The Influence of Gadget Use and Teacher Creativity Through Motivation on Students Learning Outcomes of Science

Authors

Muhammad Iqbal , Rosma Diana Lubis , Sri Wahyuni

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v10i9.8594

Published:

2024-09-30

Issue:

Vol. 10 No. 9 (2024): September

Keywords:

Gadget, Learning Results, Motivation, Teacher Creativity

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Iqbal, M., Lubis, R. D., & Wahyuni, S. (2024). The Influence of Gadget Use and Teacher Creativity Through Motivation on Students Learning Outcomes of Science. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(9), 6287–6297. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i9.8594

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This research aims to provide empirical evidence regarding the influence of gadget use and teacher creativity through motivation on learning outcomes in class VI students at SD Negeri 10 Bebesen. In this research, the author used secondary data and primary data. Secondary data was obtained from the Central Aceh District Education Office, while primary data was obtained from questionnaires for students at SD Negeri 10 Bebesen. The analysis model used is path analysis with a t-test, F-test, and coefficient of determination test. Based on partial test results (t-test) it shows that the use of gadgets has a positive and significant effect through motivation on the learning outcomes of Class VI students at SD Negeri 10 Bebesen, this is proven by the calculated t value (1.95) which is greater than the t table (1.67) with a value significance (0.01) is smaller than the significance limit (0.05). Teacher Creativity has a positive and significant effect through Motivation on Class VI Student Learning Outcomes at SD Negeri 10 Bebesen, this is proven by the calculated t value (1.82) which is greater than the t table (1.67) with a significance value (0.01) which is smaller than the significance limit (0.05).

References

Alt, D., Naamati-Schneider, L., & Weishut, D. J. N. (2023). Competency-based learning and formative assessment feedback as precursors of college students’ soft skills acquisition. Studies in Higher Education, 48(12), 1901–1917. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2217203

Ariyanti, K. S., Sariyani, M. D., Viqtrayana, I. P. E., & Winangsih, R. (2022). The Relationship Between Gadget Usage and Adolescents Eye Health. Nursing and Health Sciences Journal (NHSJ), 2(3), 211–214. https://doi.org/10.53713/nhs.v2i3.129

Atma, B. A., Azahra, F. F., & Mustadi, A. (2021). Teaching style, learning motivation, and learning achievement: Do they have significant and positive relationships? Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v9i1.33770

Bandhu, D., Mohan, M. M., Nittala, N. A. P., Jadhav, P., Bhadauria, A., & Saxena, K. K. (2024). Theories of motivation: A comprehensive analysis of human behavior drivers. Acta Psychologica, 244, 104177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104177

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Dwivedi, Y. K., Ismagilova, E., Hughes, D. L., Carlson, J., Filieri, R., Jacobson, J., Jain, V., Karjaluoto, H., Kefi, H., Krishen, A. S., Kumar, V., Rahman, M. M., Raman, R., Rauschnabel, P. A., Rowley, J., Salo, J., Tran, G. A., & Wang, Y. (2021). Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102168

Fabriz, S., Mendzheritskaya, J., & Stehle, S. (2021). Impact of Synchronous and Asynchronous Settings of Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education on Students’ Learning Experience During COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 733554. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733554

Fan, M., & Cai, W. (2022). How does a creative learning environment foster student creativity? An examination on multiple explanatory mechanisms. Current Psychology, 41(7), 4667–4676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00974-z

Faradiba P, St. A. A. & Arsad Bahri. (2024). Systematic Literature Review: Using Mind Mapping to Improve Students’ Creative Thinking Abilities. Journal of Digital Learning And Distance Education, 3(1), 921–929. https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v3i1.269

Fromm, J., Radianti, J., Wehking, C., Stieglitz, S., Majchrzak, T. A., & Vom Brocke, J. (2021). More than experience? - On the unique opportunities of virtual reality to afford a holistic experiential learning cycle. The Internet and Higher Education, 50, 100804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100804

Gómez-Trigueros, I. M., Ruiz-Bañuls, M., Esteve-Faubel, J. M., & Mareque León, F. (2024). Teacher Motivation: Exploring the Integration of Technology and Didactics in the Narratives of Future Teachers. Social Sciences, 13(4), 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13040217

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

Henriksen, D., Henderson, M., Creely, E., Carvalho, A. A., Cernochova, M., Dash, D., Davis, T., & Mishra, P. (2021). Creativity and risk-taking in teaching and learning settings: Insights from six international narratives. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 100024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100024

Ibrahim, M. & Abadi. (2018). Cultivating characters (moral value) through internalization strategy in science classroom. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 296, 012047. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/296/1/012047

Irawahyuni, S., Pujiastuti, P., & Nugraheni, A. S. (2021). The Effect of Snowball Throwing Cooperative Learning Model on Student Learning Outcomes. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(3), 1995–2002. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i3.696

Iskandar, A., Rusydi, I., Amin, H., Nur Hakim, M., & Amirul Haqq, H. (2022). Strategic Management in Improving the Quality of Education in Boarding School. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(4), 7229–7238. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.2075

Ismayilova, K., & Bolander Laksov, K. (2023). Teaching Creatively in Higher Education: The Roles of Personal Attributes and Environment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 67(4), 536–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2042732

