Validity and Reliability Test of the Learning Independence Questionnaire Instrument in Using Electronic Modules
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.4466Published:
2023-12-20Issue:
Vol. 9 No. 12 (2023): DecemberKeywords:
Questionnaire, Learning independence, Reliability, ValidityResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This research aims to create an instrument that can measure students' learning independence by measuring the level of validity and reliability. The instrument is a questionnaire for student learning independence consisting of 41 statements (20 positive statements and 21 negative statements) with responses based on a Likert scale score of 1 to 5. The research location for the empirical test of learning independence was at SMAN 1 Kalasan class XII MIPA in 3 classes. The number of empirical trial participants was 99 students. The results of the empirical test of the learning independence questionnaire instrument were then analyzed using the Winstep Rasch model program. The quality of the instrument can be determined from the unidimensional assumption test, the suitability test of the statement items to the Rasch model (item fit), and the bias of the statement items with the help of the Winstep program. The results obtained were that in the validity calculation there was 1 invalid statement out of 41 existing statements, namely the statement "I try to study as best as possible to achieve good performance" on the responsibility indicator. The reliability of the learning independence questionnaire instrument regarding the use of electronic modules is 0.93 and is in the very high category, so it can be concluded that the other 40 statements are declared valid and variable so that they can be used as instruments in measuring learning independence regarding the use of electronic modules.
References
Algiani, S. R., Artayasa, I. P., Sukarso, A., & Ramdani, A. (2023). Application of guided inquiry model using self-regulated learning approach to improve student’s creative disposition and creative thinking skill in biology subject. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2836
Aulia, D., Azmi, C., & Fitria, Y. (2023). Implementation of webbed type integrated learning to improve student learning activities. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 7775–7783. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.3959
Bond, T. G. & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the rasch model fundamental measurement in the human science (3rd ed). New York, Routledge.
Boone, W. J, Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Person reliability, item reliability, and more in: rasch analysis in the human science. Springer. Dordrecht.
Cho, M. H., Kim, Y., & Choi, D. (2017). The effect of self-regulated learning on college students’ perceptions of community if inquiry and affective outcomes in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 34, 10-17.
Cukurova, M., Bennett, J., & Abrahams, I. (2018). Student’s knowledge acquisition and ability to apply knowledge into different science contexts in two different independent learning settings. ReseaRch in science & Technological education, 36(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1336709
English, M. C., & Kitsantas, A. (2013). Supporting student self-regulated learning in problem-and project-based learning. Interdisciplinary journal of problem-based learning, 7(2), 6. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1339
Faisal, S., Rusilowati, A., & Susilaningsih, E. (2023). Science literacy assessment instrument for additives and addictive substances: development, validation, and rasch model analysis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 7826-7836. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.4376
Graham, C. R., & Bonk, C. J. (2006). The handbook of Blended Learning. USA. Pfeiffer.
Hizqiyah, I. Y. N., Widodo, A., Sriyati, S., & Ahmad, A. (2023). Development of a digital problem solving skills test instrument: model rasch analysis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(4), 1658–1663. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i4.2671
Hockings, C., Thomas, L., Ottaway, J., & Jones, R. (2018). Independent learning what we do when you are not there. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(3), 145-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1332031
Johnstone, A. H. (1993). The development of chemistry teaching: a changing response to changing demand. Journal of chemical education, 70(9), 701-705. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed070p701
Liu, S., Zhang, H., Ye, Z., & Wu, G. (2020). Online blending learning model of school-enterprise cooperation and course certificate integration during the covid-19 epidemic. Science Journal of Education, 8(2), 66-70. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20200802.16
Lu’luilmaknun, U., & Wutsqa, D. U. (2018). Efektivitas media e-learning dengan metode guided discovery ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar matematika siswa. Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 413-424. Retrieved from https://ojs.fkip.ummetro.ac.id/index.php/matematika/article/view/1572
Martin, A. J., & Evans, P. (2018). Load reduction instruction: Exploring a framework that assesses explicit instruction through to independent learning. Teaxhing and Teacher Education, 73(1), 203-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.018
Martinis, Y. (2007). Desain pembelajaran berbasis tingkat satuan pendidikan. Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press.
