Design and Validity of Five Tier-Multiple Choice Test E-Instruments Using I-Spring Quiz Maker as an Assessment of Student Science Literacy in 21st Century Learning

Authors

Hendra Musfa Dirman , Fatni Mufit

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.2300

Published:

2022-12-30

Issue:

Vol. 8 No. 6 (2022): December

Keywords:

Concept understanding, Scientific literacy, Five-tier multiple choice e-instrument

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Dirman, H. M., & Mufit, F. . (2022). Design and Validity of Five Tier-Multiple Choice Test E-Instruments Using I-Spring Quiz Maker as an Assessment of Student Science Literacy in 21st Century Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(6), 3170–3179. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.2300

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

The goal of 21st century learning is to provide students with conceptual knowledge and scientific literacy abilities. Creating a five-tier multiple choice e-instrument on the subject of work and energy and momentum and impulse. The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics and validity of a five-tier multiple choice e-instrument using the i-Spring Quiz Maker as an assessment of scientific literacy and understanding of concepts for high school students in class X. The research carried out included the type of development research using the Plomp model. The research was carried out to the expert review stage (Validity). The object of the research is a five-tier multiple choice e-instrument using the i-Spring Quiz Maker. The source of content validity data was obtained from the results of expert validation by a Physics lecturer at the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, UNP. Preliminary research conducted at this stage of research revealed that teachers were not familiar with the five-tier-multiple choice instrument in assessing students' conceptual understanding, especially on the matter of effort and energy and momentum and impulse. In the Development or Prototyping Phase, a five-level multiple choice electronic instrument is designed using the i-Spring Quiz Maker application. The results of the self-evaluation were obtained with very good criteria. The results of the instrument validity test are obtained as a whole with a high validity category.

References

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448545101

Alti, R. P., Lufri, L., Helendra, H., & Yogica, R. (2021). Instrumen Asesmen Berbasis Literasi Sains Tentang Materi Keanekaragaman Hayati. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 4(1), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v4i1.34270

Anam, R. S., Widodo, A., Sopandi, W., & Wu, H. K. (2019). Developing a five-tier diagnostic test to identify students’ misconceptions in science: an example of the heat transfer concepts. Elementary Education Online, 18(3), 1014–1029. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2019.609690

Arief, M. K. (2015). Penerapan Levels of inquiry pada pembelajaran IPA tema pemanasan global untuk meningkatkan literasi sains. Edusentris, 2(2), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.17509/edusentris.v2i2.169

Arohman, M., Saefudin, S., & Priyandoko, D. (2016). Kemampuan literasi sains siswa pada pembelajaran ekosistem. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 13(1), 90–92. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/view/5662/5030

Capriconia, J., & Mufit, F. (2022). Analysis of Concept Understanding and Students’ Attitudes towards Learning Physics in Material of Straight Motion. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1453–1461. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1381

Dirman, H. M., Mufit, F., & Festiyed, F. (2022). Review.and Comparison of.Four-Tier Multiple Choice and.Five-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic.Tests to Identify Mastery of Physics Concepts. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.838

Duffin, J. M., & Simpson, A. P. (2000). A search for understanding. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(4), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(00)00028-6.

Fajriyyah, N. S., & Ermawati, F. U. (2020). The Validity and Reliability of Five-Tier Conception Diagnostic Test For Kinetic Theory Of Gases. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 9(2), 126–132. https://jurnal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/inovasi-pendidikan-fisika/article/view/33889

Fanata, M. R., E., W. A., Setiawan, R., Hanifah, R., Miftahussururi. Nento, M. N., Akbari, Q. S., & Ayomi, J. M. (2017). Materi Pendukung Literasi Sains, Gerakan Literasi Nasional. Kemendikbud. https://gln.kemdikbud.go.id/glnsite/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/cover-materi-pendukung-literasi-sains-gabung.pdf

Guswina, S., & Mufit, F. (2020). Desain.Four-Tier.Multiple Choice.Test pada Materi.Getaran Harmonis untuk Mengidentifikasi Pemahaman.Konsep.Siswa Kelas X SMA/MA. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.24036/jppf.v6i2.110873

Ilahi, T. D. W., F, M., H, H., & R, A. (2021). Desain dan validitas multimedia interaktif berbasis konflik kognitif pada materi vektor untuk kelas X SMA/MA. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 12(2), 182–195. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v12i2.9324

Inggit, S. M., Liliawati, W., & Suryana, I. (2021). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi dan Penyebabnya Menggunakan Instrumen Five-Tier Fluid Static Test (5TFST) pada Peserta Didik Kelas XI Sekolah Menengah Atas. Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics, 6(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.15575/jotalp.v6i1.11016

Lailiyah, S., & Ermawati, F. U. (2020). Materi Gelombang Bunyi: Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Konsepsi Berformat Five-Tier, Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas serta Uji Terbatas. JPFT (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako), 8(3), 104–119. http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/EPFT/article/view/17128

Mufit, F., & Fauzan, A. (2019). The application.of real experiments video analysis.in the CCBL.model to remediate the misconceptions.about motion’s concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317(1), 12156. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012156.

Plomp, T. (2013). Educational Design Research: An Introduction. In D. T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational Design Research, Part A: An Introduction (pp. 10–51). SLO. Netherlands Institute for Curricullum Development.

Putra, A. S. U., & Hamidah, I. (2020). The development of five-tier diagnostic test to identify misconceptions and causes of students’ misconceptions in waves and optics materials. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(2), 22020. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/2/022020/meta

Putri, W. K., & Ermawati, F. U. (2021). Pengembangan, Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Tes Diagnostik Five-Tier untuk Materi Getaran Harmonis Sederhana beserta Hasil Uji Coba. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 92–101. https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/pendipa/article/download/14099/7027

Qonita, M., & Ermawati, F. U. (2020). The Validity and Reliability of Five-Tier Conception Diagnostic Test for Vector Concepts. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 9(03), 459–465. https://doi.org/10.26740/ipf.v9n3.p459-465

Ramadhani, N. N., & Ermawati, F. U. (2021). Five-Tier Diagnostic Test Instrument for Uniform Circular Motion Concepts: Development, Validity, Reliability and Limited Trials. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 9(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v9i1.4763

Rosita, I., Liliawati, W., & Samsudin, A. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Five-Tier Newton’s Laws Test (5TNLT) Untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi dan Penyebab Miskonsepsi Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 6(2), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v6i2.2018

Salsabila, F. N., & Ermawati, F. U. (2020). Validity and Reliability of Conception Diagnostic Test Using Five Tier Format for Elasticity Concepts. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 9(03), 439–446. https://doi.org/10.26740/ipf.v9n3.p439-446

Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006). The Use of Scientific Literacy Taxonomy for Assessing the Development of Chemical Literacy Among High-School Students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(4), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90011A

Soeharto, Csapó, B., Sarimanah, E., Dewi, F. I., & Sabri, T. (2019). A review of students’ common misconceptions in science and their diagnostic assessment tools. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(2), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i2.18649

Sutiyono, A. (2015). Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Belajar. Karya Abadi Jaya.

Author Biographies

Hendra Musfa Dirman, Universitas negeri Padang

Fatni Mufit, Master of Physics Education Study Program, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Hendra Musfa Dirman, Fatni Mufit

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).