Enterprise Architecture for Digital Transformation in a Fragile State: Evidence from a Mixed-Methods Case Study of Afghanistan
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v12i8.16244Published:
2026-08-31Downloads
Abstract
Digital transformation (DT) programmes in fragile states routinely produce fragmented systems, duplicated investment, and outcomes that diverge from strategic intent. Enterprise architecture (EA) is the discipline conventionally prescribed for these pathologies, yet its established frameworks presuppose institutional stability, deep specialist labour markets, and formal governance, none of which characterise a post-conflict economy. This paper reports a pragmatic, convergent parallel mixed-methods case study of Afghanistan that triangulates a survey of 105 public and private sector professionals with seven in-depth interviews with senior leaders. The results expose an adoption paradox: only 16.2% of surveyed organisations maintain a formal EA function, while the minority that do report markedly stronger outcomes in standardisation (M = 4.18), innovation enablement (M = 4.00), and technology risk reduction (M = 3.94). Organisations without EA rate long-term technology planning lowest of all measured items (M = 2.84). DT implementation intensity correlates strongly with perceived DT success (r = .654, p < .001), while sector membership predicts neither success (t(80) = −0.57, p = .572) nor EA adoption (χ²(1) = 0.045, p = .832), indicating a system-wide rather than sector-specific deficit. The dominant barriers are human and contextual rather than technical: a shortage of skilled professionals (M = 3.66) sustained by brain drain, and political and economic instability (M = 3.65). Committed senior leadership emerged as the single decisive enabler. The paper argues that TOGAF, Zachman, and FEAF are mismatched to this environment at the level of embedded assumption, and proposes “EA-Lite,” a practitioner-derived model that is lightweight, value-driven, politically savvy, and leadership-centric, together with a revised conceptual framework for leveraging EA in fragile states.
Keywords:
Developing countries Digital transformation Enterprise architecture Fragile states Mixed-methods research Public sector information systems TOGAFReferences
Alghamdi, H., & Mario, C. (2024). Assessing the impact of enterprise architecture on digital transformation success: A global perspective. Sustainability, 16(20), Article 8865. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208865
Bente, S., Bombosch, U., & Langade, S. (2012). Collaborative enterprise architecture: Enriching EA with lean, agile, and enterprise 2.0 practices. Morgan Kaufmann. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2381034
Bernard, S. A. (2012). An introduction to enterprise architecture. AuthorHouse.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chernbumroong, S., Sureephong, P., & Janchai, W. (2021). The conceptual model of digital transformation for small and medium enterprises in Thailand. In Proceedings of the Joint 6th International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology (Ecti damt & Ncon) (pp. 336–339). https://doi.org/10.1109/ectidamtncon51128.2021.9425755
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE. Retrieved from https://collegepublishing.sagepub.com/products/qualitative-inquiry-and-research-design-4-246896
Dang, D., & Pekkola, S. (2016). Root causes of enterprise architecture problems in the public sector. Proceedings of the 20th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), Paper 287. http://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2016/287
Dietz, J., Hoogervorst, J. A. P., Albani, A., Aveiro, D., Babkin, E., Barjis, J., ... & Wortmann, H. (2009). Enterprise architecture at work: Modelling, communication and analysis. Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-662-53933-0
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Emin, M., Budiardjo, E. K., & Santoso, H. B. (2024). Enterprise architecture and agile approach for digital transformation: An integrated analysis approach using bibliometric and content analysis. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.0795.v1
Fadhlurrahman, M. A. (2024). An academic analysis of digital transformation: A comprehensive review of literature and business strategies. Security Intelligence Terrorism Journal (SITJ), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.70710/sitj.v1i1.4
Hakimi, M., Parsa, N. M., & Turan, M. N. (2026). Consumer trust in AI-generated advertisements: A comparative study of AI and human-created advertising content. COMMUSTY Journal of Communication Studies and Society, 5(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.38043/commusty.v5i1.7734
Ilin, I., Levina, A., Abran, A., & Iliashenko, O. (2017). Measurement of enterprise architecture (EA) from an IT perspective: Research gaps and measurement avenues. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference Series (Vol. F131936, pp. 232–243). https://doi.org/10.1145/3143434.3143457
Kohansal, M. A., Rolland, K. H. R., & Khodambashi, S. (2022). Towards an explanation for why enterprise architecture management fails: A legitimacy lens. In Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation (Vol. 57, pp. 217–231). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10902-7_15
Lestari, M., Wijaya, A. F., & Chandra, M. M. D. (2025). Enterprise architecture model for smart government implementation. Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, 7(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.51519/journalisi.v7i1.978
Lin, J. (2024). Digital transformation strategies and practices for corporates. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 96(1), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/96/2024mur0086
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Establishing trustworthiness. In Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE.
