Literature Review of the Concepts of Elasticity and Oscillation in Fundamental Physics 1: Various Research Variables, Educational Level, and Instructional Methods
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.4327Published:
2023-07-25Issue:
Vol. 9 No. 7 (2023): JulyKeywords:
Educational level, Elasticity, Instructional method, Literature review, OscillationReview
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive overview of the concepts of elasticity and vibration, based on research variables, educational levels, and teaching strategies. The article is organized based on queries conducted in reputable international databases, such as Scopus and Web of Science, using content analysis techniques, such as analyzing article identities, educational information, synthesis of used approaches, and measured variables. In the topics of elasticity and oscillation, qualitative, quantitative, and hybrid methods can be used to investigate a variety of variables, as indicated by the research findings. Among these variables are conceptual comprehension, academic achievement, and student interest. In addition, the educational level being investigated determines how elasticity and oscillation concepts are taught in the classroom. These findings highlight the significance of utilizing a variety of instructional strategies to effectively convey the concept of elasticity and oscillation to measure various variables with practical consideration on educational settings. In addition, our review provides a comprehensive list of common variables research that can serve as a valuable resource for educators and researchers seeking to enhance their elasticity and oscillation research. This systematic review highlights the need for additional research on effective teaching methods for oscillation and provides educators and researchers with useful insights.
References
Adal, E. E., & Cakiroglu, J. (2022). Investigation of Preservice Science Teachers’ Nature of Science Understanding and Decision Making on Socioscientific Issue through the Fractal Model. Science and Education, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00319-1
Alvarez, K. S. (2021). Using virtual simulations in online laboratory instruction and active learning exercises as a response to instructional challenges during COVID-19. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 22(2), 4. https://doi.org/10.1128/JMBE.V22I1.2503
Aygün, B. M., & Hacıoğlu, Y. (2022). Teaching the Sound Concept : A Review of Science and Physics Education Postgraduate Theses in Turkey. Athen Journal of Education, 9(2), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.9-2-5
Bolinger, M. T. (2022). Experiments in Strategy Research: A Critical Review and Future Research Opportunities. In Journal of Management (Vol. 48, Issue 1, pp. 77–113). https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211044416
Borrachero, A. B., BrÃgido, M., Dávila, M. A., Costillo, E., Cañada, F., & Mellado, V. (2019). Improving the self-regulation in prospective science teachers: the case of the calculus of the period of a simple pendulum. Heliyon, 5(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02827
Bouquet, F., Dauphin, C., Bernard, F., & Bobroff, J. (2019). Low-cost experiments with everyday objects for homework assignments. Physics Education, 54(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/aaf6d6
Cahill, M. J., McDaniel, M. A., Frey, R. F., Hynes, K. M., Repice, M., Zhao, J., & Trousil, R. (2018). Understanding the relationship between student attitudes and student learning. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 10107. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010107
Cervetti, G. N., Barber, J., Dorph, R., Pearson, P. D., & Goldschmidt, P. G. (2012). The impact of an integrated approach to science and literacy in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(5), 631–658. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21015
Chen, S., Lai, C., Lai, Y., & Su, Y. (2022). Effect of project-based learning on development of students ’ creative thinking. International Journal of Electrical Engineering, 59(3), 232–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020720919846808
Chou, R. J., Liang, C. P., Huang, L. yu, & She, H. C. (2022). The Impacts of Online Skeuomorphic Physics Inquiry–Based Learning With and Without Simulation on 8th Graders’ Scientific Inquiry Performance. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(3), 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09960-5
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
De Oliveira Almeida, G., & Bastos, C. A. R. (2018). Application of the cognitive walkthrough method to evaluate the usability of PhET simulations package to teach physics. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 14(4), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2018100103
Firdaus, T., Erwin, E., & Rosmiati, R. (2019). Learning media free fall motion to reduce misconceptions and improve students’ understanding of the concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032072
Gnesdilow, D. (2022). Comparing Middle School Students’ Science Explanations During Physical and Virtual Laboratories. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09941-0
Hamengkubuwono, Asha, L., Warsah, I., Morganna, R., & Adhrianti, L. (2022). The Effect of Teacher Collaboration as the Embodiment of Teacher Leadership on Educational Management Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1315–1326. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1315
