STEM-AR Based Ecology and Biodiversity E-book Development for Increasing Students' Scientific Reasoning

Authors

Ina Ana Khoeriah , Irvan Permana , Indarini Dwi Pursitasari

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.5214

Published:

2023-10-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 10 (2023): October

Keywords:

E-book development, Scientific Reasoning, STEM-AR, Teaching material, 21st-century skill

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Khoeriah, I. A. ., Permana, I. ., & Pursitasari, I. D. . (2023). STEM-AR Based Ecology and Biodiversity E-book Development for Increasing Students’ Scientific Reasoning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 8837–8845. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.5214

Downloads

Metrics

PDF views
154
Oct 25 '23Oct 28 '23Oct 31 '23Nov 01 '23Nov 04 '23Nov 07 '23Nov 10 '23Nov 13 '23Nov 16 '23Nov 19 '23Nov 22 '236.0
|

Abstract

This research aims to developing STEM-AR-based e-book teaching materials to improve students' scientific reasoning in ecology and biodiversity materials. The development of this research is important as a parameter of 21st-century abilities, which require students to have 4C abilities to face the education era of 4.0. This research method uses Research and Development (R&D). The R&D design chosen was Thiagarajan design consisting of four stages (Define, Design, Develop, and Disseminate) (Thiagarajan, 1974). Class VII students (N = 42) were involved as research subjects who were taken by the purposive sampling technique. Data collection was carried out through scientific reasoning tests, student response questionnaires, and observation sheets. Data processing techniques used paired sample T-tests and then performed the N-gain test. The results of the analysis show that after using the STEM-AR-based e-book, there is an increase in scientific reasoning ability, with an N-Gain value of 63% in the medium category. Testing the effectiveness of teaching materials using the SPSS paired sample t-test showed a result of 0.001, which means that STEM-AR-based teaching materials affect students' scientific reasoning. The descriptive average of scientific reasoning has increased by 40%. In addition, students gave positive responses to teaching materials, which made it easier to understand the material

References

Afandi, A., Hidayat, S., & Syahri, I. (2019). Developing interactive questions to measure the higher-order thinking skills of senior high schools’ students. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 5(2), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i2.7747

Ain, N. (2021). Prospective physics teacher’s ability in developing HOTS questions: CRI analysis. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 5(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v5i2.5566

Changwong, K., Sukkamart, A., & Sisan, B. (2018). Critical thinking skill development: Analysis of a new learning management model for Thai high schools. Journal of International Studies, 11(2), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-2/3

Damawati, N. A. C., & Juanda, E. A. (2016). The Effect Of Inquiry Based Learning On The Reasoning Ability Of Grade VII Students About Heat Concept. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 12(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi

Daryanto. (2010). Media Pembelajaran. Satu Nusa.

DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601. https://web.nmsu.edu/~susanbro/eced440/docs/scientific_literacy_another_look.pdf

Dole, S., Bloom, L., & Kowalske, K. (2015). Transforming pedagogy: Changing perspectives from teacher-centered to learner-centered. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1538

Elivera, A., & Palaoag, T. (2020). Development of an Augmented Reality Mobile Application to Enhance the Pedagogical Approach in Teaching History. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 803(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/803/1/012014

Fenanlampir, A., Batlolona, J. R., & Imelda, I. (2019). The struggle of Indonesian students in the context of TIMSS and Pisa has not ended. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 10(2), 393–406.

Fitriani, I., & Rohayati, S. (2019). Pengembangan E-Book Berbasis Android Dengan Pendekatan Saintifik Pada Mata Pelajaran Administrasi Pajak Kelas Xii Akuntansi Di Smk Negeri 2 Buduran. JPAK: Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi, 7(1), 11–20. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jpak/article/view/26640/24393

Fraenkel, Jack R., Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. In McGraw-Hill Higher Education (Issue 0). McGraw-Hill.

Giang, N. N. (2021). Project-Based Learning on the Topic of Aromatic Wax Production. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 8(4), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.20448/JOURNAL.509.2021.84.395.407

Hanif, S., Wijaya, A. F. C., & Winarno, N. (2019). Enhancing Students’ Creativity through STEM Project-Based Learning. Journal of Science Learning, 2(2), 50. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v2i2.13271

Hanifah, N. (2019). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) di sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 197–202. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/crecs/article/view/14286

Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2012). Do better schools lead to more growth? Cognitive skills, economic outcomes, and causation. Journal of Economic Growth, 17(4), 267–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-012-9081-x

Kambeyo, L., & Csapo, B. (2018). Scientific reasoning skills: A theoretical background on science education. Reform Forum, 26(1), 27–36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329196813_scientific_reasoning_skills_a_theoretical_background_on_science_education

Khoeriah, I. A., Permana, I., & Ardianto, D. (2022). Science Reasoning : A Review and Bibliometric Analysis. 8(2). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1135

King, F. J., Goodson, L., & Rohani, F. (2012). High Order Thinking Skills, Definition, Teaching Strategies, Assessment. Educational Services Program. Educational Services Program, 18.

