Blended Learning Station-Rotation Model: Does it Impact on Preservice Teachers' Scientific Literacy?

Autor(s): Gito Hadiprayitno, Kusmiyati Kusmiyati, Ayudya Lestari, Marheny Lukitasari, Akhmad Sukri
DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v7i3.676


This study aims to test the effectiveness of the blended learning rotation model to improve the scientific literacy skill of prospective teacher students. The design of this study used the Posttest-only design with nonequivalent groups. The research subjects were 76 students majoring in biology education at Universitas Mataram. The research was done to two experimental groups, namely the blended learning station rotation model (BLSRM) and regular learning (RL). The research instrument used a multiple-choice test which refers to the aspects of scientific literacy competence according to PISA. The data analysis technique was carried out descriptively, complete with the Hotelling's T2 test to test the effect of BLSRM on students' scientific literacy skills. The results showed that students' scientific literacy skills were in the very low category (mean BLSRM = 38.50, RL = 34.22) and there was no effect of BLSRM on students' scientific literacy skills (Hotteling Trace = .098 and Sig. = .080). To improve students' scientific literacy skills, BLSRM needs to be combined with other models such as problem-solving model, so it can be an effective strategy in science learning


blended learning; station rotation model; science literacy

Full Text:



Arini, Z. (2016). Profil Kemampuan Penalaran Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Extrovert dan Introvert. MATHEdunesa, 5(2).

Hastjarjo, T. D. (2019). Rancangan Eksperimen-Kuasi. Buletin Psikologi, 27(2), 187-203.

Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Rojko, A. (2017). Industry 4.0 concept: background and overview. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 11(5), 77-90.

Tay, S. I., Lee, T. C., Hamid, N. Z. A., & Ahmad, A. N. A. (2018). An overview of industry 4.0: Definition, components, and government initiatives. J. Adv. Res. Dyn. Control Syst, 10, 1379-1387.

Vuksanovic, D., Ugarak, J., & Korčok, D. (2016). Industry 4.0: The future concepts and new visions of factory of the future development. Conference Sinteza 2016.

Syamsuar, S., & Reflianto, R. (2018). Pendidikan dan tantangan pembelajaran berbasis teknologi informasi di era revolusi industri 4.0. E-Tech: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Pendidikan, 6(2).

Ghufron, G. (2018, September). Revolusi Industri 4.0: Tantangan, Peluang, Dan Solusi Bagi Dunia Pendidikan. In Seminar Nasional dan Diskusi Panel Multidisiplin Hasil Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 2018 (Vol. 1, No. 1).

Iswan, I., & Bahar, H. (2018, July). Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter Perspektif Islam dalam Era Millenial IR. 4.0. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan (Vol. 1, No. 1).

Sukartono. 2018. Revolusi Industri 4.0 dan Dampaknya terhadap Pendidikan di Indonesia. pcontent/uploads/sites/73/2018/12 /Materi-Sukartono.pdf. Di akses 1 April 2019.

Bender, D. M., & Vredevoogd, J. D. (2006). Using online education technologies to support studio instruction. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 9(4), 114-122.

Lalima, D., & Dangwal, K. L. (2017). Blended learning: An innovative approach. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(1), 129-136.

Cianda, F., Burhendi, A., WD, L., & Kusdiwelirawan, A. (2019). Implementation of Blended Learning to Use Discovery Learning Method. Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang, 5(6), 153-163.

Srivastava, D. K., & Mudholkar, G. S. (2001). Trimmed T2: A robust analog of Hotelling's T2. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 97(2), 343-358.

OECD (2016), PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic and Financial Literacy, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, DOI:

Willems, G., Pison, G., Rousseeuw, P. J., & Van Aelst, S. (2002). A robust Hotelling test. Metrika, 55(1-2), 125-138.

Fakhriyah, F., Masfuah, S., Roysa, M., Rusilowati, A., & Rahayu, E. S. (2017). Student's Science Literacy in the Aspect of Content Science?. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1), 81-87.

