Students’ Knowledge and Attitude toward Genetic Engineering

Authors

Purwanti Pratiwi Purbosari , Parni Astuti

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2875

Published:

2023-01-31

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): January

Keywords:

Attitude, Genetic engineering, Knowledge, Students

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Purbosari, P. P., & Astuti, P. . (2023). Students’ Knowledge and Attitude toward Genetic Engineering. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 433–443. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2875

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Students are the people who will be consumers, producers, and policymakers of genetic engineering application products in the future. This paper reviewed research exploring the students' knowledge and attitude toward genetic engineering through a narrative literature review of articles published between 2012 and 2022. After applying criteria of inclusion, exclusion, and thematic belonging in google scholar databases, the sample was constituted of 20 studies. The results showed that most secondary school students needed more knowledge of genetic engineering, even in countries that produce genetically modified organisms through genetic engineering nationally. Most studies also revealed that most students expressed a negative attitude toward genetic engineering and its products. Besides that, students with a positive attitude toward genetic engineering often showed multiple attitudes, depending on which aspects they focus on.

References

Alanazi, F. H. (2021). Saudi Students’ and Science Teachers’ Knowledge of and Attitudes towards Biotechnology. Journal of Biological Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.1884584

Aleksejeva, I. (2014). Latvian Consumers ’ Knowledge about Genetically Modified Organisms. SiStEminiai TYRimai, 71(1), 7–16.

Anderton, B. N., & Ronald, P. C. (2017). Hybrid Thematic Analysis Reveals Themes for Assessing Student Understanding of Biotechnology. Journal of Biological Education, 52(3), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2017.1338599

Bruce, D. & Bruce, A. (eds) (2013). Engineering Genesis: Ethics of Genetic Engineering in Non-human Species. London: Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315870335/engineering-genesis-donald-bruce-ann-bruce

Casarin, T., Freitas, N. C., Pinto, R. T., Breitler, J. C., Rodrigues, L. A. Z., Marraccini, P., Etienne, H., Diniz, L. E. C., Andrade, A. C., & Paiva, L. V. (2022). Multiplex CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Knockout of The Phytoene Desaturase Gene in Coffea canephora. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21566-w

Castro, R. C. (2022). Awareness of Grade 9 Students in Genetically Modified Organisms ( GMO ) Food Products : A Survey Study. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 7(7), 1077–1081.

Chen, S. Y., Chu, Y. R., Lin, C. Y., & Chiang, T. Y. (2016). Students’ Knowledge of, and Attitudes towards Biotechnology Revisited, 1995-2014: Changes in Agriculture Biotechnology but Not in Medical Biotechnology. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 44(5), 475–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20969

Fernandez-Cornejo, J., Seth, W., Michael, L., & Lorraine, M. (2014). The First Decade of Genetically Engineered Crops in The United States. In Genetically Engineered Crops in America: Analyses, Adoption, Trends.

Fernbach, P. M., Light, N., Scott, S. E., Inbar, Y., & Rozin, P. (2019). Extreme Opponents of Genetically Modified Foods Know the Least but Think They Know the Most. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(3), 251–256. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0520-3

Fonseca, M. J., Costa, P., Lencastre, L., & Tavares, F. (2012). Multidimensional Analysis of Highschool Students’ Perceptions about Biotechnology. Journal of Biological Education, 46(3), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2011.634019

Freire, A. de S., Xavier, M. C. F., & Moraes, M. O. (2013). High School Students’ Attitudes Associated with Biotechnology and Molecular Genetics Concepts in Brazil. Creative Education, 04(02), 149–153. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.42021

Gerçek, C. (2020). High School Students’ Cognitive Structures and Views: What is a Genetically Modified Organism? Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 8(1), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.8c.1s.5m

Goldschmidt, M., & Bogner, F. X. (2013). Associations with Plant Genetic Engineering: A Perception Analysis of Students’ Hopes and Fears. Journal of Gender, Agriculture and Food Security, 115, 143–149.

Haga, S. B., Rosanbalm, K. D., Boles, L., Tindall, G. M., Livingston, T. M., & O’Daniel, J. M. (2013). Promoting Public Awareness and Engagement in Genome Sciences. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 22(4), 508–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-013-9577-3

Haidar, H., Chouman, M., & Abou Tayeh, P. (2014). Attitudes of Lebanese Secondary School Students and Teachers towards Biotechnology and its Teaching. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(6), 430–435. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-2-6-15

Henneman, L., Vermeulen, E., Van El, C. G., Claassen, L., Timmermans, D. R. M., & Cornel, M. C. (2013). Public Attitudes towards Genetic Testing Revisited: Comparing Opinions between 2002 and 2010. European Journal of Human Genetics, 21(8), 793–799. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2012.271

Herodotou, C., Kyza, E. A., Nicolaidou, I., Hadjichambis, A., Kafouris, D., & Terzian, F. (2012). The Development and Validation of the GMOAS, an Instrument Measuring Secondary School Students’ Attitudes Towards Genetically Modified Organisms. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 2(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.637580

Hu, X. (2016). CRISPR/Cas9 System and Its Applications in Human Hematopoietic Cells. Blood Cells, Molecules, and Diseases, 62, 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcmd.2016.09.003

Huijts, N. M. A., Molin, E. J. E., & Steg, L. (2012). Psychological Factors Influencing Sustainable Energy Technology Acceptance: A Review-based Comprehensive Framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1), 525–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.018

Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture. (2018). Kompetensi Dasar Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA)/ Madrasah Aliyah (MA). Jakarta

