Development of Student Cognitive Learning Outcomes Tests Based on Differentiated Learning

Authors

Nur Azizah , Edi Istiyono , Insih Wilujeng

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v10i1.5080

Published:

2024-01-25

Issue:

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): January

Keywords:

Cognitive Learning Outcomes Tests, Differentiated Learning Styles, Instrument Development

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Azizah, N. ., Istiyono, E. ., & Wilujeng, I. . (2024). Development of Student Cognitive Learning Outcomes Tests Based on Differentiated Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(1), 194–200. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i1.5080
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Differentiated learning is the core of the independent curriculum now. The aim of this research is to develop an instrument for measuring the cognitive learning outcomes of high school students based on differentiated learning on elasticity material and to obtain its characteristics. Differentiation, in this case, is differentiation of student learning styles. The instrument grid is arranged based on indicators of cognitive learning outcomes, which are then used to compile question items. The test instrument consists of two test sets, each of which has 9 items including two anchor items so that the total number of items is 16 items and has been validated by 6 experts. The validated instrument was tested on 252 respondents spread across high schools in the low, medium and high categories. Dichotomous data were analyzed using the Partial Credit Model (PCM). The trial results showed that all 16 items and the differentiated learning-based student cognitive learning outcomes test instrument were proven to be valid, fit the PCM model, and reliable, which means all items were in the good category. Thus, the test instrument developed meets the requirements for measuring the cognitive learning outcomes of high school students on elasticity material based on differentiated learning.

References

Adams, R. J. & Khoo, S. T. (1996). Quest: The interactive test analysis system version 2.1. Victoria: The Australian Council for Educational Reearch

Aiken, L. R. (1985) Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability, and Validity of Ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45,131-142

Aisah, S., & Agustini, R. R. (2024). Pengembangan Instrumen Keterampilan Proses Sains Dengan Desain Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi Di Tingkat Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Education and Development, 12(1), 275-280. https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v12i1.5746

Anderson, L.W. & D.R. Krathwohl. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assesing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Angga, A., Suryana, C., Nurwahidah, I., Hernawan, A. H., & Prihantini, P. (2022). Komparasi Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 dan Kurikulum Merdeka di Sekolah Dasar Kabupaten Garut. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 5877–5889. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3149

Anggraini, S. F., & Mufit, F. (2022). The Validity of Interactive Multimedia Based on Cognitive Conflict on Elasticity Materials Using Adobe Animate CC 2019. EDUCATUM-Journal of Social Science (EJOSS), 8(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.37134/ejoss.vol8.1.2.2022

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design-The ADDIE Approach. New York: Springer.

Budiyanti, N., Abdul Aziz, A., & Salim Mansyur, A. (2020). The Formulation of The Goal of Insan Kamil as a Basis For The Development of Islamic Education Curriculum. IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application), 3(2), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.v3i2.2252

Coubergs, C., Struyven, K., Vanthournout, G., & Engels, N. (2017). Measuring teachers’ perceptions about differentiated instruction: The DI-Quest instrument and model. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.02.004

Dijkstra, E. M., Walraven, A., Mooij, T., & Kirschner, P. A. (2016). Improving kindergarten teachers’ differentiation practices to better anticipate student differences. Educational Studies, 42(4), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1195719

Dixon, F. A., Yssel, N., McConnell, J. M., & Hardin, T. (2014). Differentiated instruction, professional development, and teacher efficacy. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353214529042

Hambleton & Swaminathan. (1985). Item Res-ponse Theory Principles and Applications. Boston: Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing.

Hamilton, D., McKechnie, J., Edgerton, E., & Wilson, C. (2021). Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: a systematic literature review of quantitative learning outcomes and experimental design. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00169-2

Herwina, W. (2021). Optimalisasi Kebutuhan Murid Dan Hasil Belajar Dengan Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi. Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan, 35(2), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.21009/pip.352.10

Huang, C. L., Luo, Y. F., Yang, S. C., Lu, C. M., & Chen, A. S. (2020). Influence of Students’ Learning Style, Sense of Presence, and Cognitive Load on Learning Outcomes in an Immersive Virtual Reality Learning Environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(3), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119867422

Istiyono, E., Mardapi, D., & Suparno, S. (2014). Pengembangan Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Fisika (Pysthots) Peserta Didik SMA. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i1.2120

Khamparia, A., & Pandey, B. (2020). Association of learning styles with different e-learning problems: a systematic review and classification. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 1303–1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10028-y

Magableh, I. S. I., & Abdullah, A. (2020). On the effectiveness of differentiated instruction in the enhancement of jordanian students’ overall achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 533–548. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13237a

