Vol. 12 No. 8 (2026)
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Formulating and Balancing Chemical Equations for Organic Compounds

Authors

Nasratullah Mahboob , Tamann Quraishi

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v12i8.16269

Published:

2026-08-31

Downloads

Abstract

Balancing chemical equations for organic compounds is a routine yet often tedious component of chemistry education and computational chemistry, and it becomes markedly harder as molecular size and functional-group complexity grow. This paper reviews how artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, ranging from classical algebraic and matrix-based solvers to modern machine-learning models such as graph neural networks and sequence-to-sequence transformers, are being used to formulate, balance, and validate chemical equations for organic reactions. We synthesise findings from the computational chemistry, cheminformatics, and chemistry-education literature to compare rule-based, algebraic, and learned approaches, and we illustrate the underlying logic with a worked example of ethanol combustion solved through the matrix null-space method. The review indicates that deterministic algebraic methods remain the most reliable choice for routine stoichiometric balancing, while learned models add clear value for predicting reaction outcomes and retrosynthetic routes in more complex organic transformations, albeit with lower top-1 accuracy and weaker interpretability. We further discuss the growing use of generative AI tools in chemistry classrooms, including in low-resource settings such as Afghan universities, and conclude that a hybrid architecture combining deterministic solvers with learned chemical-plausibility models is the most promising direction for AI-assisted equation balancing

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence Chemical equation balancing Organic chemistry machine learning Chemistry education

References

Ausat, A. M. A., Massang, B., Efendi, M., Nofirman, & Riady, Y. (2023). Can ChatGPT replace the role of the teacher in the classroom: A fundamental analysis. Journal on Education, 5(4), 16100-16106. Retrieved from https://www.studocu.com/cl/document/universi...8004-072fc476e24a1788181670

Blakley, G. R. (1982). Chemical equation balancing: A general method which is quick, simple, and has unexpected applications. Journal of Chemical Education, 59(9), 728-734. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed059p728 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ed059p728

Chen, Z., Ayinde, O. R., Fuchs, J. R., Sun, H., & Ning, X. (2023). G2Retro as a two-step graph generative model for retrosynthesis prediction. Communications Chemistry, 6, 102. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-023-00897-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-023-00897-3

Coley, C. W., Barzilay, R., Jaakkola, T. S., Green, W. H., & Jensen, K. F. (2017). Prediction of organic reaction outcomes using machine learning. ACS Central Science, 3(5), 434-443. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.7b00064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.7b00064

Fazil, A. W., Hakimi, M., Shahidzay, A. K., & Hasas, A. (2024). Exploring the broad impact of AI technologies on student engagement and academic performance in university settings in Afghanistan. RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 2(2), 108-118. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v2i2.268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v2i2.268

Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2024). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 460-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846

Firat, M. (2023). What ChatGPT means for universities: Perceptions of scholars and students. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 57-63. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.22 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.22

Fooshee, D., Mood, A., Gutman, E., Tavakoli, M., Urban, G., Liu, F., Huynh, N., Van Vranken, D., & Baldi, P. (2018). Deep learning for chemical reaction prediction. Molecular Systems Design & Engineering, 3(3), 442-452. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7ME00107J DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C7ME00107J

Gao, Z., Tan, C., Wu, L., & Li, S. Z. (2022). SemiRetro: Semi-template framework boosts deep retrosynthesis prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.08205.

Jin, W., Coley, C. W., Barzilay, R., & Jaakkola, T. (2017). Predicting organic reaction outcomes with Weisfeiler-Lehman network. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 2607-2616.

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Kuchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Gunnemann, S., Hullermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., ... Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Krishna, Y. H., et al. (2016). Balancing chemical equations by using matrix algebra. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 6, 994-999.

Kumar, D. D. (2001). Computer applications in balancing chemical equations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(4), 347-350. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012295119087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012295119087

Lin, Z., Yin, S., Shi, L., Zhou, W., & Zhang, Y. (2023). G2GT: Retrosynthesis prediction with graph-to-graph attention neural network and self-training. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 63(7), 1894-1905. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01302 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01302

Mohialden, Y. M., Hussien, N. M., & Al-Rada, W. A. A. (2023). Automated chemical equation balancing using the Apriori algorithm. Journal La Multiapp, 4(3), 92-97. https://doi.org/10.37899/journallamultiapp.v4i3.852 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37899/journallamultiapp.v4i3.852

Rahman, M. M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5783. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095783 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095783

Rasul, T., Nair, S., Kalendra, D., Robin, M., de Oliveira Santini, F., Ladeira, W. J., Sun, M., Day, I., Rather, R. A., & Heathcote, L. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29

Schwaller, P., Laino, T., Gaudin, T., Bolgar, P., Hunter, C. A., Bekas, C., & Lee, A. A. (2019). Molecular Transformer: A model for uncertainty-calibrated chemical reaction prediction. ACS Central Science, 5(9), 1572-1583. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.9b00576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.9b00576

Schwaller, P., Petraglia, R., Zullo, V., Nair, V. H., Haeuselmann, R. A., Pisoni, R., Bekas, C., Iuliano, A., & Laino, T. (2019). Molecular Transformer unifies reaction prediction and retrosynthesis across pharma chemical space. Chemical Communications, 55(81), 12152-12155. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CC05122H DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CC05122H

Segler, M. H. S., Preuss, M., & Waller, M. P. (2018). Planning chemical syntheses with deep neural networks and symbolic AI. Nature, 555, 604-610. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25978 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25978

Somnath, V. R., Bunne, C., Coley, C. W., Krause, A., & Barzilay, R. (2021). Learning graph models for retrosynthesis prediction. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34, 9405-9415.

Thorne, L. R. (2010). An innovative approach to balancing chemical-reaction equations: A simplified matrix-inversion technique for determining the matrix null space. The Chemical Educator, 15, 304-308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1333/s00897102277a

Tu, Z., & Coley, C. W. (2022). Permutation invariant graph-to-sequence model for template-free retrosynthesis and reaction prediction. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 62(15), 3503-3513. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00321

Tyson, J. (2023). Shortcomings of ChatGPT. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(8), 3098-3101. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00361

Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 5998-6008.

Wang, X., Li, Y., Qiu, J., Chen, G., Liu, H., Liao, B., Hsieh, C.-Y., & Yao, X. (2021). RetroPrime: A diverse, plausible and transformer-based method for single-step retrosynthesis predictions. Chemical Engineering Journal, 420, 129845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.129845 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.129845

Zabadi, A. M., & Assaf, R. (2017). From chemistry to linear algebra: Balancing chemical reaction equation using algebraic approach. International Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Research, 8, 24-33.

Zhang, Z., Zhang, X., Zhao, Y. X., & Yang, S. A. (2024). Balancing chemical equations from the perspective of Hilbert basis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.06023.

Zhong, W., Yang, Z., & Chen, C. Y.-C. (2023). Retrosynthesis prediction using an end-to-end graph generative architecture for molecular graph editing. Nature Communications, 14, 3009. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38851-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38851-5

Author Biographies

Nasratullah Mahboob, Samangan University

Author Origin : Afghanistan

Tamann Quraishi, University of the People

Author Origin : United States

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Mahboob, N., & Quraishi, T. (2026). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Formulating and Balancing Chemical Equations for Organic Compounds. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 12(8), 252–258. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v12i8.16269