Students’ Visual Representation of Lights and Visions

Authors

Yogi Kuncoro Adi , Ari Widodo , Wahyu Sopandi , Muslim

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.5240

Published:

2023-10-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 10 (2023): October

Keywords:

Elementary school students, Lights, Vision, Visual representations

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Adi, Y. K., Widodo, A., Sopandi, W., & Muslim. (2023). Students’ Visual Representation of Lights and Visions . Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 8546–8553. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.5240

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Visual representations are used by scientists to communicate scientific conceptions and are used by teachers to teach science in the classroom. The 2013 Curriculum textbook reduces this visual representation. Meanwhile, visual representations will help students develop a comprehensive understanding of the concept. This case study research aims to reveal cases of misconceptions in the visual representation of students at an X elementary school. We used observations of fifty-nine fourth-grade elementary school students to find students with different cases of misconceptions. Eleven students were further identified using interviews and drawing tests. We analysed the data qualitatively based on the collection of these two types of data. We found misconceptions in the representation of luminous objects and how students draw visions of luminous objects and non-luminous objects. Research results showed that we found cases of misconceptions similar to the findings from previous studies. While light and vision are prerequisite concepts, a student's conception of vision is affected when he has a misconception about light. Content can be developed by paying attention to the various modes of representation, conceptual change, and learning progression in the future. The pattern of learning progression can be studied in more detail using the microgenetic method.

References

Adi, Y. K., & Oktaviani, N. M. (2019). Faktor-faktor penyebab miskonsepsi siswa sd pada materi life processes and living things. Profesi Pendidikan Dasar, 6(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.23917/ppd.v1i1.7988

Adnyana, I. G. A. D., Margunayasa, I. G., & Kusmariyatni, N. (2019). Pengaruh model pembelajaran word square berbantuan media gambar terhadap hasil belajar ipa. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 3(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v3i1.17661

Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333(6046), 1096–1097. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204153

Allen, M. (2014). Misconceptions in primary science: second edition. Open University Press.

Anggoro, S., Widodo, A., & Badarudin, B. (2022). Elementary student conceptual change about free fall using reflective conceptual change model. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 2396–2403. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1998

Asriadi, M., & Istiyono, E. (2022). Multiple representation ability of high school students in physics: a study of modern response theory. Thabiea: Journal of Natural Science Teaching, 5(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v5i1.12550

Bergqvist, A., & Rundgren, S. N. C. (2017). The influence of textbooks on teachers’ knowledge of chemical bonding representations relative to students’ difficulties understanding. Research in Science and Technological Education, 35(2), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1295934

Brock, R., & Taber, K. S. (2017). The application of the microgenetic method to studies of learning in science education: characteristics of published studies, methodological issues and recommendations for future research. Studies in Science Education, 53(1), 45–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1262046

Cahyanto, M. A. S., Ashadi, A., & Saputro, S. (2019). An analysis of gender difference on students’ misconceptions in learning the material classification and its changes. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 157–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i2.26613

Chang, H. Y. (2018). Students’ representational competence with drawing technology across two domains of science. Science Education, 102(5), 1129–1149. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21457

Chang, H. Y., Lin, T. J., Lee, M. H., Lee, S. W. Y., Lin, T. C., Tan, A. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2020). A systematic review of trends and findings in research employing drawing assessment in science education. Studies in Science Education, 56(1), 77–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2020.1735822

Chusni, M. M. (2022). Effectiveness of discovery learning-based multiple representation module on enhancing the critical thinking skills of the students with high and low science process skills. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 8(2), 199–209. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v8i2.49340

Cook, M. P. (2006). Visual representations in science education: the influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Science Education, 90(6), 1073–1091. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce

Desstya, A., Prasetyo, Z. K., & Suyanta. (2019). Understanding of elementary school teachers on physical concepts. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1318(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012077

Desstya, A., Prasetyo, Z. K., Suyanta, Susila, I., & Irwanto. (2019). Developing an instrument to detect science misconception of an elementary school teacher. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12313a

Dewi, S. P., Lidyawati, Y., & Destiansari, E. (2022). How is the implementation of diagnostic tests in biology learning in south sumatra? Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(6), 2605–2612. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.1859

Dirman, H. M., Mufit, F., & Festiyed, F. (2022). Review and comparison of four-tier multiple choice and five-tier multiple choice diagnostic tests to identify mastery of physics concepts. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.838

Elmesky, R. (2013). Building capacity in understanding foundational biology concepts: a k-12 learning progression in genetics informed by research on children’s thinking and learning. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 1155–1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9286-1

Haidar, D. A., Yuliati, L., & Handayanto, S. K. (2020). The effect of inquiry learning with scaffolding on misconception of light material among fourth-grade students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(4), 540–553. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i4.22973

Hamdiyati, Y., Soesilawaty, S. A., & Habibah, S. N. (2022). Analysis of high school student’s mental model on virus: representation of students’ conceptions. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 2085–2092. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1879

Hamid, R., Widodo, A., & Sopandi, W. (2017). Pattern of students’ conceptual change on magnetic field based on students’ mental models. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1848(May), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983971

Hardiansyah, F., Misbahudholam, M., & Hidayatillah, Y. (2022). Ipas learning assessment to measure science process skill in elementary school. International Journal of Elementary Education, 6(3), 612–623. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v6i4.54217

Hunaidah, H., Erniwati, E., & Mahdiannur, M. A. (2022). Four-tier diagnostic test to assess students’ misconceptions about fluids: a story from development to measurement from three environmental sites. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1586–1592. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1784

