Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022): January
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

The Validity and Practicality of the Contextual Analysis of Science and Laboratory Problems (CANLABS) Learning Model in Science Learning

Authors

Aris Singgih Budiarso , Sutarto Sutarto , I Ketut Mahardika , Pramudya Dwi Aristya Putra , Dian Nur Indah Sari , Finda Nor Laela

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.1069

Published:

2022-01-07

Downloads

Abstract

The learning model about Contextual Analysis of Science and Laboratory Problems (CANLABS) is a model that provides opportunities for students to choose several natural events around them that are relevant to the material which is being studied and then explore the phenomenon profoundly in the laboratory. This study aims to analyze the validity and practicality of the CANLABS learning model for science mastery for junior high school students. The trial results of the model development were carried out in the 7th grade of the former Besuki residency (Jember, Bondowoso, Situbondo, and Banyuwangi) with a total of 120 students. The sampling technique was carried out using a purposive sampling area. To measure the validity, use the model validity sheet carried out by experts through the Focus Group Discussion (FGD). Meanwhile, to measure practicality, an observation sheet on the implementation of the learning implementation plan was used by the observer. Based on the analysis, it was found that the content validation and construct validation respectively scored an average of 4.08 and 4.11 with the reliability of the model 96%. Meanwhile, the implementation of the learning implementation plan in preliminary activities, core activities, strengthening activities, closing, and classroom atmosphere with an average score of 3.39 is categorized as very good. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the CANLABS learning model meets the criteria of validity and practicality so that it is suitable in science learning for junior high school students.

Keywords:

CANLABS learning model Validity Practicality

References

Agatha, N. D., Prihatin, J., & Narulita, E. (2018). Pengembangan Buku Komik Pokok Bahasan Sistem Peredaran Darah. Jurnal Bioedukatika, 5(2), 59. https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v5i2.7200.

Ahmad, S., Helsa, Y., & Ariani, Y. (2020). Pendekatan Realistik dan Teori Van Hiele. Deepublish.

Anisa, A. (2017). Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Melalui Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis Potensi Lokal Jepara. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v3i1.8607.

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Rineka Cipta.

Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (2005). Educational Research: An Introduction, Fourth Edition. Longman Inc.

Borich, G. D. (1994). Observation Skill for Effective Teaching. Mac Millian Publishing Company.

Budiarso, A. S. (2021). Contextual Analysis of Science and Laboratory Problems (CANLABS). CV. Pustaka Abadi, 157.

Budiarso, A. S., & Rohmatillah, S. (2020). Optimalisasi Pendidikan dalam Rekontruksi Pembelajaran Berbasis Sains dan Teknologi di Era New Normal. Webinar Pendidikan Disika 2020. 5(1), 27–32.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791.

Dewi, E. Y., Supeno, & Subiki. (2012). Peningkatan Kemampuan Kerja Ilmiah dan Hasil Belajar Fisika dengan Model Inkuiri Terbimbing pada Siswa Kelas VIIC SMP Negeri 1 Tapen Bondowoso. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 1(1), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.19184/jpf.v1i1.23144

Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2012). Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran Mengajar Konten dan Keterampilan Berfikir. Indeks.

Hekmah, N., Wilujeng, I., & Suryadarma, I. G. P. (2019). Web-Lembar Kerja Siswa IPA Terintegrasi Lingkungan untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Lingkungan Siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i2.25402.

Isrok’atun, & Rosmala, A. (2018). Model–model Pembelajaran Matematika. PT. Bumi Aksara.

Jan van den, A., Gravemeijer, K., Koeno, S., & Nieveen, N. (2006). Educational Design Research. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 279.

Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2011). Models of Teaching, Eighth Edition. Pearson Education Inc.

Khairah, D. I. U., Mudakir, I., & Wahono, B. (2017). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Talk Write (TTW) untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas VIII D SMPN 1 Mangaran Situbondo. Jurnal Edukasi, 4(3), 6. https://doi.org/10.19184/jukasi.v4i3.6046.

Kumalasari, D., Sudarti, & Lesmono, A. D. (2015). Dampak Model Discovery Learning Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Hasil Belajar IPA-FISIKA Siswa di MTs Negeri Jember. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 4(1), 80–86. Retrieved from https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JPF/article/view/1866

Laksana, D. N. L. (2017). The Effectiveness of Inquiry Based Learning for Natural Science Learning in Elementary School. Journal of Education Technology, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v1i1.10077.

Mahanal, S., Zubaidah, S., Sumiati, I. D., Sari, T. M., & Ismirawati, N. (2019). RICOSRE: A Learning Model to Develop Critical Thinking Skills for Students with Different Academic Abilities. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 417–434. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12227a.

