Analyzing Project Outcomes and Students’ Responses of Renewable Energy STEAM Kit

Authors

Lintang Rahmayanti , Sentot Budi Rahardjo , Sukarmin

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v10i9.8485

Published:

2024-09-25

Issue:

Vol. 10 No. 9 (2024): September

Keywords:

Project outcome, Renewable energy, Science Kit, STEAM

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Rahmayanti, L., Rahardjo, S. B., & Sukarmin. (2024). Analyzing Project Outcomes and Students’ Responses of Renewable Energy STEAM Kit. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(9), 7103–7112. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i9.8485

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Addressing global challenges requires a strong focus on environmental sustainability within educational institutions. This research aims to analyze the project outcome and student’s responses of Renewable Energy STEAM Kit. The study involved 31 students who participated in the learning project using Renewable Energy STEAM Kit. Data was collected through observation to assess the project outcome of learning activities, and survey & interview to gather student’s responses about their experiences from learning activities using Renewable Energy STEAM Kit. Data processing utilized descriptive quantitative methodologies to derive significant insights from the provided data. According to the result, 96.8% of students agreed and strongly agreed that the Renewable Energy STEAM Kit is easy to use, interest, flexible, benefit, and relevant. Only 3.2% of students that disagreed about that statement. The results of this study can be concluded that Renewable Energy STEAM Kit's success in being user-friendly, engaging, flexible, beneficial, and relevant to students' educational experiences and future aspirations.

References

Abdurrahman, A., Maulina, H., & Nurulsari, N. (2023). Heliyon Impacts of Integrating Engineering Design Process Into STEM Makerspace on Renewable Energy Unit to Foster Students’ System Thinking Skills. Heliyon, 9(4), e15100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15100

Aguilera, D., & Ortiz-Revilla, J. (2021). STEM vs. STEAM Education and Student Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review. Education Sciences, 11(7), 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070

Annan-Diab, F., & Molinari, C. (2017). Interdisciplinarity: Practical Approach to Advancing Education for Sustainability and for the Sustainable Development Goals. The International Journal of Management Education, 15(2), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.

006

Aurelia, C., Santhalia, P. W., & Kristiyanto, W. H. (2023). STEAM-Integrated Problem-Based Learning: Indonesian Music on Sound Wave Concepts. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 9078–9084. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10

.3495

Badriyah, N. L., Anekawati, A., & Azizah, L. F. (2020). Application of PjBL with Brain-Based STEAM Approach to Improve Learning Achievement of Students. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v6i1.29884

Barlex, D. (2011). The STEM Programme in England: Help or Hindrance for Design & Technology Education? Leiden: Brill.

Budiastra, A. A. K., Wicaksono, I., & Erlina, N. (2022). The Effect of Science Kit and Supervision Models on The Implementation and Implications on The Evaluation of Science Practicum Distance Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(5), 2443–2450. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.

Chen, W., Tang, X., & Mou, T. (2019). Course Design and Teaching Practice in STEAM Education at Distance Via an Interactive E-Learning Platform. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 14(2), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-07-201

-0027

Chou, Y., Yen, H., & Yen, H. (2015). The Effectiveness of Teaching Aids for Elementary Students’ Renewable Energy Learning and an Analysis of Their Energy Attitude Formation. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education - IJESE, 10(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.12973/

ijese.2015.229a

Çoker, B., Çatlıoğlu, H., & Birgin, O. (2010). Conceptions of Students about Renewable Energy Sources: A Need to Teach Based on Contextual Approaches. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1488–1492. https://doi.org/10.1016

/j.sbspro.2010.03.223

Cross, N. (2021). Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Dickerson, D. L., Stewart, C. O., Hathcock, S., & McConnell, W. (2014). The Nature and Role of Science Kits in Affecting Change in Public Attitude Toward Understanding of Science. In Communicating Science to the Public (pp. 47–62). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/

-94-017-9097-0_4

Ejaz, M. R. (2021). The Future of Flexible Product Manufacturing by Using Industry 4.0 Technologies in Regard to Consumer Preferences. Marketing & Menedzsment, 55(3), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.15170/MM.2021.55.03.01

Engelman, S., Magerko, B., McKlin, T., Miller, M., Edwards, D., & Freeman, J. (2017). Creativity in Authentic STEAM Education with EarSketch. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017763

English, L. D. (2017). Advancing Elementary and Middle School STEM Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(S1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9802-x

Erlina, N., Warpala, I. W. S., & Juniartina, P. P. (2022). Pengembangan Alat Peraga 3D Berbasis Eco-Friendly Melalui Project Based Online Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kreativitas Ilmiah Calon Guru IPA. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sains Indonesia (JPPSI), 5(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/

/jppsi.v5i2.52785

Graham, M. A. (2020). Deconstructing the Bright Future of STEAM and Design Thinking. Art Education, 73(3), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.

