Exploring Chemistry Teacher’s TPCK in Rasch Model: A Point of View from Difference of Teaching Stage, Gender, and Ages.

Authors

Inas Sausan , Jamaludin , Elda Frediana Rety Kartika , Dola Suciana , Sukma Wahyu Wijayanti

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.4297

Published:

2023-10-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 10 (2023): October

Keywords:

Chemistry Teachers, Perception, Rasch mode, TPCK

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Sausan, I., Jamaludin, Kartika, E. F. R. ., Suciana, D. ., & Wijayanti, S. W. . (2023). Exploring Chemistry Teacher’s TPCK in Rasch Model: A Point of View from Difference of Teaching Stage, Gender, and Ages . Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 7935–7943. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.4297
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Teachers should have different knowledge types including technological, pedagogical, and content to realize effective learning in the digital era. Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPCK) is a framework that explains these knowledge types and the interactions between them. It is considered to enable chemistry teachers’ multifaceted teaching. Coping, for this reason, a study to examine chemistry teachers’ level of TPCK is needed. This paper reports the level of chemistry teacher’s TPCK and their perception in terms of teaching stage, gender, and age. The study involved fifty-three students of chemistry education in a public university in Indonesia. A quantitative method was applied to explore their perspective on TPCK. Data were collected through surveys and interviews. The findings showed that the majority of chemistry teachers’ TPCK skills are currently good. They integrate technology into their teaching while conducting online learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In terms of teaching stage, age, and gender, provide deep insight into seven indicators of TPCK. However, some indicators still need to be improved, so a TPCK training program for individuals or centralized individuals should be added to the chemistry department program.

References

Al-malah, D. K. A., & Majeed, B. H. (2023). Enhancement the Educational Technology by Using 5G Networks. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(01), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i01.36001

Andyani, H., Setyosari, P., Wiyono, B. B., & Djatmika, E. T. (2020). Does technological pedagogical content knowledge impact on the use of ICT in pedagogy? International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(3), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i03.11690

Aqib, M. A., Budiarto, M. T., & Wijayanti, P. (2018). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Prospective Mathematics Teacher in Three Dimensional Material Based on Sex Differences. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012069

Arifianto, C. F., Mutawali, & Subekti, H. (2021). The Teachers’ Online Readiness : An Evaluation of Online Learning during Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Learning, 1(3), 270–282. https://doi.org/10.47134/ijsl.v1i3.63

Aw, J. K., Boellaard, K. C., Tan, T. K., Yap, J., Loh, Y. P., Colasson, B., Blanc, étienne, Lam, Y., & Fung, F. M. (2020). Interacting with Three-Dimensional Molecular Structures Using an Augmented Reality Mobile App. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(10), 3877–3881. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00387

Bai, B., Shen, B., & Mei, H. (2020). Hong Kong primary students’ self-regulated writing strategy use: Influences of gender, writing proficiency, and grade level. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100839

Blamire, R., Balanskat, A., & Kefala, S. (2006). The ICT Impact Report - A review of studies of ICT impact on schools in Europe. In Bridge it: Tematic Network (Issue December).

Cetin-Dindar, A., Boz, Y., Yildiran Sonmez, D., & Demirci Celep, N. (2018). Development of pre-service chemistry teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00175D

Chittleborough, G. (2014). Learning How to Teach Chemistry with Technology: Pre-Service Teachers’ Experiences with Integrating Technology into Their Learning and Teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(4), 373–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9387-y

Dampil, F. (2015). The Influence of Educational Technology in Improving the Performance of Students in Chemistry. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(11), 822–825. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2015.v5.619

Engida, T. (2014). Chemistry teacher professional development using the (TPACK) framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 4(May), 2–21. Retrieved from https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajce/article/view/104084

Fuad, M., Ariyani, F., Suyanto, E., & Shidiq, A. S. (2020). Exploring teachers’ TPACK: Are indonesian language teachers ready for online learning during the COVID-19 outbreak? Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11B), 6091–6102. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082245

Gawlik-Kobylińska, M., Walkowiak, W., & MacIejewski, P. (2020). Improvement of a Sustainable World through the Application of Innovative Didactic Tools in Green Chemistry Teaching: A Review. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(4), 916–924. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b01038

Goodson, I. F., & Mangan, J. M. (1995). Subject Cultures and the Introduction of Classroom Computers. British Educational Research Journal, 21(5), 613–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192950210505

Goodyear, P. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 82–101. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1344

Guan, H., & Wang, L. (2019). Research on the Countermeasures for the Development of Informatization Teaching Ability of University Teachers. In 2018 International Workshop on Education Reform and Social Sciences, 300, 711–716. https://doi.org/10.2991/erss-18.2019.140

Guzey, S. S., & Roehrig, G. H. (2009). Teaching Science with Technology: Case Studies of Science Teachers’ Development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK). Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 25–45.

