How is The Implementation of Diagnostic Tests in Biology Learning in South Sumatra?

Authors

Safira Permata Dewi , Yenni Lidyawati , Elvira Destiansari

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.1859

Published:

2022-12-28

Issue:

Vol. 8 No. 6 (2022): December

Keywords:

Diagnostic Test, Biology Teacher, Evaluation Standart, South Sumatera

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Dewi, S. P., Lidyawati, Y. ., & Destiansari, E. . (2022). How is The Implementation of Diagnostic Tests in Biology Learning in South Sumatra?. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(6), 2605–2612. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.1859

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Diagnostic tests have a very important role to provide information about the strengths and weaknesses of students related to a concept to be studied. This study aims to obtain an overview of the implementation of diagnostic tests carried out by Biology teachers in South Sumatra Province using the survey method. This study involved 86 Biology teachers in South Sumatra Province. Samples were taken using the convenience sampling method. Data collection by using e-questionnaire distributed through Google Form. The e-questionnaire consists of 25 questions developed from standard indicators of assessment, including planning, method selection, test instrument development, test implementation, test result management, test results reporting and the implications of these test results in the biology learning process in schools. The results of this study indicate that Biology teachers in South Sumatra have carried out routine diagnostic tests. The development of this diagnostic test instrument has also referred to the learning objectives and the results of the diagnostic test have been used to determine the methods, strategies, and approaches used in the learning process. Although in general the implementation of diagnostic tests in Biology learning is good, but the implementation and management of diagnostic tests that are very close to the learning process is feared will not have a significant effect on the implementation of the learning process in schools.

References

Agustina, E., & Supahar. (2021). The Teacher’s Necessity for a Diagnostic Test to Detect Student Weaknesses in Learning Physics in Offline and Online Classes During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Science Education (ISSE 2020), 541(Isse 2020), 367–373. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210326.052

Alruwais, N., Wills, G., & Wald, M. (2018). Advantages and Challenges of Using e-Assessment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(1), 34–37. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.1.1008

Andariana, A., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Suarsini, E. (2020). Identification of biology students’ misconceptions in human anatomy and physiology course through three-tier diagnostic test. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(3), 1071–1085. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.752438

Ariyanto, A., Kristiyanto, W., & Nugroho, R. (2021). Effect of interactive media, make a match and lecture method on learning achievement of virus. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 14(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.17262

Bayazit, A., & Aşkar, P. (2012). Performance and duration differences between online and paper-pencil tests. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13(2), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-011-9190-9

Coley, J. D., & Tanner, K. D. (2012). Common origins of diverse misconceptions: Cognitive principles and the development of biology thinking. CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(3), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-06-0074

Duda, H. J., Wahyuni, F. R. E., & Setyawan, A. E. (2020). Misconception of the biology education students on the concepts of fermentation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042006

Ebenes, F., & Caballes, D. (2020). Misconceptions of science teachers in evolution. CiiT International Journal of Biometrics and Bioinformatics, 12(2), 31–37. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345975936

Ebuoh, C. N. (2018). Effects of Analytical and Holistic Scoring Patterns on Scorer Reliability in Biology Essay Tests. World Journal of Education, 8(1), 111. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v8n1p111

Esomonu, N. P.-M., & Eleje, L. I. (2020). Effect of Diagnostic Testing on Students’ Achievement in Secondary School Quantitative Economics. World Journal of Education, 10(3), 178. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v10n3p178

Fakhriyah, F., & Masfuah, S. (2021). The Development of a Four Tier-Based Diagnostic Test Diagnostic Assessment on Science Concept Course. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1842(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1842/1/012069

Fan, T., Song, J., & Guan, Z. (2021). Integrating diagnostic assessment into curriculum: a theoretical framework and teaching practices. Language Testing in Asia, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-020-00117-y

Fauzi, A., Rosyida, A. M., Rohma, M., & Khoiroh, D. (2021). The difficulty index of biology topics in Indonesian Senior High School: Biology undergraduate students’ perspectives. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 7(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v7i2.16538

Fuchs, T. T., & Arsenault, M. (2018). Secondary biology misconceptions: using 23 years of test-data to inform pedagogy. National Association of Biology Teachers Professional Development Conference, 1–16. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjJm9Ox1vz7AhXOGbcAHSMIAMUQFnoECAwQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fnabt.org%2Ffiles%2Fgalleries%2FFuchs_Arsenault.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1HwRqBd6_u4WCilDDbfTks

Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 989–1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a

Gusmalini, A., Wulandari, S., & Zulfarina. (2020). Identification of Misconceptions and Causes of Student Misconceptions on Genetics Concept with CRI Method. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1655(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1655/1/012053

Hadiprayitno, G., Muhlis, & Kusmiyati. (2019). Problems in learning biology for senior high schools in Lombok Island. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1241(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012054

Halim, A., Mustafa, Nurulwati, Soewarno, & Nanda, N. (2018). Development of Two-Tier Diagnostic Test Based on E-Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1120(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1120/1/012030

Hasyim, W., Suwono, H., & Susilo, H. (2018). Three-tier Test to Identify Students’ Misconception of Human Reproduction System. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 6(2), 48–54. Retrieved from https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPK/article/view/3975%0Ahttp://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/

Haynie, W. J. (1994). Effects of Multiple-Choice and Short-Answer Tests on Delayed Retention Learning. Journal of Technology Education, 6(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v6i1.a.3

Juhanda, A. (2017). the Use of Difficulty Learning Assessment in Assessing the Concept Mastery of Biology Teacher Candidates on Development Stage of Animal Embriology. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v3i1.420

Kirbulut, Z. D., & Geban, O. (2014). Using three-tier diagnostic test to assess students’ misconceptions of states of matter. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(5), 509–521. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1128a

Lions, S., Monsalve, C., Dartnell, P., Godoy, M. I., Córdova, N., Jiménez, D., Blanco, M. P., Ortega, G., & Lemarié, J. (2021). The Position of Distractors in Multiple-Choice Test Items: The Strongest Precede the Weakest. Frontiers in Education, 6(October), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.731763

Lissa, Minarti, I. B., Subkhi, N., & Nerih. (2021). Learning Difficulties for Retarded Students: Case Studies on Biology Subjects in High School. Proceedings of the 1st Paris Van Java International Seminar on Health, Economics, Social Science and Humanities (PVJ-ISHESSH 2020), 535, 216–220. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210304.045

Mcclelland, T., & Cuevas, J. (2020). A comparison of Computer Based Testing and Paper and Pencil Testing in Mathematics Assessment. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 10(2), 78–89. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiu4ZOl1_z7AhWnTmwGHXXzAEYQFnoECAgQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tojned.net%2Fjournals%2Ftojned%2Farticles%2Fv10i02%2Fv10i02-01.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2wHuPXllTedf-2bapXLrxf

McDermott, K. B., Agarwal, P. K., D’Antonio, L., Roediger, H. L. I., & McDaniel, M. A. (2014). Both multiple-choice and short-answer quizzes enhance later exam performance in middle and high school classes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000004

Meslie, Y., Enbeyle, W., & Arega, Y. (2020). Assessment of Parental Involvement & Related Factors for Students’ Academic Achievement in Case of College of Natural Science, University of Gondar, Ethiopia. International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Technology, 4(2), 1–20. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Yibeltal-Meslie/publication/343893115_Assessment_of_Parental_Involvement_Related_Factors_for_Students'_Academic_Achievement_in_Case_of_College_of_Natural_Science_University_of_Gondar_Ethiopia/links/5f46ae44458515a88b6b9c7d/Assessment-of-Parental-Involvement-Related-Factors-for-Students-Academic-Achievement-in-Case-of-College-of-Natural-Science-University-of-Gondar-Ethiopia.pdf

Mishra, C., Parker, L., & Clase, K. (2022). Developing a Classroom Assessment Rubrics. Journal of Collage Science Teaching, 51(5), 62–69. Retrieved from https://my.nsta.org/click?file=JCST_May_June_2022_p62-69RT-Clase.pdf

Novianti, R., & Garzia, M. (2020). Parental Engagement in Children’s Online Learning During COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Teaching and Learning in Elementary Education (Jtlee), 3(2), 117. https://doi.org/10.33578/jtlee.v3i2.7845

Nugraha, M., & Fitrihidajati, H. (2021). Validity of ecology misconception test instrument using three-tier test method for 10th grade high school students. Bioedu: Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 10(3), 627–634. https://doi.org/10.26740/bioedu.v10n3.p627-634

Ofem, U., Idika, J., & Ovat, S. (2017). Effect of Diagnostic and Feedback Assessment Approaches in Enhancing Achievement in Mathematics among Secondary School Students in Calabar Municipality. International Journal of Scientific Research in Education, 10(2), 221–227. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333679901_Effect_of_diagnostic_and_feedback_assessment_approaches_in_enhancing_achievement_in_mathematics_among_secondary_school_students_in_Calabar_Municipality/download

