Quality of Student Scientific Argumentation Through the Application of Problem-Based Learning With Flipped Classroom Approach

Authors

Mentari Darma Putri , Nur Azizah Lubis , Tariza Fairuz

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2504

Published:

2023-01-31

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): January

Keywords:

Flipped Classroom, PBL, Scientific Argumentation

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Putri, M. D. ., Lubis, N. A., & Fairuz, T. . (2023). Quality of Student Scientific Argumentation Through the Application of Problem-Based Learning With Flipped Classroom Approach. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2504
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This research is quantitative research with a descriptive method that aims to analyze and compare the quality of students' scientific arguments in experimental class 1 which is applied by the PBL model through Flipped Classroom approach with experimental class 2 which applies the PBL model only. Instruments to measure students' scientific argumentation skills are essay questions. The quality of the students' arguments was analyzed based on the completeness of the components and the strength of the arguments. Analysis of the completeness of students' argumentation components aims to determine the level of students' argumentation which consists of 5 levels. The strength of the students' arguments was analyzed and categorized into three categories, namely weak, moderately strong, and strong. The results showed that students' scientific argumentation skills based on the completeness of the argument components in both classes experienced a significant increase. Most of the students in both classes have level 3 argumentation skills, meaning that students can make claims accompanied by complete supporting grounds. Based on the analysis of students' argument strength, experimental class 1 showed better argument quality than experimental class 2 where the percentage of students with strong argument strength in experimental class 1 was higher. Therefore, it can be concluded that the application of PBL with Flipped Classroom approach can improve the quality of students' scientific arguments

References

Anggreni, N. K. S., & Suniasih, N. W. (2021). Pengembangan Video Berbasis Problem Based Learning Materi Siklus Hidup Hewan pada Muatan IPA Kelas IV SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Profesi Guru, 4(2), 319–328. https://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jippg.v4i2

Antonio, RP., & Prudente, M.S. (2021). Metacognitive Argument-Driven Inquiry in Teaching Antimicrobial Resistance: Effects on Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Argumentation Skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(2), 192-217. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.60

Arends, R. I. (2008). Belajar untuk Mengajar. Edisi ke tujuh alih bahasa oleh Helly Prayitno dan Sri Mulyantani Prayitno dari judul Learning to Teach. Seven edition. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar.

Arikunto, S. (2006). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta, Indonesia: PT Bumi Aksara.

Asiksoy, G., & Ozdamli, F. (2015). Flipped Classroom Adapted to the ARCS Model of Motivation and Applied to a Physics Course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(6), 1589-1603. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1251a

DeJenger T. (2012). Can First-Year Students Critical Thinking Skills Develop in a Space of Three Months?. Science Direct, 47, 1374-1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.829

Diniya, D., Ilhami, A., Mahartika, I., Permana, P., Dian, N., & Prakash, O. (2021). Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Calon Guru IPA Melalui Pendekatan MIKiR selama Pandemi Covid-19. Journal of Natural Science and Integration, 4(2), 141-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/jnsi.v4i1.12770

Dawson, V., & Venville, G. J. (2009). Teaching Strategies for Developing Students’ Argumentation Skill about Sosioscientific in High School Genetics. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9104-y

Faize, F. A., Husain, W., & Nisar, F. (2018). A Critical Review of Scientific Argumentation in Science Education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 475-483. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80353

Gonzalez-Gomez, D., Jeong, J. S., & Airado Rodríguez, D. (2016). Performance and Perception in the Flipped Learning Model: an Initial Approach to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a New Teaching Methodology in a General Science Classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 450-459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9605-9

Herawati, D. (2015). Penalaran Ilmiah (Scientific Reasoning) Siswa Sekolah Berorientasi Lingkungan dan Sekolah Multinasional. Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung. Retrieved from http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/20992

Jewaru, A. A. L., Parno, P., & Nasikhudin, N. (2021). Identifikasi Kualitas Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa SMA pada Termodinamika. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 6(9), 1436—1446. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i9.15008

Kemendikbud. (2016). Silabus Mata Pelajaran SMP/MTs Mata Pelajaran IPA. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kemendikbud.