Kirana, R. W. candra. (2020). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar E-Book Praktikum Akuntansi Perusahaan Dagang Berbasis Scientific Approach Sebagai Sumber Belajar Alternatif. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 18(1), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpai.v18i1.32292

Lamb, S., Jackson, J., & Rumberger, R. (2015). ISCY Technical Paper: Measuring 21st Century Skills in ISCY. Victoria University, Center for International Research on Education Systems.

Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Fabiani, P., Benesova, W., Meneses, M. D., & Mora, C. E. (2015). Augmented reality to promote collaborative and autonomous learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 752–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.093

Marušić, M., & Sliško, J. (2012). Influence of Three Different Methods of Teaching Physics on the Gain in Students’ Development of Reasoning. International Journal of Science Education, 34(2), 301–326.https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.582522.

Putra, A. B. N. R., Heong, Y. M., Meidyanti, D. S., & Rahmawati, A. D. (2022). Hi World: The Virtual Book Learning Integrated Augmented Reality to Increase Knowledge of Covid-19 Prevention in The Learning Process Post-Pandemic Era. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(6), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i06.29001

Putri, S. A., Subiki, S., & Supriadi, B. (2020). Identifikasi Kemampuan Penalaran Ilmiah (Scientific Reasoning) Siswa SMA Pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor. FKIP E-PROCEEDING, 5(1), 11–14. https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/fkip-epro/article/download/7382/5281

Redhana, W. (2019). Mengembangkan Keterampilan Abad Ke-21 dalam Pembelajaran Kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 113(1), 2239–2253.

Remigio, K. B., Yangco, R. T., & ... (2018). Analogy-enhanced instruction: Effects on reasoning skills in science. In … : Malaysian Online Journal …. mojes.um.edu.my. https://mojes.um.edu.my/article/download/12829/8224

Retnawati, H., Djidu, H., Kartianom, Apino, E., & Anazifa, R. D. (2018). Teachers’ knowledge about higher-order thinking skills and its learning strategy. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/18.76.215

Saad, M. I. M., Baharom, S., & ... (2017). Scientific reasoning skills based on socio-scientific issues in the biology subject. In … journal of …. … EXTENSION PO BOX 23-31, TAIPEI …. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2017.03.003

Schlottmann, A. (2001). Perception versus knowledge of cause and effect in children: When seeing is believing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(4), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00128

Schulz, H., & FitzPatrick, B. (2016). Teachers’ understandings of critical and higher order thinking and what this means for their teaching and assessments. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 62(1), 61–86. https://cdm.ucalgary.ca/index.php/ajer/article/view/56168

Smith, T. E., Rama, P. S., & Helms, J. R. (2018). Teaching critical thinking in a GE class: A flipped model. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.02.010

Sternberg, R. J., Todhunter, R. J. E., Litvak, A., & Sternberg, K. (2020). The relation of scientific creativity and evaluation of scientific impact to scientific reasoning and general intelligence. Journal of Intelligence, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence8020017

Thiagarajan. (1974). Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children. In Indiana University Bloomington (Ed.), ERIC. ERIC.http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED090725.pdf

Tseng, K. H., Chang, C. C., Lou, S. J., & Chen, W. P. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9160-x

Zulkipli, Z. A., Yusof, M. M. M., Ibrahim, N., & Dalim, S. F. (2020). Identifying Scientific Reasoning Skills of Science Education Students. … Journal of University Education. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i3.10311

Author Biographies

Ina Ana Khoeriah, MAHASISWA PASCA SARJANA- UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN PROGRAM STUDI SEKOLAH PASCA SARJANA PENDIDIKAN IPA


Interested in research in the field of science education, especially in learning models to improve the quality of education and student abilities.

Irvan Permana, Universitas Pakuan

Indarini Dwi Pursitasari, Universitas Pakuan, Bogor

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Ina Ana Khoeriah, Irvan Permana, Indarini Dwi Pursitasari

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).