The Effect of Using Virtual Laboratories Using the Guided Discovery Learning Model on Students' Conceptual Understanding of Static Electricity Material

Authors

Haeratunisah , Aris Doyan , Muhammad Taufik

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v10i10.8682

Published:

2024-10-25

Issue:

Vol. 10 No. 10 (2024): October

Keywords:

Conceptual understanding, Guided Discovery learning, Static electricity, Virtual laboratory

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Haeratunisah, Doyan, A., & Taufik, M. (2024). The Effect of Using Virtual Laboratories Using the Guided Discovery Learning Model on Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Static Electricity Material. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(10), 8015–8022. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i10.8682
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This study aims to test or examine the effect of the use of virtual laboratories using the Guided Discovery Learning model on students' conceptual understanding abilities in static electricity material. This type of research is a quasi-experimental study with a nonequivalent control group research design. The population in this study were all students of class XII of SMAN 1 Monta. The sampling technique used in this study was purposive sampling with class XII MIPA 2 consisting of 28 students as the experimental class and class XII MIPA 1 consisting of 28 students as the control class. Before and after the treatment, both classes were given a conceptual understanding ability test in the form of essay questions that had previously been tested for their feasibility with validity, reliability, difficulty level of questions, and discriminatory power. The results of the initial test (Pretest) and final test (Posttest) of conceptual understanding ability were analyzed for homogeneity and normality to conduct a hypothesis test. The analysis of the hypothesis test using the t-test obtained a t_count of 3.49 and a t_table of 2.00. Thus, the calculated t_value is greater than the t_table, so H_0 is rejected and H_a is accepted, so it can be concluded that there is an influence of the use of virtual laboratories using the Guided Discovery Learning model on students' conceptual understanding abilities in static electricity material.

References

Akina, A., Mufidah, M., Sani, N. K., & Astuti, G. A. M. N. (2023). Application of the Guided Discovery Learning Model to Improve Student Learning Outcomes in Fractions Division Material. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 11(2), 527. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v11i2.7266

Almulla, M. A. (2020). The Effectiveness of the Project-Based Learning (PBL) Approach as a Way to Engage Students in Learning. SAGE Open, 10(3), 215824402093870. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702

Cai, S., Liu, C., Wang, T., Liu, E., & Liang, J. (2021). Effects of learning physics using Augmented Reality on students’ self‐efficacy and conceptions of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13020

Capone, R. (2022). Blended Learning and Student-centered Active Learning Environment: A Case Study with STEM Undergraduate Students. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 22(1), 210–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-022-00195-5

Chan, P., Van Gerven, T., Dubois, J.-L., & Bernaerts, K. (2021). Virtual chemical laboratories: A systematic literature review of research, technologies and instructional design. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100053

Corni, F., & Fuchs, H. U. (2020). Primary Physical Science for Student Teachers at Kindergarten and Primary School Levels: Part I—Foundations of an Imaginative Approach to Physical Science. Interchange, 51(3), 315–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-019-09382-0

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Devy, N. K., Halim, A., Syukri, M., Yusrizal, Y., Nur, S., Khaldun, I., & Saminan, S. (2022). Analysis of Understanding Physics Concepts in terms of Students’ Learning Styles and Thinking Styles. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 2231–2237. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1926

Erna, M., Anwar, L., & Mazidah, M. (2021). Interactive e-module using Zoom Cloud Meeting platform to reduce misconceptions on salt hydrolysis material. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 15(2), 283–290. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i2.18460

Felita, A. R. I., Mahardika, I. K., & Bektiarso, S. (2023). Identification of the Misconception Levels of Students in Several Public Senior High School in Jember on Straight Motion Material Through Graphical Representation Approach and CRI. Journal of Science and Science Education, 4(2), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.29303/jossed.v4i2.1862

Gopalan, M., Rosinger, K., & Ahn, J. B. (2020). Use of Quasi-Experimental Research Designs in Education Research: Growth, Promise, and Challenges. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 218–243. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903302

Gunawan, G., Nisrina, N., Y Suranti, N. M., Herayanti, L., & Rahmatiah, R. (2018). Virtual Laboratory to Improve Students’ Conceptual Understanding in Physics Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108, 012049. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012049

Hadzigeorgiou, Y., & Schulz, R. M. (2019). Engaging Students in Science: The Potential Role of “Narrative Thinking” and “Romantic Understanding.” Frontiers in Education, 4, 38. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00038

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Asim Qadri, M., Pratap Singh, R., & Suman, R. (2022). Artificial intelligence (AI) applications for marketing: A literature-based study. International Journal of Intelligent Networks, 3, 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijin.2022.08.005

