Five-Tier Diagnostic Test Instrument Validation on Reaction Rate Materials: To Identify the Causes of Misconception and Student Representation
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i3.2952Published:
2023-03-31Issue:
Vol. 9 No. 3 (2023): MarchKeywords:
Five-Tier Diagnostic, Instrument, Misconceptions, ValidationResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This study aims to determine the validity of the five-tier diagnostic instrument. Empirical validation tests were carried out to identify the items' difficulty level, the different power of the items, the percentage of distractor effectiveness, and test the validity and reliability of the items. The results show that the five-tier diagnostic test instrument is feasible and valid to use by looking at the test difficulty level, discriminating power, distractor effectiveness, item validity, empirical validity, and reliability test. The difficulty level of the questions is included in the average level of easy difficulty at Tier A and Tier R. In contrast, and the Multiple representatives are included in the medium level of difficulty. The average results at Tier A, Tier R, and Multiple Representative in the differential power test have sufficient differential power.
References
Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to Learn in Science. Science, 333(6046), 1096–1097. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204153
Anam, R. S., Widodo, A., Sopandi, W., & Wu, H.-K. (2019). Developing a Five-Tier Diagnostic Test to Identify Students’ Misconceptions in Science: An Example of the Heat Transfer Concepts. İlköğretim Online, 1014-1029. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2019.609690
Ardiansah, Masykuri, M., & Rahardjo, S. B. (2017). Kelayakan Instrumen Diagnostik Pada Materi Asam-. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains, 21, 104–111. Retrieved from https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/snps/article/view/11399
Arikunto, S. (2009). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.
Atikah. (2020). Identifikasi Pemahaman Konsep Dan Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Jurusan Kimia Pada Materi Sifat Koligatif Larutan Dengan Menggunakan Instrumen Diagnostik Four-Tier. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Borich, G. D. (1994). Observation Skills for Effective Teaching (2th Editio). Macmillan Publishing Company.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
DiBattista, D., & Kurzawa, L. (2011). Examination of the quality of multiple-choice items on classroom tests. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 4. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2011.2.4
Habiddin, H., & Page, E. M. (2019a). Development and Validation of a Four-Tier Diagnostic Instrument for Chemical Kinetics (FTDICK). Indonesian Journal of Chemistry, 19(3), 720–736. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.39218
Habiddin, & Page, E. M. (2019b). Development and Validation of a Four-Tier Diagnostic Instrument for Chemical Kinetics (FTDICK). Indonesian Journal of Chemistry, 19, 720–736. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.39218
Hakimah, N., Muchson, M., Herunata, H., Permatasari, M. B., & Santoso, A. (2021). Identification student misconceptions on reaction rate using a Google forms three-tier tests. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043114
Jusniar, J., Effendy, E., Budiasih, E., & Sutrisno, S. (2020). Developing a three-tier diagnostic instrument on chemical equilibrium (TT-DICE). Educacion Quimica, 31(3), 84–102. https://doi.org/10.22201/fq.18708404e.2020.3.72133
Kimberlin, C. L., & Winterstein, A. G. (2008). Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research. American journal of health-system pharmacy, 65(23), 2276–2284. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp070364
Magdalena, I., Fauziah, S. N., Faziah, S. N., & Nupus, F. S. (2021). Analisis Validitas, Reliabilitas, Tingkat Kesulitan dan Daya Beda Butir Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Tema 7 Kelas III SDN Karet 1 Sepatan. BINTANG: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sains, 3(2), 198–214. Retrieved from https://www.ejournal.stitpn.ac.id/index.php/bintang/article/view/1291
Nazar, M., Winarni, S., Fitriana, R., Prodi Pendidikan Kimia Unsyiah Banda Aceh, D., & Prodi Pendidikan Kimia Unsyiah Banda Aceh, M. (2013). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa SMA Pada Konsep Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Laju Reaksi. Biologi Edukasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 2(3), 49–53. Retrieved from https://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/JBE/article/view/448
Putri, W. K., & Ermawati, F. U. (2021). Pengembangan, Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Tes Diagnostik Five-Tier untuk Materi Getaran Harmonis Sederhana beserta Hasil Uji Coba. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.5.1.92-101
Qodriyah, N. R. L., Rokhim, D. A., Widarti, H. R., & Habiddin. (2020). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri 4 Malang pada Materi Hidrokarbon Menggunakan Instrumen Diagnostik Three Tier. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 14(2), 2642–2651.
Quillin, K., & Thomas, S. (2015). Drawing-to-Learn: A Framework for Using Drawings to Promote Model-Based Reasoning in Biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-08-0128
Sinaga, M. S. (2006). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa Dalam Memahami Materi Sub Pokok Bahasan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Laju Reaksi Yang Diolah Dengan Reduksi Didaktik. UPI Bandung.
Suruchi, S., and Rana, S. S. (2014). Test item analysis and the relationship between difficulty level and discrimination index of test items in an achievement test in biology. Paripex India Journal of Research, 3(6), 56–68. Retrieved from https://www.worldwidejournals.com/paripex/recent_issues_pdf/2014/June/June_2014_1403953039__18.pdf
Tuckman, B. W., & Harper, B. E. (2012). Conducting educational research (6th ed). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, INC.
Utari, J. I., & Ermawati, F. U. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Miskonsepsi Berformat Four-Tier untuk Materi Suhu, Kalor, dan Perpindahannya. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 7(3), 434–439. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/inovasi-pendidikan-fisika/article/view/25537
Widarti, H. R., Permanasari, A., & Mulyani, S. (2017). Undergraduate Students’ Misconception On Acid-Base And Argentometric Titrations: A Challenge To Implement Multiple Representation Learning Model With Cognitive Dissonance Strategy. International Journal of Education, 9(2), 105–112. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/208918/
Yusup, F. (2018). Uji Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jurnal Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1), 17–23. https://dx.doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v7i1.2100
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Deni Ainur Rokhim, Hayuni Retno Widarti, Sutrisno Sutrisno
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
