The Development of a Moodle-Assisted Guided Inquiry Model for General Biology E-Learning to Enhance the Student' Critical Thinking Dispositions

Authors

Saidil Mursali , Utami Sri Hastuti , Siti Zubaidah , Fatchur Rohman

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9iSpecialIssue.6282

Published:

2023-12-15

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. SpecialIssue (2023): UNRAM journals and research based on science education, science applications towards a golden Indonesia 2045

Keywords:

Critical thinking dispositions, E-learning, General biology, Guided inquiry, Moodle

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Mursali, S. ., Hastuti, U. S., Zubaidah, S. ., & Rohman, F. . (2023). The Development of a Moodle-Assisted Guided Inquiry Model for General Biology E-Learning to Enhance the Student’ Critical Thinking Dispositions. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(SpecialIssue), 280–291. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9iSpecialIssue.6282

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Critical thinking disposition is a component of higher-order thinking skills required to meet 21st-century challenges. This research aimed to develop a Moodle-assisted Guided Inquiry model (GI-Moodle) for General Biology e-learning and to enhance university students' critical thinking disposition. Fenrich's instructional model was used in this development research. Meanwhile, a quasi-experimental study was conducted at the implementation stage. This study was carried out at the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, Undikma. The data were collected using validation sheets and the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. Descriptive quantitative analysis and ANCOVA were done. The results revealed that: the general biology e-learning developed was reliable and valid; students' critical thinking disposition increased from the pretest to the posttest, where the GI-Moodle students achieved better than the WhatApp Group-assisted Guided Inquiry students (GI-WAG) and WhatApp Group-assisted Structured Inquiry students (SI-WAG); the implementation of GI-Moodle and GI-WAG E-learning did not have a significant effect, but it was significantly different compared to the SI-WAG class. In conclusion, GI-Moodle is a viable option for enhancing college students critical thinking disposition through General Biology e-learning. It can be a reference for development in other learning

References

Afandi, A., Sajidan, S., Akhyar, M., & Suryani, N. (2018). Pre-service science teachers’ perception about high order thinking skills (HOTS) in the 21st century. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 2(1), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v2i1.18254

Aikina, T. Y., & Bolsunovskaya, L. M. (2020). Moodle-Based learning: Motivating and Demotivating Factors. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(2), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i02.11297

Alismaiel, O. A. (2022). Develop a new model to measure the blended learning environments through students’ cognitive presence and critical thinking skills. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(12), 150–169. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i12.30141

Almusharraf, N., & Khahro, S. (2020). Students Satisfaction with Online Learning Experiences during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(21), 246. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i21.15647

Anggraeni, D. M., & Sole, F. B. (2022). Analysis of 4-C in Moodle-Based Online Learning in Science Learning Media Courses. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1612–1617. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1818

Antón-Sancho, Ã., Fernández-Arias, P., & Vergara-Rodríguez, D. (2023). Impact of the covid-19 pandemic on the use of ICT tools in science and technology education. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), 130–158. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1860

Artayasa, I. P., Susilo, H., Lestari, U., & Indriwati, S. E. (2018). The effect of three levels of inquiry on the improvement of science concept understanding of elementary school teacher candidates. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11216a

Bekteshi, E., Gollopeni, B., & Avdiu, E. (2023). The challenges of conducting online inquiry-based learning among tertiary level education. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1700

Bunterm, T., Lee, K., Ng Lan Kong, J., Srikoon, S., Vangpoomyai, P., Rattanavongsa, J., & Rachahoon, G. (2014). Do Different Levels of Inquiry Lead to Different Learning Outcomes? A comparison between guided and structured inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 1937–1959. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.886347

Chootongchai, S., & Songkram, N. (2018). Design and development of SECI and moodle online learning systems to enhance thinking and innovation skills for higher education learners. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(3), 154–172. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i03.7991

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.

Cynthia, C., Arafah, K., & Palloan, P. (2023). Development of interactive physics E-module to improve critical thinking skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 3943–3952. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.2302

Eichenholtz, S., & Bellard, E. (2017). Enhancing Kuhlthau’s Guided Inquiry Model Using Moodle and LibGuides to Strengthen Graduate Students’ Research Skills. In Distributed Learning: Pedagogy and Technology in Online Information Literacy Instruction (pp. 93–109). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100598-9.00005-2

Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical Thinking Dispositions: Their Nature and Assessability. Informal Logic, 18(2), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v18i2.2378

Facione, N. C., Facione, P. A., & Sanchez, C. A. (1994). Critical thinking disposition as a measure of competent clinical judgment: the development of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. The Journal of Nursing Education, 33(8), 345–350. https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-19941001-05

Facione, P. (2015). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Measured Reasons LLC, 1–30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251303244

Fenrich, Peter. (2005). Creating instructional multimedia solutions: Practical guidelines for the real world. Informing Science Press.