Habibi, A., Yusop, F. D., & Razak, R. A. (2020). The role of TPACK in affecting pre-service language teachers’ ICT integration during teaching practices: Indonesian context. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 1929–1949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10040-2

Hatlevik, O. E. (2016). Examining the Relationship between Teachers’ Self-Efficacy, their Digital Competence, Strategies to Evaluate Information, and use of ICT at School. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(5), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1172501

Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2011). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in Action: A Descriptive Study of Secondary Teacher's Curriculum-Based, Technology-Related Instructional Planing. Journal of Research On Technology in Education, 43(3), 211-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782570

Henry, M. (2020). Online student expectations: A multifaceted, student-centred understanding of online education. Student Success, 11(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.1678

Howard, S. K., Chan, A., & Caputi, P. (2015). More than beliefs: Subject areas and teachers’ integration of laptops in secondary teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 360–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12139

Judd, T. (2018). The rise and fall (?) of the digital natives. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(5), 99–119. https://doi.org/AE 2013029

Kartika, E. F. R., VH, E. S., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2021). Development And Validation Of Web-Based STEAM Online Platfrom To Improve Learning Quality In Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(2), 513–525. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8302410

Kay, R. H. (2009). Examining gender differences in attitudes toward interactive classroom communications systems (ICCS). Computers and Education, 52(4), 730–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.015

Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2013). Missing: evidence of a scholarly approach to teaching and learning with technology in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.773419

Kivunja, C. (2014). Theoretical Perspectives of How Digital Natives Learn. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n1p94

Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2013). Teachers’ Content Knowledge and Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Role of Structural Differences in Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112460398

Koh, J. H. L., & Sing, C. C. (2011). Modeling pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) perceptions: The influence of demographic factors and TPACK constructs. ASCILITE 2011 - The Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, 2011, 735–746.

Lambert, J., & Gong, Y. (2010). 21st Century paradigms for pre-service teacher technology preparation. Computers in the Schools, 27(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380560903536272

Li, S., Liu, Y., & Su, Y. S. (2022). Differential Analysis of Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Abilities according to Teaching Stages and Educational Levels. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127176

Manfra, M. M., & Hammond, T. C. (2008). Teachers’ instructional choices with student-created digital documentaries: Case studies. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(2), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2008.10782530

Markuna, M. (2022). Online Learning Activities During the Covid-19 Pandemic. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 11(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v11i1.29251

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610

Morine-Dershimer, G., & Kent, T. (2006). The Complex Nature and Sources of Teachers’ Pedagogical Knowledge. In Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge, 21–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47217-1_2

Mosa, A. A., Naz’ri bin Mahrin, M., & Ibrrahim, R. (2016). Technological Aspects of E-Learning Readiness in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature. Computer and Information Science, 9(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.5539/cis.v9n1p113

Munzil, M., & Rochmawati, S. (2021). Development of e-learning teaching materials based on guided inquiry models equipped with augmented reality on hydrocarbon topics as teaching materials for COVID-19 pandemic. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043238

Mutanga, P., Nezandonyi, J., & Bhukuvhani, C. (2018). Enhancing engineering education through technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK): A case study. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 14(3), 38–49.

Paidi, Subali, B., & Handoyo, L. D. (2021). The Mastery of Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge among Indonesian Biology Teachers. In European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3) 1063-1073. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1307666

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Native, Digital Immigrant Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816

Rakaj, D. (2023). University Professors‟ Perceptions of Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(1), 176–180. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.1.1793

Rolf, E., Knutsson, O., & Ramberg, R. (2019). An analysis of digital competence as expressed in design patterns for technology use in teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3361–3375. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12739

Salehudin, M., Zulherman, Z., Arifin, A., & Napitupulu, D. (2021). Extending Indonesia Government Policy for E-Learning and Social Media Usage. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 11(2), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2021.00

Setiawan, H., Phillipson, S., Sudarmin, & Isnaeni, W. (2019). Current trends in TPACK research in science education: A systematic review of literature from 2011 to 2017. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012213

Suyamto, J., Masykuri, M., & Sarwanto, S. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Tpack (Technolgical, Pedagogical, and Content, Knowledge) Guru Biologi Sma Dalam Menyusun Perangkat Pembelajaran Materi Sistem Peredaran Darah. INKUIRI: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.20961/inkuiri.v9i1.41381

Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2012). Technological pedagogical content knowledge - A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x

Waycott, J., Bennett, S., Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., & Gray, K. (2010). Digital divides? Student and staff perceptions of information and communication technologies. Computers and Education, 54(4), 1202–1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.006

Zimmermann, F., Melle, I., & Huwer, J. (2021). Developing Prospective Chemistry Teachers’ TPACK-A Comparison between Students of Two Different Universities and Expertise Levels Regarding Their TPACK Self-Efficacy, Attitude, and Lesson Planning Competence. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(6), 1863–1874. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01296

Author Biographies

Inas Sausan, Universitas Terbuka

Jamaludin, Universitas Terbuka

Elda Frediana Rety Kartika, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Dola Suciana, Universitas Terbuka

Sukma Wahyu Wijayanti, Universitas Terbuka

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Inas Sausan, Jamaludin, Elda Frediana Rety Kartika, Dola Suciana, Sukma Wahyu Wijayanti

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).