Students' Information Processing Abilities and Cognitive Processes in Biotechnology Learning

Authors

Yusnita Renata Tamba , Adi Rahmat , Rini Solihat

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9iSpecialIssue.5021

Published:

2023-12-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. SpecialIssue (2023): UNRAM journals and research based on science education, science applications towards a golden Indonesia 2045

Keywords:

Conventional biotechnology, Cognitive processes, Cognitive system, Independent curriculum, Information processing capabilities, Metacognitive system, Self-system

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Tamba, Y. R., Rahmat, A. ., & Solihat, R. . (2023). Students’ Information Processing Abilities and Cognitive Processes in Biotechnology Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(SpecialIssue), 598–606. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9iSpecialIssue.5021
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

The learning outcomes in the independent curriculum expect students to have skills in processing and analyzing data and information. These skills are in line with the information processing abilities developed by Marzano (1993). This research aims to determine the level of students' information processing abilities in biotechnology learning and its relationship with students' cognitive processes. The data in this research were processed using PLS-SEM (Partial Least Square–Structural Equation Model) analysis. Based on the results of the analysis, the instruments used to test information processing abilities, level 1 retrieval and level 2 comprehension cognitive systems, metacognitive systems and self-systems are valid and reliable. However, the level 3 analysis and level 4 knowledge utilization cognitive systems showed invalid and unreliable results so no further evaluation was carried out at these two levels. The results of the inner model analysis show that increasing information processing abilities have a significant and linear relationship to increasing cognitive processes. The relationship between information processing abilities and cognitive processes from the highest respectively is students' comprehension (L2), self-system (L6), metacognitive system (L5), and retrieval (L1).

References

Almulla, M. A. (2020). The Effectiveness of the Project-Based Learning (PBL) Approach as a Way to Engage Students in Learning. SAGE Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702

Arifa, A. B., Wibawanto, S., Wirawan, M., & Beladinna Arifa, A. (2018). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning dengan Strategi Metakognitif untuk Meningkatkan Metakognitif dan Hasil Belajar. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi Terapan, IV(3).

Berhitu, M., Rehena, J. F., & Tuaputty, H. (2020). The Effect of Project-Based Learning (PjBL) Models on Improving Students’ Understanding of Concepts, Retention, and Social Attitudes. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v10i2.5947

Dewi, K. H. S., Sudiatmika, I. P. G. A., Fernando, A., Putra, Y. A. B., & Raspati. (2023). Diagnostik Kesulitan Belajar Mahasiswa Berdasarkan Sistem Metakognitif Pada Taksonomi Marzano. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 6(2), 115–124.

Faiz, A., Parhan, M., & Ananda, R. (2022). Paradigma Baru dalam Kurikulum Prototipe. EDUKATIF : JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN, 4(1), 1544–1550. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i1.2410

Faroun, I. K., & Aja, A. H. (2022). Biological Literacy among University Students and Its Relationship to Information Processing Skills. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5625–5634. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6ns5.9934

Faujiyati, R. (2021). Kemampuan Pemrosesan Informasi dan Kemampuan Berpikir Siswa SMA pada Pembelajaran Siklus Biogeokimia dengan Menggunakan Example Based Learning di Dua SMA Berbeda Karakter Siswa.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, Marko. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Halimah, M., Rahmat, A., Redjeki, S., & Riandi. (2021). Penggunaan Examples Based Learning(EBL) Untuk Meningkatkan Level Kemampuan Berpikir Mahasiswa Berdasarkan Taksonomi Marzano Materi Metabolit Sekunder Mata Kuliah Bioteknologi. Biosfer, 6(2), 61–66.

Indrawan, E., Jalinus, N., & Syahril. (2018). Review Project Based Learning. International Journal of Science and Research, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.21275/ART20196959

Jamaludin, D. N. (2022). Information Processing and Memory in Learning. Journal of Educational Integration and Development, 2(2), 2022.