Jaganathan, D., Ramasamy, K., Sellamuthu, G., Jayabalan, S., & Venkataraman, G. (2018). CRISPR for Crop Improvement: an Update Review. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9(July), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00985

Kooffreh, M. E., Ikpeme, E. V., & Mgbado, T. I. (2021). Knowledge, Perception, and Interest regarding Biotechnology among Secondary School Students in Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 49(4), 664–668. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21507

Kumnuanek, O., Aranyawat, U., & Pongsopon, P. (2022). Study of Students’ Moral Reasoning on Modern Biotechnology Applications Using Bioethics for Informed Decision Modules. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(2), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.134

Lucht, J. M. (2015). Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops. Viruses, 7(8), 4254–4281. https://doi.org/10.3390/v7082819

Ma’rifah, D. R., & Purbosari, P. P. (2021). Sikap Mahasiswa Non-Science terhadap Produk Rekayasa Genetik (PRG). Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi VI, 303–308.

Maes, J., Gheysen, G., & Valcke, M. (2016). the Role of Knowledge in Student Opinions on Genetically Modified Organisms: an Intervention Study. PONTE International Scientific Researchs Journal, 72(7). https://doi.org/10.21506/j.ponte.2016.7.2

Meerah, T. S. M., Harail, M. F. A., & Halim, L. (2012). Malaysian Secondary School Students’ Knowledge and Attitudes towards Biotechnology. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 11(2), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/12.11.153

Montuori, P., Triassi, M., & Sarnacchiaro, P. (2012). The Consumption of Genetically Modified Foods in Italian High School Students. Food Quality and Preference, 26(2), 246–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.05.004

Nisztuk, S., Jankowska, M., Ślaska, B., & Zięba, G. (2013). Knowledge and Opinions of Poles on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs). Annales UMCS, Zootechnica, 30(4), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10083-012-0033-x

Niu, Y., Jin, M., Li, Y., Li, P., Zhou, J., Wang, X., Petersen, B., Huang, X., Kou, Q., & Chen, Y. (2017). Biallelic β-carotene oxygenase 2 Knockout Results in Yellow Fat in Sheep via CRISPR/Cas9. Animal Genetics, 48(2), 242–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12515

Nordqvist, O., & Johansson, S. (2020). Secondary School Biology Students’ Attitudes Towards Modern Biotechnology Characterised using Structural Equation Modeling. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/115016

Occelli, M., & Valeiras, N. (2021). Knowledge and Attitudes towards Biotechnology in High School Students in Journal of Science Education Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Biotechnology in High School Students in. Journal of Science Education, 21(2), 44–50.

Osakabe, Y., & Osakabe, K. (2015). Genome Editing with Engineered Nucleases in Plants. Plant and Cell Physiology, 56(3), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcu170

PaÅ¡, M., Vogrinc, J., Raspor, P., UdovÄ KneževiÄ, N., & ÄŒehovin Zajc, J. (2019). Biotechnology Learning in Slovenian Upper-Secondary Education: Gaining Knowledge and Forming Attitudes. Research in Science and Technological Education, 37(1), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2018.1491473

Piergentili, R., Rio, A. Del, Signore, F., Ronchi, F. U., Marinelli, E., & Zaami, S. (2021). CRISPR-Cas and Its Wide-Ranging Applications : From Human Limitations , Hazards and Bioethical Issues. Cells, 10, 969. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10050969

Purbosari, P. P., & Ma’rifah, D. R. (2021). Knowledge and Attitude of Biology Teacher Candidate Students towards Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs). Scientiae Educatia, 10(2), 128. https://doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v10i2.9173

Shademan, B., Nourazarian, A., Hajazimian, S., Isazadeh, A., Biray Avci, C., & Oskouee, M. A. (2022). CRISPR Technology in Gene-Editing-Based Detection and Treatment of SARS-CoV-2. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 8(January), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2021.772788

Turker, T., Kocak, N., Aydin, I., Istanbulluoǧlu, H., Yildiran, N., Turk, Y. Z., & Kilic, S. (2013). Determination of Knowledge, Attitude, Behavior about Genetically Modified Organisms in Nursing School Students. Gulhane Medical Journal, 55(4), 297–304. https://doi.org/10.5455/gulhane.33326

Van Eenennaam, A. L., De Figueiredo Silva, F., Trott, J. F., & Zilberman, D. (2021). Genetic Engineering of Livestock: The Opportunity Cost of Regulatory Delay. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, 9, 453–478. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-061220-023052

van Lieshout, E., & Dawson, V. (2016). Knowledge of, and Attitudes Towards Health-related Biotechnology Applications Amongst Australian Year 10 High School Students. Journal of Biological Education, 50(3), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2015.1117511

Věra, J., & Věra, Č. (2014). Biotechnology Knowledge and Attitude: Comparison of Czech Secondary School Students in An International Context. Journal of Science Education, 15(2), 82–86.

Volet, S. & Vauras, M. (eds) (2013). Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation: methodological advances. New York: Routledge

Wada, N., Ueta, R., Osakabe, Y., & Osakabe, K. (2020). Precision Genome Editing in Plants: State-of-the-art in CRISPR/Cas9-based Genome Engineering. BMC Plant Biology, 20(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02385-5

Wunderlich, S., & Gatto, K. A. (2015). Consumer Perception of Genetically Modified Organisms and Sources of Information. Adv Nutr, 6(51), 842–851. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.115.008870.842

Author Biographies

Purwanti Pratiwi Purbosari, Ahmad Dahlan University

Parni Astuti, Biotechnology, Graduate School , IPB University, Indonesia

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Purwanti Pratiwi purbosari, Parni Astuti

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).