The Validity of Online Assessment Instruments for Measuring Higher Order Thinking Skills of High School Students in Physics Subject

Authors

Siti Rahmah , Festiyed

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v11i2.4993

Published:

2025-02-25

Issue:

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): February

Keywords:

Higher order thinking skills, Online assessment instruments, Validity

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Rahmah, S., & Festiyed. (2025). The Validity of Online Assessment Instruments for Measuring Higher Order Thinking Skills of High School Students in Physics Subject. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(2), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i2.4993

Downloads

Metrics

PDF views
16
Feb 25 '25Feb 28 '25Mar 01 '25Mar 04 '25Mar 07 '25Mar 10 '25Mar 13 '25Mar 16 '25Mar 19 '25Mar 22 '25Mar 25 '253.0
|

Abstract

Assessment instruments are assessment tools consisting of tests and non-tests which guide educators in making decisions and obtaining information on students' progress or achievement of competencies. A good assessment instrument has several requirements, including being valid and reliable. Currently there are no valid and reliable assessment instruments available that can measure students' higher order thinking skills, especially in high school physics subjects. This research aims to produce a valid and reliable instrument for measuring students' higher order thinking skills physics. The instrument of this research is questions to measure higher order thinking skills in the form of essay questions. Validity analysis is carried out by proving the validity of the content and criteria. The validity analysis results were 0.44 in the valid category and the reliability results were 0.70 in the high category. The research results show that the instrument has met the appropriate and valid criteria for measuring students' higher order thinking skills.

References

Arif, S., Basyaruddin, & Yuhdi, A. (2020). Integration of High Order Thinking Skills in Research Method Subject in University. Britain International of Linguistics Arts and Education (BIoLAE) Journal, 2(1), 378–383. https://doi.org/10.33258/biolae.v2i1.207

Arikunto, S. (2015a). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Arikunto, S. (2015b). Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Ariningrum, W. (2016). Aspek Materi, Konstruksi Dan Bahasa Pada Soal Sastra Ujian Nasional Tingkat Smk Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Tahun 2014/2015 [Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta]. Retrieved from https://eprints.ums.ac.id/47022/15/NASKAH PUBLIKASI-WEN.pdf

Arnellis, A., Fauzan, A., Arnawa, I. M., & Yerizon, Y. (2020). The Effect of Realistic Mathematics Education Approach Oriented Higher Order Thinking Skills to Achievements’ Calculus. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1554(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1554/1/012033

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to Assess Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Your Classroom. ASCD. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/Publications/Books/Overview/How-to-Assess-Higher-Order-Thinking-Skills-in-YourClassroom.aspx

Hayashi, P., Abib, G., & Hoppen, N. (2019). Validity in qualitative research: A processual approach. Qualitative Report, 24(1), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3443

Hidayatullah, A. R., Yamtinah, S., & Masykuri, M. (2022). Development of A Two-Tier Multiple-Choice Instrument Based on Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) on Acids, Bases, and Salts. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(2), 932–938. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1423

Istiyono, E., Dwandaru, W. S. B., Setiawan, R., & Megawati, I. (2020). Developing of computerized adaptive testing to measure physics higher order thinking skills of senior high school students and its feasibility of use. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.91

Kadir, A. (2015). Menyusun dan Menganalisis Tes Hasil Belajar. Al-Ta’dib, 8(2), 70–71. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/231137378.pdf

Mardhiyyah, L. A., Rusilowati, A., & Linuwih, S. (2016). Pengembangan instrumen asesmen literasi sains tema energi. Journal of Primary Education, 5(2), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpe.v5i2.12905

Prayitno, A., & Nofiana, M. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi High Order Thinking Skills Pada Materi Jaringan Hewan Dengan Bentuk Two-Tier Multiple Choice Question. Bioed: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.25157/jpb.v8i1.5959

Rahmi, Y. L., Miatidini, N. A., Alberida, H., Darussyamsyu, R., Ichsan, I. Z., Sigit, D. V., Titin, T., Koc, I., & Sison, M. H. (2021). HOTS Assessment of Biology Cell: Validity, Practicality and Reliability. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(3), 481–487. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i3.742

Saifudin, A. (2012). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sudiyatno. (2010). Pengembangan model penilaian komprehensif unjuk kerja siswa pada pembelajaran berbasis standar kompetensi di smk teknologi industri. Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Sudjana, N. (2016). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. Bandung: Rosdikarya.

Susiatin. (2019). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Guru Dalam Menyusun Kisi-Kisi Soal Dengan Metode Pendampingan Pola “Ocf.” Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen Pendidikan, 4(1), 17–24. Retrieved from https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jdmp/article/view/5946/2982

Susilawati, Doyan, A., Rokhmat, J., & Muliyadi, L. (2023). Analysis Validation of Modern Physics Learning Media Based on Smartphone Integrated Project Based Learning to Improve Students’ Creativity and Scientific Literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 7888–7892. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.5404

Trisnawaty, W., Citrasukmawati, A., & Thohir, M. A. (2017). Self Assessment For Student Performance Based on Higher Order Thinking Skills in Physics Learning. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 11(4), 446–452. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v11i4.6456

Widana, I. W. (2018). Higher Order Thinking Skills Assessment towards Critical Thinking on Mathematics Lesson. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH), 2(1). https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v2n1.74

Yusuf, A. M. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif & Penelitian Gabungan. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Yusuf, M. (2015). Asesmen dan Evaluasi Pendidikan: Pilar Penyedia Informasi dan Kegiatan Pengendalian Mutu Pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Grup.

Author Biographies

Siti Rahmah, Padang University

Festiyed, Padang University

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Siti Rahmah, Festiyed

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).