Vol. 9 No. 12 (2023): December
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

Development of A Guided Discovery Learning Model Based on E-Learning in Thematic Learning

Authors

Drajat Sukmanto Utomo , Kartono , Widiasih

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.5309

Published:

2023-12-20

Downloads

Abstract

The research objectives include several things. The aim is to develop and analyze the effectiveness of an e-learning based guided discovery learning model in thematic learning for class V elementary school. The way to answer the research objectives is to use the ADDIE Research and Development (R&D) model. The school sample for testing the effectiveness of the model developed was selected based on probability sampling. After the sample was determined, the research results showed that the validity of the learning model was very good and could be used, while the results of the effectiveness of the model implementation could be understood through the posttest results and the results of filling out the questionnaire. Based on these results, it can be concluded that classes that use the guided discovery learning model have higher learning outcomes on average. The average learning outcome of students who studied with the e-learning based guided discovery learning model in the test class was 91.47 with a completion rate of 100%, while the control class which used the guided discovery learning model showed an average learning outcome of 88.33.

Keywords:

Guided Discovery Learning E Learning Thematic Learning

References

Abid Azhar, K., & Iqbal, N. (2018). Effectiveness of Google Classroom: Teachers’ Perceptions. Prizren Social Science Journal, 2(2), 52–66.

Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach. McGraw-Hill Companies.

Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktek Edisi V. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 69.

Arumisore, N. M., Indana, S., & Soetjipto, S. (2018). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Ipa Berbasis Pendekatan Saintifik Untuk Menuntaskan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pokok Bahasan Sistem Gerak Manusia Di Smp. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), 7(1), 1386. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v7n1.p1386-1396

Batubara, I. H. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Guided Discovery Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pengembangan Silabus Pembelajaran Matematika Pada Masa Pandemic Covid 19. Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran: JPPP, 1(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.30596/jppp.v1i2.4948

Ebiere Dorgu, T. (2015). Different Teaching Methods: A Panacea for Effective Curriculum Implementation in the Classroom. International Journal of Secondary Education, 3(6), 77. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.s.2015030601.13

Fitriah, H., Yasa, I. N., & Tantri, A. A. S. (2020). Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Melalui E-Ukbm. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 76–83. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPBS

Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction. Longman Publishing.

Hartanto, A. A., & Purbo, O. W. (2002). Buku pintar internet teknologi e-learning berbasis PHP dan MySQL. Penerbit PT Elex Media Komputindo Kelompok Gramedia, Jakarta.

Magdalena, I., Wahyuni, A., & Hartana, D. D. (2020). Pengelolaan Pembelajaran Daring Yang Efektif Selama Pandemi Di Sdn 1 Tanah Tinggi. EDISI : Jurnal Edukasi Dan Sains, 2(2), 366–377. https://ejournal.stitpn.ac.id/index.php/edisi

Mangesa, R. T., & Mappaloteng, A. M. (2019). Mengoptimalkan kualitas proses pembelajaran melalui pembelajaran kooperatif dengan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. In Seminar Nasional Pengabdian (pp. 107-109).

Mufidah, N. L., & Surjanti, J. (2021). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Blended Learning dalam Meningkatkan Kemandirian dan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Ekuitas: Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 9(1), 187. https://doi.org/10.23887/ekuitas.v9i1.34186

Naidu, S. (2006). E-Learning: A Guidebook of Principles, Procedures and Practices. In E-Learning: A Guidebook of Principles, Procedures and Practices. https://doi.org/10.56059/11599/53

Naviri, V. T., Andayani, S., & Widiansyah, A. T. (2019). Penerapan Model Cooperatife Tipe Group Investigation (Gi) Untuk Meningkatkan Kerjasama Dan Hasil Belajar Pada Materi Pencemaran Lingkungan Siswa Kelas Vii Smpn 3 Bagor Nganjuk Tahun Pelajaran 2018/2019. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hayati, 7(1), 240–245. https://proceeding.unpkediri.ac.id/index.php/hayati/article/view/573

Pamugar, H., Winarno, W. W., & Najib, W. (2014). Model Evaluasi Kesuksesan dan Penerimaan Sistem Informasi E-Learning pada Lembaga Diklat Pemerintah. Scientific Journal of Informatics, 1(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.15294/sji.v1i1.3638

Popper, K. (2005). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.