Heath, S. M., Bishop, D. V., Bloor, K. E., Boyle, G. L., Fletcher, J., Hogben, J. H., ... & Yeong, S. H. (2014). A spotlight on preschool: The influence of family factors on children’s early literacy skills. PloS one, 9(4), e95255.

Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 275-288.

OECD (2019). PISA 2018 Results. Where All Students Can Succeed. Volume II. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved September 29, 2020 from

Sinaga, Y., Silitonga, M., & Djulia, E. (2019). Comparison of scientific literacy skills based on gender in north Labuhanbatu district. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 6(12), 50-54.

Fitriani., Harahap., F., & Manurung, B. (2018). Biology Scientific Literacy of Indonesian Students: Case Study in Aceh Tamiang – Aceh. International Journal of Research and Review, 5(3), 63-72.

Banyen, W., Viriyavejakul, C., & Ratanaolarn, T. (2016). A Blended Learning Model for Learning Achievement Enhancement of Thai Undergraduate Students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(4), 48-55.

Obiedat, R., Eddeen, L. N., Harfoushi, O., Montaha, A. H., Koury, A., & Alassaf, N. (2014). Effect of blended-learning on academic achievement of students in the University of Jordan. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 9(2), 37-44.

Divayana, D. (2019). The implementation of blended learning with Kelase platform in the learning of assessment and evaluation course. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(17), 114-132.

Rasmitadila, R., Widyasari, W., Humaira, M., Tambunan, A., Rachmadtullah, R., & Samsudin, A. (2020). Using Blended Learning Approach (BLA) in Inclusive Education Course: A Study Investigating Teacher Students’ Perception. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(2), 72-85.

Bi, X., & Shi, X. (2019). On the Effects of Computer-Assisted Teaching on Learning Results Based on Blended Learning Method. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(01), 58-70.

Ayob, N. F. S., Abd Halim, N. D., Zulkifli, N. N., Zaid, N. M., & Mokhtar, M. (2020). Overview of Blended Learning: The Effect of Station Rotation Model on Students’achievement. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(6), 320-326.

Ambarli, S., Syahrial, Z., & Sukardjo, M. (2020). Pengaruh Model Blended Learning Rotasi dan Kecerdasan Intrapersonal Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA di SMP. Visipena, 11(1), 16-32.

Dewi, K. C., Ciptayani, P. I., Surjono, H. D., & Priyanto, P. (2018). Study of Instructional Model on Blended Learning in Polytechnic. Cakrawala Pendidikan, XXXVII(2), 270-281.

Govindaraj, A., & Silverajah, V. G. (2017, December). Blending Flipped Classroom and Station Rotation Models in Enhancing Students' Learning of Physics. In Proceedings of the 2017 9th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers (pp. 73-78).

Christina, S., Rusijono, R., & Bachtiar, B. (2019). The Application of Blended Learning’s Station Rotation Method in Elementary School’s Science Education to Improve Higher Order Thinking Skills. Dinamika Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 11(2), 79-85.

Fatmawati, I. N., & Utari, S. (2015). Penerapan levels of inquiry untuk meningkatkan literasi sains siswa SMP tema limbah dan upaya penanggulangannya. Edusains, 7(2), 151-159.

Stockwell, B. R., Stockwell, M. S., Cennamo, M., & Jiang, E. (2015). Blended learning improves science education. Cell, 162(5), 933-936.

Morton, C. E., Saleh, S. N., Smith, S. F., Hemani, A., Ameen, A., Bennie, T. D., & Toro-Troconis, M. (2016). Blended learning: how can we optimise undergraduate student engagement?. BMC medical education, 16(1), 195.

Maza, E. M. T., Lozano, M. T. G., Alarcón, A. C. C., Zuluaga, L. M., & Fadul, M. G. (2016). Blended learning supported by digital technology and competency-based medical education: a case study of the social medicine course at the Universidad de los Andes, Colombia. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 1-13.