Fitriani, H., Asy’Ari, M., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2018). Critical Thinking Disposition of Prospective Science Teachers at IKIP Mataram, Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012091

Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Herayanti, L., & Husein, S. (2019). Problem-based Learning Approach with Supported Interactive Multimedia in Physics Course: Its Effects on Critical Thinking Disposition. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 1075–1089. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.627162

Herayanti, L., Gummah, S., Sukroyanti, B. A., Ahzan, S., & Gunawan, G. (2018). Developing moodle in problem-based learning to improve student comprehension on the concepts of wave. Mathematics, Informatics, Science, and Education International Conference (MISEIC), 157(Miseic), 134–137. https://doi.org/10.2991/miseic-18.2018.33

Ibnusaputra, M., Wilujeng, I., & Kuswanto, H. (2023). Development of electronic worksheet Guided Inquiry to reduce misconceptions and improve High School students’ concept mastery on straight motion material. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 2653–2663. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.2738

Indawati, H., Sarwanto, S., & Sukarmin, S. (2023). Effect of Guided Inquiry Models and Open Inquiry of Wave and Sound Vibration Materials on Critical Thinking Ability in terms of Science Process Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.1994

Irwanto, I. (2023). Improving preservice chemistry teachers’ critical thinking and science process skills using research-oriented collaborative inquiry learning. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1796

Jaganathan, P., & Subramaniam, I. (2016). Incorporating higher order thinking skills in task-based learning for Malaysian undergraduates. International Journal of Contemporary Applied Sciences, 3(2), 274–288. http://www.ijcar.net/assets/pdf/Vol3-No2-February2016/16.pdf

Khoiri, N., Huda, C., Rusilowati, A., Wiyanto, Sulhadi, & Wicaksono, A. G. C. (2020). The impact of guided inquiry learning with digital swing model on students’ generic science skill. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(4), 554–560. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i4.26644

Khotimah, K., Hastuti, U. S., Ibrohim, & Suhadi. (2021). Developing microbiology digital handout as teaching material to improve the student’s science process skills and cognitive learning outcomes. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 95, 80–97. https://doi.org/10.14689/EJER.2021.95.5

Llewellyn, D. (2013). Teaching High School Science Through Inquiry and Argumentation (R. Najar & J. Nemer, Eds.; 2nd ed.). Corwin A Sage Company.

Makruf, I., Rifa’i, A. A., & Triana, Y. (2022). Moodle-Based Online Learning Management in Higher Education. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.1518a

Margunayasa, I. G., Dantes, N., Marhaeni, A. A. I. N., & Suastra, I. W. (2019). The Effect of Guided Inquiry Learning and Cognitive Style on Science Learning Achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 737–750. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12147a

Miftakhurrohmah, N. L., Masykuri, M., Ariyani, S. R. D. A., & Noris, M. N. (2023). Effect of Guided Inquiry-Based Excretion System E-Module to Improve Critical Thinking and ICT Literacy Skills for Students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(2), 681–689. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i2.2036

Ninghardjanti, P., & Dirgatama, C. H. A. (2021). Building critical thinking skills through a new design mobile-based interactive learning media knowledge framework. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(17), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i17.23801

Nurwahidah, I., Widiyawati, Y., Sari, D. S., Masykuri, M., & Budiyanto, C. W. (2022). The use of project-based Moodle science learning integration on the theme of city noise. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 2028–2035. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1469

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003

Pursitasari, I. D., Suhardi, E., Putra, A. P., & Rachman, I. (2020). Enhancement of student’s critical thinking skill through science context-based inquiry learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(1), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i1.21884

Putra, B. K. B., Prayitno, B. A., & Maridi. (2018). The effectiveness of guided inquiry and instad towards students’ critical thinking skills on circulatory system materials. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 476–482. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.14302

Quinto, J. D. G. (2022). Development and Validation of Survey Instrument on Game-Based Learning Approach (SIGBLA). International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(15), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i15.33267

Ratumanan, G. T., & Laurens T. (2011). Assessment of learning outcomes at the level of education units (2th Ed.). Unesa University Press.

