Implementation of Differentiated Learning of Sekolah Penggerak Program in Learning in Elementary Schools
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.5785Published:
2023-12-20Downloads
Abstract
The difference in student’s needs and abilities in learning mathematics made teachers need to vary learning. This study aimed to describe the steps, implementation, and obstacles in the implementation of differentiated learning in mathematics learning in elementary schools. The location of this study was SDN 47/IV Kota Jambi. The subjects of this research were the principal, IVD class teachers, and IVD class students. Qualitative phenomenology was the type of approach used in this study. This study used interview guidelines, observation, and documentation. The data analysis technique used in this study consisted of three stages, namely data reduction, data presentation, and concluding. The results of the study found that differentiated learning in mathematics subjects begins with mapping students' mathematics learning needs, designing learning according to mapping results, and conducting evaluations on an ongoing basis. The implementation of differentiated learning does not mean that in the process it distinguishes all components of learning for one student at a time. The obstacles that are often faced are limited time and lack of experience so it needs adaptation.
Keywords:
Differentiated Learning Sekolah PenggerakReferences
Aarts, R., Kools, Q., & Schildwacht, R. (2020). Providing a good start. Concerns of beginning secondary school teachers and support provided. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(2), 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1693992
Adare, A. A., Li, Y., & Gebresilase, B. M. (2023). Assessing Practices and Challenges in Implementing Differentiated Instruction in Mingde Primary School. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 11(02), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2023.112007
Barrett, P., Davies, F., Zhang, Y., & Barrett, L. (2015). The impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning: Final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis. Building and Environment, 89, 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.013
Bush, E. J., Singh, R. L., & Kooienga, S. (2019). Lived Experiences of a Community: Merging Interpretive Phenomenology and Community-Based Participatory Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 160940691987589. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919875891
Dalila, A. A., Rahmah, S., Liliawati, W., & Kaniawati, I. (2022). Effect of Differentiated Learning in Problem Based Learning on Cognitive Learning Outcomes of High School Students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 2116–2122. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1839
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Dash, S., Shakyawar, S. K., Sharma, M., & Kaushik, S. (2019). Big data in healthcare: Management, analysis and future prospects. Journal of Big Data, 6(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-019-0217-0
Dhawan, S. (2020). Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
Eikeland, I., & Ohna, S. E. (2022). Differentiation in education: A configurative review. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 8(3), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2022.2039351
Fischman, G. E., Anderson, K. T., Tefera, A. A., & Zuiker, S. J. (2018). If Mobilizing Educational Research Is the Answer, Who Can Afford to Ask the Question? An Analysis of Faculty Perspectives on Knowledge Mobilization for Scholarship in Education. AERA Open, 4(1), 233285841775013. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417750133
GarcÃa Bacete, F. J., Marande Perrin, G., Schneider, B. H., & Blanchard, C. (2014). Effects of School on the Well-Being of Children and Adolescents. In Handbook of Child Well-Being, 1251–1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8_149
Haelermans, C. (2022). The Effects of Group differentiation by students’ learning strategies. Instructional Science, 50(2), 223–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09575-0
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Hariyati, N., Riyanto, Y., Sujarwanto, S., Suyatno, S., & Islamiah, N. (2023). Actualization of Principal Instructional Leadership in the Implementation of Differentiated Learning to Realize Students’ Well-Being. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 9(1), 188. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i1.7002
Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching and the Mathematical Quality of Instruction: An Exploratory Study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802177235
Jayantika, I. G. A. N. T., & Santhika, K. Y. (2023). Implementation Of Differentiate Learning To Improve Student Learning Outcomes In Mathematics Subject. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 4(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v4i1.2687
Kamila, H. R., Cahyaningrum, S. E., & Sanjaya, I. G. M. (2023). Effectiveness of Differentiated Learning Materials Oriented toward Nature of Science to Improve Scientific Literacy Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(4), 1968–1973. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i4.2995
Kurniawan, H., Sutawidjaja, A., As’ari, A. R., & Muksar, M. (2018). The Thinking Process of Students in Representing Images to Symbols in Fractions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028, 012138. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012138
Li, Y., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2019). Problematizing teaching and learning mathematics as “given†in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 44, s40594-019-0197–0199. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0197-9
Manurung, P., H Maulidiah, R., L P Sari, P., Marsidin, S., Supiatman, L., & S Rambe, M. (2023). Synchronous in Merdeka Belajar Based Education Management Quality (EMQ. KnE Social Sciences, 370-380. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i4.12919
Ma’ruf Dharmaji, W., & Astuti*, R. (2023). Improvement of Student Achievement Through Problem Based Differentiated Learning. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA, 7(3), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v7i3.33145
Mirawati, I. G. A., Suwastini, N. K. A., Haryanti, N. D., & Jayantini, I. G. A. S. R. (2022). Differentiated Instructions: Relevant Studies on Its Implementation. Prasi, 17(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.23887/prasi.v17i1.41867
Novita, M., Kusumaningsih, W., Setia Wardana, Y., Kumar Behera, S., . M., & Iskandar, F. (2022). Advancing Indonesian Education through the Three Penggerak Programs. KnE Social Sciences, 421-431. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i19.12462
Österman, T., & Bråting, K. (2019). Dewey and mathematical practice: Revisiting the distinction between procedural and conceptual knowledge. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(4), 457–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1594388
Planas, N., Adler, J., & Mwadzaangati, L. (2023). What is mathematics teaching talk for? A response based on three sites of practice in mathematics education. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 55(3), 521–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01452-5
Pozas, M., Letzel-Alt, V., & Schwab, S. (2023). The effects of differentiated instruction on teachers’ stress and job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 122, 103962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103962
Ruggeri, K., Garcia-Garzon, E., Maguire, Ã., Matz, S., & Huppert, F. A. (2020). Well-being is more than happiness and life satisfaction: A multidimensional analysis of 21 countries. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18(1), 192. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01423-y
Samino GarcÃa, R. (2023). A service-learning program assessment: Strengths, weaknesses and impacts on students. Intangible Capital, 19(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.2093
Schoen, R. C., & LaVenia, M. (2019). Teacher beliefs about mathematics teaching and learning: Identifying and clarifying three constructs. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1599488. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1599488
Schons, C., Obersteiner, A., Reinhold, F., Fischer, F., & Reiss, K. (2023). Developing a Simulation to Foster Prospective Mathematics Teachers’ Diagnostic Competencies: The Effects of Scaffolding. Journal Für Mathematik-Didaktik, 44(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-022-00210-0
Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2017). The effect of games and simulations on higher education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0062-1
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Yantoro, Muhammad Sholeh, Anindyta Laila Amalia, Sri Marmoah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
