Efforts to Remediate Misconceptions in Cell Materials Using the Think Talk Write Learning Model
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.3470Published:
2023-12-15Issue:
Vol. 9 No. 12 (2023): DecemberKeywords:
Cell material, Misconception, Think talk write learning modelResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
In cell material, many concepts are abstract and can cause students to experience difficulties in understanding them. Every concept in biology learning is interconnected so that every concept that is built can influence the formation of the next concept. However, often students' initial concepts are misconceptions, namely the concepts possessed by students conflict with the concepts raised by experts. A good learning experience is needed so that students can understand the concept correctly. One learning model that provides a learning experience to discover and understand concepts is the Think Talk Write learning model. The purpose of this research is to remediate misconceptions about cell material by using the Think Talk Write learning model. This study used an experimental method with the type of pre-experimental research and one-group pretest-posttest research design. The subjects in this study were students of class XI IPA at SMA Muhammadiyah 5 Rancaekek consisting of 36 students. Based on the results of data processing, it was found that misconceptions in the pretest resulted in 12.78% and in the posttest it decreased to 6.25%. So it can be concluded that the Think Talk Write learning model can reduce students' misconceptions about cell material.
References
Ali, M. (2019). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Berdasarkan Gender Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Dengan Menggunakan Tes Diagnostik Two-Tier Di Kotabaru. CENDEKIA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 7(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.33659/cip.v7i1.120
Andry, S., Putra, U., Hamidah, I., & Nahadi. (2019). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Four-Tier Untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik Materi Gelombang dan Optik. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22611/jpf.v8i1.12778
Anjarsari, P. (2014). Pentingnya melatih keterampilan berpikir (thinking skills) dalam pembelajaran IPA SMP. Optimalisasi Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Dengan Workshop Pengembangan LKS IPA Berpendekatan Guided Inquiry Untuk Mengembangkan Thinking Skills Dan Sikap Ilmiah Siswa, 23. Retrieved from http://eprints.uny.ac.id/42369/1/Artikel Inoteks PPM Berbasis Riset.pdf
Aulia, H., Suhara, S., & Surakusumah, W. (2020). Keefektifan bahan ajar berbasis praktikum sederhana untuk menurunkan miskonsepsi siswa pada materi sistem pencernaan makanan. Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 3(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.17509/aijbe.v3i1.23302
Cahyanto, M. A. S., Ashadi, A., & Saputro, S. (2019). An Analysis of Gender Difference on Students’ Misconceptions in Learning the Material Classification and Its Changes. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i2.26613
Caleon, I. S., & Subramaniam, R. (2010). Do Students Know What They Know and What They Don’t Know? Using a Four-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess the Nature of Students’ Alternative Conceptions. Research in Science Education, 40(3), 313–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9122-4
Carlan, F. de A., Sepel, L. M. N., & Loreto, E. L. S. (2014). Teaching Cell Biology in Primary Schools. Education Research International, 2014, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/272475
Cisterna, D., Williams, M., & Merritt, J. (2013). Students’ Understanding of Cells & Heredity: Patterns of Understanding in the Context of a Curriculum Implementation in Fifth & Seventh Grades. The American Biology Teacher, 75(3), 178–184. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2013.75.3.6
Dina, P. A., & Rosyidi, A. H. (2019). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa SMAN di Kediri Menggunakan Certainty Of Response Index (CRI) Termodifikasi pada Materi Trigonometri. MATHEdunesa, 8(3), 500–506. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v8n3.p500-506
Eilam, B., & Gilbert, J. K. (2014). The Significance of Visual Representations in the Teaching of Science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06526-7_1
Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A Review and Comparison of Diagnostic Instruments to Identify Students’ Misconceptions in Science. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 989–1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a
Gustinasari, M., Ardi, A., & Lufri. (2017). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Berbasis Konsep Disertai Contoh pada Materi Sel untuk Siswa SMA. Bioeducation Journal, 1, 2354–8363. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/bioeducation/article/view/7154
Habibah, K. N. (2015). Pengaruh gender terhadap keterampilan metakognitif dan hasil belajar kognitif biologi pada penerapan strategi pembelajaran PBMP (Pemberdayaan Berpikir Melalui Pertanyaan) dipadu TPS (Think Pair Share) pada siswa kelas XI IPA di Malang [Universitas Negeri Malang]. Retrieved from http://repository.um.ac.id/id/eprint/60522
Hamdayana, J. (2014). Model dan Metode Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Berkarakter. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Hidayati, N. (2017). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Think Talk Write untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Mahasiswa pada Matakuliah Biologi Sel. Bioilmi: Jurnal Pendidikan, 3(2), 94–99. https://doi.org/10.19109/bioilmi.v3i2.1400
Huda, N., Tandailing, E., & Mahmuda, D. (2016). Integrasi Remediasi Miskonsepsi Generatif Dalam Pembelajaran Gerak Lurus Berubah Beraturan Di SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 6(August), 128. https://doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v6i1.17944
Juanengsih, N., Rahmat, A., Wulan, A. ratna, & Rahman, T. (2021). Representasi Mental Mahasiswa dalam Membaca Gambar Struktur Membran Sel Setelah Perkuliahan Biologi Sel dengan Pendekatan Vark. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Biologi, 2(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.26740/jipb.v2n1.p9-18
Khairunnisa, D. E. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Conceptual Understanding Procedures (CUPs) dengan Strategi Think Talk Write (TTW) Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman dan Disposisi Matematis Siswa SMA [FKIP Unpas]. Retrieved from http://repository.unpas.ac.id/29295/
Kılıç, D., Taber, K. S., & Winterbottom, M. (2016). A Cross-National Study of Students’ Understanding of Genetics Concepts: Implications from Similarities and Differences in England and Turkey. Education Research International, 2016, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6539626
Lestari, E. T. (2020). Cara praktis meningkatkan motivasi siswa sekolah dasar. Sleman: Deepublish.
