The Contribution of the Inquiry Learning Model to Student Scientific Argumentation Skills on Fluid
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.4012Published:
2023-09-25Downloads
Abstract
The inquiry learning model is a model that facilitates the construction of students' scientific knowledge which can also improve students' argumentation skills. According to several research results, inquiry-based learning has proven to be effective in improving scientific argumentation skills because in the learning process students are directed in investigative activities to find scientific evidence as a basis for scientific argumentation. By considering the student learning process, the aim of this research is to describe whether the use of three types of inquiry learning models can teach fluid material and influence the student learning process, one of which is students' argumentation abilities. This research method uses mixed method triangulation. The instruments used were interview questionnaires and argumentation tests. The data obtained was then analyzed using simple statistical tests and N-gain scores. Interview data was analyzed to find out clarification of students' answers. The research results of the inquiry learning model were successful in developing argumentation skills, namely the n-gain score resulted in the use of the structured inquiry learning model gaining 0.88, the guided inquiry learning model 0.84 and the open inquiry learning model 0.74.
Keywords:
Fluid Inquiry learning model Scientific argumentationReferences
Buchanan, S., Harlan, M., Bruce, C., & Edwards, S. (2016). Inquiry Based Learning Models, Information Literacy, and Student Engagement: A literature review. School Libraries Worldwide, 23–39. https://doi.org/10.29173/slw6914
Damşa, C. I., & Nerland, M. (2016). Student Learning Through Participation in Inquiry Activities: Two Case Studies in Teacher and Computer Engineering Education. Vocations and Learning, 9(3), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-016-9152-9
Epinur, E., & Minarni, M. (2023). Development of Student Worksheets on the Inquiry-Flipped Classroom Model on Addictive and Addictive Substance Material to Improve Student’s Argumentation Abilities. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(8), 6292–6299. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.4499
Fakhriyah, F., Rusilowati, A., Nugroho, S. E., Saptono, S., Ridlo, S., Mindyarto, B., & Susilaningsih, E. (2022). The scientific argumentative skill analysis reviewed from the science literacy aspect of pre-service teacher. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(4), 2129–2139. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i4.22847
Falk, A., Brodsky, L., & Hall, L. (2013). Inquiry-Based Science Instruction. 13(1), 27–55. https://doi.org/10.25891/8B5N-RJ84
Frey, B. B., Ellis, J. D., Bulgren, J., Craig-Hare, J., & Ault, M. (2015). Development of a Test of Scientific Argumentation. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 19(4). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1188271.pdf
Gültepe, N., & Kılıç, Z. (2021). The Effects of Scientific Argumentation on High School Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(6), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.382.13
Hosbein, K. N., Lower, M. A., & Walker, J. P. (2021). Tracking Student Argumentation Skills across General Chemistry through Argument-Driven Inquiry Using the Assessment of Scientific Argumentation in the Classroom Observation Protocol. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(6), 1875–1887. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01225
Hwang, G. J., Zou, D., & Wu, Y. X. (2023). Learning by storytelling and critiquing: a peer assessment-enhanced digital storytelling approach to promoting young students’ information literacy, self-efficacy, and critical thinking awareness. Educational Technology Research and Development, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10184-y
Katchevich, D., Hofstein, A., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2013). Argumentation in the Chemistry Laboratory: Inquiry and Confirmatory Experiments. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 317–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9267-9
Lin, V., Barrett, N. E., Liu, G. Z., & Chen, H. H. J. (2023). A Systematic Review on Inquiry-Based Writing Instruction in Tertiary Settings. Written Communication, 40(1), 238–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883221129605
Llewellyn. (2013). Teaching High Scholl Science Through Inquiry and Argumentation. USA: Corwin.
