–576. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v3i4.1221

Tong, D. H., Uyen, B. P., & Ngan, L. K. (2022). The effectiveness of blended learning on students’ academic achievement, self-study skills and learning attitudes: A quasi-experiment study in teaching the conventions for coordinates in the plane. Heliyon, 8(12), e12657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12657

Une, D. F., Pomalato, S. W. D., & Machmud, T. (2023). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Two Stay Two Stray Terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa. Jambura Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.34312/jmathedu.v4i1.18206

Veldman, M. A., Doolaard, S., Bosker, R. J., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2020). Young children working together. Cooperative learning effects on group work of children in Grade 1 of primary education. Learning and Instruction, 67, 101308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101308

Vermunt, J. D., & Donche, V. (2017). A Learning Patterns Perspective on Student Learning in Higher Education: State of the Art and Moving Forward. Educational Psychology Review, 29(2), 269–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9414-6

Vong, S. A., & Kaewurai, W. (2017). Instructional model development to enhance critical thinking and critical thinking teaching ability of trainee students at regional teaching training center in Takeo province, Cambodia. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(1), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.05.002

W. Johnson, D., & T. Johnson, R. (2019). Cooperative Learning: The Foundation for Active Learning. In S. Manuel Brito (Ed.), Active Learning—Beyond the Future. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81086

Yang, X. (2023). A Historical Review of Collaborative Learning and Cooperative Learning. TechTrends, 67(4), 718–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00823-9

Zamiri, M., & Esmaeili, A. (2024). Methods and Technologies for Supporting Knowledge Sharing within Learning Communities: A Systematic Literature Review. Administrative Sciences, 14(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14010017

Author Biographies

Siti Nur Faiqoh, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Sri Sami Asih, Universitas Negeri Semarang

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Siti Nur Faiqoh, Sri Sami Asih

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).