Kurniawati, I. L., Setyosari, P., Dasna, I. W., & Praherdhiono, H. (2022). Problem-Based Flipped Classroom dalam Pembelajaran Sains. Sleman, Indonesia: Deepublish

Kusdiningsih, E. Z., Abdurrahman, A., & Jalmo, T (2016). Penerapan LKPD Berbasis Kemampuan Argumentasi-SWH untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Tertulis dan Literasi Sains Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 6(2), 101-110. Retrieved from http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/jpp/article/view/11786

Pitorini, D. E., Suciati, S., & Ariyanto, J. (2020). Kemampuan argumentasi siswa: Perbandingan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing dan inkuiri terbimbing dipadu dialog Socrates. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 26-38. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v6i1.27761

Pritasari, A. C., Dwiastuti, S., & Probosari, R. M. (2016). Peningkatan Kemampuan Argumentasi Melalui Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning pada Siswa Kelas X MIA 1 SMA Batik 2 Surakarta Tahun Pelajaran 2014/2015. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 8(1), 1-7. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/reader/289788271

Purwanto, N. (2010). Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Jakarta, Indonesia: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Putri, MD & Rusdiana, D. (2017). Identifying Students’ Scientific Argumentation Skill At Junior High School 1 Argamakmur, North Bengkulu. International E-Journal of Advances in Education, 3(9), 566-572. Retrieved from http://ijaedu.ocerintjournals.org/tr/download/article-file/390170

Putri, MD. (2018). Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning Melalui Pendekatan Flipped Classroom Termodifikasi Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Memahami Konsep Dan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa SMP Pada Materi Tekanan Zat. Tesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia. Retrieved from http://repository.upi.edu/37360/

Rahmawati, F., Soegimin, W. W., & Kardi, S. (2016). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Model Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbantuan Videoscribe pada Materi Kalor untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa SMAN 1 Kedungwaru. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Surabaya, 5(2), 1039-1047. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v5n2.p1039-1047

Steck, T. R., DiBiase, W., Wang, C., & Boukhtiarov, A. (2012). The Use of Open-Ended Problem-Based Learning Scenarios in Interdisciplinary Biotechnology Class: Evaluation of a Problem-Based Learning Course across Three Year. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Educational, 13(1), 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v13i1.389

Sudjana dan Ibrahim. (2007). Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Bandung, Indonesia: Sinar Baru Algesindo.

Supriatna, A. (2016). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Penalaran Siswa SMP Melalui Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) pada Konsep Pemanasan Global. Tesis, Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung. Retrieved from http://repository.upi.edu/25436/

Tan, O. S. (2003). Problem-Based Learning Innovation: Using Problems to Power Learning in the 21 Century. Singapore: Thomson.

Tarigan, A. E. (2015). Penerapan PBL Berbasis Metode Praktikum terhadap Penguasaan Konsep dan Kemampuan Argumentasi Tertulis Siswa pada Materi Interaksi Makhluk Hidup dengan Lingkungan. Tesis, Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung. Retrieved from http://repository.upi.edu/23019/

Tarigan, E. A., & Rochintaniawati, D. (2015). Pengaruh Metode Praktikum Berbasis PBL terhadap Kemampuan Argumentasi Tertulis Siswa pada Materi Interaksi Makhluk Hidup dengan Lingkungannya. Edusains, 7(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v7i2.1648

Varma, K. (2014). Supporting Scientific Experimentation and Reasoning in Young Elementary School Students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(3), 381-397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9470-8

Venville, G. J. & Dawson, V. M. (2010). The Impact of a Classroom Intervention on Grade 10 Students’ Argumentation Skill, Informal Reasoning, and Conceptual Understanding of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 952-977. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20358

Waldrip, B., Prain, V., & Sellings, P. (2013). Explaining Newton’s Laws of Motion: Using Student Reasoning through Representations to Develop Conceptual Understanding. Instructional Science, 41(1), 165-189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9223-8

Author Biographies

Mentari Darma Putri, Samudra University

Nur Azizah Lubis, Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika FKIP Universitas Samudra

Tariza Fairuz, STIT Al-Hikmah, Tebing Tinggi

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Nur Azizah Lubis

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).