Development of Argumentation Skills Assessment Instruments on Buffer Solution Material

Authors

Fitria Rahmatul Ula , Suyono

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.4760

Published:

2023-12-20

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 12 (2023): December

Keywords:

Argumentation Skills, Assesment Instrument, Buffer Solution, Development, Reliability, Validity

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Ula, F. R. ., & Suyono. (2023). Development of Argumentation Skills Assessment Instruments on Buffer Solution Material. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 10792–10799. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.4760
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This research aims to produce a qualified argumentation skill assessment according the criteria of validity and reliability. This research is a development research with the ADDIE model whose implementation is limited to the pilot implementation and the evaluation formative evaluation. The subject of this research was an argumentation skills assesment in buffer solutions implemented in 18 students grade XI of SMA Trensains Tebuireng. The research instruments are review sheets, validation sheets, and argumentation skill test sheets. The results of content validity gain a mode with scores of 4 and 5 with valid and very valid criteria. In the construct aspect, gain a mode with a score of 5 with very valid criteria. The empirical validity result of the five questions in order is 0.791; 0.876; 0.961; 0.927; and 0.871. The calculated value appropriate with the criteria of rcalculate > rtable so that it can be declared valid. The value of reliability obtained 0.922 is greater than the rtable which is 0.468. With such results, the instrument can be declared reliable. Based on the results of the analysis, the argumentation skill assessment instrument is qualified to be used to measure students' argumentation skills on buffer solution material.

References

Abduh, N. K., Sastromiharjo, A., & Anshori, D. S. (2019). Pola Argumentasi Pada Genre Teks Eksposisi Karangan Siswa Sma. RETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 12(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.26858/retorika.v12i1.7372

Afni, A. N., & Suyono, S. (2021). Kelayakan Lembar Penugasan Terstruktur pada Materi Laju Reaksi untuk Melatihkan Literasi Sains. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.1.16-25

Ain, T. N., Wibowo, H. A. C., Rohman, A., & Deta, U. A. (2018). The scientific argumentation profile of physics teacher candidate in Surabaya. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 997(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/997/1/012025

Amalia, W. N., Amir, H., & Sumpono, S. (2019). Studi Perbandingan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Menggunakan Model Kooperatif Tipe Take and Give Dan Think Pair Square Di Kelas Xi Ipa Sma Negeri 1 Rejang Lebong. Alotrop, 3(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.33369/atp.v3i1.9026

Ambiyar, & Panyahuti. (2020). Asesmen Pembelajaran Berbasis Komputer dan Android. Prenada Media.

Azwar, S. (2018). Reliabilitas dan Validitas (4th ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.

Dachliyani, L. (2020). Instrumen Yang Sahih : Sebagai Alat Ukur Keberhasilan Suatu Evaluasi Program Diklat (Evaluasi Pembelajaran). Media Informasi Dan Komunikasi Diklat Kepustakawanan, 5(1), 57–65. Retrieved from https://ejournal.perpusnas.go.id/md/article/view/721

Devi, N. D. C., VH, E. S., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa SMA pada Materi Larutan Penyangga. JKPK (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan Kimia), 3(3), 152–159. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/jkpk/article/viewFile/23308/18616

Du, Y., Arkesteijn, M. H., den Heijer, A. C., & Song, K. (2020). Sustainable assessment tools for higher education institutions: Guidelines for developing a tool for China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166501

Dwiretno, G., & Setyarsih, W. (2018). Pembelajaran Fisika Menggunakan Model Argument Driven Inquiry (Adi) Untuk Melatihkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Peserta Didik. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika (IPF), 7(2), 337–340. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/inovasi-pendidikan-fisika/article/view/24505

Elyani, E., Sumpono, S., & Amir, H. (2019). Perbandingan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Structured Numbered Heads (Snh) Dan Numbered Head Together (Nht) Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Kelas X Mipa Sman 6 Kota Bengkulu. Alotrop, 3(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.33369/atp.v3i1.9046

Erlinawati, E., & Muslimah, M. (2021). Test Validity and Reliability in Learning Evaluation. Bulletin of Community Engagement, 1(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.51278/bce.v1i1.96