Wichadee, S. (2017). A development of the blended learning model using Edmodo for maximizing students’ oral proficiency and motivation. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 12(02), 137-154.

Rafiola, R., Setyosari, P., Radjah, C., & Ramli, M. (2020). The Effect of Learning Motivation, Self-Efficacy, and Blended Learning on Students’ Achievement in The Industrial Revolution 4.0. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(8), 71-82.

Cao, S., & Liu, H. (2019). Effectiveness Analysis of Edmodo-Based Blended English Learning Mode. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(18), 64-75.

Nurkhin, A., Kardoyo, K., Pramusinto, H., Setiyani, R., & Widhiastuti, R. (2020). Applying Blended Problem-Based Learning to Accounting Studies in Higher Education; Optimizing the Utilization of Social Media for Learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(08), 22-39.

Ridwan, R., Hamid, H., & Aras, I. (2020). Blended Learning in Research Statistics Course at The English Education Department of Borneo Tarakan University. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(07), 61-73.

Saritepeci, M., & Cakir, H. (2015). The effect of blended learning environments on student motivation and student engagement: A study on social studies course. Egitim ve Bilim, 40(177), 203-216.

Schober, A., & Keller, L. (2012). Impact factors for learner motivation in Blended Learning environments. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 7(2012), 37-41.

Islam, S., Baharun, H., Muali, C., Ghufron, M. I., Bali, M. M. E. I., Wijaya, M., & Marzuki, I. (2018, November). To boost students’ motivation and achievement through blended learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1114, pp. 1-11).

Ibrahim, M. M., & Nat, M. (2019). Blended learning motivation model for instructors in higher education institutions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 12.

Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2011). The rise of K-12 blended learning. Innosight institute, 5.

Purwanto, N. (2010). Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Dinni, H. N. (2018, February). HOTS (High Order Thinking Skills) dan kaitannya dengan kemampuan literasi matematika. In PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika (Vol. 1, pp. 170-176).

Suryapuspitarini, B. K., Wardono, W., & Kartono, K. (2018, February). Analisis soal-soal matematika tipe Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) pada kurikulum 2013 untuk mendukung kemampuan literasi siswa. In PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika (Vol. 1, pp. 876-884).

Nofiana, M. (2017). Profil kemampuan literasi sains siswa smp di kota purwokerto ditinjau dari aspek konten, proses, dan konteks sains. JSSH (Jurnal Sains Sosial dan Humaniora), 1(2), 77-84.

Sujarwanto, E., Hidayat, A., & Wartono, W. (2014). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah fisika pada modeling instruction pada siswa SMA kelas XI. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3(1), 65-78.

Asyhari, A., & Clara, G. P. (2017). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Levels of Inquiry Terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 6(2), 87-101.

Aisyah, A. (2016). Studi literatur: Pendekatan induktif untuk meningkatkan kemampuan generalisasi dan self confident siswa SMK. JP3M (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Matematika), 2(1), 1-12.

Ekawati, R., Junaedi, I., & Nugroho, S. E. (2013). Studi respon siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal pemecahan masalah matematika berdasarkan taksonomi SOLO. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 2(2), 101-107.

Nurrahmah, A., & Karim, A. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Pembuktian Matematis Pada Matakuliah Teori Bilangan. JURNAL e-DuMath, 4(2), 21-29.

Soekisno, R. B. A. (2015). Pembelajaran berbasis masalah untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi matematis mahasiswa. Infinity Journal, 4(2), 120-139.

Ramdani, Y. (2012). Pengembangan instrumen dan bahan ajar untuk meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi, penalaran, dan koneksi matematis dalam konsep integral. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 13(1), 44-52.

Budiyono, A., Rusdiana, D., & Kholida, S. I. (2015). Pembelajaran Argument Based Science Inquiry (ABSI) Pada Fisika. Prosiding Simposium Nasional Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Sains 2015 (SNIPS 2015), 8, 205-208.


  • There are currently no refbacks.