Development of a Problem-Based Five-Tier Assessment Instrument in Phase B Science Learning to Measure Elementary School Students' Critical and Creative Thinking Abilities

Authors

Syaifullah , Undang Rosidin , Fatkhur Rohman , Ryzal Perdana

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v10i11.7450

Published:

2024-11-25

Issue:

Vol. 10 No. 11 (2024): November

Keywords:

Assessment instruments, Critical and creative thinking, IPA phase b material, Problem-based

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Iqbal Muhammad Syaifullah, Undang Rosidin, Rohman, F., & Perdana, R. (2024). Development of a Problem-Based Five-Tier Assessment Instrument in Phase B Science Learning to Measure Elementary School Students’ Critical and Creative Thinking Abilities. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(11), 9189–9199. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i11.7450

Downloads

Metrics

PDF views
54
Nov 25 '24Nov 28 '24Dec 01 '24Dec 04 '24Dec 07 '24Dec 10 '24Dec 13 '24Dec 16 '24Dec 19 '24Dec 22 '242.0
|

Abstract

The aim of this research is to develop an assessment instrument for problem-based Phase B science learning that is valid, practical and effective for measuring the critical and creative thinking abilities of students in elementary schools. This type of research is Research and Development (R&D), with development design referring to Borg & Gall theory. The population in this study was class IV students at SDN 4 Bumi Waras Bandar Lampung. Data collection tools use valid and reliable test instruments. The final average validation results from material experts, evaluation experts and language experts obtained a score of 87.75% with very valid criteria. The test results for the educator practitioners were 83% and the students were 82% with very practical criteria. The data analysis technique uses the One-Sample Z-Test to determine the correctness of the results of the assessment scores with a significance level of 95% (α 0.05), with a significance value of 0.023 obtained, indicating that the sig. value < 0.05 means H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted, so Effective assessment instrument for measuring students' critical and creative thinking abilities in elementary schools. Based on this research, it can be concluded that the assessment instruments for problem-based science learning are valid, practical and effective for measuring the critical and creative thinking abilities of students in elementary schools.

References

Ariyani, B., & Kristin, F. (2021). Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPS Siswa SD. Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 5(3), 353. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v5i3.36230

Azharini, R., Handoko, H., Rosidin, U., & Perdana, R. (2023). Analysis of Student Needs for E-Assessment Tools Oriented to Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in Thematic Learning to Measure Soft Skills and Hard Skills Competence. In R. Perdana, Sunyono, G. E. Putrawan, T. Y. Septiawan, & B. Saputra (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Progressive Education 2022 (ICOPE 2022) (Vol. 746, pp. 79–87). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-060-2_9

Cheung, G. W., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Lau, R. S., & Wang, L. C. (2023). Reporting Reliability, Convergent and Discriminant Validity with Structural Equation Modeling: A Review and Best-Practice Recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41, 745-783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for Educational Practice of the Science of Learning and Development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Dinara, H. A., Rahmawati, F., & Chasanah, A. (2022). Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability on Polyhedron in Term of Learning Styles. Union: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 10(3), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.30738/union.v10i3.12387

Dwyer, C. P., & Walsh, A. (2020). An Exploratory Quantitative Case Study of Critical Thinking Development Through Adult Distance Learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09659-2

Elangovan, N., & Sundaravel, E. (2021). Method of Preparing a Document for Survey Instrument Validation by Experts. MethodsX, 8, 101326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101326

Firdaus, R. M., Andayani, E., Yudiono, U., & Walipah, W. (2022). Implementasi Triple Helix of Economic Education Terintegrasi Sustainable Develompent Goals (SDGs) dalam Konteks Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Ekonomi, 7(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.21067/jrpe.v7i1.6404

Handayani, A., & Koeswanti, H. D. (2021). Meta-Analisis Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(3), 1349–1355. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i3.924

Handoko, H., Tola, B., Supriyati, Y., & Rangka, I. B. (2019). The Change of National Exam System from Paper-Based Test into Computer-Based Test. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technology and Educational Science, ICSTES 2018. Bali, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.21-11-2018.2282048

Intiana, S. R. H., Prihartini, A. A., Handayani, F., Mar’i, M., & Faridi, K. (2023). Independent Curriculum and the Indonesian Language Education Throughout the Era of Society 5.0: A Literature Review. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(1), 911–921. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.3140

Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S., & Khan, I. H. (2023). Unlocking the Opportunities Through ChatGPT Tool Towards Ameliorating the Education System. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(2), 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100115

Kim, S., Raza, M., & Seidman, E. (2019). Improving 21st-Century Teaching Skills: The Key to Effective 21st-Century Learners. Research in Comparative and International Education, 14(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499919829214

Ku, K. Y. L. (2009). Assessing Students’ Critical Thinking Performance: Urging for Measurements Using Multi-Response Format. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4(1), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2009.02.001

Lia, R. M., Rusilowati, A., & Isnaeni, W. (2020). NGSS-Oriented Chemistry Test Instruments: Validity and Reliability Analysis with the Rasch Model. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 6(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v6i1.30112

Luque-Vara, T., Linares-Manrique, M., Fernández-Gómez, E., Martín-Salvador, A., Sánchez-Ojeda, M. A., & Enrique-Mirón, C. (2020). Content Validation of an Instrument for the Assessment of School Teachers’ Levels of Knowledge of Diabetes Through Expert Judgment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), 8605. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228605