Moutinho, S., Torres, J., Almeida, A., & Vasconcelos, C. (2013). Portuguese Teachers ’ Views, 1970, 9–12. Retrieved from https://raco.cat/index.php/Ensenanza/article/view/307888
Muntholib, M., Munadhiroh, A., Setiawan, N. C. E., & Yahmin, Y. (2021). High school students’ scientific argumentation on chemical equilibrium. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330(May 2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043236
RodrÃguez, G., Pérez, N., Núñez, G., Baños, J. E., & Carrió, M. (2019). Developing creative and research skills through an open and interprofessional inquiry-based learning course. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1563-5
Sato, M., Bartiromo, M., & Elko, S. (2016). Investigating your school’s science teaching and learning culture. Phi Delta Kappan, 97(6), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721716636872
Seprianingsih, D.,& Jufri, A. W. (2017). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Biologi Berbasis Inkuiri Terbimbing (Ppbit) Dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berargumen Siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v3i2.86
Setiawan, A., & Jumadi, J. (2023). Analysis of the Implementation of Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) in Students’ Argumentation Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(6), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.2725
Shea, P., Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2022). Building bridges to advance the Community of Inquiry framework for online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2089989
Siregar, N., & Pakpahan, R. A. (2020). Kemampuan Argumentasi IPA Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Argumentasi Driven Inquiry (ADI). LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 10(2), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v10i2.113
Spernes, K., & Afdal, H. W. (2021). Scientific methods assignments as a basis for developing a profession-oriented inquiry-based learning approach in teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 00(00), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1928628
Stanford, C., Moon, A., Towns, M., & Cole, R. (2016). Analysis of Instructor Facilitation Strategies and Their Influences on Student Argumentation: A Case Study of a Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning Physical Chemistry Classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(9), 1501–1513. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00993
Syuzita, A., Susilawati, S., & Sukarso, A. (2023). Validation of E-Module Based on Argument-Driven Inquiry using 3D Page Flip Professional to Improve Students’ Generic Science, Critical Thinking and Scientific Argumentation Abilities. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(8), 6272–6277. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.4947
Tan, C. (2016). Beyond ‘either-or’ thinking: John Dewey and Confucius on subject matter and the learner. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 24(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2015.1083046
Tang, K. S. (2022). Material inquiry and transformation as prerequisite processes of scientific argumentation: Toward a social-material theory of argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(6), 969–1009. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21749
Urdanivia Alarcon, D. A., Talavera-Mendoza, F., Rucano Paucar, F. H., Cayani Caceres, K. S., & Machaca Viza, R. (2023). Science and inquiry-based teaching and learning: a systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1170487
Vishnumolakala, V. R., Southam, D. C., Treagust, D. F., Mocerino, M., & Qureshi, S. (2017). Students’ attitudes, self-efficacy and experiences in a modified process-oriented guided inquiry learning undergraduate chemistry classroom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(2), 340–352. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6rp00233a
Walker, J. P., & Sampson, V. (2013). Learning to argue and arguing to learn: Argumentâ€driven inquiry as a way to help undergraduate chemistry students learn how to construct arguments and engage in argumentation during a laboratory course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(5), 561–596. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21082
Weiss, K. A., McDermott, M. A., & Hand, B. (2022). Characterising immersive argument-based inquiry learning environments in school-based education: a systematic literature review. Studies in Science Education, 58(1), 15–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2021.1897931
Yuliati, Y., Doyan, A., & Sahidu, H. (2021). Development of Inkuiri Model Learning Tools Guided to Improve Concept Mastery Learner Physics. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(3), 422. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i3.564
Zeivots, S., Buchanan, J. D., & Pressick-Kilborn, K. (2023). Pre-service teachers becoming researchers: the role of professional learning groups in creating a community of inquiry. Australian Educational Researcher, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-022-00589-2
Zion, M., & Mendelovici, R. (2012). Moving from structured to open inquiry: Challenges and limits. Science Education International, 23(4), 383–399. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1001631.pdf
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Tutut Nurita, An Nuril Maulida Fauziah, Muhamad Arif Mahdiannur, Enny Susiyawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