Priadi, M. A., Riyanda, A. R., & Purwanti, D. (2021). Pengaruh Model Guided Discovery Learning Berbasis E-Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis. IKRA-ITH HUMANIORA : Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 5(2), 1–13. https://journals.upi-yai.ac.id/index.php/ikraith-humaniora/article/view/959

Riyanti, M. (2018). Penerapan Model Guided Discovery Learning Dalam Meningkatkan Partisipasi Belajar Siswa Smkn 3 Pontianak. New England Journal of Medicine, 372(2), 2499–2508. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7556065%0Ahttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC394507%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2017.05.005%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-018-1825-z%0Ahttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27157931

Rosenberg, M. J. (2006). What lies beyond e-learning. Learning circuits.

Saputri, R. P., & Fransisca, M. (2020). Analisis Kebutuhan Siswa Terhadap Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Android Mata Pelajaran Simulasi Digital. Seminar Nasional Terapan Riset Inovatif (SENTRINOV) Ke-6, 6(1), 902–909.

Singer, N. (2017). How Google took over the classroom. The New York Times, 13, 368-405.

Sucipta, S. (2018). Metode Guided Discovery Learning terhadap Tingkat Berpikir Kritis Siswa Dilihat dari Motivasi Belajar. Indonesian Journal of Economic Education (IJEE), 1(1).

Sugihartini, N., & Yudiana, K. (2018). Addie Sebagai Model Pengembangan Media Instruksional Edukatif (Mie) Mata Kuliah Kurikulum Dan Pengajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 15(2), 277–286. https://doi.org/10.23887/jptk-undiksha.v15i2.14892

Syamsir, M., Danial, M., & Syahrir, M. (2020). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran IPA SMP Berbasis Discovery Learning Berorientasi Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik. Chemistry Education Review (CER), 3(2), 205. https://doi.org/10.26858/cer.v3i2.13771

Triton, P. B. (2006). SPSS 13.0 terapan riset statistik parametrik.

Utami, I. S. (2017). Pengujian Validitas Model Blended Learning di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. VOLT : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30870/volt.v2i1.963

Wenning, C. J. (2005). Levels of inquiry: Hierarchies of pedagogical practices and inquiry processes. Journal of physics teacher education online, 2(3), 3-11.

Wijaya, D. M. (2021). Pengembangan E-modul Biologi Berbasis Guided Discovery Learning Pada Topik Ekosistem dan Lingkungan untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik. 101–140.

Wiyanto, W. (2017). Pendekatan Saintifik Pada Perkuliahan Dengan Sistem E-Learning. Integralistik, 28(2), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.15294/integralistik.v28i2.13738

Yani, J. A., Mangkunegara, A. A. A. P., & Aditama, R. (1995). Sugiyono. 2017, Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. bandung: Alfabeta. Procrastination And Task Avoidance: Theory, Research and Treatment. New York: Plenum Press, Yudistira P, Chandra, Diktat Ku.

Yunus, Y. (2019). Students’ needs Of English Speaking Materials In Tourism Vocational School In Padang. Journal of RESIDU, 3(23), 116-123.

Author Biographies

Drajat Sukmanto Utomo, Mahasiswa Universitas Terbuka

Author Origin : Indonesia

Kartono, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Author Origin : Indonesia

Widiasih, Magister Pendidikan Dasar Universitas Terbuka, Banten

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Utomo, D. S., Kartono, & Widiasih. (2023). Development of A Guided Discovery Learning Model Based on E-Learning in Thematic Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 11625–11640. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.5309