Mailasan, J., Karim bin Mohamad, A., & Abu, A. (2019). Enterprise architecture embrace digital technology in Malaysian transportation industry. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT).
Möhring, M., Keller, B., Schmidt, R., Sandkuhl, K., & Zimmermann, A. (2023). Digitalization and enterprise architecture management: A perspective on benefits and challenges. SN Business & Economics, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-023-00426-3
Nasrat, N. (2020). An enterprise architecture evaluation of e-government progress: Afghanistan as a case study. Valparaiso University. https://scholar.valpo.edu/gas
Niemi, E., et al. (2013). Global Association of Enterprise Architects. Journal of enterprise architecture. https://www.globalaea.org/journal
The Open Group. (2022). The TOGAF® standard. https://www.opengroup.org
Oyekunle, D., & Boohene, D. (2024). Digital transformation potential: The role of artificial intelligence in business. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 9(3), Article e04499. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2024.v9i3.4499
Rezaie, M., Mirzahosein, Z., & Rasouli, H. (2022). Developing a digital transformation architecture framework: A business intelligence approach. In Proceedings of the 6th Iranian Conference on Advances in Enterprise Architecture (ICAEA) (pp. 7–14). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAEA57644.2022.10054019
Ross, J. W., Weill, P., & Robertson, D. C. (2006). Enterprise architecture as strategy: Creating a foundation for business execution. Harvard Business School Press.
Rouhani, B. D., Mahrin, M. N. Z. R., Nikpay, F., Ahmad, R. B., & Nikfard, P. (2015). A systematic literature review on enterprise architecture implementation methodologies. Information and Software Technology, 62(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.01.012
Saha, P. (2019). Digital transformation and the role of enterprise architecture. ITU Publications, Thematic Reports.
Saleem, F., & Fakieh, B. (2020). Enterprise architecture and organizational benefits: A case study. Sustainability, 12(19), Article 8237. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198237
Salesforce. (2025). What is digital transformation?. Retrieved from https://www.salesforce.com/digital-transformation/
SAP LeanIX. (2025). Enterprise architecture frameworks: Choose and implement. Retrieved from https://www.leanix.net/en/wiki/ea/enterprise-architecture-frameworks
Sapai, R. (2024). The impact of enterprise architecture on driving digital transformation in developing countries: A study of Afghanistan.
Sararuch, S., Wannapiroon, P., & Nilsook, P. (2023). The development of agile enterprise architecture for digital transformation in higher education institutions. Higher Education Studies, 13(3), 69. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v13n3p69
Shaanika, I., & Iyamu, T. (2014). Developing enterprise architecture skills: A developing country perspective. In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (Vol. 444). Springer.
Shukla, S., George, J. P., Tiwari, K., & Kureethara, J. V. (2022). Data ethics and challenges. Springer.
Singh, P., Lynch, F., & Helfert, M. (2024). Enterprise architecture for the transformation of public services based on citizen's feedback. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 26(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-11-2022-0123
Sparx Systems. (2023). Guide to enterprise architecture: Enterprise Architect user guide series. Sparx Systems.
World Bank Group. (2025). World Bank country and lending groups. Retrieved from https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.
Zimmermann, A., Schmidt, R., Sandkuhl, K., Jugel, D., Bogner, J., & Möhring, M. (2018). Evolution of enterprise architecture for digital transformation. In Proceedings of the IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW) (pp. 87–96). https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOCW.2018.00023
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bilal Himmat, Amir Kror Shahidzay, Mohammad Rashid Sapai
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
