Research-Based Teaching Materials As Innovation In Chemistry Learning
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.3370Published:
2023-09-25Downloads
Abstract
Most of the teaching materials used during learning are not research-based. To address this issue, this paper deals with a literature review regarding the intent and interpretation of research-based learning. The data were obtained from library sources such as papers and books. The data analysis technique is content analysis, where the content of the collected data is read, recorded, and analyzed in order to obtain a concept. The use of teaching materials that contain research-based learning methods in chemistry learning is considered suitable. The findings of the concept are discussed in depth.
References
Abdullah, I., Hudayana, B., Kutanegara, P. M., & Indiyanto, A. (2019). Beyond school reach: Character education in three schools in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 9(3), 145-145. https://doi.org/10.2478/jesr-2019-0032
Amaringga, N. G., Amin, M., & Irawati, M. H. (2021). The effect of problem-based learning module containing research result to improve students’ scientific literacy. Paper presented at the AIP Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043529
Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching: John Wiley & Sons.
Andrews, J. D. (1984). Discovery and expository learning compared: Their effects on independent and dependent students. The Journal of Educational Research, 78(2), 80-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1984.10885578
Aronson, B., & Laughter, J. (2016). The theory and practice of culturally relevant education: A synthesis of research across content areas. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 163-206. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582066
Atkins, P., & De Paula, J. (2011). Physical chemistry for the life sciences: Oxford University Press, USA.
Banegas, D. L., & de Castro, L. S. V. (2019). Action research The Routledge handbook of English language teacher education (pp. 570-582): Routledge.
Beatty, I. D., & Gerace, W. J. (2009). Technology-enhanced formative assessment: A research-based pedagogy for teaching science with classroom response technology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(2), 146-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9140-4
Benkler, Y. (2005). Common Wisdom: Peer Production of Educational Materials, Center for Open and Sustainable Learning. Retrieved from http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:37077901
Bennett, J., & Holman, J. (2002). Context-based approaches to the teaching of chemistry: What are they and what are their effects? Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 165-184): Springer.
Bergmark, U. (2022). The role of action research in teachers’ efforts to develop research-based education in Sweden: intentions, outcomes, and prerequisite conditions. Educational Action Research, 30(3), 427-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1847155
Bonk, C. J., & Cunningham, D. J. (1998). Searching for learner-centered, constructivist, and sociocultural components of collaborative educational learning tools. In C. J. Bonk & K. S. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse (pp. 25–50). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers
Brame, C. (2016). Active learning. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. Retrieved from https://cft.vander bilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/active-learning/. ISBN: 9780470484104
Brew, A., & Saunders, C. (2020). Making sense of research-based learning in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87, 102935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102935
Carnell, B., & Fung, D. (2017). Developing the higher education curriculum: Research-based education in practice: UCL Press.
Chen, J. (2022). Cognitive Mapping for Problem-based and Inquiry Learning: Theory, Research, and Assessment.
Clark, R. E., Yates, K., Early, S., & Moulton, K. (2009). An analysis of the failure of electronic media and discoveryâ€based learning: Evidence for the performance benefits of guided training methods. Handbook of Improving Performance in the Workplace: Volumes 1â€3, 263-297. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470592663.ch8
Cook, M. P. (2006). Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Science education, 90(6), 1073-1091. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20164
Crawford, V. M., Schlager, M., Toyama, Y., Riel, M., & Vahey, P. (2005). Characterizing adaptive expertise in science teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2202_1
Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching: ASCD.
Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational researcher, 34(3), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034003003
DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601. https://doi.org/0.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6%3C582::AID-TEA5%3E3.0.CO;2-L
Dewi, P. Y. A., & Primayana, K. H. (2019). Effect of learning module with setting contextual teaching and learning to increase the understanding of concepts. International Journal of Education and Learning, 1(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v1i1.26
Edelson, D. C. (2001). Learningâ€forâ€use: A framework for the design of technologyâ€supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science teaching, 38(3), 355-385.
https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3%3C355::AID-TEA1010%3E3.0.CO;2-M
Fagen, A. P., Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2002). Peer instruction: Results from a range of classrooms. The physics teacher, 40(4), 206-209. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1474140
Firmadani, F. (2017). Pembelajaran Berbasis Riset Sebagai Inovasi Pembelajaran. Prosiding TEP & PDs, 4(14), 262-268.