Mukhlisa, R., Gani, A., Winarni, S., Khaldun, I., & Hanum, L. (2021). Independence of learning and achievement of learners’ cognitive abilities in thermochemical materials through the application of flipped classroom. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(4), 523–530. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i4.674
Najuah, N., Lukitoyo, P. S., & Wirianti, W. (2020). Modul elektronik: prosedur penyusunan dan aplikasinya. Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Nastiti, F. E., & Abdu, A. R. N. (2020). Kajian: kesiapan pendidikan indonesia menghadapi era society 5.0. Edcomtech, 5(1), 61-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um039v5i12020p061
Nursakinah, S., & Suyanta, S. (2023). Influence of models discovery learning to critical thinking ability and scientific attitude of students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 8879–8889. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.4792
Rakhmawan, A., Firman, H., Redjeki, S., & Mulyani, S. (2018). Contribution of logical thinking ability to students’ achievement in three level of representations in chemical dynamic materials. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 4(2), 116-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v4i2.4102
Rifa’i, M. (2019). Analisis respon dan kemandirian belajar mahasiswa stkip qomaruddin Gresik terhadap penggunaan modul elektronik kalkulus berbasis geogebra. SNHRP, 55-62. Retrieved from https://snhrp.unipasby.ac.id/prosiding/index.php/snhrp/article/view/37
Shah, U. V., Chen, W., Inguva, P., Chadha, D., & Brechtelsbauer, C. (2020). The discovery laboratory part II: A framework for in incubating independent learning. Education for Chemical Engineers, 31, 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2020.03.003
Sirait, J. (2023). Development and validation of physics learning motivation survey (plms) using rasch analysis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 4063–4069. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.3481
Song, L., & Hill, J. R. (2007). A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(1), 27-42. Retrieved from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=92b2b47bdc0836b2b8caf2e397b0e6216ea46bd2
Subagja, S., Rubini, B., & Kurniasih, S. (2023). Development and validation of a test of science process skills for secondary students on cellular living system organization matter: rasch model analysis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 9056–9062. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.5177
Suhendri, H. (2011). Pengaruh Kecerdasan matematis-logis dan kemandirian belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Jurnal Formatif, 1(3), 29-39. Retrieved from https://journal.lppmunindra.ac.id/index.php/Formatif/article/view/61
Sumintono, B. & Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi model rasch untuk penelitian ilmu-ilmu sosial. Cimahi. Trim Komunikata Publishing House.
Suyanto, S. (2005). Dasar-dasar pendidikan usia dini. Yogyakarta, Hikayat Publishing.
Syam, I. K., & Louise, I. S. Y. (2023). Implementation of electronic module based multiple representation on buffer solution materials to improve students’ self-regulated learning and cognitive learning outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 7816-7825. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.3656
UNESCO. (2020). COVID-19 Educational disruption and response. UNESCO. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/news/covid-19-educational-disruption-and-response.
Warlinda, Y. A., Yerimadesi, Y., Hardeli, H., & Andromeda, A. (2022). Implementation of guided discovery learning model with sets approach assisted by e-modul chemistry on scientific literacy of students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(2), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1264
Woi, M.F. & Prihatni, Y. (2019). Hubungan antara kemandirian belajar dengan hasil belajar matematika. Teacher in Educational Research, 1(1), 1-8.
WHO. (2020). Coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) situation report -77. World Health Organization Retrieved from https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200406-sitrep-77-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=21d1e632_2
Author Biographies
Siti Imroatus Sa'adah, Magister Pendidikan Kimia, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Jalan Colombo No.1 Karang Malang, Sleman, Yogyakarta
Jaslin Ikhsan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Siti Imroatus Sa'adah, Jaslin Ikhsan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