1717820

Guyotte, K. W., Sochacka, N. W., Costantino, T. E., Walther, J., & Kellam, N. N. (2014). STEAM as Social Practice: Cultivating Creativity in Transdisciplinary Spaces. Art Education, 67(6), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2014.11519

Habibi, M. M. (2023). Strategies for Enhancing Early Childhood Science Literacy Through STEAM Education. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 11767–11772. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i

4960

Hamimi, E., Danissa, F. P., & Affriyenni, Y. (2024). Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills Through The Development of Educational Kit Based on Problem Based Learning on Conservation Material. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 12(2), 294–314. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v12i2.3498

Han, H., & Ahn, S. W. (2020). Youth Mobilization to Stop Global Climate Change: Narratives and Impact. Sustainability, 12(10), 4127. https://doi.

org/10.3390/su12104127

Hawari, A. D. M., & Noor, A. I. M. (2020). Project Based Learning Pedagogical Design in STEAM Art Education. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(3), 102. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i3.

Henriksen, D., Mehta, R., & Mehta, S. (2019). Design Thinking Gives STEAM to Teaching: A Framework that Breaks Disciplinary Boundaries. In STEAM Education (pp. 57–78). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007

/978-3-030-04003-1_4

Hsiao, P.-W., & Su, C.-H. (2021). A Study on the Impact of STEAM Education for Sustainable Development Courses and Its Effects on Student Motivation and Learning. Sustainability, 13(7), 3772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073772

Jones, G., Robertson, L., Gardner, G. E., Dotger, S., & Blanchard, M. R. (2012). Differential Use of Elementary Science Kits. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2371–2391. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.602755

Kayes, D. C., & Kayes, A. B. (2021). Experiential Learning and Education in Management. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Oxford University Press. https://doi

.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.294

Kersanszki, T., Márton, Z., Fenyvesi, K., Lavicza, Z., & Holik, I. (2024). Minecraft in STEAM Education – Applying Game-Based Learning to Renewable Energy. Interaction Design and Architecture(S), 60, 194–213. https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-060-008

Khamhaengpol, A., Sriprom, M., & Chuamchaitrakool, P. (2021). Development of STEAM Activity on Nanotechnology to Determine Basic Science Process Skills and Engineering Design Process for High School Students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

tsc.2021.100796

Khanum, B., & Haleem, B. (2023). Exploring the Role of Green Education in Enhancing Multiple Literacies for the 21st Century: Preparing Students for Globalized Living and Working in the New Millennium. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 7(3), 1083–1098. https://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2023(7-III)89

Kim, Y. E., Morton, B. G., Gregorio, J., Rosen, D. S., Edouard, K., & Vallett, R. (2019). Enabling Creative Collaboration for All Levels of Learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(6), 1878–1885. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.

Kyle, W. C. (2020). Expanding Our Views of Science Education to Address Sustainable Development, Empowerment, and Social Transformation. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 2(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0018-5

Lederman, N. G., Zeidler, D. L., & Lederman, J. S. (2023). Handbook of Research on Science Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/97803678557

Lestari, S. (2021). Pengembangan Orientasi Keterampilan Abad 21 pada Pembelajaran Fisika Melalui Pembelajaran PjBL-STEAM Berbantuan Spectra-Plus. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v6i3.243

Li, J., Luo, H., Zhao, L., Zhu, M., Ma, L., & Liao, X. (2022). Promoting STEAM Education in Primary School Through Cooperative Teaching: A Design-Based Research Study. Sustainability, 14(16), 10333. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10333

Linn, R. L., & Miller, M. D. (2005). Measurement and Assessment in Teaching (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Luh, N., Mareta, I., Redhana, W., & Suastra, W. (2023). Multiple Scaffolding STEAM Project-Based Learning Model In Science Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(8), 6493–6502. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.4470

Lyon, J. A., & Magana, A. J. (2021). The Use of Engineering Model Building Activities to Elicit Computational Thinking: A Design Based Research Study. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(1), 184–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.2037

McNally, R. C., Cavusgil, E., & Calantone, R. J. (2010). Product Innovativeness Dimensions and Their Relationships with Product Advantage, Product Financial Performance, and Project Protocol. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(7), 991–1006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.20

