Digital Literacy Ability of Students of Biology Education Study Program FSTT Undikma
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i3.2779Published:
2023-03-31Issue:
Vol. 9 No. 3 (2023): MarchKeywords:
Ability, Digital literacy, StudentsResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This study aims to understand the condition of digital literacy skills of S1 students of the biology education study program, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Applied (FSTT) Mandalika University of Education (Undikma). Cross-sectional study with a survey method that aims to analyze variable data collected at a certain point in time throughout the sample population or a predetermined subset. The population of this study is all active Biology Education study program students as many as 212 students. The research sample amounted to 86 students as respondents obtained by accidental sampling techniques. This research instrument is in the form of a google form-based student digital literacy mastery questionnaire, which is given online. The results of the study on each indicator are the Access indicator of 58.1% of students' goals to access the internet to complete assignments, 91.9% using mobile phone media, 40% using subjects as search points, and 67% using complete search keywords to access information from the internet. In the Analyze and Evaluate indicator, 60.5% read and understand the information thoroughly and 48.98% read the information thoroughly and the sources used. In the Create indicator, the new form of information created by students is with 41.9% making research reports, 36.0% using Microsoft Office devices, and 51.2% in the form of writing. The Reflect indicator is the largest percentage of respondents to respect and maintain a code of ethics when accessing information accessed from the internet with a magnitude of 65.1% listing the source of information cited appropriately and 75.6% ensuring the correctness of the information and using as needed. Indiator Act, the actions of college students after accessing and using the internet with 46.5% using information to solve problems and 34.9% to make presentations in public. Based on this description, it can be concluded that students' digital literacy skills have reached the good category
References
Agustin, N. C., & Krismayani, I. (2019). Kemampuan Literasi Digital Mahasiswa S-1 Angkatan 2018 Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Diponegoro. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, 8(3), 94-107. Retrieved from https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jip/article/view/26826
Akayoglu, S., Satar, H. M., Dikilitas, K., Cirit, N. C., & Korkmazgil, S. (2020). Digital literacy practices of Turkish pre-service EFL teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 85-97. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4711
Alkali, Y. E., & Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2004). Experiments in digital literacy. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(4), 421-429. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2004.7.421
American Library Association. (2013). Digital Literacy Definition. ALA Connect Web. Retrieved from http://connect.ala.org/node/181197.
Bawden, D. (2008). Origins and concepts of digital literacy. Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices, 30(2008), 17-32. Retrieved from http://clikmedia.ca/LMM/origins-and-concepts-digital-literacy
Brian, W. (2015). Top 10 Benefits of Digital Skills. WebPercent. http://webpercent.com/top-10-benefits-of-digital-skills/diakses tanggal 30 April 2022.
Daeng, I. T., Mewengkang, N., & Kalesaran, E. R. (2017). Penggunaan Smartphone Dalam Menunjang Aktivitas Perkuliahan Oleh Mahasiswa Fispol Unsrat Manado. e-journal “Acta Diurna†6(1), 15. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/actadiurnakomunikasi/article/view/15482
Eshet, Y. (2012). Thinking in the digital era: A revised model for digital literacy. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 9(2), 267-276. Retrieved from https://www.informingscience.org/Publications/1621 https://doi.org/10.28945/1621
Febliza, A. dan Oktarian. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Literasi Digital Sekolah, Siswa dan Guru. JPK UNRI, 5(1), 1–10 http://dx.doi.org/10.33578/jpk-unri.v5i1.7776
Firdaus, L., Hunaepi, H., Muliadi, A., & Fitriani, H. (2020). Respon mahasiswa terhadap pembelajaran online pada masa pandemi covid-19. Empiricism Journal, 1(2), 60-65. https://doi.org/10.36312/ej.v1i2.336
Fraenkel, Jack. R., and Norman E. Wallen. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education 8th Edition. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Greene, J.A., Yu, S.B. & Copeland, D.Z. (2014). Measuring critical components of digital literacy and their relationships with learning. Computers & Education, 76(1), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.008.
Hobbs, Renne. (2010). Digital and Media Literacy. Knight Comm. Retrieved from. http://www.knightcomm.org/digital-and-media-literacy/
Jongsermtrakoon, S., & Nasongkhla, J. (2015). A group investigation learning system for open educational resources to enhance student teachers' digital literacy and awareness in information ethics. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(10), 783. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2015.V5.611
Karpati, A. (2011). Digital literacy in education. UNESCO Institute for information technologies in Education. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000214485
Komimfo. (2020). Status Literasi Digital Indonesia 2020 Hasil Survei di 34 Provinsi. Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Retrieved from https://aptika.kominfo.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Survei-Literasi-Digital-Indonesia-2020.pdf
Kurnia, N., Santi, D., & Astuti, I. (2017). Peta gerakan literasi digital di Indonesia: studi tentang pelaku, ragam kegiatan, kelompok sasaran dan mitra. Informasi, 47(2), 149-166. https://doi.org/10.21831/informasi.v47i2.16079
Leahy, M., Davis, N., Lewin, C., Charania, A., Nordin, H., Orlic, D., Butler, D., & Lopez-Fernadez, O. (2016). Smart partnerships to icrease equity in education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 84-98. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.3.84
Martin, A. & Grudziecki J. (2006). DigEuLit: Concepts and Tools for Digital Literacy Development. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(4), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2006.05040249
Murray, M. C., & Pérez, J. (2014). Unraveling the digital literacy paradox: How higher education fails at the fourth literacy. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 11, 85. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/facpubs/3438/
Murtafi’ah, B., & Putro, N. (2019). Digital literacy in the English curriculum: Models of learning activities. Acta Informatica Malaysia, 3(2), 11-14. https.//doi.org/10.26480/aim.02.2019.10.13
Otieno, D. (2020). Integrating digital literacy in competency-based curriculum. In Handbook of Research on Literacy and Digital Technology Integration in Teacher Education, IGI Global. 142-155.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Techataweewan, W., & Prasertsin, U. (2018). Development of digital literacy indicators for Thai undergraduate students using mixed method research. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(2), 215-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.07.001
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. (2021). What Is Digital Literacy?. Digital Age. Retrieved from http://www.library.illinois.edu/diglit/definition.html
UNESCO. (2011). Education for All: Literacy for Life. UNESCO Institute of Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.uis.unesco.org/Library/Documents/gmr06-en.pdf.
Wilhelm, A. G. (2006). Digital nation: Toward an inclusive information society. mit Press.
Yazon, A. D., Ang-Manaig, K., Buama, C. A. C., & Tesoro, J. F. B. (2019). Digital literacy, digital competence and research productivity of educators. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(8), 1734-1743. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070812
Author Biographies
Herdiyana Fitriani, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika
Taufik Samsuri, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika
M Zainuddin, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Herdiyana Fitriani, Taufik Samsuri, M Zainuddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
