Analysis of 4C Skills (Critical Thinking, Creativity and Innovation, Collaboration, and Communication) of Physics Education Students in Facing the Industrial Revolution 4.0

Authors

Ulil Azmi , Safrijal , Mulia Rahmi

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v10i2.5584

Published:

2024-02-25

Issue:

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): February

Keywords:

Collaboration, Communication, Creative innovation, Critical thinking, 4C

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Azmi, U. ., Safrijal, & Rahmi, M. . (2024). Analysis of 4C Skills (Critical Thinking, Creativity and Innovation, Collaboration, and Communication) of Physics Education Students in Facing the Industrial Revolution 4.0. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(2), 695–703. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i2.5584
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This research is a qualitative research with a case study design. The instruments used will be prepared based on the indicators of each 4C skill. The data collected will be analyzed through the stages of data reduction, data presentation and conclusions. The research results show students' critical thinking skills on indicator 1 reasoning have an achievement percentage of 34%; indicator 2 thinking as hypothesis testing has an achievement percentage of 47%; indicator 3 analyzing arguments has an achievement percentage of 49%; indicator 4 analysis of possibilities and uncertainties has a percentage of 68% and indicator 5 problem solving and decision making has a percentage of 73%. The results of students' creative and innovative thinking abilities on indicator 1 of fluency thinking skills have an achievement percentage of 28%; indicator 2 elaboration skill has an achievement percentage of 52%; indicator 3 of flexible thinking skills (flexibility) has an achievement percentage of 26%; and indicator 4 Original thinking skills (originality) has a percentage of 17%. The results of student collaboration skills in indicator 1 contributed to the percentage of achievement of 49%; indicator 2 time management has an achievement percentage of 54%; indicator 3focus on taskhas an achievement percentage of 63%; indicator 4 working with other people has a percentage of 71%; and indicator 5 responsibility has a percentage of 67%.

References

Arief, R. (2012). Usaha Peningkatan Kompetensi Softskill Melalui Student Centered-Learning Bagi Mahasiswa Yang Mengikuti Mata Kuliah Analisa Perancangan Sistem. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 21(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v21i1.3336

Astuti, A. P., Aziz, A., Sumarti, S. S., & Bharati, D. A. L. (2019). Preparing 21st Century Teachers: Implementation of 4C Character’s Pre-Service Teacher through Teaching Practice. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1), 012109. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012109

Besson, U. (2004). Students’ conceptions of fluids. International Journal of Science Education, 26(14), 1683–1714. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000243745

Black, B. (2012). An overview of a programme of research to support the assessment of Critical Thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(2), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.04.003

Cotrell, S. (2005). Critical thinking skill. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Daulay, N. H., Sani, R. A., & Rahmatsyah. (2021). An analysis of 4c skill on heat in facing the industrial revolution era 4.0. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1811(1), 012002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1811/1/012002

Diana, P., Isriyah, U., Dewi, W. S., Akmam, A., & Sari, S. Y. (2021). The Availability Analysis Of 21st Century Skill Indicators On Physics Worksheet Of Senior High School Grade X Semester 1 In Pasaman Districts. Pillar of Physics Education, 14(3), 169. https://doi.org/10.24036/11144171074

Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical thinking. Prentice-Hall.

Facione, P. a. (2011). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight assessment.

Fakhriyah, F. (2014). Application of Problem Based Learning in Developing Students’ Critical Thinking Ability. Journal of Indonesian Science Education, 3(1), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v3i1.2906

Finken, M., & Ennis, R. (1993). Illinois Critical Thinking Essay Test. Departement of Educational Policy Studies University of Illinois.

Greenstein, L. M. (2012). Assessing 21st century skills: A guide to evaluating mastery and authentic learning. Corwin Press.

Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (2015). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. In Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (Vol. 9789400723). Dodrecht: Springer Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5

Halpern, D. F., & Dunn, D. S. (2021). Critical Thinking: A Model of Intelligence for Solving Real-World Problems. Journal of Intelligence, 9(2), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9020022

Harjo, B., Kartowagiran, B., & Mahmudi, A. (2019). Development of Critical Thinking Skill Instruments on Mathematical Learning High School. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12410a

Hughes, D. J., Lee, A., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Legood, A. (2018). Leadership, creativity, and innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.03.001

Muhibin, S. (2003). Learning Psychology. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Munandar, U. (2014). Gifted Children’s Creativity Development. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Mustadi, A. (2014). Fundamental School Reform Through Lesson Study For Learning Community (LSLC): A Study Of Collaborative Learning In Indonesia And Japan. International Conference On Fundamentals And Implementation Of Education (ICFIE), 87–95. Retrieved from https://eprints.umk.ac.id/11824/4/Prosiding ICFIE UNY Full.pdf#page=95

