Study of Students' Concept Understanding and Argumentation Levels of Material Magnets at Class VI-IX Level
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.4800Published:
2023-10-25Downloads
Abstract
This study airms to examine differences in understunding the concept of magnets and arguments about magnets at different grade levels. This type of research is survey research. The research subjects consisted of 188 students spread across different grade levels and school in the city of Kupang, namely class VI of elementary school, class VII of junior high school and class IX of junior high school. The method used is the ex post facto method using test instrumens and interview. The data analysis used is the difference test and correlation test. The conclusion obtained after carrying out the research proces and data testing is that there are differences in understanding of the concept of magnets between class VI students who are currently learning about magnets in class VI, class IX students who are currently studying magnets and have studeied magnets in class VI. There are differences in the level of magneic argumentation between class VI students who are currently learning about magnets, class VII students who have studied magnets in class VI and grade IX students who are currently studying magnets and have stidied magnets in grade VI. There is no correlation between understunding of the concept and level of argumentation of magnetic material in class VI elementary school students and class VII students of junior high school.
Keywords:
Arguments Magnets Understunding conceptsReferences
Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2009). A disciplinary discourse perspective on university science learning: Achieving fluency in a critical constellation of modes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20265
Aji, H. W. (2018). Pengaruh Disiplin Belajar Dan Rasa Ingin Tahu Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Ipa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 20(7), 934–939. Retrieved from https://journal.student.uny.ac.id/index.php/pgsd/article/view/11648
Amalia, N. F., Riandi, R., Widodo, A., & Rochintaniawati, D. (2018). Kompleksitas Argumentasi Berbasis Isu Sosiosaintifik pada Jenjang SD, SMP, dan SMA. Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 1(1), 29–32. https://doi.org/10.17509/aijbe.v1i1.11453
Daulay, N. H., Sani, R. A., & others. (2021). An analysis of 4c skill on heat in facing the industrial revolution era 4.0. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1811(1), 12002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1811/1/012002
Fatmawati, D. R., Harlita, & Ramli, M. (2018). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa melalui Action Research dengan Fokus Tindakan Think Pair Share. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 15(1), 253–259. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/view/31790
Fitriani, N., Hidayah, I. S., & Nurfauziah, P. (2021). Live Worksheet Realistic Mathematics Education Berbantuan Geogebra: Meningkatkan Abstraksi Matematis Siswa SMP pada Materi Segiempat. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v5i1.4526
Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning. OER Collection for the pacific https://staging.oer4pacific.org/id/eprint/5
Ginanjar, W. S., Utari, S., & Muslim, D. (2015). Penerapan Model Argument-Driven Inquiry Dalam Pembelajaran Ipa Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa Smp. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 20(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i1.559
Haruna, A., & Nahadi, D. (2021). Menjelajahi Hubungan Level Argumentasi Dengan Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Ikatan Kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 15(1), 2686-2694. https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v15i1.24156
Hasnunidah, N., Susilo, H., Irawati, M., & Suwono, H. (2019). The contribution of argumentation and critical thinking skills on students’ concept understanding in different learning models. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.17.1.6
Izquierdo-Acebes, E., & Taber, K. S. (2023). Secondary Science Teachers’ Instructional Strategies for Promoting the Construction of Scientific Explanations. Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00412-5
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2010). Mental models and human reasoning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(43), 18243–18250. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1012933107
Jumadi, J., Perdana, R., Riwayani, & Rosana, D. (2021). The impact of problem-based learning with argument mapping and online laboratory on scientific argumentation skill. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20593
Kalemkus, J., Bayraktar, Åž., & Ciftci, S. (2021). Comparative Effects of Argumentation and Laboratory Experiments on Metacognition, Attitudes, and Science Process Skills of Primary School Children. Journal of Science Learning, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v4i2.27825
Kartika Sari, W., & Izzatin Nada, E. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia pada Pembelajaran Daring. NCOINS: National Conference Of Islamic Natural Science, 1(1)1-10. Retrieved from Retrieved from http://proceeding.iainkudus.ac.id/index.php/NCOINS/article/view/53
Kathpalia, S. S., & See, E. K. (2016). Improving argumentation through student blogs. System, 58, 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.03.002
Martini, M., Widodo, W., Qosyim, A., Mahdiannur, M. A., & Jatmiko, B. (2021). Improving undergraduate science education students’ argumentation skills through debates on socioscientific issues. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(3), 428–438. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1842/1/012065
Noer, H. A., Setiono, S., & Pauzi, R. Y. (2020). Profil Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa Smp Pada Materi Sistem Pernapasan. Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan, 8(2), 138–144. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpp.v8i2.17702
Noviyani, M., Kusairi, S., & Amin, M. (2016). Penguasaan Konsep dan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa SMP pada Pembelajaran IPA dengan Inkuiri Berbasis Argumen. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 2(7), 974–978. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v2i7.9692
Noviyani, M., Kusairi, S., & Amin, M. (2017). Pembelajaran Ipa Dengan Inkuiri Berbasis Argumen. Jurnal Pendidikan : Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 2(7), 974–978. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/article/view/9692
Paton, D., Smith, L., & Johnston, D. M. (2000). Volcanic Hazards: Risk Perception and Preparedness. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 29, 86–91. Retrieved from https://www.psychology.org.nz/journal-archive/NZJP-Vol292-2000-6-Paton.pdf
Pratiwi, S. N., Cari, C., & Aminah, N. S. (2019). Pembelajaran IPA abad 21 dengan literasi sains siswa. Jurnal Materi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 9(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.20961/jmpf.v9i1.31612
Rahman, D. F. (2018). Analisis Argumentasi dalam Isu Sosiosaintifik Siswa SMP. Thabiea : Journal of Natural Science Teaching, 1(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v1i1.3868
Santika, I. G. N. (2021). Grand desain kebijakan strategis pemerintah dalam bidang pendidikan untuk menghadapi revolusi industri 4.0. Jurnal Education and Development, 9(2), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v9i2.2500
Siswanto, S., Kaniawati, I., & Suhandi, A. (2014). Penerapan model pembelajaran pembangkit argumen menggunakan metode saintifik untuk meningkatkan kemampuan kognitif dan keterampilan berargumentasi siswa. Indonesian Journal of Physics Education, 10(2), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v10i2.3347
Sitompul, H. S. (2022). Psikologi Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar. Get Press.
Sudarmo, N. A., Lesmono, A. D., & Harijanto, A. (2018). Analisis kemampuan berargumentasi ilmiah siswa pada konsep termodinamika. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 7(2), 196–201. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/291838104.pdf
Suprianto, G., Nurdyansyah, N., & Nyong, E. (2020). Analysis of Character Education in Curriculum 13 to Build Moral Awareness in Education at SMA Muhammadiyah 2 Sidoarjo. Proceedings of The ICECRS, 5. https://doi.org/10.21070/icecrs2020404
Viyanti, V., Cari, C., Sunarno, W., & Kun Prasetyo, Z. (2016). Pemberdayaan Keterampilan Argumentasi Mendorong Pemahaman Konsep Siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 7(1), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v7i1.1152
Wahdan, W. Z., Sulistina, O., & Sukarianingsih, D. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Berargumentasi Ilmiah Materi Ikatan Kimia Peserta Didik Sma, Man, Dan Perguruan Tinggi Tingkat I. J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia, 2(2), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.17977/um026v2i22017p030
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Yohana Idamina Betty, I Wayan Dasna, Widiyanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