Fidia, F., Puspitawati, R. P., & Yakub, P. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Soal Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTs) Materi Jaringan dan Organ pada Tumbuhan Kelas XI SMA. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi (BioEdu), 11(3), 745–754. https://doi.org/10.26740/bioedu.v11n3.p745-754

Hidayati, R., Kusmanto, A. S., & Kiswantoro, A. (2023). Development and Construct Validation of Indonesian Students Self-Confidance Scale Using Pearson Product Moment. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(3), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.03.11

Imania, K. A., & Bariah, S. K. (2019). Rancangan Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Pembelajaran Berbasis Daring. Jurnal Petik, 5(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.31980/jpetik.v5i1.445

Irvan, A., & Admoko, S. (2020). Analisis kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa bebasis pola toulmin’s argument pattern (tap) menggunakan model argument driven inquiry dan diskusi pada pembelajaran fisika SMA. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 9(3), 318-324. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/inovasi-pendidikan-fisika/article/view/35092/31224

Jumadi, J., Perdana, R., Riwayani, & Rosana, D. (2021). The impact of problem-based learning with argument mapping and online laboratory on scientific argumentation skill. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20593

Kamilahrohmawati. (2018). Validity And Effectiveness Of Student Worksheet Based Toulmin’ S Argument. BIOEDUSAINS:Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Dan Sains, 7(3), 450–458.

Marselina, K. T., Lasmawan, I. W., & Dantes, N. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dan Hasil Belajar Ips Pada Siswa Kelas V Sd. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Indonesia, 11(2), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpepi.v11i2.620

Permata Sari, I. (2018). Analisis Keterampilan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa Kelas Xi Ipa Menggunakan Model Toulmin’s Argument Pattern (Tap) Dengan Penerapan Metode Problem Solving. Institut Agama Islam Negeri (Iain) Batusangkar.

Prajoko, S., Anjani, A., Oktaviani, R. D., Fathimah, P., & Kamaludin, W. (2021). Development of Self-assessment Instruments to Measure Student Affective Domains on Online Biology Learning. Thabiea : Journal of Natural Science Teaching, 4(2), 185. https://doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v4i2.11964

Putri, F. D. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Berargumentasi Pada Materi Impuls Dan Momentum. Khazanah Pendidikan, 14(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.30595/jkp.v14i1.8463

Rafiqoh, S. (2020). Arah Kecenderungan dan Isu Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Sesuai Pembelajaran Abad 21 Untuk Menghadapi revolusi industri 4.0. Jurnal MathEducation Nusantara, 3(1), 58–73.

Rahayu, Y., Suhendar, & Ratnasari, J. (2020). Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa Pada Materi Sistem Gerak SMA Negeri Kabupaten Sukabumi-Indonesia (Student’s Argumentation Skills on Motion Systems Material at SMA Negeri Sukabumi-Indonesia). Biodik: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 6, 312–318. Retrieved from https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/biodik/article/view/9802

Rahmawati, D., & Suprapto, N. (2019). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Guided Discovery Terhadap Keterampilan Argumentasi Tertulis Peserta Didik SMA. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 8(3), 891-894. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/inovasi-pendidikan-fisika/article/view/30598

Rizky Hilaldy. (2021). Content Validity of English Summative Test. Journal of Language Learning and Research (JOLLAR), 4(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.22236/jollar.v4i1.7708

Sahidu, H., Gunawan, Suranti, N. M. Y., & Nisrina, N. (2020). Model E-Assessment Dan Implikasinya Dalam Pembelajaran. CV. Literasi Nusantara Abadi.

Setiabudi, A., Mulyadi, M., & Puspita, H. (2019). An Analysis of Validity and Reliability of a Teacher-Made Test. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 3(4), 522–532. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.3.4.522-532

Slamet, R., & Wahyuningsih, S. (2022). Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Terhadap Instrumen Kepuasan Ker. Aliansi : Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 17(2), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.46975/aliansi.v17i2.428

Syerliana, L., Muslim, & Setiawan, W. (2018). Argumentation skill profile using “toulmin Argumentation Pattern†analysis of high school student at Subang on topic hydrostatic pressure. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012031

Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Yusup, F. (2018). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jurnal Tarbiyah : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v7i1.2100

Author Biographies

Fitria Rahmatul Ula, State University of Surabaya, Surabaya

Suyono, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Fitria Rahmatul Ula, Suyono

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).