The Effect of Cognitive Conflict Strategies on Students' Cognitive Learning Outcomes
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.1308Published:
2022-01-25Issue:
Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022): JanuaryKeywords:
Cognitive conflict strategies, Cognitive learning outcomes, Experimental researchResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
An important aspect of learning outcomes at all levels of education is cognitive learning outcomes, and to achieve optimal cognitive learning outcomes, multi-method intervention is needed. This study aims to determine the effect of using cognitive conflict strategies on students' cognitive learning outcomes. Experimental research with one group pretest-posttest design was conducted in this study. A total of thirty-five students as the research sample, sample came from one of the high schools in West Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara. Cognitive conflict strategies are conducted in the material of continuous straight motion and uniformly changing straight motion. Measurement of cognitive learning outcomes using a test instrument (essay test) as many as six test items that accommodate cognitive level 1 (C1) to 6 (C6) and these are given to students as pretest and posttest. Descriptively, the results showed that cognitive learning outcomes increased after learning using cognitive conflict strategies (mean: 3. 4803) significantly (p: 0.000) with an n-gain of 0.74 in the high category. These results imply that cognitive conflict strategies are effective for improving students' cognitive learning outcomesReferences
Akmam, A., Anshari, R., Amir, H., Jalinus, N., & Amran, A. (2018). Influence of Learning Strategy of Cognitive Conflict on Student Misconception in Computational Physics Course. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 335, 012074. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/335/1/012074
Bloom, B. H. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. David Mackay Co.
Hake, R., R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. Indiana University: Woodland Hills, CA - USA.
Harris, R., & Clayton, B. (2019). The current emphasis on learning outcomes. International Journal of Training Research, 17(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2019.1644777
Hinderliter, H., Xie, Y., Ladendorf, K., & Muehsler, H. (2021). Path Analysis of Internal and External Factors Associated with Parental Satisfaction over K-12 Online Learning. Computers in the Schools, 0(0), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2021.1988319
Krathwohl, D. R., & Anderson, L. W. (2010). Merlin C. Wittrock and the Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 64–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903433562
Lee, G., Kwon, J., Park, S.-S., Kim, J.-W., Kwon, H.-G., & Park, H.-K. (2003). Development of an instrument for measuring cognitive conflict in secondary-level science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(6), 585–603. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10099
Madu, B. C., & Orji, E. (2015). Effects of Cognitive Conflict Instructional Strategy on Students’ Conceptual Change in Temperature and Heat. SAGE Open, 5(3), 215824401559466. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015594662
Muzyk, A. J., Tew, C., Thomas-Fannin, A., Dayal, S., Maeda, R., Schramm-Sapyta, N., Andolsek, K., & Holmer, S. (2018). Utilizing Bloom’s taxonomy to design a substance use disorders course for health professions students. Substance Abuse, 39(3), 348–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2018.1436634
Ni, Y., Zhou, D.-H. R., Cai, J., Li, X., Li, Q., & Sun, I. X. (2018). Improving cognitive and affective learning outcomes of students through mathematics instructional tasks of high cognitive demand. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(6), 704–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1402748
Potvin, P. (2021). Response of science learners to contradicting information: A review of research. Studies in Science Education, 0(0), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2021.2004006
Prayogi, S., Muhali, M., Yuliyanti, S., Asy’ari, M., Azmi, I., & Verawati, N. N. S. P. (2019). The Effect of Presenting Anomalous Data on Improving Student’s Critical Thinking Ability. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 14(06), 133. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i06.9717
Prayogi, S., & Verawati, N. N. S. P. (2020). The Effect of Conflict Cognitive Strategy in Inquiry-based Learning on Preservice Teachers’ Critical Thinking Ability. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal), 0(21), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2020-021-pray
Prayogi, S., Yuanita, L., & Wasis. (2018). Critical Inquiry Based Learning: A Model of Learning to Promote Critical Thinking Among Prospective Teachers of Physic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(1), 43–56.
Schmidts, C., Foerster, A., & Kunde, W. (2020). Situation selection and cognitive conflict: Explicit knowledge is necessary for conflict avoidance. Cognition and Emotion, 34(6), 1199–1209. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2020.1736006
Verawati, N. N. S. P., & Afifah, G. (2018). Efek Penggunaan Strategi Konflik Kognitif terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 6(2), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v6i2.1081
Wang, J., Shimada, A., Oi, M., Ogata, H., & Tabata, Y. (2020). Development and evaluation of a visualization system to support meaningful e-book learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813178
Waxer, M., & Morton, J. B. (2012). Cognitive Conflict and Learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 585–587). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_280
Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Pant, H. A., & Coates, H. (2016). Assessing student learning outcomes in higher education: Challenges and international perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(5), 655–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1169501
Author Biographies
Widia Widia, Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) Harapan Bima
Suhirman Suhirman, Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram
Muhammad Suhardi, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Mataram
Saiful Prayogi, Universitas Mandalika Mataram
Muhammad Yamin, Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) Harapan Bima
Muhammad Salahuddin, Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) Harapan Bima
Lutfin Haryanto, Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) Harapan Bima
Ewisahrani Ewisahrani, Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) Harapan Bima
E Nursa’ban E Nursa’ban, Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) Harapan Bima
Ilyas Ilyas, Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) Taman Siswa, Bima
Mujitahid Mujitahid, Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP) Satu Atap Gili Trawangan
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Widia Widia, Suhirman Suhirman, Muhammad Suhardi, Muhammad Yamin, Muhammad Salahuddin, Lutfin Haryanto, Ewisahrani Ewisahrani, E Nursa’ban E Nursa’ban, Ilyas Ilyas, Mujitahid Mujitahid
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
