Design and Validity of Student Worksheet Integrated Scientific Literacy for The Use of Physics Practicum KIT
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2887Published:
2023-01-31Issue:
Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): JanuaryKeywords:
Practicum KIT, Student Worksheet, Scientific LiteracyResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
The 2013 curriculum contains 4 components, one of which is literacy skills. One of the important literacy skills in learning physics is scientific literacy. Physics learning is always closely related to practicum which requires practicum tools such as the physics practicum KIT. The reality found in the field is the KIT for physics practicum in schools is available but has not been utilized optimally by teachers and the worksheets used have not been integrated with scientific literacy. This study aims to determine the validity value of the student worksheet integrated scientific literacy for the use of physics practicum KIT. The type of research carried out was research and development on Sugiyono's book which consisted of 10 stages, but in this study it was only limited to the design revision stage. The object that is the focus of research is the student worksheets used in schools. The data analysis technique used in this research is descriptive statistics, namely validity analysis. Based on the research, it can be concluded that the validity score of the LKS integrated with scientific literacy for the use of KIT practicum was obtained from an analysis of content eligibility with a value of 0.87; language component with a value of 0.85; clarity component with a value of 0.87 and a graphic component with a value of 0.89. The average validity value of the integrated scientific literacy worksheet for the use of the physics practicum KIT is 0.87 which is classified as very valid.
References
Arief, M. K., & Utari, S. (2015). Implementation of levels of inquiry on science learning to improve junior high school student’s scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 11(2), 117-125. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/JPFI/article/view/4233
Asropah, A., Sulanjari, B., & Alfiah, A. (2017). Kemampuan Menyusun Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP) Kurikulum 2013 Revisi 2017 Guru Bahasa Jawa Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA) Kota Semarang. Media Penelitian Pendidikan: Jurnal Penelitian Dalam Bidang Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.26877/mpp.v11i2.3360
Azmanita, Y., & Festiyed, F. (2019). Analisis Kebutuhan Media untuk Pengembangan E-Book Tema Abrasi pada Pembelajaran Fisika Era 4.0. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 5(1). Retrieved from http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/jppf/article/view/107416
Depdiknas. (2008). Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Group, M., & NCREL. (2003). Engauge 21st Century Skills: Literacy in The Digital Age. Naperville: Metiri Group.
Hidayati, H., Masril, M., Darvina, Y., & Zakiya, Z. (2019). Efektivitas lembar kerja siswa virtual laboratory pada materi gerak lengkung di kelas X SMAN. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (JEP), 3(1), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol3-iss1/320
Hidayati, H., & Masril, M. (2019). Penggunaan LKM untuk menunjang kegiatan laboratorium virtual Fisika Inti. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 149-153. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v5i2.250
Mardianti, F., Yulkifli, Y., & Asrizal, A. (2020). Metaanalisis Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Literasi Saintifik. Sainstek: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi, 12(2), 91-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.31958/js.v12i2.2435
Nurdyansyah, N. (2018). Pengembangan Bahan ajae Modul Pengetahuan Alam bagi Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo. Retrieved from http://eprints.umsida.ac.id/1607/
PISA, O. (2003). Assessment Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science and Problem Solving Knowledge and Skills. Paris: OECD .
Retnawati. H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian. Parama Publishing.
Oktari, S., Maharta, N., & Ertikanto, C. (2015). Pengembangan LKS Berbasis Inkuiri Terbimbing pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 3(5), 47–57. Retrieved from http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/jpf/article/view/10176
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Widayanto.2009. Pengembangan Keterampilan Proses dan Pemahaman Siswa Kelas X Melalui KIT Optik. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 5(1). Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/JPFI/article/view/991
Author Biographies
Hidayati Hidayati, Jurusan Fisika FMIPA Universitas Negeri Padang
Allin Wel Ningsi, Universitas Negeri Padang
Ananda Mahaputra Iskandar, Universitas Negeri Padang
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Hidayati Hidayati, Allin Wel Ningsi, Ananda Mahaputra Iskandar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
