Empirical Foundations for Developing New Learning Models to Improve Chemical Literacy, Scientific Habits of Mind, and Science Process Skills of Chemistry Education Students
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v10i10.8661Published:
2024-10-25Issue:
Vol. 10 No. 10 (2024): OctoberKeywords:
Chemical literacy, Chemistry education, Science process skills, Scientific habits of mindResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
The development of a new learning model to increase chemical literacy skills, scientific habits of mind (SHOM), and science process skills (SPS) of chemistry education students is needed to prepare competent chemistry teacher candidates in the future. Theoretical studies have discussed the low chemistry literacy, SHOM, and SPS of students. This research aims to prove the theoretical study data by looking directly at the conditions of chemical literacy, SHOM, and SPS of chemistry education students. The research took place in four stages: measuring and comparing chemical literacy; measuring SHOM; observing SPS during learning activities in the laboratory; and conducting needs analysis for lecturers. The scores obtained from measuring chemical literacy are very worrying. However, there are significant differences in chemical literacy as the years of study increase. Student SHOM is also still in the medium category and needs to be improved. Student SPS is also still relatively low. Furthermore, the lecturers suggested developing a learning model that could develop these three abilities. The model developed must be suitable for adult learning and be able to develop student abilities
References
Arciniega, L., Woehr, D., & Fernandez, L. G. (2023). Leading a post-pandemic workforce: Understanding employees’ changing work ethic. Business Research Quarterly, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444231208725
Asikin, N., & Yulita, I. (2019). Scientific literacy-based chemical teaching materials design of chemical solution materials on sea pollution context. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v5i2.249
Asrizal, A. F., & Sumarmin, R. (2018). The development of integrated science instructional materials to improve students’ digital literacy in scientific approach. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(4), 442–450. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.13613
Ball, A., Joyce, H. D., & Anderson-Butcher, D. (2016). Exploring 21st-century skills and learning environments for middle school youth. International Journal of School Social Work, 1(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4148/2161-4148.1012
Çalik, M., & Coll, R. (2012). Investigating socio-scientific issues via scientific habits of mind: Development and validation of the scientific habits of mind survey. International Journal of Science Education, 34(12), 1909–1930. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.685197
Çalık, M., Ültay, N., Kolomuç, A., & Aytar, A. (2015). A cross-age study of science student teachers’ chemistry attitudes. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4rp00133h
Cholifah, N., Parmin, & Dewi, N. R. (2016). Pengaruh pendekatan contextual teaching and learning (ctl) berbasis eksperimen terhadap hasil belajar kognitif dan sikap ilmiah. Unnes Science Education Journal, 5(3), 1343–1353. https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v5i3.13163
Cigdemoglu, C., & Geban, O. (2015). Improving students’ chemical literacy levels on thermochemical and thermodynamics concepts through a context-based approach. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5rp00007f
Creswell, J. C. (2012). Education research, planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4 th). Pearson.
Delen, İ., & Kesercioğlu, T. (2012). How middle school students’ science process skills affected by Turkey’s national curriculum change? Journal of Turkish Science Education, 9(4), 3–9. Retrived from https://tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/465
Edwards, D., Carrier, J., Csontos, J., Evans, N., Elliot, M., Gillen, E., Hannigan, B., Lane, R., & Williams, L. (2023). Review: Crisis responses for children and young people – systematic review of effectiveness, experiences, and service organisation (camh-crisis. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 29(1), 70 – 83. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12639
Feyzioğlu, B. (2009). An investigation of the relationship between science process skills with efficient laboratory use and science achievement in chemistry education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(3), 114–132. Retrived from https://tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/132
Gauld, C. F. (2005). Habits of mind, scholarship and decision making in science and religion. Science & Education, 14, 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-004-1997-x
Gay, L., Geoffrey, E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research: competencies for analysis and application (10th ed.). Pearson.
Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (2012). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Spinger. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 94-007-2324-5
Hayat, M. S., Rustaman, N. Y., Rahmat, A., & Redjeki, S. (2019). The improvement of prospective teachers’ habits of mind during the 5E+e inquiry learning program in holticulture course. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 14(9), 535–545. Retrived from Downloads%5CDocuments%5CIJESE_2143_article_5d9b71999c179.pdf
Hernawati, D., Amin, M., Irawati, M., Indriwati, S., & Aziz, M. (2018). Integration of project activity to enhance the scientific process skill and self-efficacy in zoology of vertebrate teaching and learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2475–2485. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/89940
Irwanto. (2022). The impact of research-oriented collaborative inquiry learning on pre-service teachers’ scientific process skills and attitudes. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(2), 410–425. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1583
Irwanto. (2023). Improving preservice chemistry teachers’ critical thinking and science process skills using research-oriented collaborative inquiry learning. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1796
Keslair, F., & Paccagnella, M. (2020). Assessing adults’ skills on global scale: a joint analysis of results frim piaac and step. OECD Education Working Paper, 230, 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1787/ae2f95d5-en
Kohen, Z., Herscovitz, O., & Dori, Y. J. (2020). How to promote chemical literacy? On-line question posing and communicating with scientists. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 250–266. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00134d
Marzano, R. J. (1994). Performance assessment on dimensions of learning. ACSD.