Maksum, H., & Purwanto, W. (2019). Model Pembelajaran Pedidikan Vokasi Otomotif. UNP Press.

March, S. T., & Smith, G. F. (1995). Design and Natural Science Research on Information Technology. Decision Support Systems, 15(4), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9236(94)00041-2.

Mayer, R. E. (2008). Applying the Science of Learning: Evidence-Based Principles for the Design of Multimedia Instruction. American Psychologist, 63(8), 760–769. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.760.

Mustami, M. K., Syamsudduha, S., & Ismail, M. I. (2019). Validity, Practicality, and Effectiveness Development of Biology Textbooks Integrated with Augmented Reality on High School Students. International Journal Technology Enhanced Learning, 11(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2019.098789

Nawzad, L., Rahim, D., & Said, K. W. (2018). The Effectiveness of Technology for Improving the Teaching of Natural Science Subjects. Indonesian Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies, 6(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcets.v6i1.22863.

Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. M. (2010). An introduction to educational design research: Proceedings of the seminar conducted at the East China Normal University, Shanghai (PR China), November 23-26, 2007. SLO.

Prahani, B. K., Nur, M., Yuanita, L., & Limatahu, I. (2017). Validitas Model Pembelajaran Group Science Learning; Pembelajaran Inovatif di Indonesia. Vidya Karya, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.20527/jvk.v31i1.3976.

Pratiwi, I. (2019). Improving Students’ Learning with NHT Model of Teaching in Natural Science Courses. 2(3), 153–156.

Puspaningrum, A., Mahardika, I. K., & Supriadi, B. (2015). Peningkatkan Kemampuan Multirepresentasi IPA (Fisika) dengan Model Quantum Learning disertai Metode Eksperimen pada Siswa Kelas VIII-A SMP Negeri 7 Jember. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 3(4), 342–348.

Sadiqin, I. K., Santoso, U. T., & Sholahuddin, A. (2017). Pemahaman Konsep IPA Siswa SMP Melalui Pembelajaran Problem Solving pada Topik Perubahan Benda-benda di Sekitar Kita. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 3(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v3i1.12554.

Sagala, ‪Syaiful. (2011). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Alfabeta.

Santrock, J. W. (2011). Educational Psychology. McGraw Hill.

Sari, M. (2019). Mengenal Lebih Dekat Model Blended Learning Dengan Facebook (NBL-FB): Model Pembelajaran Untuk Generasi Digital. Deepublish.

Setiawan, Y., & Mustangin, M. (2020). Validitas Model Pembelajar IDEA (Issue, Discussion, Establish, and Apply) untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep. JP3M (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Matematika), 6(1), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.37058/jp3m.v6i1.1432.

Sukarni, W., Astalini, A., & Agus Kurniawan, D. (2021). Literatur Review: Sistem Sosial Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving Terhadap Sikap Sosial Siswa. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(1), 106-115. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v5i1.1102.

Uryawati, E., & Osman, K. (2017). Contextual Learning: Innovative Approach towards the Development of Students’ Scientific Attitude and Natural Science Performance. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79329.

Umbara, U. (2017). Psikologi Pembelajaran Matematika Melaksanakan Pembelajaran Matematika Berdasarkan Tinjauan Psikologi. Deepublish.

Wen, P. (2018). Application of Bruner’s Learning Theory in Mathematics Studies. Proceedings of the International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Ecological Studies (CESSES 2018). Proceedings of the International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Ecological Studies (CESSES 2018), Moscow, Russia. https://doi.org/10.2991/cesses-18.2018.53.

Wicaksono, I., Supeno, & Budiarso, A. S. (2020). Validity and Practicality of the Biotechnology Series Learning Model to Concept Mastery and Scientific Creativity. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13311a.

Xi, J., & Lantolf, J. P. (2021). Scaffolding and the Zone of Proximal Development: A Problematic Relationship. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 51(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12260.

Author Biographies

Aris Singgih Budiarso, University of Jember

Author Origin : Indonesia

Sutarto Sutarto, University of Jember

Author Origin : Indonesia

I Ketut Mahardika, University of Jember

Author Origin : Indonesia

Pramudya Dwi Aristya Putra, University of Jember

Author Origin : Indonesia

Dian Nur Indah Sari, University of Jember

Author Origin : Indonesia

Finda Nor Laela, University of Jember

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Budiarso, A. S., Sutarto, S., Mahardika, I. K. ., Putra, P. D. A. ., Sari, D. N. I. ., & Laela, F. N. . (2022). The Validity and Practicality of the Contextual Analysis of Science and Laboratory Problems (CANLABS) Learning Model in Science Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.1069