Jan, P. L., Roxana, M., & Roland, B. (2010). Cognitive Load Theory. www.cambridge.org/9780521860239

Jumain, A. F., Fazira, D., Suyanti, E., Sipahutar, M., Khairani, M., & Tanjung, I. F. (2022). Analisis Pemahaman Siswa Sma Mengenai Ilmu Bioteknologi Kelas XII Di MAS Al-Manar Pulo Raja. Symbiotic: Journal of Biological Education and Science, 3(2), 77–82.

Liu, H. H., Wang, Q., Su, Y. S., & Zhou, L. (2019). Effects of project-based learning on teachers’ information teaching sustainability and ability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205795

Lutz, S. T., & Huitt, W. G. (2003). Information Processing and Memory: Theory and Applications. Educational Psychology Interactive. http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/papers/infoproc.pdf

Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D., & McTighe, J. (1993). Assessing student outcomes : performance assessment using the dimensions of learning model.

Nugraini, A. R., & Amelia, R. N. (2023). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Materi Bioteknologi pada Siswa Kelas XII SMA. Seminar Nasional IPA XIII : Kecemerlangan Pendidikan IPA Untuk Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam, 367–372.

Permendikbud. (2022). Pedoman Penerapan Kurikulum dalam rangka Pemulihan Pembelajaran (Kurikulum Merdeka).

Rahmat, A., & Hindriana, F. A. (2014). Beban Kognitif Mahasiswa dalam Pembelajaran Fungsi Terintegrasi Struktur Tumbuhan Berbasis Dimensi Belajar. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 20(1).

Rahmat, A., Soesilawaty, S. A., Fachrunnisa, R., Wulandari, S., Suryati, Y., & Rohaeni, H. (2014). Beban Kognitif Siswa SMA pada Pembelajaran Biologi Interdisiplin Berbasis Dimensi Belajar. Prosiding Mathematics and Sciences Forum, 475–480.

Rini, S., Rahmat, A., & Hidayat, T. (2017). Information processing capability in the concept of biodiversity. In Ideas for 21st Century Education (pp. 101–104). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315166575-19

Simbolon, R., & Koeswanti, H. D. (2020). Comparison Of PjBL (Project Based Learning) Models With PBL (Problem Based Learning) Models to Determine Student Learning Outcomes and Motivation. International Journal of Elementary Education, 4(4), 519–529. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/IJEE

Suryana, E., Lestari, A., & Harto, K. (2022). Teori Pemrosesan Informasi Dan Implikasi Dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education (JIME), 8(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/DOI:10.36312/jime.v8i2.3498

Suryanda, A., Kurniati, T. H., & Damayanti, S. (2020). Pengembangan Multimedia Interaktif Berbasis Inkuiri untuk Praktikum Virtual pada Materi Bioteknologi di SMA. PSEJ (Pancasakti Science Education Journal), 5(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.24905/psej.v5i1.18

Sweller, J. (2006). The Worked Example Effect and Human Cognition. Learning and Instruction, 16(2), 165–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.02.005

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory. http://www.springer.com/series/8640

Toharudin, U., Rahmat, A., & Kurniawan, I. S. (2019). The important of self-efficacy and self-regulation in learning: How should a student be? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022074

Tuzzahra, D. U., Rahmat, A., & Hamdiyati, Y. (2022). Biology learning tasks variation during COVID-19 pandemic and its effect on students’ self-efficacy. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 8(3), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v8i3.21880

Van Blerkom, D. (2009). College Study Skills : Becoming a Strategic Learner (6th Edition). Wadsworth Cengange Learning.

Yahaya, A. A. (2009). Information Processing and Its Implications to Teaching and Learning.

Yilmaz, K. (2011). The Cognitive Perspective on Learning: Its Theoretical Underpinnings and Implications for Classroom Practices. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 84(5), 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2011.568989

Author Biographies

Yusnita Renata Tamba, UPI

Adi Rahmat, Indonesian Education University

Rini Solihat, Indonesian Education University

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Yusnita Renata Tamba, Adi Rahmat, Rini Solihat

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).