Fitria, D., Imran, A., & Ahda, Y. (2022). Studi Literature Model Problem Based Learning. International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 1(6).
https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v1i6.177
Harits, M., Sujadi, I., & Slamet, I. (2019). Technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge math teachers: To develop 21st century skills students. Paper presented at the Journal of physics: Conference series.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/3/032011
Haryati, A. S. (2017). The implementation of 21st century learning to improve high level thinking skills through various model. Paper presented at the International Conference on Education. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012130
Hendawati, Y., Pratomo, S., Suhaedah, S., Lestari, N., Ridwan, T., & Majid, N. (2019). Contextual teaching and learning of physics at elementary school. Paper presented at the Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012130
Hepworth, M., & Walton, G. (2009). Teaching information literacy for inquiry-based learning: Elsevier.
Hoepfl, M. C. (1997). Choosing qualitative research: A primer for technology education researchers. Volume 9 Issue 1 (fall 1997). https://doi.org/10.22089/res.2022.12026.2218
Hudson, C. C., & Whisler, V. R. (2007). Contextual teaching and learning for practitioners. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 6(4), 54-58. ISSN: 1690-4524
Humana, P., & Rahmat, R. (2022). Contextual Teaching Learning in the Development of a Student’s Environmental Care Attitude During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Paper presented at the Annual Civic Education Conference (ACEC 2021). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220108.051
Indrilla, N., & Ciptaningrum, D. S. (2018). An approach in teaching writing skills: does it offer a new insight in enhancing students writing ability. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 21(2), 124-133.
https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.2018.210201
Juntunen, M., & Aksela, M. (2013). Life-cycle analysis and inquiry-based learning in chemistry teaching. Science Education International, 24(2), 150-166. ISSN-2077-2327
Khozaei, S. A., Zare, N. V., Moneghi, H. K., Sadeghi, T., & Taraghdar, M. M. (2022). Effects of quantum-learning and conventional teaching methods on learning achievement, motivation to learn, and retention among nursing students during critical care nursing education. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00198-7
Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why unguided learning does not work: An analysis of the failure of discovery learning, problem-based learning, experiential learning and inquiry-based learning. Educational psychologist, 41(2), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01003922
Knight, J. K., & Brame, C. J. (2018). Peer instruction. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(2), fe5. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-02-0025
Kovarik, M. L., Ott, L. S., Robinson, J. K., & Wenzel, T. J. (2022). Getting Started on Active Learning Active Learning in the Analytical Chemistry Curriculum (pp. 13-35): ACS Publications. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2022-1409.ch002
Kuisma, M. (2022). Bliss and Curse of Autonomy: Implementing inquiry learning in a domain-specific and cross-curricular context.
Latipah, E. D. P., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2018). Analisis kemampuan koneksi matematis siswa menggunakan pendekatan pembelajaran CTL dan RME. Matematika: Jurnal Teori dan Terapan Matematika, 17(1). ISSN: 1412-5056 / 2598-8980
Lotulung, C. F., Ibrahim, N., & Tumurang, H. (2018). Effectiveness of Learning Method Contextual Teaching Learning (CTL) for Increasing Learning Outcomes of Entrepreneurship Education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 17(3), 37-46.
Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2021). The cognitive affective model of immersive learning (CAMIL): A theoretical research-based model of learning in immersive virtual reality. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 937-958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09586-2
Maksum, A., & Hani, U. (2018). Active Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran. Geneologi PAI: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 4(2), 169-180. https://doi.org/10.32678/tarbawi.v6i01.2212
Malmia, W., Makatita, S. H., Lisaholit, S., Azwan, A., Magfirah, I., Tinggapi, H., & Umanailo, M. C. B. (2019). Problem-based learning as an effort to improve student learning outcomes. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res, 8(9), 1140-1143.
Mawarnis, E. R. (2021). Kimia Dasar II: Deepublish.
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiryâ€based science instruction—what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347
Naezak, N. A., Savitri, E. N., & Fibriana, F. (2021). Simple Terrarium Teaching Aid for Guided Inquiry Learning Model: The Development of Learning Instruments to Students' Concept Understanding in Global Warming and Environmental Awareness. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 2(2), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v2i2.37
Nurdyansyah, N. (2018). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Modul Ilmu Pengetahuan Alambagi Siswa Kelas Iv Sekolah Dasar. Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo. Retrieved from http://eprints.umsida.ac.id/id/eprint/1607
Peniati, E. (2012). Pengembangan modul mata kuliah strategi belajar mengajar IPA berbasis hasil penelitian pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v1i1.2006
Plomp, T. (2013). Educational design research: An introduction. Educational design research, 11-50.
