The Validation of Go-Lab Based Inquiry Learning Spaces (ILS) on Science Subject for Junior High School Student
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.2174Published:
2022-10-31Issue:
Vol. 8 No. 4 (2022): OctoberKeywords:
Inquiry Learning Spaces, Go-Lab, Science, PhysicsResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
Learning innovation in the midst of a situation like now needs to be done to adapt to the times. The times require teachers to continue to innovate by modernizing learning activities to suit the interests of students. The purpose of this research is to produce a learning innovation by combining inquiry learning and the use of information technology called Inquiry Learning Spaces (ILS) based on Go-Lab. The method used in this development research is 4D which has the stages of Define, Design, Develop, and Disseminate. This research will focus on the first three stages: Define, Design, Develop. At the Develop stage, validation is carried out on the product being developed. Validation was carried out by 3 experts in the fields of Physics Education, Media, and Learning Technology. Product reliability is also carried out using a percentage of agreement. From the results of expert validation, it was found that the product developed had an average score percentage of 88.31% with a very valid category. In addition, the percentage of agreement results show that each instrument's percentage has a value above 75% in the reliable category. Several criticisms and suggestions from the validator became a significant improvement to improve the Inquiry Learning Spaces (ILS) which was developed so that it could be used in science learning in junior high schools.
References
Abdurrahman, A. (2017). Efektivitas dan Kendala Pembelajaran Sains Berbasis Inkuiri terhadap Capaian Dimensi Kognitif Siswa: Meta Analisis. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 2(1), 1–9. http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/tadris/article/view/1206
Creagh, C., & Parlevliet, D. (2014). Enhancing student engagement in physics using inquiry oriented learning activities. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 22(1), 43–56. https://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/22645/
de Jong, T., Gillet, D., RodrÃguez-Triana, M. J., Hovardas, T., Dikke, D., Doran, R., Dziabenko, O., Koslowsky, J., Korventausta, M., Law, E., Pedaste, M., Tasiopoulou, E., Vidal, G., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2021). Understanding teacher design practices for digital inquiry–based science learning: the case of Go-Lab. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 417–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09904-z
de Jong, T., Sotiriou, S., & Gillet, D. (2014). Innovations in STEM education: the Go-Lab federation of online labs. Smart Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-014-0003-6
Gunawan, Suranti, N. M. Y., & Fathoroni. (2020). Variations of Models and Learning Platforms for Prospective Teachers during the COVID-19 Pandemic Period. Indonesian Journal of Teacher Education, 1(2), 75–94. https://journal.publication-center.com/index.php/ijte/article/view/95
Harwati, K., & Rokhmat, J. (2021). Development of student worksheet to improve creative and critical thinking ability of students in causalitic-learning model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1816(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1816/1/012038
Koç, A., & Büyük, U. (2021). Effect of Robotics Technology in Science Education on Scientific Creativity and Attitude Development. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.52
Makhrus, M., Harjono, A., Syukur, A., Bahri, S., & Muntari, M. (2019). Analisis Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP) Terhadap Kesiapan Guru Sebagai “Role Model†Keterampilan Abad 21 Pada Pembelajaran IPA SMP. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/JPPIPA.V5I1.171
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EDUREV.2015.02.003
Pujilestari, Y. (2020). Dampak Positif Pembelajaran Online Dalam Sistem Pendidikan Indonesia Pasca Pandemi Covid-19. Adalah.
Putri, A. M., Mahardika, I. K., & Nuriman, N. (2021). Model Pembelajaran Free Inquiry (Inkuiri Bebas) Dalam Pembelajaran Multirepresentasi Fisika Di MAN 2 Jember. In Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika (pp. 324–327). https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JPF/article/download/23179/9327
Ramdani, A., & Artayasa, I. P. (2020). Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Mahasiswa dalam Pembelajaran IPA Menggunakan Model Inkuiri Terbuka. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v8i1.15394
RodrÃguez-Triana, M. J., Govaerts, S., Halimi, W., Holzer, A., Salzmann, C., Vozniuk, A., De Jong, T., Sotirou, S., & Gillet, D. (2015). Rich open educational resources for personal and inquiry learning: Agile creation, sharing and reuse in educational social media platforms. 2014 International Conference on Web and Open Access to Learning, ICWOAL 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICWOAL.2014.7009219
Rodriguez, L. V., van der Veen, J. T., Anjewierden, A., van den Berg, E., & de Jong, T. (2020). Designing inquiry-based learning environments for quantum physics education in secondary schools. Physics Education, 55(6). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/abb346
Septiani, D., & Susanti, S. (2021). Urgensi Pembelajaran Inkuiri di Abad ke 21: Kajian Literatur. SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan), 6(1). https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v6i1.7784
Suharsimi, A. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian : Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Tamami, F., Rokhmat, & Gunada, I. W. (2017). Pengaruh Pendekatan Berpikir Kausalitik Scaffolding Tipe 2A Modifikasi Berbantuan LKS Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Optik Geometri dan Kreativitas Siswa Kelas XI SMAN 1 Mataram [The Influence of Scaffolding Causalitic-thinking Approach of Type 2A A. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 3(1), 76–83.
Thiagarajan, S. (1976). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(76)90066-2
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-Century Skills and 21st-Century Digital Skills for Workers: A Systematic Literature Review. In SAGE Open (Vol. 10, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176
Author Biographies
Fuad Tamami, University of Mataram
Magister Pendidikan IPA, Pasca Sarjana
Joni Rokhmat, University of Mataram
Ahmad Harjono, University of Mataram
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Fuad Tamami, Joni Rokhmat, Ahmad Harjono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
