Physics Workbook using Multimodal Representation on Simple Harmonic Motion Topic

Authors

Metta Liana , Parlindungan Sinaga , Emiliannur

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.3477

Published:

2023-09-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 9 (2023): September

Keywords:

Critical Thinking, Problem Solving, Workbook

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Liana, M., Sinaga, P. ., & Emiliannur, E. (2023). Physics Workbook using Multimodal Representation on Simple Harmonic Motion Topic . Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 7503–7513. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.3477

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This study aimed to produce teaching materials in workbooks using multimodal representations, which can effectively improve problem-solving and critical-thinking skills. The research method used is the research and development (R&D) method. Test the quality of the workbook developed through validation by three expert lecturers and ten teachers and test the legibility of the main ideas of the discourse by ten high school students. Meanwhile, to test the effectiveness of this research workbook using design randomized control group pretest-posttest design to 70 high school students, 35 each in the control class and 35 in the experimental class. The test results of students' problem-solving and critical-thinking skills were analyzed quantitatively using the N-gain and t-test with the help of SPSS. Based on the main idea's quality and understanding tests, the feasibility percentage of the workbook was 76.35% in the feasible category. Moreover, the effectiveness test results show that workbooks using multimodal representations significantly improve students' problem-solving skills and critical-thinking skills compared to worksheets that can be used in schools.

References

Al-Hashim, A. (2019). Critical thinking and reflective practice in the science education practicum in Kuwait. Utopia y Praxis Latinoamericana, 24(6), 85–96. Retrieved from https://www.redalyc.org/journal/279/27962177010/html/.

AM, M. A., & Istiyono, E. (2022). Multiple Representation Ability of High School Students in Physics: A Study of Modern Response Theory. Thabiea : Journal of Natural Science Teaching, 5(1), 85–97. Retrieved from http://journal.iainkudus.ac.id/index.php/Thabiea

Baifeto, E. P. F., Samsudin, A., Efendi, R., & Athiyyah, R. (2022). Developing PHYCOM (Physics Comics) on Newton’s Law Material for 10th Grade High School Students. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 8(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.08201

Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7.ed). Longman. Inc.

Burkholder, E. W., Miles, J. K., Layden, T. J., Wang, K. D., Fritz, A. V, & Wieman, C. E. (2020). Template for teaching and assessment of problem solving in introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010123

Campos, E., Zavala, G., Zuza, K., & Guisasola, J. (2020). Students ’ understanding of the concept of the electric field through conversions of multiple representations. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010135

Carli, M., Lippiello, S., Pantano, O., Perona, M., & Tormen, G. (2020). Testing students ability to use derivatives , integrals , and vectors in a purely mathematical context and in a physical context. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010111

Dervic, D., Glamocic, D. S., Gazibegovic-Busuladzic, A., & Mesic, V. (2018). Teaching Physics With Simulations : Teacher- Centered Versus Student- Centered Approaches. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 288–299. Retrieved from https://oaji.net/articles/2017/987-1523527472.pdf.

Elise D. Wallace, & Jefferson, R. N. (2015). Developing Critical Thinking Skills: Assessing The Effectiveness Of Workbook Exercises. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 12(2), 101–108. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1061312.pdf.

Ennis, R. H. (2009). Critical thinking assessment. Theory Into Practicce, 32(3), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849309543594

Ifeoma, M. M. (2013). Use of Instructional Materials and Educational Performance of Students in Integrated Science ( A Case Study of Unity Schools in Jalingo, Taraba State, Nigeria). IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 3(4), 7–11. Retrieved from https://iosrjournals.org/iosr-jrme/papers/Vol-3%20Issue-4/B0340711.pdf.

Kartimi, K., & Winarso, W. (2021). Enhancing Students’ Science Literacy Skills; Implications for Scientific Approach in Elementary School. Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, 8(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v8i2.9175

Liana, M., & Sugiarti, T. (2022). Teacher’s Questioning Skills in Elementary Science Classroom to Facilitate Student’s Higher-Order Thinking Skills. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Maritime Education, ICOME 2021, 3-5 November 2021, Tanjungpinang, Riau Islands, Indonesia, 4(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.3-11-2021.2314794

Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Hopper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 International Results in Science. Timss & Pirls. Retrieved from https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/international-results/wp-content/uploads/filebase/full%20pdfs/T15-International-Results-in-Science-Grade-8.pdf

Nasir, M. (2017). Design and Empirical Analysis Visualization Motion And Vector Analysis Program As Interactive Multimedia Physics Learning at. Applied Science and Technology, 1(1), 240–227. Retrieved from https://jom.unri.ac.id/index.php/JOMFKIP/article/download/19840/19179