Juita, Z., Sundari, P. D., Sari, S. Y., & Rahim, F. R. (2023). Identification of physics misconceptions using five-tier diagnostic test: newton’s law of gravitation context. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA), 9(8), 5954–5963. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.3147

Kartimi, K., Yunita, Y., Fuadi, F. N., & Addiin, I. (2021). A four-tier diagnostic instrument: an analysis of elementary student misconceptions in science topic. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(SpecialIssue), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7ispecialissue.1022

Kokologiannaki, V., & Ravanis, K. (2012). Mental representations of sixth graders in Greece for the mechanism of vision in conditions of day and night. International Journal of Research In Education Methodology Council for Innovative Research, 2(1), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.24297/ijrem.v2i1.4111

Kubiatko, M., & Pavol, P. (2009). Pupils ’ understanding of mammals: an investigation of the cognitive dimension. Orbis Scholae, 3(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2018.214

López, V., & Pintó, R. (2017). Identifying secondary-school students’ difficulties when reading visual representations displayed in physics simulations. International Journal of Science Education, 39(10), 1353–1380. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1332441

Margunayasa, I. G., Dantes, N., Marhaeni, . A. I. N., & Suastra, I. W. (2021). Reducing misconceptions of elementary school students through guided inquiry learning. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 5(4), 729–736. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v5i4.40388

Masfuah, S., Fakhriyah, F., Wilujeng, I., & Rosana, D. (2021). Diagnostic test profile of scientific literacy to measure student’s misconceptions in science concept course. ELEMENTARY: Islamic Teacher Journal, 9(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.21043/elementary.v9i1.10382

Namdar, B., & Shen, J. (2016). Intersection of argumentation and the use of multiple representations in the context of socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 38(7), 1100–1132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1183265

Nurfiyani, Y., Putra, M. J. A., & Hermita, N. (2020). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa sd kelas v pada konsep sifat-sifat cahaya. Journal of Natural Science and Integration, 3(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.24014/jnsi.v3i1.9303

Park, J., Chang, J., Tang, K. S., Treagust, D. F., & Won, M. (2020). Sequential patterns of students’ drawing in constructing scientific explanations: focusing on the interplay among three levels of pictorial representation. International Journal of Science Education, 42(5), 677–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1724351

Ravanis, K. (2019). Mental representations of light propagation time for 10- and 14-year- old students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(2), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.276

Ravanis, K., & Boilevin, J. M. (2009). A comparative approach to the representation of light for five-, eight- and ten-year-old children: Didactical perspectives. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 8(3), 182–190. Retrieved from http://oaji.net/articles/2014/987-1404740300.pdf

Ravanis, K., Christidou, V., & Hatzinikita, V. (2013). Enhancing conceptual change in preschool children’s representations of light: a sociocognitive approach. Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2257–2276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9356-z

Ravanis, K., Zacharos, K., & Vellopoulou, A. (2010). The formation of shadows: the case of the position of a light source in relevance to the shadow. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 3(3), 1–6. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1056131.pdf

Reinoso, R., & Delgado-Iglesias, J. (2020). Understanding pre-service teacher conceptual knowledge of human nutrition processes through drawings. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(6), 1008–1019. http://dx.doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.1008

Rokhim, D. A., Widarti, H. R., & Sutrisno, S. (2023). Five-tier diagnostic test instrument validation on reaction rate materials: to identify the causes of misconception and student representation. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(3), 1380–1385. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i3.2952

Sopandi, W., Latip, A., & Sujana, A. (2017). Prospective primary school teachers’ understanding on states of matter and their changes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan RD. CV Alfabeta.

Suminar, I., Muslim, & Liliawati, W. (2017). Integrated argument-based inquiry with multiple representation approach to promote scientific argumentation skill. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1848(May), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983958

Suparno, P. (2013). Miskonsepsi & perubahan konsep dalam pendidikan fisika (2nd edition). PT Grasindo.

Suryana, S. I., Sopandi, W., Sujana, A., & Pramswari, L. P. (2021). Creative thinking ability of elementary school students in science learning using the radec learning mode. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(SpecialIssue), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7ispecialissue.1066

Syahmel, S., & Jumadi, J. (2019). Discovery Learning using Multiple Representation model for enhancing scientific processing and critical thinking skills of the students. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i2.26704

Uzun, S., Alev, N., & Karal, I. S. (2013). A cross-age study of an understanding of light and sight concepts in physics. Science Education International, 24(2), 129–149. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1015829.pdf

Vojíř, K., & Rusek, M. (2019). Science education textbook research trends: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Science Education, 41(11), 1496–1516. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1613584

Wu, H. K., Lin, Y. F., & Hsu, Y. S. (2013). Effects of representation sequences and spatial ability on students’ scientific understandings about the mechanism of breathing. Instructional Science, 41(3), 555–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9244-3

Xu, L., Prain, V., & Speldewinde, C. (2021). Challenges in designing and assessing student interdisciplinary learning of optics using a representation construction approach. International Journal of Science Education, 43(6), 844–867. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1889070

Yuliana, Y., Wahyudi, W., Doyan, A., & Pineda, C. I. S. (2021). Development of phet simulation-assisted inquiry model learning in elasticity materials. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(2), 178–183. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i2.505

Author Biographies

Yogi Kuncoro Adi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Ari Widodo, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Wahyu Sopandi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Muslim, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Yogi Kuncoro Adi, Ari Widodo, Wahyu Sopandi, Muslim

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).