CinQASE E-module: Its Effectiveness to Improve Senior High School Students’ Physics Learning Outcomes
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1413Published:
2022-04-30Downloads
Abstract
One of the many digital technologies to actualize the digital learning environment is to provide e-modules based on collaboration in questioning, analyzing, synthesizing, and evaluating (CinQASE) learning model. The main purpose of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of the CinQASE e-module to improve students' learning outcomes in 10th grade in several Senior High Schools in Kendari, Southeast Sulawesi Province. This study implemented design-based research with a three-group pretest-posttest design. 85 students in the 10th grade participated in this study. The research subjects consist of three classes. Each class will use the CinQASE e-modules with different concepts. These concepts were Work and Energy, Momentum and Impulse, and Circular Motion. The differences in learning outcomes will be tested and evaluated based on the t-test. The results of the data analysis showed the normalized gain in the medium category, and the differences in learning outcomes showed a significance level (0.000) < 0.05 for all classes. Consistently implementing the CinQASE e-module can improve physics learning outcomes for all class groups with Sig. (0.161) > 5%. Hence, the CinQASE e-module had the potential to be used in physics classrooms and improve senior high school students’ learning outcomesKeywords:
E-module CinQASE learning model Physics learning outcomesReferences
Ab Kadir, M. A. (2018). An inquiry into critical thinking in the Australian curriculum: examining its conceptual understandings and their implications on developing critical thinking as a “general capability†on teachers’ practice and knowledge. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38(4), 533–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2018.1535424
Alhammad, R., & Ku, H.-Y. (2019). Graduate students’ perspectives on using e-books for academic learning. Educational Media International, 56(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2019.1583460
An, T., & Oliver, M. (2021). What in the world is educational technology? Rethinking the field from the perspective of the philosophy of technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1810066
Asrowi, A., Hadaya, A., & Hanif, M. (2019). The impact of using the interactive e-book on students’ learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 709–722. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12245a
Dewi, M. S. A., & Lestari, N. A. P. (2020). E-modul interaktif berbasis proyek terhadap hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(3), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v4i3.28035
Dwijayani, N. M. (2019). Development of circle learning media to improve student learning outcomes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321(2), 022099. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/2/022099
Ghaem Sigarchian, H., Logghe, S., Verborgh, R., de Neve, W., Salliau, F., Mannens, E., … Schuurman, D. (2018). Hybrid e-TextBooks as comprehensive interactive learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(4), 486–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1343191
Glackin, B. C., Rodenhiser, R. W., & Herzog, B. (2014). A library and the disciplines: A collaborative project assessing the impact of ebooks and mobile devices on student learning. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(3–4), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.04.007
Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v7i1.a.2
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Hou, H.-T., Fang, Y.-S., & Tang, J. T. (2021). Designing an alternate reality board game with augmented reality and multi-dimensional scaffolding for promoting spatial and logical ability. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1961810
Hunaidah, Susantini, E., Wasis, & Mahdiannur, M. A. (2022). Model Pembelajaran CinQASE (Collaborative in Questioning, Analyzing, Synthesizing, and Evaluating). Surabaya: Global Aksara Pres.
Hunaidah, Susantini, E., Wasis, Prahani, B. K., & Mahdiannur, M. A. (2018). Improving collaborative critical thinking skills of physics education students through implementation of CinQASE learning model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108, 012101. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012101
Jack, B. M., & Lin, H. (2017). Making learning interesting and its application to the science classroom. Studies in Science Education, 53(2), 137–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2017.1305543
Karakoç Öztürk, B. (2021). Digital reading and the concept of ebook: Metaphorical analysis of preservice teachers’ perceptions regarding the concept of ebook. SAGE Open, 11(2), 215824402110168. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211016841
Laili, I., Ganefri, & Usmeldi. (2019). Efektivitas pengembangan e-modul project based learning pada mata pelajaran instalasi. Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 3(3), 306–315. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v3i3.21840
Latifah, N., Ashari, & Kurniawan, E. S. (2020). Pengembangan e-modul fisika untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains (JIPS), 1(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.37729/jips.v1i1.570
Lawrence, J. E., & Tar, U. A. (2018). Factors that influence teachers’ adoption and integration of ICT in teaching/learning process. Educational Media International, 55(1), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1439712
Loes, C. N., & Pascarella, E. T. (2017). Collaborative learning and critical thinking: Testing the link. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(5), 726–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2017.1291257
Logan, R. M., Johnson, C. E., & Worsham, J. W. (2021). Development of an e-learning module to facilitate student learning and outcomes. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 16(2), 139–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2020.10.007
Magdalena, I., Ramadanti, F., & Az-Zahra, R. (2021). Analisis bahan ajar dalam kegiatan belajar dan mengajar di SDN Karawaci 20. Edisi: Jurnal Edukasi Dan Sains, 3(3), 434–459. https://doi.org/10.36088/edisi.v3i3.1444
Mahdiannur, M. A., & Romadhoni, W. (2020). Evaluation of senior high school students scientific inquiry skills: A perspective from proposing action and interpreting results. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 80–86. https://doi.org/10.26740/jppipa.v5n2.p80-86
Martinez-Estrada, P. D., & Conaway, R. N. (2012). EBooks: The next step in educational innovation. Business Communication Quarterly, 75(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569911432628
Morris, N. P., & Lambe, J. (2017). Multimedia interactive eBooks in laboratory bioscience education. Higher Education Pedagogies, 2(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2017.1338531
Näykki, P., Isohätälä, J., & Järvelä, S. (2021). “You really brought all your feelings out†– Scaffolding students to identify the socio-emotional and socio-cognitive challenges in collaborative learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 30, 100536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100536
Nisrina, S. H., Rokhmawati, R. I., & Afirianto, T. (2021). Pengembangan e-modul berbasis project based learning (PjBL) pada mata pelajaran animasi 2 dimensi dan 3 dimensi untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar peserta didik. Edu Komputika Journal, 8(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.15294/edukomputika.v8i2.48451
Puspitasari, A. D. (2019). Penerapan media pembelajaran fisika menggunakan modul cetak dan modul elektronik pada siswa SMA. JPF (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika) Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, 7(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.24252/jpf.v7i1.7155
Sung, H.-Y., Hwang, G.-J., & Chen, S.-F. (2019). Effects of embedding a problem-posing-based learning guiding strategy into interactive e-books on students’ learning performance and higher order thinking tendency. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(3), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1474235
van der Velde, W., & Ernst, O. (2009). The future of eBooks? Will print disappear? An endâ€user perspective. Library Hi Tech, 27(4), 570–583. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830911007673
Wilson, R., Landoni, M., & Gibb, F. (2003). The WEB Book experiments in electronic textbook design. Journal of Documentation, 59(4), 454–477. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410310485721
Wulandari, D. D., Adnyana, P. B., & Santiasa, I. M. P. A. (2020). Penerapan e-modul interaktif terhadap motivasi dan hasil belajar siswa pada pembelajaran biologi kelas X. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Undiksha, 7(2), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpb.v7i2.29681.g16858
License
Copyright (c) 2022 M Hunaidah, Erniwati Erniwati, Muhamad Arif Mahdiannur
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