OECD (2018). PISA 2018 Science Framework. OCED Library. https://doi.org/10.1787/f30da688-en

Pierce, C. E., Gassman, S. L., & Huffman, J. T. (2013). Environments for fostering effective critical thinking in geotechnical engineering education (Geo-EFFECTs). European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(3), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2013.800021

Prayogi, S., Yuanita, L., & Wasis, L. (2018). Critical inquiry based learning: A model of learning to promote critical thinking among prospective teachers of physic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10220a

Rahmawati, I., Nisrina, N., & Abdani, M. R. (2022). Multi-representation-based interactive physics electronic module as teaching materials in online learning. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 11(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipf

Richard R. Hake. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores. Dept. of Physics Indiana University

RonÄević, T. N., Ćuk, Ž. Ä., Rodić, D. D., Segedinac, M. D., & Horvat, S. A. (2019). An Analysis of the high school students’ abilities to read realistic, conventional, and hybrid images in general chemistry. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(6), 943–954. Retrieved from https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:213325315.

Rosengrant, D., Etkina, E., & Van Heuvelen, A. (2007). An overview of recent research on multiple representations. In AIP Conference proceedings, 883(1), 149-152. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2508714

Rusilowati, A. (2018). Asesmen Literasi Sains: Analisis Karakteristik Instrumen dan Kemampuan Siswa Menggunakan Teori Tes Modern Rasch Model. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika Universitas Riau Ke-3, September, 2–15. Retrieved from https://snf.fmipa.unri.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/0.-300B-2-15NI.pdf

Ryan, Q. X., & Schermerhorn, B. P. (2020). Students ’ use of symbolic forms when constructing equations of boundary conditions. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010122

Santosa, I. E. (2022). View of Representation and content in student’s exam note sheets. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 6(2), 139–149. Retrieved from http://repository.usd.ac.id/44387/1/8510_Edi_Note_sheets.pdf.

Sari, A. M., & Ariswan, A. (2021). The Integrated Physics Learning E-Module with Pancasila Character Values in Work and Energy Subjects as Solution to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Ability and Independence: Is It Effective? Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 10(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v10i1.7749

Sinaga, P., Suhandi, A., & Liliasari. (2014). Improving the Ability of Writing Teaching Materials and Self-Regulation of Pre-Service Physics Teachers through Representational Approach. International Journal of Science: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 15(1), 80–94. Retrieved from https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:58129702.

Siswanto, J., Susantini, E., & Jatmiko, B. (2018). Multi-representation based on scientific investigation for enhancing students’ representation skills Multi-representation based on scientific investigation for enhancing students’ representation skills. International Conference on Mathematics, Science and Education 2017 (ICMSE2017), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012034.

Skrabankova, J., Popelka, S., & Beitlova, M. (2020). Students’ Ability to Wor with Graphs in Physics Studies Related to Three Typical Student Group. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(2), 298–316. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.298.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta, CV.

Treagust, D. F., & Duit, R. (2017). Multiple Representations in Physics Education. Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-58914-5?.

Ubaidillah, M., & Wilujeng, I. (2019). Developing Physics SSP Based on the Problem Solving to Improve the Process Skills and Problem-Solving Ability. Journal of Science Education Research, 3(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v3i1.27325

Wawro, M., Watson, K., & Christensen, W. (2020). Students ’ metarepresentational competence with matrix notation and Dirac notation in quantum mechanics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020112

Wei, B., Wang, C., & Tan, L. (2022). Visual representation of optical content in China’s and Singapore’s junior secondary physics textbooks. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(2), 20138. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.020138

Weng, X., Cui, Z., Ng, O.-L., Jong, M. S. Y., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2022). Characterizing Students’ 4C Skills Development During Problem-based Digital Making. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(3), 372–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09961-4

Yeşildağ Hasançevi, F., & Günel, M. (2013). College Students’ Perceptions toward the Multi Modal Representations and Instruction of Representations in Learning Modern Physics. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 53, 197–214. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2013.53.11

Yulkifli, Jaafar, R., & Resnita, L. (2020). Developing Student Worksheets Using Inquiry - based Learning Model with Scientific Approach to Improve Tenth Grade Students ’ Physics Competence. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 10(01), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v101.p56

Author Biographies

Metta Liana, Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji

Parlindungan Sinaga, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Emiliannur, Universitas Negeri Padang

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Metta Liana, Parlindungan Sinaga, Emiliannur

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).