Marar, S., Hamza, M. A., Ayyash, M., & Abu-Shaheen, A. (2023). Development and Validation of an Instrument to Assess the Knowledge and Perceptions of Predatory Journals. Heliyon, 9(11), e22270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22270

Moyo, S. E., Combrinck, C., & Staden, S. V. (2022). Evaluating the Impact of Formative Assessment Intervention and Experiences of the Standard 4 Teachers in Teaching Higher-Order-Thinking Skills in Mathematics. Frontiers in Education, 7, 771437. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.771437

Nazhifah, N., Wiyono, K., Ismet, I., & Azairok, M. (2023). Profile of Physics Creative Thinking Skills for High School Students in The 21st Century. JIPFRI (Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika dan Riset Ilmiah), 7(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.30599/jipfri.v7i1.2131

Novita, L., Windiyani, T., Sukmanasa, E., & Utari, R. L. (2023). Higher Order Thinking Skills in Evaluation of IV Grade Thematic Materials in Elementary Schools. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 7(3), 498–507. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v7i3.57003

Nufus, H., Muhandaz, R., Hasanuddin, H., Nurdin, E., Ariawan, R., Fineldi, R. J., Hayati, I. R., & Situmorang, D. D. B. (2024). Analyzing the Students’ Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability in Terms of Self-Regulated Learning: How Do We Find What We are Looking for? Heliyon, 10(3), e24871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24871

O’Reilly, C., Devitt, A., & Hayes, N. (2022). Critical Thinking in the Preschool Classroom—A Systematic Literature Review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101110

Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., Leidy, N. K., Martin, M. L., Molsen, E., & Ring, L. (2011). Content Validity—Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 2—Assessing Respondent Understanding. Value in Health, 14(8), 978–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.013

Perdana, R., Rudibyani, R. B., Budiyono, B., Sajidan, S., & Sukarmin, S. (2020). The Effectiveness of Inquiry Social Complexity to Improving Critical and Creative Thinking Skills of Senior High School Students. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13430a

Petra, T. Z. H. T., & Aziz, M. J. A. (2020). Investigating Reliability and Validity of Student Performance Assessment in Higher Education Using Rasch Model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1529(4), 042088. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1529/4/042088

Petropoulos, F., Apiletti, D., Assimakopoulos, V., Babai, M. Z., Barrow, D. K., Taieb, S. B., Bergmeir, C., Bessa, R. J., Bijak, J., Boylan, J. E., Browell, J., Carnevale, C., Castle, J. L., Cirillo, P., Clements, M. P., Cordeiro, C., Cyrino Oliveira, F. L., Baets, S. D., Dokumentov, A., … Ziel, F. (2022). Forecasting: Theory and Practice. International Journal of Forecasting, 38(3), 705–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.11.001

Priyatni, E. T., & Martutik, M. (2020). The Development of a Critical–Creative Reading Assessment Based on Problem Solving. SAGE Open, 10(2), 215824402092335. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020923350

Rashid, Y., Rashid, A., Warraich, M. A., Sabir, S. S., & Waseem, A. (2019). Case Study Method: A Step-by-Step Guide for Business Researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 160940691986242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919862424

Rosidin, U., Herliani, D., & Viyanti, V. (2023). Development of Assessment Instruments in Project-Based Learning to Measure Students Scientific Literacy and Creative Thinking Skills on Work and Energy Materials. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(6), 4484–4494. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.2421

Rohman, F., Santi, T., Alamin, A., Pramudiyanti, P., Syahnia, S. M., & Yuninda, D. (2023). Participant Worksheet Education Based on Contextual Teaching and Learning to Develop Science Process Skills. Scientific Journal of Education and Learning, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v7i3.62991

Royani, A., & Setyarsih, W. (2022). Development of Google Form-Based Five-Tier E-Diagnostic Test to Identify Conception Levels and Track Students’ Misconceptions on Thermodynamics Materials. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 10(3), 450. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v10i3.5209

Sasmita, Z. A. G., Widodo, W., & Indana, S. (2021). Contextual Based Learning Media Development to Train Creative Thinking Skill in Primary School. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 2(4), 468–476. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v2i4.124

Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2022). Assessment of Mathematical Creative Thinking: A Systematic Review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101019

Surya, A., & Aman, A. (2016). Developing Formative Authentic Assessment Instruments Based on Learning Trajectory for Elementary School. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 2(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i1.6540

Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Tanjung, Y. I., & Nasution, I. R. (2023). The Development of Creative Thinking Test Instruments with Torrance Indicators on Direct Current Electricity Materials. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 18(2), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v18i2.32117

Vries, J. A. D., Dimosthenous, A., Schildkamp, K., & Visscher, A. J. (2022). The Impact on Student Achievement of an Assessment for Learning Teacher Professional Development Program. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 74, 101184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101184

Weber, A. M., & Greiff, S. (2023). ICT Skills in the Deployment of 21st Century Skills: A (Cognitive) Developmental Perspective Through Early Childhood. Applied Sciences, 13(7), 4615. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13074615

Wijayati, N., Sumarni, W., & Supanti, S. (2019). Improving Student Creative Thinking Skills Through Project Based Learning. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i18.4732

Author Biographies

Syaifullah, University of Lampung

Undang Rosidin, University of Lampung

Fatkhur Rohman, University of Lampung

Ryzal Perdana, University of Lampung

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Syaifullah, Undang Rosidin, Fatkhur Rohman, Ryzal Perdana

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).