Han, J., Kim, K. H., Rhee, W., & Cho, Y. H. (2021). Learning analytics dashboards for adaptive support in face-to-face collaborative argumentation. Computers and Education, 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104041
Leite, F., Kin, B., Kellen, K., SÃlvio, S., & Cazella, C. (2023). A systematic literature review on educational recommender systems for teaching and learning : research trends , limitations and opportunities. In Education and Information Technologies. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11341-9
Lui, C. J., Ferrin, S. E., Baum, D. R., & Randall, V. E. (2020). The Preferred Perceptual Learning Styles of Hispanic Higher Education Students. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 19(4), 404–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192718801793
Priemer, B., Pfeiler, S., & Ludwig, T. (2020). Firsthand or secondhand data in school labs: It does not make a difference. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1), 13102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.013102
Rinaldi, R. G., & Fauzi, A. (2020). A complete damped harmonic oscillator using an Arduino and an Excel spreadsheet. Physics Education, 55(1), ab539d. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ab539d
Robertson, A. D., & Hairston, W. T. (2022). Observing whiteness in introductory physics: A case study. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(1), 10119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.010119
Sáiz-Manzanares, M. C. (2021). Improve teaching with modalities and collaborative groups in an LMS: an analysis of monitoring using visualisation techniques. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 33(3), 747–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09289-9
Santyasa, I. W., Warpala, I. W. S., & Tegeh, I. M. (2018). The Effect of Conceptual Change Model in the Senior High School Students’ Understanding and Character in Learning Physics. SHS Web of Conferences, 42, 00058. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184200058
Schmid, R., Pauli, C., & Petko, D. (2022). Examining the use of digital technology in schools with a school ‑ wide approach to personalized learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10167-z
Shubha, S., & Meera, B. N. (2019). The Effect of Visual Representation in Developing Conceptual Understanding of Magnetic Force. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 3(1), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-019-00031-4
Sibgatullin, I. R., Korzhuev, A. V., Khairullina, E. R., Sadykova, A. R., Baturina, R. V., & Chauzova, V. (2022). A Systematic Review on Algebraic Thinking in Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/11486
Starkey, E. M., McKay, A. S., Hunter, S. T., & Miller, S. R. (2018). Piecing together product dissection: How dissection conditions impact student conceptual understanding and cognitive load. Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME, 140(5). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039384
Sumardi, Y., Amalia, A. F., & Prabowo, U. N. (2022). Develoment of The Computer Simulation of Oscillation in Physics Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 18(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v18i1.29040
Sun, M., Wang, M., & Wegerif, R. (2019). Using computer-based cognitive mapping to improve students’ divergent thinking for creativity development. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2217–2233. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12825
Voss, B. L. (2021). Documenting Cultures of Harassment in Archaeology: A Review and Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Studies. In American Antiquity (Vol. 86, Issue 2, pp. 244–260). https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2020.118
Wibowo, F. C., Budi, E., Sanjaya, L. A., Darman, D. R., Sumantri, M. S., & Robby, D. K. (2020). Development of the innovative smart orbital (ISO) medium to improve the cognitive skills on the heat transfer concept. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(5), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.5.8
Widiana, I. K., Sudarma, I. K., & Dibia, I. K. (2021). Integration of Multiple Intelligences in Thematic Instructional Kit in Elementary School. International Journal of Elementary Education, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v5i1.33841
Widodo, A. (2021). Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Dasar-Dasar untuk Praktik. UPI Press.
Widodo, A. P. A., Hufad, A., Sunardi, & Nandiyanto, A. B. D. (2020). Collaborative teaching in heat transfer for slow learner students. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 15(Special Issue), 11–21. Retrieved from https://jestec.taylors.edu.my/Special Issue AASEC2019/AASEC2019_002.pdf
Zandvakili, E., Washington, E., Gordon, E., & Wells, C. (2018). Mastery Learning in the Classroom: Concept Maps, Critical Thinking, Collaborative Assessment (M3CA) Using Multiple Choice Items (MCIs). Journal of Education and Learning, 7(6), 45. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n6p45
Author Biographies
Yudi Kurniawan, STKIP Singkawang
Andi Suhandi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Achmad Samsudin, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Yudi Kurniawan, Andi Suhandi, Achmad Samsudin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).