Analyzing of Using Case Method Based on Flipped Classroom on Student Learning Outcomes

Authors

Ismul Huda , Putri Desriana , Safrida , Cut Nurmaliah , Muhibbuddin

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.3844

Published:

2023-06-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 6 (2023): June

Keywords:

Case method, Flipped classroom, Quasi experimental, Student performance

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Huda, I., Desriana, P. ., Safrida, S., Nurmaliah, C. ., & Muhibbuddin, M. (2023). Analyzing of Using Case Method Based on Flipped Classroom on Student Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(6), 4103–4108. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.3844

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

An important goal of learning system is to deliver instruction that can produce equal or better learning outcomes. To achieve this goal, the number of research has been conducted to address the issue of what antecedent variables can affect the student learning outcomes. One of the methods which can develop student learning outcomes is case method based on flipped classroom. This research was conducted to analyze student learning outcomes using case method based on flipped classroom. This research is the quasi-experimental research with posttest only control group design. There is the control class and the experimental class in this research with a little of case method vs a lot of case method design.  The participants in this study were 82 biology students using the total sampling technique.  Data were analyzed using ANOVA to analyze the student learning outcome using case method based on flipped classroom. The results of study using case method based on flipped classroom has significant effect on student learning outcomes with a significance value of p < 0.05 with F (6.59) = 3.97, p=.012. Thus, it can be concluded that the case method which is combine with flipped classroom gives the positive impact on student learning outcomes

References

Ananda, R. (2018). The Effectiveness of the Implementation of the Case Methods in the Learning Evaluation Course at State Islamic University of North Sumatera. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 6(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v6i1.171

Ary, D., Jacobs, L., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education (8th ed., Vol. 8). Cengage Learning.

Astriani, D., Susilo, H., Suwono, H., Lukiati, B., & Purnomo, A. R. (2020). Mind mapping in learning models: A tool to improve student metacognitive skills. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(6), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJET.V15I06.12657

Baragash, R. S., & Al-Samarraie, H. (2018). Blended learning: Investigating the influence of engagement in multiple learning delivery modes on students’ performance. Telematics and Informatics, 35(7), 2082–2098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.07.010

Bi, M., Zhao, Z., Yang, J., & Wang, Y. (2019). Comparison of case-based learning and traditional method in teaching postgraduate students of medical oncology. Medical Teacher, 41(10), 1124–1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1617414

Boevé, A. J., Meijer, R. R., Bosker, R. J., Vugteveen, J., Hoekstra, R., & Albers, C. J. (2017). Implementing the flipped classroom: an exploration of study behaviour and student performance. Higher Education, 74(6), 1015–1032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0104-y

Bonney, K. M. (2015). Case Study Teaching Method Improves Student Performance and Perceptions of Learning Gains. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 16(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v16i1.846

Cakmak, Z., & Akgün, I. H. (2017). A Theoretical Perspective on the Case Study Method. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(1), 96. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n1p96

Ceylan, V. K., & Elitok Kesici, A. (2017). Effect of blended learning to academic achievement. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(1), 308. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v14i1.4141

Diana, P. Z., Wirawati, D., & Rosalia, S. (2020). Blended Learning dalam Pembentukan Kemandirian Belajar. Alinea: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajaran, 9(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.35194/alinea.v9i1.763

Efremenko, A. P., Berezhnoy, D. A., Tsilinko, A. P., Lomakina, T. A., & Solovey, A. I. (2020). Case method in vocational training for future specialists of culture and art. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(9), 3793–3798. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080901

Erdem, M., & Kibar, P. N. (2014). Students’ opinions on facebook supported blended learning environment. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 199–206. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1018185

Gillette, C., Rudolph, M., Kimble, C., Rockich-Winston, N., Smith, L., & Broedel-Zaugg, K. (2018). A meta-analysis of outcomes comparing flipped classroom and lecture. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 82(5), 433–440. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6898

Hapsari, R., Hapsari, R. W., Ardianti, S. D., & Ismaya, E. A. (2021). Parents’ Role in Assisting Children in Online Learning During Covid-19 Pandemic. JURNAL PAJAR (Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran), 5(3), 656–662. https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v5i3.8310