Malacapay, M. C. (2019). Differentiated instruction in relation to pupils’ learning style. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 625–638. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12440a

Matcha, W., Uzir, N. A., Gasevic, D., & Pardo, A. (2020). A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies on Learning Analytics Dashboards: A Self-Regulated Learning Perspective. In IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 13(2), 226–245. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2019.2916802

Mohd, F., Fatin Fatihah Wan Yahya, W., Ismail, S., Abdul Jalil, M., Maizura Mohamad Noor, N., & Malaysia Terengganu, U. (2019). An Architecture of Decision Support System for Visual-Auditory-Kinesthetic (VAK) Learning Styles Detection Through Behavioral Modelling. In International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System, 3(2), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.25124/ijies.v3i02.37

Nepal, S., Walker, S., & Dillon-Wallace, J. (2021). How do Australian pre-service teachers understand differentiated instruction and associated concepts of inclusion and diversity?. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1916111

Osborne, J. (2013). The 21st century challenge for science education: Assessing scientific reasoning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.07.006

Pozas, M., Letzel, V., & Schneider, C. (2020). Teachers and differentiated instruction: exploring differentiation practices to address student diversity. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 20(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12481

Purnasari, P. D., Silvester, S., & Lumbantobing, W. L. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Higher Order Thingking Skills (Hots) Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Siswa. Sebatik, 25(2), 571-580. https://doi.org/ 10.46984/sebatik.v25i2.1607

Rezigalla, A. A., & Ahmed, O. Y. (2019). Learning style preferences among medical students in the college of medicine, university of Bisha, Saudi Arabia (2018). Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 10, 795–801. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S219176

Rogowsky, B. A., Calhoun, B. M., & Tallal, P. (2015). Matching learning style to instructional method: Effects on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037478

Santyasa, I. W., Rapi, N. K., & Sara, I. W. W. (2020). Project based learning and academic procrastination of students in learning physics. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13132a

Septiyana, L., Safitri, A., Aminatun, D., & Muliyah, P. (2021). The Correlation Between Efl Learners’ Cohesion and Their Reading Comprehension. Journal of Research on Language Education (JoRLE), 2(2), 68–74. Retrieved from https://ejurnal.teknokrat.ac.id/index.php/JoRLE/article/view/1154

Sh Bekkulov, Q. (2022). Methodology Of Using Independent Learning In Organizing Extra-Curricular Lessons. In Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 10(11), 1295-1304. Retrieved from https://www.giirj.com/index.php/giirj/article/view/3921

Shi, Y., Ma, Y., MacLeod, J., & Yang, H. H. (2020). College students’ cognitive learning outcomes in flipped classroom instruction: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Journal of Computers in Education, 7(1), 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00142-8

Sudirman, S., & Qaddafi, M. (2023). The Application of Student Worksheets Based on PhET Simulation to Increase the Concept Understanding in Hooke’s Law. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 11(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v11i1.9505

Sulistyosari, Y., Karwur, H. M., Sultan, H., & Manado, U. N. (2022). Penerapan Pembelajaran Ips Berdiferensiasi Pada Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar. Harmony: Jurnal Pembelajaran IPS dan PKN, 7(2), 66-75. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/harmony/article/view/62114

Sinuraya, J., Panggabean, D. D., & Wahyuni, I. (2019). Analysis Of Relationship Science Process Skills And Creativity With The Cognitive Learning Outcomes Used Of The Icare Practice Based On Worksheet On Learning High School Physics Courses. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8(2), 91-96.

Tan, B., & Ong, D. (2020). Pediatric to adult inflammatory bowel disease transition: The Asian experience. In Intestinal Research, 18(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2019.09144

Tyas, P. A., & Safitri, M. (2017). Kinesthetic Learning Style Preferences: A Survey of Indonesian EFL Learners by Gender. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 2(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v2i1.688

Valiandes, S. (2015). Evaluating the impact of differentiated instruction on literacy and reading in mixed ability classrooms: Quality and equity dimensions of education effectiveness. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 45, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.02.005

Vasileva-Stojanovska, T., Malinovski, T., Vasileva, M., Jovevski, D., & Trajkovik, V. (2015). Impact of satisfaction, personality and learning style on educational outcomes in a blended learning environment. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.01.018

Veloo, A., Nor, R., & Khalid, R. (2015). Attitude towards physics and additional mathematics achievement towards physics achievement. International Education Studies, 8(3), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n3p35

Author Biographies

Nur Azizah, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Edi Istiyono, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Insih Wilujeng, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Nur Azizah, Edi Istiyono, Insih Wilujeng

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).