Robillos, R. J. (2022). Impact of LoiLooNote Digital Mapping on University Students’ Oral Presentation Skills and Critical Thinking Dispositions. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 501–518. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15228a

Schettini, C., Amendola, D., Borsini, I., & Galassi, R. (2020). A blended learning approach for general chemistry modules using a moodle platform for first year academic students. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 16(2), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135197

Sendag, S., Erol, O., Sezgin, S., & Dulkadir, N. (2015). Preservice Teachers’ Critical Thinking Dispositions and Web 2.0 Competencies. Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(3), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6148

Setyawan, A., Aznam, N., Paidi, & Citrawati, T. (2020). Influence of the use of technology through problem based learning and inkuiri models are leading to scientific communication students class VII. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 10(2), 190–198. https://doi.org/10.3926/JOTSE.962

Shaw, A., Liu, O. L., Gu, L., Kardonova, E., Chirikov, I., Li, G., Hu, S., Yu, N., Ma, L., Guo, F., Su, Q., Shi, J., Shi, H., & Loyalka, P. (2020). Thinking critically about critical thinking: validating the Russian HEIghten® critical thinking assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 45(9), 1933–1948. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1672640

Sumarwati, S., Fitriyani, H., Setiaji, F. M. A., Amiruddin, M. H., & Jalil, S. A. (2020). Developing Mathematics Learning Media Based on E-learning Using Moodle on Geometry Subject to Improve Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(4), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJIM.V14I04.12731

Sutiani, A., Situmorang, M., & Silalahi, A. (2021). Implementation of an Inquiry Learning Model with Science Literacy to Improve Student Critical Thinking Skills. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 117–138. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1428a

Syahfitri, J., & Firman, H. (2022). CTDBT instruments to measure the critical thinking disposition based on gender in biology education student. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(5), 2437–2442. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.1650

Syahfitri, J., Firman, H., Redjeki, S., & Sriyati, S. (2019). Development and validation of critical thinking disposition test in biology. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12425a

Temel, S. (2014). The effects of problem-based learning on pre-service teachers’ critical thinking dispositions and perceptions of problem-solving ability. South African Journal of Education, 34(1), 1–20. http://www.sajournalofeducation.co.za

Tong, L. C., Rosli, M. S., & Saleh, N. S. (2022). Enhancing HOTS using Problem-Based Learning and Digital Game in the Context of Malaysian Primary School. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i02.27677

Turner, R. C., Keiffer, E. A., & Salamo, G. J. (2018). Observing inquiry-based learning environments using the scholastic inquiry observation instrument. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(8), 1455–1478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9843-1

Utari, H. S. T., Budiharti, R., Sukarmin, S., Wahyuningsih, D., & Haryani, F. F. (2023). Development of learning media Moodle-based on static fluids. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 8713–8721. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.4367

Verawati, N. N. S. P., Hikmawati, & Prayogi, S. (2020). The effectiveness of inquiry learning models intervened by reflective processes to promote critical thinking ability in terms of cognitive style. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(16), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i16.14687

Wechsler, S. M., Saiz, C., Rivas, S. F., Vendramini, C. M. M., Almeida, L. S., Mundim, M. C., & Franco, A. (2018). Creative and critical thinking: Independent or overlapping components? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27(November 2017), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.003

Weinstein, S. (2017). Scaffolding to promote critical thinking and learner autonomy among pre-service education students. Journal of Education and Training, 4(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.5296/jet.v4i1.9871

Yanto, B. E., Subali, B., & Suyanto, S. (2019). Improving students’ scientific reasoning skills through the three levels of inquiry. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 689–704. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12444a

Yu, K., Tang, H., Gong, R., Dong, J., & Hu, S. (2018). Effects of the application of multimedia to library use education on learning motivation and learning satisfaction. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 2987–2994. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90628

Yuliati, L., Riantoni, C., & Mufti, N. (2018). Problem Solving Skills on Direct Current Electricity through Inquiry-Based Learning with PhET Simulations. In International Journal of Instruction (Vol. 11, Issue 4, pp. 123–138). www.e-iji.net

Zidoun, Y., el Arroum, F., Talea, M., & Dehbi, R. (2016). Students’ perception about mobile learning in Morocco: Survey analysis. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 10(4), 80–84. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v10i4.5947

Author Biographies

Saidil Mursali, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika

Utami Sri Hastuti, Universitas Negeri Malang

Siti Zubaidah, Universitas Negeri Malang

Fatchur Rohman, Universitas Negeri Malang

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Saidil Mursali, Utami Sri Hastuti, Siti Zubaidah, Fatchur Rohman

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).