Osman, K., Hiong, L. C., & Vebrianto, R. (2013). 21st Century Biology: An Interdisciplinary Approach of Biology, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.732

Pasquinelli, E., Farina, M., Bedel, A., & Casati, R. (2021). Naturalizing Critical Thinking: Consequences for Education, Blueprint for Future Research in Cognitive Science. Mind, Brain, and Education, 15(2), 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12286

Plummer, R., Witkowski, S., Smits, A., & Dale, G. (2022). Higher Education Institution–Community Partnerships: Measuring the Performance of Sustainability Science Initiatives. Innovative Higher Education, 47(1), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-021-09572-8

Polat, Ö., & Aydın, E. (2020). The effect of mind mapping on young children’s critical thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100743

Pramesswari, A. S., Widodo, W., & Qosyim, A. (2016). Penerapan Strategi Debat Aktif untuk Melatihkan Ketrampilan Berpikir Kritis pada Materi Pemanasan Global. Pensa E-Jurnal: Pendidikan Sains, 4(3), 1–6. Retrieved from https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/pensa/article/view/15331

Proulx, G. (2004). Integrating Scientific Method & Critical Thinking in Classroom Debates on Environmental Issues. The American Biology Teacher, 66(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/4451613

Rubenstein, L. D., Callan, G. L., Speirs Neumeister, K., & Ridgley, L. M. (2020). Finding the problem: How students approach problem identification. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100635

Santrock, J. W. (2007). Adolesence (Remaja) (11th ed.). Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Saputri, A. C., Sajidan, Rinanto, Y., Afandi, & Prasetyanti, N. M. (2019). Improving students’ critical thinking skills in cell-metabolism learning using Stimulating Higher Order Thinking Skills model. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12122a

Scoular, C., & Timms, M. J. (2020). Development Of A Measurement Approach To Assess 21st-Century Skills. In Contemporary perspectives on research in educational assessment. IAP.

Scuttari, A., Pechlaner, H., & Erschbamer, G. (2021). Destination Design: A heuristic case study approach to sustainability-oriented innovation. Annals of Tourism Research, 86, 103068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2020.103068

Sholekha, M. (2023). Analysis of 4C Skills (Critical Thinking, Creativity, Communication, and Collaboration) in Indonesian History Textbooks. Indonesian Journal of History Education, 8(2), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijhe.v8i2.70858

Sipayung, H. D., Sani, R. A., & Bunawan, W. (2018). Collaborative Inquiry For 4C Skills. Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL), 200(3). https://doi.org/10.2991/aisteel-18.2018.95

Siregar, Y., Daryanto, E., & Siman, S. (2023). Increasing the Competence of Vocational Education Teachers with 4C Skills-Based Training Management (Critical Thinking, Creativity, Communication, Collaboration). Proceedings of the 8th Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership, AISTEEL 2023, 19 September 2023, Medan, North Sumatera Province, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.19-9-2023.2340493

Sternberg, R. J., & Karami, S. (2022). An 8P Theoretical Framework for Understanding Creativity and Theories of Creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 56(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.516

Sudarisman, S. (2015). Understanding the nature and characteristics of biology learning in answering the challenges of the 21st century and optimizing the implementation of the 2013 curriculum. Jurnal Florea, 2(1), 29–35. Retrieved from http://e-journal.unipma.ac.id/index.php/JF/article/view/403

Susilo, S. (2015). Curriculum of EFL Teacher Education and Indonesian Qualification Framework: A Blip of the Future Direction. Dinamika Ilmu, 15(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v15i1.98

Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J.-M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, Critical Thinking, Communication, and Collaboration: Assessment, Certification, and Promotion of 21st Century Skills for the Future of Work and Education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2010). 21st century skills: learning for life in our times. Choice Reviews Online, 47(10), 47-5788-47–5788. https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.47-5788

Wibowo, E., Ulya, N., Helvantriyudo, W., Azyumardi, M. M., Hafiduddin, F., Rokhmat, M., Handayani, I. P., Abrar, A., Fitriyanti, N., Sutisna, S., & Ameruddin, A. S. (2023). Misconceptions on the understanding of flying objects in fluids. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 7(2), 178–187. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v7i2.6881

Zubaidah, S. (2020). Keterampilan Abad Ke-21: Keterampilan yang Diajarkan Melalui Pembelajaran. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, 2(2), 1–17. Retrieved from https://rb.gy/ctz851

Author Biographies

Ulil Azmi, UNIVERSITAS JABAL GHAFUR

Safrijal, Universitas Jabal Ghafur

Mulia Rahmi, Universitas Jabal Ghafur

License

Copyright (c) 2024 ULIL AZMI Ulil, Safrijal, Mulia Rahmi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).