Muntholib., I., S., & Kuswandi, B. (2020). Chemical literacy: performance of first year chemistry students on chemical kinetics. Indonesian Journal of Chemistry, 20(2), 468–482. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.43651
Novitra, F. (2021). Development of Online-Based Inquiry Learning Model to Improve 21st-Century Skills of Physics Students in Senior High School. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(9). Retrived from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1311539
OECD. (2015). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Result from PISA. Retrived from https://shorturl.asia/5z3dn
OECD. (2023). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2022 Result. Retrived from https://shorturl.asia/bRmad
Osman, K., & Vebrianto, R. (2013). Fostering science process skills and improving achievement through the use of multiple media. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(2), 191–204. Retrived from https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1084415
Özgelen, S. (2012). Students’ science process skills withina cognitive domain framework. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.846a
Padilla, M. J., Okey, J. R., & Dillashaw, F. G. (1983). The relationship between science process skill and formal thinking abilities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(3), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660200308
Perry, K. H., Shaw, D. M., & Saberimoghaddam, S. (2020). Literacy practices and the programme for the international assessment of adult competencies (piiac): a conceptual critique. International Review of Education, 66(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-019-09819-9
Pratama, F. I. (2023). Pengaruh penggunaan e-book “chemistry challenge” pada materi kesetimbangan kimia terhadap peningkatan literasi kimia dan kebiasaan berpikir ilmiah peserta didik. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Pratama, F. I., Aznam, N., & Rohaeti, E. (2023). The study of chemical literacy related to chemical ethics based on local phenomena day-to day: a case of used cooking oil. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 6810–6818. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.3224
Pratama, F. I., & Rohaeti, E. (2023). Students’ chemical literacy ability on hydrocarbon material: a case of toxic compounds in fried food. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 6795–6802. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.4554
Pratama, F. I., & Rohaeti, E. (2024). How does “chemistry challenge” e-book affect the chemical literacy profile? A study to test learning media effectiveness. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(5), 2253–2260. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.7018
Priliyanti, A., Muderawan, I. W., & Maryam, S. (2021). Analisis kesulitan belajar siswa dalam mempelajari kimia kelas xi. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Undiksha, 5(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpk.v5i1.32402
Rohaeti, E., Prodjosantoso, A. K., & Irwanto. (2020). Research-oriented collaborative inquiry learning model: improving students’ scientific attitudes in general chemistry. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(1), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.108
Sadhu, S., Ad’hiya, E., & Laksono, E. W. (2019). Exploring and comparing content validity and assumptions of modern theory of an integrated assessment: critical thinking-chemical literacy studies. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(4), 570–581. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i4.20967
Sevian, H., Dori, Y. J., & Parchmann, I. (2018). How does stem context-based learning work: what we know and what we still do not know. International Journal of Science Education, 40(10), 1095–1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.147034
Shaibu, A. A., & Mari, J. S. (2003). The effect of process-skill instruction on secondary school students’ formal reasoning ability in Nigeria. Science Education International, 14(4), 51–54. Retrived from https://shorturl.asia/4IQDy
Shwartz, Y., Ben-zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006). The use of scientific literacy taxonomy for assessing the development of chemical literacy among high-school students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(4), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90011A
Siami, F., Sumarni, W., Sudarmin., & Harjono. (2023). Development of integrated lkpd ethnoscience batik semarang to improve students’ chemical literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 7784–7792. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.3604
Songhori, M. H. (2008). Introduction to needs analysis. English for Specific Purpose World.
Stasevic, F., Miletic, N., Nikolic, J. D., & Gutman, I. (2023). Do Serbian high school students possess knowledge of basic chemical facts related to real life as prerequisite for chemical literacy? Journal of Serbian Chemical Society, 88(3), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC211126083S
Steinkuehler, C., & Duncan, S. (2008). Scientific habits of mind in virtual worlds. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 530–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9120-8
Tosun, C. (2019). Scientific process skills test development within the topic “matter and its nature” and the predictive effect of different variables on 7th and 8th grade students’ scientific process skill levels. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(1), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8rp00071a
Wiyarsi, A., & Çalik, M. (2019). Revisiting the scientific habits of mind scale for socio-scientific issues in the Indonesian context. International Journal of Science Education, 41(17), 2430–2447. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1683912
Wiyarsi, A., Çalik, M., Priyambodo, E., & Dina, D. (2023). Indonesian prospective teachers’ scientific habits of mind: A cross-grade study in the context of local and global socio-scientific issues. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00429-4
Wiyarsi, A., Pratomo, H., & Priyambodo, E. (2020). Vocational high school students’ chemical literacy on context-based learning: a case of petroleum topic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(1), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.18
Wiyarsi, A., Prodjosantoso, A. K., & Nugraheni, A. R. E. (2020). Students’ chemical; literacy level: a case on electrochemistry topic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012019
Wiyarsi, A., Prodjosantoso, A. K., & Nugraheni, A. R. E. (2021). Promoting students’ scientific habits of mind and chemical literacy using the context of socio-scientific issues on the inquiry learning. Frontiers in Education, 6(May), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.660495
Zakiyah, Z., Ibnu, S., & Subandi, S. (2018). Analisis Dampak Kesulitan Siswa pada Materi Stoikiometri terhadap Hasil Belajar Termokimia dan Upaya Menguranginya dengan Metode Pemecahan Masalah. EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan, 3(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.30870/educhemia.v3i1.1784
Zeidan, A. H., & Jayosi, M. R. (2015). Science process skills and attitudes toward science among Palestinian secondary school students. World Journal of Education, 5(1), 13–24. Retrived from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1158460
Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27(2), 172–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.dr.2006.12.001
Author Biographies
Faiz Ilham Pratama, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Eli Rohaeti, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Endang Widjajanti Laksono, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Faiz Ilham Pratama, Eli Rohaeti, Endang Widjajanti Laksono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
