Vol. 9 No. 7 (2023): July
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

Differences in Anatomical Thickness of Leaves of Six Types of Monocot Ornamental Plants at Base and Top Position

Authors

Minati , Entin Daningsih , Asriah Nurdini Mardiyyaningsih

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.2967

Published:

2023-07-25

Downloads

Abstract

The position of the leaves on each plant can affect the thickness of the leaf tissue. This study aims to determine the thickness of the leaf tissue at the base and shoot positions. The study used a nested design model (random nesting pattern design). This design uses two factors, the first factor is the leaves of six types of monocot ornamental plants, namely adam hawa (Rhoeo discolor), daffodils (Hymenocallis littoralis), hanjuang (Cordyline fructicosa), lilies of paris (Chlorophytum laxum), song india (Dracaena reflexa) and sri fortune (Aglaonema commutatum), while the second factor was leaf position (base and shoot) with three replications. The method of making leaf preserved preparations is paraffin which refers to Johansen. Parameters measured were total leaf thickness, upper epidermis, lower epidermis, mesophyll (palisade and sponge). Data were analyzed with ANOVA followed by LSD if the factor results were significant. The correlation was made between the total leaf thickness and the tissue which was significant on the leaf position factor. The results showed that the type of plant affected the total leaf thickness, upper and lower epidermis, mesophyll (palisade and sponge). However, leaf position has no effect on the thickness of the upper epidermis and sponge for differentiated mesophyll. The thickness of the leaf depends on the thickness of the lower epidermis, followed by the thickness of the mesophyll or palisade for differentiated mesophyll.

Keywords:

Anatomical Monocot Ornamental plants Thickness of leaves

References

Afzal, A., Duiker, S. W., & Watson, J. E. (2017). Leaf thickness to predict plant water status. Biosystems Engineering, 156(2011), 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.01.011

Amruddin, Priyanda, R., Agustina, T. S., Ariantini, N. S., & Rusmayani, N. G. A. L. (2022). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif. Pradina Pustaka.

Araújo, J. S., Azevedo, A. A., Silva, L. C., & Meira, R. M. S. A. (2010). Leaf anatomy as an additional taxonomy tool for 16 species of Malpighiaceae found in the Cerrado area (Brazil). Plant Systematics and Evolution, 286(1–2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-010-0268-3

Azmin, N., Nurfathurrahman, Hartati, & Fahruddin. (2021). Anatomi Tumbuhan (Analisis Teori Dan Praktek). CV. AA. RIZKY.

Berghuijs, H. (2016). Leaf anatomy and photosynthesis : Unravelling the CO 2 diffusion pathway in C 3 leaves Herman Nicolaas Cornelis Berghuijs. Wageningen Unversity. https://doi.org/10.18174/379249

Berlyn, G. P., & Miksche, J. (1976). Microtechnique Cytochemistry. State University Press.

Cambaba, S., & Maryani. (2016). Karakter Anatomis Daun Kedelai (Glycine max (L.) Merril) ‘GROBOGAN’ Hasil Perlakuan Kekeringan Dan Mulsa Jerami. Prosiding Seminar Nasional, 02, 881–889. Retrieved from https://journal.uncp.ac.id/index.php/proceding/article/view/574

Coneva, V., & Chitwood, D. H. (2018). Genetic and developmental basis for increased leaf thickness in the arabidopsis cvi ecotype. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9(March), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00322

Daningsih, E., Mardiyyanigsih, A. N., Costa, Y. O. D., Primawati, R., & Karlina, S. (2022). Changes of stomatal distribution and leaf thickness in response to transpiration rate in six dicot plant species. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 976(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/976/1/012060

Fahn, A. (1991). Anatomi Tumbuhan. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Gotoh, E., Suetsugu, N., Higa, T., Matsushita, T., Tsukaya, H., & Wada, M. (2018). Palisade cell shape affects the light-induced chloroplast movements and leaf photosynthesis. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19896-9

Gratani, L., Covone, F., & Larcher, W. (2006). Leaf plasticity in response to light of three evergreen species of the Mediterranean maquis. Trees - Structure and Function, 20(5), 549–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-006-0070-6

Hartutiningsih-M. Siregar, Wahyuni, S., & Ardaka, I. M. (2018). Karakterisasi Morfologi Daun Begonia Alam (Begoniaceae): Prospek Pengembangan Koleksi Tanaman Hias Daun di Kebun Raya Indonesia (Leaf morfological characterization of native Begonia (Begoniaceae): Development prospect of foliage ornamental plants collecti. Jurnal Biologi Indonesia, 14(2), 201–211. Retrieved from https://ejournal.biologi.lipi.go.id/index.php/jurnal_biologi_indonesia/article/view/3739

Jahan, E., Sharwood, R. E., & Tissue, D. T. (2023). Effects of leaf age during drought and recovery on photosynthesis , mesophyll conductance and leaf anatomy in wheat leaves. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1091418. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1091418

Johansen, D. A. (1940). Plant microtechnique. Mc-Graw-Hill Book Company.