Mukhlisa, N. (2021). Miskonsepsi Pada Peserta Didik. SPEED Journal : Journal of Special Education, 4(2), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.31537/speed.v4i2.403
Muzakki, N. A., Diana, S., & Priyandoko, D. (2022). Effectiveness of the Think Talk Write Learning Strategy toward Concept Mastery of Cell for High School Biology Students. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 23(4), 1539–1547. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v23i4.pp1539-1547
Nasution, R. H., Wijaya, T. T., Adi Putra, M. J., & Hermita, N. (2021). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa SD pada Materi Gaya dan Gerak. Journal of Natural Science and Integration, 4(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.24014/jnsi.v4i1.10851
Nicol, D. J., & Boyle, J. T. (2003). Peer Instruction versus Class-wide Discussion in Large Classes: A comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom. Studies in Higher Education, 28(4), 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507032000122297
Nurani, I. F., Irawan, E. B., & Sa’dijah, C. (2016). Level Berpikir Geometri Van Hiele Berdasarkan Gender Pada Siswa Kelas Vii Smp Islam Hasanuddin Dau Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(5), 978–983. https://doi.org/10.17977/jp.v1i5.6335
Park, M., & Liu, X. (2021). An Investigation of Item Difficulties in Energy Aspects Across Biology, Chemistry, Environmental Science, and Physics. Research in Science Education, 51(S1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9819-y
Rahim, A. (2010). Eksplorasi Kesulitan dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita yang Berkaitan dengan KPK dan FPB Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gender. Jurnal Prosiding Seminar Nasional, 2(1), 2. Retrieved from http://journal.uncp.ac.id/index.php/proceding/article/view/386
Rybczynski, S. M., & Schussler, E. E. (2011). Student Use of Out-of-Class Study Groups in an Introductory Undergraduate Biology Course. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10(1), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe-10-04-0060
Sarlina. (2015). Miskonsepsi Siswa terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Matematika pada Pokok Bahasan Persamaan Kuadrat Siswa Kelas X5 SMA Negeri 11 Makassar. MaPan: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pembelajaran, 3(2), 198. https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2015v3n2a5
Sidauruk, S. (2005). Miskonsepsi Stoikiometri pada Siswa SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 7(2), 253–272. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v7i2.2024
Sreenivasulu, B., & Subramaniam, R. (2013). University Students’ Understanding of Chemical Thermodynamics. International Journal of Science Education, 35(4), 601–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.683460
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suhailah, F., Muttaqin, M., Suhada, I., Jamaluddin, D., & Paujiah, E. (2021). Articulate Storyline: Sebuah Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Interaktif Pada Materi Sel. Pedagonal : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 5(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.33751/pedagonal.v5i1.3208
Sutrisno. (2007). Pengembangan Pembelajaran IPA SD. Jakarta: Dirjen Dikti Depdiknas.
Suwono, H., Prasetyo, T. I., Lestari, U., Lukiati, B., Fachrunnisa, R., Kusairi, S., Saefi, M., Fauzi, A., & Atho’Illah, M. F. (2021). Cell Biology Diagnostic Test (CBD-Test) portrays pre-service teacher misconceptions about biology cell. Journal of Biological Education, 55(1), 82–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1643765
Utami, R. D., Agung, S., & Sapinatul Bahriah, E. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Genderterhadap Miskonsepsi Siswa Sman Di Kota Depok Dengan Menggunakan Tes Diagnostik Two-Tier. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan FKIP UNTIRTA, 1(2), 93–102. https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/psnp/article/download/93-102/1713
Vlckova, J., Kubiatko, M., & Usak, M. (2016). Czech High School Students’ Misconceptions About Basic Genetic Concepts: Preliminary Results. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(6), 738–745. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.738
Wahyuni, S., Djudin, T., & Oktavianty, E. (2018). Integrasi Remediasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Model Problem Based Learning Dalam Pembelajaran Fluida Statis Di SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 7(7), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v7i7.26598
Wright, L. K., & Newman, D. L. (2011). An interactive modeling lesson increases students’ understanding of ploidy during meiosis. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 39(5), 344–351. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20523
Author Biographies
Naufal Ahmad Muzakki, Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Sariwulan Diana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Didik Priyandoko, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Naufal Ahmad Muzakki, Sariwulan Diana, Didik Priyandoko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).