Kamalov, F., Santandreu Calonge, D., & Gurrib, I. (2023). New Era of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Towards a Sustainable Multifaceted Revolution. Sustainability, 15(16), 12451. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612451

Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0131-6

Könings, K. D., Mordang, S., Smeenk, F., Stassen, L., & Ramani, S. (2021). Learner involvement in the co-creation of teaching and learning: AMEE Guide No. 138. Medical Teacher, 43(8), 924–936. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1838464

Lodge, J. M., Kennedy, G., Lockyer, L., Arguel, A., & Pachman, M. (2018). Understanding Difficulties and Resulting Confusion in Learning: An Integrative Review. Frontiers in Education, 3, 49. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00049

Madarcos, C. A., De Vera, M. G., & Manlavi, M. (2024). The Effectiveness of Using Gadgets on Students’ Learning Interests and Academic Performance. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v3i1.222

Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100202

Naik, G., Chitre, C., Bhalla, M., & Rajan, J. (2020). Impact of use of technology on student learning outcomes: Evidence from a large-scale experiment in India. World Development, 127, 104736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104736

Pilcher, N., & Cortazzi, M. (2024). “Qualitative” and “quantitative” methods and approaches across subject fields: Implications for research values, assumptions, and practices. Quality & Quantity, 58(3), 2357–2387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01734-4

Rahmi, N. A., Sumarmin, R., Ahda, Y., Alberida, H., & Razak, A. (2021). Relationship between Learning Motivation and Biology Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(4), 537–541. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i4.773

Ratnasari, D., & Haryanto, H. (2019). Analysis of Utilization of Gadgets as Effective Learning Media in Innovation Education to improve Student Learning Achievement. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i17.4671

Rosanna, D. L. (2023). Analysis of the Impact of Gadgets on Student Learning Motivation on High School Chemistry Lessons. LAVOISIER: Chemistry Education Journal, 2(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.24952/lavoisier.v2i1.8275

Saputro, H. B., & Suci, S. N. S. (2023). The Teacher’s Role in Increasing Student Motivation in Learning Mathematics for Fourth Grade Students at SDN Gotakan. Journal of Education and Learning Mathematics Research (JELMaR), 4(1), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.37303/jelmar.v4i1.100

Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0

Scott-Barrett, J., Johnston, S.-K., Denton-Calabrese, T., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2023). Nurturing curiosity and creativity in primary school classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 135, 104356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104356

Siregar, H. (2023). Improving Students’ Learning Outcome in Mathematics with Brainstorming Model. Journal of Digital Learning and Distance Education, 1(10), 325–331. https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v1i10.96

Steinmayr, R., Weidinger, A. F., Schwinger, M., & Spinath, B. (2019). The Importance of Students’ Motivation for Their Academic Achievement – Replicating and Extending Previous Findings. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1730. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01730

Suryani, N., Rozi, F., & Purnama, N. (2018). The Influence of Learning Motivation, Learning Ways, and Variation of Teaching Styles Towards Learning Activeness in the Subject of Public Administration at Grade X Students of Automatic Expertise Program and Office Governance of Vocational High School NU 01 Kendal in the Academic Year of 2017/2018. KnE Social Sciences, 3(10), 289. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i10.3136

Triana, H., Abustang, P. B., Utomo, E., Rakhman, G. G. F., & Fahrurrozi, F. (2023). Assessment Evaluation Using Solo Taxonomy for Measuring Levels of Critical Thinking Skills: PYP International Baccalaureate Case Study. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 11(2), 581. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v11i2.7894

Urhahne, D., & Wijnia, L. (2023). Theories of Motivation in Education: An Integrative Framework. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09767-9

Vagg, T., Balta, J. Y., Bolger, A., & Lone, M. (2020). Multimedia in Education: What do the Students Think? Health Professions Education, 6(3), 325–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2020.04.011

Viyanti, Ramayani, D. L., & Rosidin, U. (2023). Development of Assessment Instruments in Project-Based Learning to Measure Students Scientific and Numeracy Literacy Ability on Harmonic Vibration Materials. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(7), 5039–5048. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.2408

Yusop, S. R. M., Rasul, M. S., Mohamad Yasin, R., Hashim, H. U., & Jalaludin, N. A. (2022). An Assessment Approaches and Learning Outcomes in Technical and Vocational Education: A Systematic Review Using PRISMA. Sustainability, 14(9), 5225. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095225

Zamiri, M., & Esmaeili, A. (2024). Methods and Technologies for Supporting Knowledge Sharing within Learning Communities: A Systematic Literature Review. Administrative Sciences, 14(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14010017

Zen, Z., Reflianto, Syamsuar, & Ariani, F. (2022). Academic achievement: The effect of project-based online learning method and student engagement. Heliyon, 8(11), e11509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11509

Zhang, H., Sun, C., Liu, X., Gong, S., Yu, Q., & Zhou, Z. (2020). Boys benefit more from teacher support: Effects of perceived teacher support on primary students’ creative thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100680

Author Biographies

Muhammad Iqbal, Universitas Al-Muslim, Bireun, Aceh, Indonesia

Rosma Diana Lubis, Universitas Al-Muslim, Bireun, Aceh, Indonesia

Sri Wahyuni, Universitas Al-Muslim, Bireun, Aceh, Indonesia

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Iqbal, Rosma Diana Lubis, Sri Wahyuni

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).