Differences in Creative Thinking Abilities of High School Students from Village and City
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v7i1.354Published:
2020-12-10Downloads
Abstract
This study aims to distinguish the creative thinking ability of high school students in Biology subject. This research method uses a quantitative approach and the type of research is descriptive. The population that used was all students of XII MIPA of high school in rural and urban areas by taking a sample of 30 students per each school. The instrument that used was a test of creative thinking ability on chapter ‘Animalia’ in the form of 40 multiple choice questions that contained indicators of creative thinking ability. This research used descriptive qualitative analysis with data collection techniques using cognitive observation techniques. The results showed that there was a difference between the student’s ability to think creatively in rural school (village) and urban school (city).
Keywords:
Creative thinking ability senior high school in rural senior high school in urbanReferences
Abidin, Y. (2016). Revitalisasi Penilaian Pembelajran dalam Konteks Pendidikan Multiliterasi Abad-21. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Agustina, W., & Noor, F. (2016). Hubungan hasil belajar dan tingkat berpikir kreatif siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika. Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(3), 191-200. https://doi.org/10.33654/math.v2i3.49.
Anas, A.Y,. Riana, A., Wahyudi, A., & Nurliana, C. (2015). Desa dan Kota dalam Potret Pendidikan. Prosiding KS : Riset dan PKM. 2 (3): 418-422. doi: https://doi.org/10.24198/jppm.v2i3.13592
Arikunto, S. (2016). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Arnyana, I. B. P. (2007). Pengembangan peta pikiran untuk peningkatan kecakapan berpikir kreatif siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran UNDIKSHA, 3, 670-683.
Fardah, D.K. (2012). Analisis Proses dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dalam Matematika Melalui Tugas Open-Ended. Jurnal Kreano, 3(3), 1-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v3i2.2616
Hwang, G,J. (2014). Effects of Mobile Learning Time on Students' Conception Of Collaboration, Communication, Complex Problem-Solving, Meta-Cognitive Awareness And Creativity. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organization, 8(4): 276. doi: 10.1504/IJMLO.2014.067029
Kusuma, R.D., Rohman, F., & Syamsuri, I. (2017). Permasalahan dalam Pembeljaran Biologi pada Jurusan Pertanian SMK Negeri 1 Kademangan Blitar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional III Tahun 2017. 133-136.
Li, Y., & Ranieri, M. (2013). Educational and Social Correlates of the digital divide for rural and urban children: A study on Primary School Students in A Provincial City of China. Comput. Educ, 60: 197-209. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.001
Mahmudi, A. (2010). Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis. Konferensi Nasional Matematika XV (pp. 1-9). Manado: Unima Press.
Mardapi, D. (2008). Tekniik Penyusunan Instrumen Tes dan No-tes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendikia Offset.
Marwiyah, S., Kamid, & Risnita. (2015). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif pada Mata Pelajaran IPA Terpadu Materi Atom, Ion, dan Molekul SMP Islam Al Falah. Edu-Sains. 4 (1). doi:https://doi.org/10.22437/jmpmipa.v4i1.2365
Maya, A., Ginting, N., & Tuah, S. (2019). Upaya Meningkatkan Kreativitas Belajar Biologi Siswa Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Number Head Together (NHT) Di MAN Siabu. PeTeKa, 2(1), 1-8. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.31604/ptk.v2i1.1-8.
Meilasari, T. (2018). Pengembangan Asesmen Biologi Berbasis Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Pada Materi Animalia Kelas X di SMA Negeri 1 Pangkalan Lampam Oki. Skripsi Pendidikan Biologi UIN Raden Fatah Palembang.
Munandar, U. (2009). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Opoku-Asare, N. A. A., & Siaw, A. O. (2015). Rural–Urban Disparity in Students’ Academic Performance in Visual Arts Education: Evidence From Six Senior High Schools in Kumasi, Ghana. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015612523.
Park, H., Ribière, V., & Schulte, W. D. (2004). Critical attributes of organizational culture that promote knowledge management technology implementation success. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(3), 106-117. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270410541079
Prasetyo, A. (2016). Perbedaan Kreativitas Siswa SMP di Desa dengan Siswa SMP di Kota. Skripsi Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.
Putra, R.D., Rinanto, Y., Dwiastuti, S., & Rifa’i, I. (2016). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa melalui Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing pada Siswa Kelas XI MIA 1 SMA Negeri Colomadu Karanganyar Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016. Proceeding Biology Education Conference. 13(1) : 330-334.
Sarwinda, W. (2012). Pemberdayaan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Melalui Strategi Reciprocal Teaching Pada Pembelajaran Biologi SMA. In Proceeding Biology Education Conference: Biology, Science, Enviromental, and Learning. 10 (2), 254-258.
Shi, B., Dai, D. Y., & Lu, Y. (2016). Openness to Experience as a Moderator of the Relationship between Intelligence and Creative Thinking: A Study of Chinese Children in Urban and Rural Areas. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 641. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00641.
Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55(1), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.151.
Sudjana, N. (2005). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sujana, A. (2017). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMA. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Matematka, 10(2), 8-13. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v10i2.2025
Suryadi, D., & Herman, T. (2008). Eksplorasi matematika pembelajaran pemecahan masalah. Jakarta: Karya Duta Wahana.
Syah, M. (2014). Psikologi Pendidikan dengan Pendekatan Baru. Bandung: Rosdakarya.
Tarnoto, N., Purnamasari, A. (2009). Perbedaan Kreativitas Siswa SMP N 2 Moyudan Ditinjau dari Tingkat Pendidikan Ibu. Humanitas.
License
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