Prayitno, T., & Hidayati, N. (2022). Analysis of Students’ Misconception on General Biology Concepts Using Four-Tier Diagnostic Test (FTDT). IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v3i1.177

Puthiaparampil, T., & Rahman, M. M. (2020). Very short answer questions: A viable alternative to multiple choice questions. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02057-w

Rahmadani, D., Chastanti, I., & Harahap, D. A. (2021). Parents’ Role in Biology Learning During the Covid 19 Pandemic. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(2), 137. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i2.583

Rahmi, M., & Zulyusri. (2021). Students’ Misconceptions in High School Biology Subjects. PENBIOS: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Dan Sains, 6(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.51673/penbios.v6i01.602

Rahmi, Y. L., Miatidini, N. A., Alberida, H., Darussyamsyu, R., Ichsan, I. Z., Sigit, D. V., Titin, T., Koc, I., & Sison, M. H. (2021). HOTS Assessment of Biology Cell: Validity, Practicality and Reliability. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(3), 481–487. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i3.742

Reydon, T. A. C. (2021). Misconceptions, conceptual pluralism, and conceptual toolkits: bringing the philosophy of science to the teaching of evolution. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-021-00363-8

Rodiyah, Santosa, C. A. H. F., & Rumanta, M. (2020). The effects of scientific-based learning strategy (images media and lecture method) and students ’ learning motivation towards science achievement on students of ciruas 2 elementary school. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 5(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.26740/jppipa.v5n1.p6-14

Rukayah, Atmojo, I. R. W., Hartono, & Daryanto, J. (2020). Conceptual Biotechnology Measured by Using a Two-Tier Multiple Test. 397(Icliqe 2019), 565–569. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200129.069

Saat, R. M., Fadzil, H. M., Aziz, N. A. A., Haron, K., Rashid, K. A., & Shamsuar, N. R. (2016). Development of an online three-tier diagnostic test to assess pre-university students’ understanding of cellular respiration. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(4), 532–546. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.532

Susanti, R. (2018). Misconception of biology education student of teacher training and education of Sriwijaya University to the concept of photosynthesis and respiration. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1022(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1022/1/012056

Susanto, L. H., Rostikawati, R. T., Novira, R., Sa’diyah, R., Istikomah, I., & Ichsan, I. Z. (2022). Development of Biology Learning Media Based on Android to Improve Students Understanding. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(2), 541–547. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1334

Sutarto, S., Sari, D. P., & Fathurrochman, I. (2020). Teacher strategies in online learning to increase students’ interest in learning during COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Konseling Dan Pendidikan, 8(3), 129. https://doi.org/10.29210/147800

Syamsiar, A. A., & Raharjo, R. (2021). Profile of Misconception on Genetic Substance Topic on Student Grade XII with Four-Tier Diagnostic Test. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi (BioEdu), 10(3), 523–529. https://doi.org/10.26740/bioedu.v10n3.p523-529

Tang, F., & Zhan, P. (2021). Does Diagnostic Feedback Promote Learning? Evidence From a Longitudinal Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment. AERA Open, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211060804

Wahyono, P., & Susetyorini, E. (2021). Misconceptions of biology education students in Biochemistry Course during the COVID-19 pandemic. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 7(2), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v7i2.17093

Wola, B. R., Ibrahim, M., & Purnomo, T. (2020). Development of a Four-Tier Multiple-Choice Test on The Concept of Transport Across Membranes. SEJ (Science Education Journal), 4(2), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.21070/sej.v4i2.878

Wolf, K., & Stevens, E. (2007). The role of rubrics in advancing and assessing student learning. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 7(1), 3–14. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1058&context=susan_madsen#page=8

Wulandari, T., Ramli, M., & Muzzazinah. (2020). The assessment of understanding biological concepts: A systematic review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1563(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1563/1/012030

Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., Mistianah, & Fauzi, A. (2020). Critical Thinking Embedded Essay Test. 10(ICoBioSE 2019), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.2991/absr.k.200807.036

Author Biographies

Safira Permata Dewi, Universitas Sriwijaya

Yenni Lidyawati, Universitas Sriwijaya

Elvira Destiansari, Uiversitas Sriwijaya

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Safira Permata Dewi, Yenni Lidyawati, Elvira Destiansari

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).