The Potential Interactive Digital Teaching Material on Cell Metabolism as a Bridge of Cognitive Processes Toward Student Learning Achievement
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v10i3.6398Published:
2024-03-30Downloads
Abstract
Education in the era of digital technology has become a challenge for teachers and lecturers in how this technology can develop comprehensive knowledge and global insight. The purpose of this study is to improve learning achievement through the cognitive process of students in cell metabolism lectures using Interactive Digital Teaching Material (IDTM). The study involved 40 Biology Education students who were taking the third semester at one of the Private Universities in Bandung, West Java. The implementation of lectures and instruments to measure students' cognitive processes is based on the framework of the 1992 Marzano Learning Dimension. The results of the analysis showed that the N-gain value of Acquire and Integrate Knowledge and Extend and Refine Knowledge obtained a percentage of (28%-26%) on low criteria. While Using knowledge with a percentage of N-gain value (32%) on medium criteria. These results illustrate that IDTM facilitates students to train their cognitive processes toward better learning achievement
Keywords:
Cognitive Process, Learning Achievement, Learning Cell Metabolism, Web-Based Interactive Digital Teaching Material (IDTM)References
Abdulrahman, M. D., Faruk, N., Oloyede, A. A., Surajudeen-Bakinde, N. T., Olawoyin, L. A., Mejabi, O. V., Imam-Fulani, Y. O., Fahm, A. O., & Azeez, A. L. (2020). Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review. Heliyon, 6(11), e05312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312
Alhammad, R., & Ku, H. Y. (2019). Graduate students’ perspectives on using e-books for academic learning. Educational Media International, 56(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2019.1583460
Amsyar, R. A., & Permata, A. T. (2023). Development of Augmented Reality on Sub-Material Mushroom Sexual Reproduction to Improve Analytical Thinking Ability. 9(9), 7210–7220. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.4273
Apthorp, S. H. (2000). Dimensions of Learning Evaluation for Kirkland School District. Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
Baker, R. S. J. D., Corbett, A. T., & Aleven, V. (2008). More accurate student modeling through contextual estimation of slip and guess probabilities in Bayesian knowledge tracing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 5091 LNCS, 406–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_44
Bozkurt, A., & Mujgan, B. (2015). Evaluation Criteria for Interactive E-Books for Open and Distance Learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5), 58–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2218
Brown, L. J. (1995). Observing dimensions of learning in classrooms and schools. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Danish, B., & Arbab, A. (2020). Analysis of Teachers’ Attitude towards Dimensions of Learning during Teaching at Tertiary Level. The Dialogue, 15(2).
Daryanes, F., Darmadi, D., Fikri, K., Sayuti, I., Rusandi, M. A., & Situmorang, D. D. B. (2023). The development of articulate storyline interactive learning media based on case methods to train students’ problem-solving ability. Heliyon, 9(4), e15082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15082
Firetto, C. M., & Van Meter, P. N. (2018). Inspiring integration in college students reading multiple biology texts. Learning and Individual Differences, 65(February), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.05.011
Grönlund, Å., Wiklund, M., & Böö, R. (2018). No name, no game: Challenges to use of collaborative digital textbooks. Education and Information Technologies, 23(3), 1359–1375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9669-z
Irvine, J. (2020). Marzano’s New Taxonomy as a framework for investigating student affect. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 24, 1–31. http://www.aabri.com/copyright.html
Koć-Januchta, M. M., Schönborn, K. J., Tibell, L. A. E., Chaudhri, V. K., & Heller, H. C. (2020). Engaging With Biology by Asking Questions: Investigating Students’ Interaction and Learning With an Artificial Intelligence-Enriched Textbook. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(6), 1190–1224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120921581
Kottmeyer, A. M., Meter, P. Van, & Cameron, C. (2020). How we teach: Generalizable education research: Diagram comprehension ability of college students in an introductory biology course. Advances in Physiology Education, 44(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1152/ADVAN.00146.2018
Lafifa, F., Rosana, D., Nurohman, S., Rejeki, S., & Astuti, D. (2023). The Effect of Using Interactive Electronic Module with Contextual Approach on Students Learning Motivation on Conductor and Insulator Materials. 9(9), 6734–6741. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.3354
Li, J. (2020). Comprehensive Global Competence for World-Class Universities in China. Springer Singapore.
Marzano, R. J. (1992). A Different Kind of Classroom Teaching With Dimension of Learning https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED350086.pdf
Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., Blackburn, G. J., Brandt, R. S., Paynter, D. E., Pollock, J. E., Whisler, J. S., & Whisler, J. S. (1997). Dimensions of Learning. Alexandria, Virginia USA. ASCD.
Moroney, E., Lee, S. S., Ebbert, A. M., & Luthar, S. S. (2023). Digital media use frequency, online behaviors, and risk for negative mental health in adolescents in high-achieving schools. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 28(1), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591045221108834
Morris, N. P., & Lambe, J. (2017). Multimedia interactive eBooks in laboratory bioscience education. Higher Education Pedagogies, 2(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2017.1338531
Ormancı, Ü., & Çepni, S. (2020). Views on interactive e-book use in science education of teachers and students who perform e-book applications. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 11(2), 247–279. https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.569211
Rawashdeh, A. Z., Enaam, Y. M., Asma, R. A. A., Mahmoud, A., & Butheyna. (2021). Advantages and Disadvantages of Using e-Learning in University Education: Analyzing Students’ Perspectives. The Electronic Journal of E-Learning Volume, 19(3), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5594899
Rowais, A. S. Al. (2019). Effectiveness of Marzano’s Dimensions of Learning Model in the Development of Creative Thinking Skills among Saudi Foundation Year Students. World Journal of Education, 9(4), 49. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v9n4p49
Soga, T. (2015). Interactive Learning Using e-Books Connected with Moodle and Development of Sharing Environments for Teaching Materials. 1171–1180.
Steehler, A. J., Pettitt-Schieber, B., & Alexander, P. A. (2022). The Smart Use of Smart Technologies in Teaching and Learning: Where We Are and Where We Need to be. Ear, Nose and Throat Journal, 101(9_suppl), 29S-36S. https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613231154037
Suryani, Y. (2023). The Effectiveness of Investigation Group Learning Model Based on Marzano’s Instructional Framework in Improving Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skill. KnE Social Sciences, 2023, 843–861. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i4.12980
Sundayana, Rostina, H. . (2015). Statistika Penelitian Pendidikan ( pembahasan dilengkapi dengan bantuan MS.Excel dan SPSS ). Alfabeta.
Torkar, G., Veldin, M., Glažar, S. A., & Podlesek, A. (2018). Why do Plants Wilt? Investigating students’ understanding of water balance in plants with external representations at the macroscopic and submicroscopic levels. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2265–2276. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/87119
Tresnawati, C., Rahmat, A., & Rahman, T. (2022). Cognitive System Profile of Prospective Teachers in Cell Biology Learning. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 17, 58–66.
Widodo, W., Sudibyo, E., Suryanti, Sari, D. A. P., Inzanah, & Setiawan, B. (2020). The effectiveness of gadget-based interactive multimedia in improving generation z’s scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(2), 248–256. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.23208
Yang, D., Zargar, E., Adams, A. M., Day, S. L., & Connor, C. M. D. (2021). Using Interactive E-Book User Log Variables to Track Reading Processes and Predict Digital Learning Outcomes. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 46(4), 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508420941935
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Cita Tresnawati, Adi Rahmat, Taufik Rahman, Kusnadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