Juwarno, J., Suparjana, T. B., & Abbas, M. (2018). Mahameru Soybean (Glycine max) Cultivar, High Salinity Tolerant. Biosaintifika: Journal of Biology & Biology Education, 10(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.15294/biosaintifika.v10i1.11870

Karyati, Ransun, J. R., & Syafrudin, M. (2017). Karakteristik Morfologis Dan Anatomis Daun Tumbuhan Tingkat Semai Pada Paparan Cahaya Berbeda Di Hutan Pendidikan Fakultas Kehutanan Universitas Mulawarman. ULIN: Jurnal Hutan Tropis, 1(1), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.32522/ujht.v1i1.776

Klimko, M., Nowińska, R., Wilkin, P., & Wiland-Szymańska, J. (2018). Comparative leaf micromorphology and anatomy of the dragon tree group of Dracaena (Asparagaceae) and their taxonomic implications. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 304(8), 1041–1055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-018-1530-3

Liu, H., Specht, C. D., Zhao, T., & Liao, J. (2020). Morphological Anatomy of Leaf and Rhizome in Zingiber officinale Roscoe, with Emphasis on Secretory Structures. HortScience, 55(2), 204–207. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14555-19

Megia, R., Ratnasari, & Hadisunarso. (2016). Karakteristik Morfologi dMEGIA, R., . R., & . H. (2016). Karakteristik Morfologi dan Anatomi, serta Kandungan Klorofil Lima Kultivar Tanaman Penyerap Polusi Udara Sansevieria trifasciata. Jurnal Sumberdaya Hayati, 1(2), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.29244/jsdh.1.2.34-40

Mulyani, S. (2006). Anatomi Tumbuhan. Kanisius.

Nelza, A., Suharsi, T. K., & Surahman, M. (2018). Karakter Vegetatif Kacang Koro Pedang ( Canavalia ensiformis L .) pada Kondisi Naungan dan Pemupukan yang Berbeda. Jurnal Agroteknologi Universitas Andalas, 2(2), 27-34. Retrieved from http://jagur.faperta.unand.ac.id/index.php/jagur/%0Aarticle/view/22%0A

Ningsih, C. S., & Daningsih, E. (2022). Ketebalan Daun dan Laju Transpirasi Tanaman Hias Monokotil. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia, 27(4), 514–520. https://doi.org/10.18343/jipi.27.4.514

Orchard, G. E., Torres, J., & Sounthararajah, P. (2008). Use of softening agents to improve the production of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of nail tissue: An assessment. British Journal of Biomedical Science, 65(2), 68–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/09674845.2008.11732799

Palupi, D., Aryani, R. D., & Lestari, S. (2021). Comparative anatomical studies on some species of of the Genus Artocarpus. Bioedukasi: Jurnal Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 19(1), 30–36. https://doi:10.19184/bioedu.v19i1.21988

Prayugo, S. (2007). Media tanam untuk tanaman hias. Penebar Swadaya.

Samiyarsih, S., Naipospos, N., & Palupi, D. (2019). Variability of catharanthus roseus based on morphological and anatomical characters, and chlorophyll contents. Biodiversitas, 20(10), 2986–2993. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d201029

Sarjani, T. M., Mawardi, Pandia, E. S., & Wulandari, D. (2017). Identifikasi Morfologi dan Anatomi Tipe Stomata Famili Piperaceae di Kota Langsa. IPA dan Pembelajaran IPA, 1(2), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v1i2.9693

Starman, T. W., Kelly, J. W., & Pemberton, H. B. (1990). The influence of ancymidol on morphology, anatomy, and chlorophyll levels in developing and mature Helianthus annuus leaves. Plant Growth Regulation, 9(3), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045282

Sumardi, I., & Pudjoarianto, A. (1993). Struktur dan perkembangan tumbuhan. Fakultas Biologi-UGM.

Surya, A., Hendrawan, V. S., & Baskoro, S. E. (2022). Analisis Prospek Usaha Tanaman Hias Studi Kasus Di Pelita Desa Ciseeng, Bogor. Jurnal Ekobis: Ekonomi Bisnis & Manajemen, 12(1), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.37932/j.e.v12i1.434

Tihurua, E. F., Agustiani, E. L., & Rahmawati, K. (2020). Karakter Anatomi Daun sebagai Bentuk Adaptasi Tumbuhan Penyusun Zonasi Mangrove di Banggai Kepulauan, Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah. Jurnal Kelautan Tropis, 23(2), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.14710/jkt.v23i2.7048

Tihurua, E. F., Astuti, I. P., & Witono, J. R. (2011). Anatomi Daun Piperaceae dari Kawasan Gunung Slamet, Jawa Tengah. Buletin Kebun Raya, 14(2), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.14203/bkr.v14i2.9.

Tobing, A. N. L., Darmanti, S., Hastuti, E. D., & Izzati, M. (2021). Struktur Anatomi Daun Mangrove Api-api Putih [Avicennia marina (Forsk.) Vierh] Di Pantai Mangunharjo, Semarang. Buletin Anatomi Dan Fisiologi, 6(1), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.14710/baf.6.1.2021.96-103

Xie, S., & Luo, X. (2003). Effect of leaf position and age on anatomical structure, photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and transpiration of Asian pear. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica, 44(4), 297–303. Retrieved from https://ejournal.sinica.edu.tw/bbas/content/2003/4/bot444-06.html

Author Biographies

Minati, Universitas Tanjungpura

Author Origin : Indonesia

Entin Daningsih, Universitas Tanjungpura

Author Origin : Indonesia

Asriah Nurdini Mardiyyaningsih, Universitas Tanjungpura

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Minati, Daningsih, E. ., & Mardiyyaningsih, A. N. . (2023). Differences in Anatomical Thickness of Leaves of Six Types of Monocot Ornamental Plants at Base and Top Position. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(7), 5436–5445. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.2967