Pollock, C. J., & Harper, N. J. (2022). Outdoor adventure education and constructive development theory: An inquiry into meaning making, growing up, and immunity to change. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 25(2), 247-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-022-00107-z
Prafitasari, N. F., & Sulistyarsi, A. (2020). Penyusunan Modul Bioteknologi Berbasis Riset. Paper presented at the Prosiding Seminar Nasional SIMBIOSIS. p-ISSN : 9772599121008
Priyanto, M., & Permatasari, D. (2022). Students’ Worksheets Based on Problem Based Learning In Composition and Inverse Functions to Enhance Conceptual Understanding.
https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2022.7.1.73-88
Rani, B. K., Widiyaningrum, P., & Anggraito, Y. U. (2020). Effectiveness of research based booklet media of conventional Biotechnology application as a supplement of Biotechnology teaching materials in Senior High School. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 9(3), 295-300. https://doi.org/10.1294/JISE.V813.36051
Rohim, M., & Sucianto, B. (2019). The analysis of implementation of research based learning implementation in developing the studens’ creative thinking skill in solving dominating set problem. Paper presented at the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/243/1/012143
Rohrbach-Lochner, F., & Marohn, A. (2018). How research-based learning can increase teacher students’ knowledge and abilities–a design-based research project in the context of pupils’(mis) conceptions in science. Research in Subject-matter Teaching and Learning (RISTAL), 1(1), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.23770/rt1810
Schapper, J., & Mayson, S. E. (2010). Researchâ€led teaching: Moving from a fractured engagement to a marriage of convenience. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(6), 641-651. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.489236
Seechaliao, T. (2017). Instructional strategies to support creativity and innovation in education. Journal of education and learning, 6(4), 201-208. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n4p201
Selvianiresa, D., & Prabawanto, S. (2017). Contextual teaching and learning approach of mathematics in primary schools. Paper presented at the Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012171
Simon, B., Esper, S., Porter, L., & Cutts, Q. (2013). Student experience in a student-centered peer instruction classroom. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ninth annual international ACM conference on International computing education research. https://doi.org/10.1145/2493394.2493407
Slameto, S. (2015). Pembelajaran berbasis riset mewujudkan pembelajaran yang inspiratif. Satya Widya, 31(2), 102-112. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.sw.2015.v31.i2.p102-112
Sucianto, B., Irvan, M., & Rohim, M. A. (2019). The Analysis of Student Metacognition Skill in Solving Rainbow Connection Problem under the Implementation of Research-Based Learning Model. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 593-610. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12438a
Sulfemi, W. B. (2019). Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching And Learning (CTL) Berbantu Media Miniatur Lingkungan Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPS. Edunomic: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Ekonomi Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(2), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.33603/ejpe.v7i2.1970
Tan, J. C. (2016). Project-based learning for academically-able students: Hwa Chong Institution in Singapore: Springer.
Towne, L., & Shavelson, R. J. (2002). Scientific research in education: National Academy Press Publications Sales Office. https://doi.org/10.17226/10236.
Tuan, L. T. (2012). An Empirical Research into EFL Learners' Motivation. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.3.430-439
Ãœlger, K. (2016). The relationship between creative thinking and critical thinking skills of students. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi-Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 31. https://doi.org/10.16986/huje.2016018493
Umar, A. A., Rahmi, E., Balouch, A., Abd Rahman, M. Y., Salleh, M. M., & Oyama, M. (2014). Highly-reactive AgPt nanofern composed of {001}-faceted nanopyramidal spikes for enhanced heterogeneous photocatalysis application. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2(41), 17655-17665. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA03518F
Usmeldi, U., Amini, R., & Trisna, S. (2017). The development of research-based learning model with science, environment, technology, and society approaches to improve critical thinking of students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 318-325. DOI: 10.15294/jpii.v6i2.10680
Velez, J. J., Cano, J., Whittington, M. S., & Wolf, K. J. (2011). Cultivating change through peer teaching. Journal of Agricultural Education, 52(1), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2011.01040
Wallace, C. S., & Kang, N. H. (2004). An investigation of experienced secondary science teachers' beliefs about inquiry: An examination of competing belief sets. Journal of Research in Science teaching, 41(9), 936-960. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20032.
Wessels, I., Rueß, J., Gess, C., Deicke, W., & Ziegler, M. (2021). Is research-based learning effective? Evidence from a pre–post analysis in the social sciences. Studies in Higher Education, 46(12), 2595-2609. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1739014.
Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science education, 87(1), 112-143. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10044.
Wong, S. L., & Hodson, D. (2009). From the horse's mouth: What scientists say about scientific investigation and scientific knowledge. Science education, 93(1), 109-130. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20290.
Zein, A., Budianti, Y., & Gea, L. F. (2022). Differences in Islamic Culture History Learning Outcomes Between Active Learning Strategies Team Quiz Type and Practice Private Madrasah Aliyah Students. Scaffolding: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam dan Multikulturalisme, 4(1), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.37680/scaffolding.v4i1.1237
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Elvy Rahmi Mawarnis, Liszulfah Roza, Sri Maiyena, Mohd Yusri Abd. Rahman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