00766.x

Mu’minah, I. H., & Suryaningsih, Y. (2020). Implementasi STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art and Mathematics) dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Bio Educatio : (The Journal of Science and Biology Education), 5(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.31949/be.v5i1.2105

Nutov, L. (2021). Integrating Visual Arts Into the Mathematics Curriculum: The Case of Pre-Service Teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 103218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.10321

Olabi, A. G., & Abdelkareem, M. A. (2022). Renewable Energy and Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 158, 112111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112111

Ozdem-Yilmaz, Y., & Bilican, K. (2020). Discovery Learning—Jerome Bruner. In: Akpan, B., Kennedy, T.J. (eds) Science Education in Theory and Practice (p. 177–190). Springer Texts in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_13

Presley, L., Carroll, B., & Gorbet, R. (2016). It Lives! A STEAM-Based in-Class Workshop for Promotion of Creative and Innovation Thinking. 2016 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), 271–277. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISECon.2016.745754

Puchongprawet, J., & Chantraukrit, P. (2022). Creative Problem-Solving and Creativity Product in STEM Education. International Journal of Instruction, 7(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2022.7211a

Qu, J., Guo, H., Wang, W., Dang, S., & Liu, H. (2022). A Study on the Intuitive Design of Target Search Tasks Under Time and Information Pressure. Brain Sciences, 12(11), 1464. https://doi.org/10.

/brainsci12111464

Rahmad, M., & Wulandari, S. (2024). Persepsi Guru IPA Terhadap Pengelolaan Eksperimen IPA. Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 7(3), 449–454. Retrieved from https://journal.ilininstitute.com/

index.php/caradde

Rahmatiah, R., Rokhmat, J., Jufri, A. W., Gunawan, G., & Sukarso, A. (2023). Science Learning Gamification: Perspectives in Building Student Creativity. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 981–991. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.4

Rahmayanti, L., Nugraheni, F. S. A., & Lestari, N. (2024). Penerapan Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, Mathematics (STEAM) untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Kreatif. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran IPA Indonesia, 14(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppii.v14i1`.68873

Rozi, Z. F., & Ruyani, A. (2024). Development of a STEAM-Based Homeostatic Module to Improve Students ’ Cognitive Abilities. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(6), 3099–3107. https://doi.org/

29303/jppipa.v10i6.7253

Sarjani, L. P. W., Suastra, I. W., & Subagia, I. W. (2023). The Influence of Project-Based Learning Models on Collaboration Skills and Science Learning Outcome for Junior High School. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(SpecialIssue), 1284–1292. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9iSpecialIssue.7243

Setianingrum, D. A., & Jumadi, J. (2023). STEAM Study on Local Wisdom of Batik Tulis Yogyakarta to Develop Science Teaching Materials. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 7390–7400. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.5133

Setiawan, S. (2021). Using Kit for Kids At Discovery Learning Model to Increase Interest Toward Science Elementary School Students. Journal of Elementary Education, 5(2), 176–186. https://doi.

org/10.22460/pej.v5i2.2745

Sinsel, S. R., Riemke, R. L., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2020). Challenges and Solution Technologies for the Integration of Variable Renewable Energy Sources—A Review. Renewable Energy, 145, 2271–2285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.14

Subiki, S., Elika, E. T. P., & Anggraeni, F. K. A. (2023). Effect of the Project-Based Learning Model with the STEAM Approach on Learning Outcomes of High School Students the Subject of Material Elasticity. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(2), 745–751. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i2.29

Taber, K. S. (2020). Mediated Learning Leading Development—The Social Development Theory of Lev Vygotsky. In: Akpan, B., Kennedy, T.J. (eds) Science Education in Theory and Practice (p. 277–291). Springer Texts in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_19

Videla, R., Aguayo, C., & Veloz, T. (2021). From STEM to STEAM: An Enactive and Ecological Continuum. In Frontiers in Education. frontiersin.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.

709560

Zulirfan, Z., & Yennita, Y. (2022). Feasibility Test of STEM at Home Prototype Kit as Science Project-Based Learning Media for Junior High School Students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.1122

Zulirfan, Z., Yennita, Y., & Rahmad, M. (2021). Students’ Perception of Home-STEM Project Kits for Science Learning in Junior High School. Universitas Riau International Conference on Education Technology, 49–53.

Author Biographies

Lintang Rahmayanti, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Sentot Budi Rahardjo, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Sukarmin, Universitas Sebelas Maret

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Lintang Rahmayanti, Sentot Budi Rahardjo, Sukarmin

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).