Harling, K. F., & Akridge, J. (1998). Using the case method of teaching. Agribusiness, 14(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6297(199801/02)14:1<1::AID-AGR1>3.0.CO;2-8

Hidayati, L. (2021). Case-based Method and its Implementation in English for Medical Purposes. Journal of Language, Literature, and English Teaching (JULIET), 2(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.31629/juliet.v2i2.3695

Huang, M., Huang, H., & Chen, M. (2007). Constructing a personalized e-learning system based on genetic algorithm and case-based reasoning approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(3), 551–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.05.019

Indriyanti, N. Y., & Yamtinah, S. (2020). An Inquiry into Students’ Metacognition and Learning Achievement in a Blended Learning Design. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(21), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i21.12907

Jianli, S. (2012). The Research on Case Method in Management Teaching. IERI Procedia, 3, 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ieri.2012.09.008

Kane, S. N., Mishra, A., & Dutta, A. K. (2016). Preface: International Conference on Recent Trends in Physics (ICRTP 2016). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 755(1), 0–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001

Krain, M. (2016). Putting the Learning in Case Learning? The Effects of Case-Based Approaches on Student Knowledge, Attitudes, and Engagement. The Journal of Excellence in College Teaching, 27(2), 131–153. Retrieved from https://discover.wooster.edu/mkrain/files/2012/12/Krain-JECT2015.pdf

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

Leonard, E. C., & Cook, R. A. (2010). Teaching with cases. Journal of Teaching in Travel and Tourism, 10(1), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220903559296

Liu, W.-Y. (2019). The Use of the Case Method to Promote Reflective Thinking in Teacher Education. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 24(2), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.67.6831

Nurmaliah, C., & Khairil. (2018). Analisis Keterampilan Metakognisi Siswa dengan Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) Pada Konsep Sistem Reproduksi Manusia di SMA Negeri 2 Banda Aceh. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi, 758–763. Retrieved from https://jurnalfkip.unram.ac.id/index.php/SemnasBIO/article/view/718

Schuster, C., Stebner, F., Leutner, D., & Wirth, J. (2020). Transfer of metacognitive skills in self-regulated learning: an experimental training study. Metacognition and Learning, 15(3), 455–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09237-5

Servant-Miklos, V. F. C. (2019). The Harvard Connection: How the Case Method Spawned Problem-Based Learning at McMaster University. Health Professions Education, 5(3), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2018.07.004

Siregar, I. Y., Susilo, H., & Suwono, H. (2017). The effect of think-pair-share-write based on hybrid learning on metacognitive skills, creative thinking and cognitive learning at SMA negeri 3 Malang. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 3(2), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v3i2.4217

Susilo, J., Kartono, K., & Mastur, Z. (2019). Analysis Metacognition and Communication Mathematics in Blended Learning Use Google Classroom. Ujmer:Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 8(1), 72–83. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer/article/view/24825

Tan, C., Yue, W.-G., & Fu, Y. (2017). Effectiveness of flipped classrooms in nursing education: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Chinese Nursing Research, 4(4), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnre.2017.10.006

van Alten, D. C. D., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2019). Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 100281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.003

Van Vliet, E. A., Winnips, J. C., & Brouwer, N. (2015). Flipped-class pedagogy enhances student metacognition and collaborative-learning strategies in higher education but effect does not persist. CBE Life Sciences Education, 14(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-09-0141

Vernadakis, N., Giannousi, M., Derri, V., Michalopoulos, M., & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2012). The impact of blended and traditional instruction in students’ performance. Procedia Technology, 1, 439–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2012.02.098

Whittaker, C., & van Garderen, D. (2009). Using a Metacognitive Approach with Case-Based Instruction to Enhance Teacher Reflection and Promote Effective Educational Practices for Diverse Learners. Action in Teacher Education, 31(2), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2009.10463514

Author Biographies

Ismul Huda, Universitas Syiah Kuala

Putri Desriana, Universitas Syiah Kuala

Safrida, Universitas Syiah Kuala

Cut Nurmaliah, Universitas Syiah Kuala

Muhibbuddin, Universitas Syiah Kuala

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Ismul Huda

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).