Haryadi, R., & Pujiastuti, H. (2020). PhET simulation software-based learning to improve science process skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(2), 022017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/2/022017

Hellín, C. J., Calles-Esteban, F., Valledor, A., Gómez, J., Otón-Tortosa, S., & Tayebi, A. (2023). Enhancing Student Motivation and Engagement through a Gamified Learning Environment. Sustainability, 15(19), 14119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914119

Hermansyah, H., Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., & Adawiyah, R. (2019). Guided inquiry model with virtual labs to improve students’ understanding on heat concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1153, 012116. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1153/1/012116

Hutapea, A., Bukit, N., & Manurung, S. R. (2021). Improvement science process skills of high school students through learning models scientific inquiry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1811(1), 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1811/1/012005

Inayah, N., & Masruroh, M. (2021). PhET Simulation Effectiveness as Laboratory Practices Learning Media to Improve Students’ Concept Understanding. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 9(2), 152. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v9i2.2923

Kranz, J., Baur, A., & Möller, A. (2023). Learners’ challenges in understanding and performing experiments: A systematic review of the literature. Studies in Science Education, 59(2), 321–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2022.2138151

Lestari, A., Lisanti, E., & Ristanto, R. H. (2021). Developing Guided Discovery Learning-Based Neurodroid Learning Media for Critical Thinking Skills. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 6(2), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v6i2.9802

Li, L. (2023). Critical thinking from the ground up: Teachers’ conceptions and practice in EFL classrooms. Teachers and Teaching, 29(6), 571–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2023.2191182

Marpanaji, E., Mahali, M. I., & Putra, R. A. S. (2018). Survey on How to Select and Develop Learning Media Conducted by Teacher Professional Education Participants. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1140, 012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1140/1/012014

Mashami, R. A., Ahmadi, Kurniasih, Y., & Khery, Y. (2023). Use of PhET Simulations as A Virtual Laboratory to Improve Students’ Problem Solving Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 11455–11465. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.6549

Mesterjon, M., Suwarni, S., & Selviani, D. (2022). Analysis of Industrial Revolution 4.0 Technology-Based Learning in Higher Education. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(4), 5627–5636. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.1870

Muhali, M., Prahani, B. K., Mubarok, H., Kurnia, N., & Asy’ari, M. (2021). The Impact of Guided-Discovery-Learning Model on Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Critical Thinking Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 5(3), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v5i3.581

Nainggolan, J., Silaban, B., Sinaga, D., & Zendrato, F. (2023). Analysis of Physics Misconceptions of Students in Mechanic Materials Using the Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i3.3023

Noer, S. H., Gunowibowo, P., & Triana, M. (2020). Development of guided discovery learning to improve students reflective thinking ability and self learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1581(1), 012041. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1581/1/012041

Parker, R., Thomsen, B. S., & Berry, A. (2022). Learning Through Play at School – A Framework for Policy and Practice. Frontiers in Education, 7, 751801. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.751801

Prasetya, F., Syahri, B., Fajri, B. R., Wulansari, R. E., & Fortuna, A. (2023). Utilizing Virtual Laboratory to Improve CNC Distance Learning of Vocational Students at Higher Education. TEM Journal, 1506–1518. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM123-31

Rahmawati, D. U., Jumadi, Kuswanto, H., & Oktaba, I. A. (2020). Identification of students’ misconception with isomorphic multiple choices test on the force and newton’s law material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1), 012052. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012052

Setiawan, W. S., R., & Prasetyo, Y. (2024). Technology Empowerment in Learning: Student Perspective Study on Virtual Laboratory to Support Independent Learning in Independent Campus. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i8.15655

Simbolon, D. H., & Silalahi, E. K. (2023). Physics Learning Using Guided Inquiry Models Based on Virtual Laboratories and Real Laboratories to Improve Learning. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v6i1.61000

Simbolon, D. H., & Silalahi, E. K. (2023). Virtual Laboratory-Based Physics Learning “PhET Simulation” to Improve Student Learning Activities. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 7(3), 461–468. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v7i3.61001

Stoian, C. E., Fărcașiu, M. A., Dragomir, G.-M., & Gherheș, V. (2022). Transition from Online to Face-to-Face Education after COVID-19: The Benefits of Online Education from Students’ Perspective. Sustainability, 14(19), 12812. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912812

Van De Pol, J., & Oudman, S. (2024). Teachers’ judgment accuracy of students’ monitoring skills: A conceptual and methodological framework and explorative study. Metacognition and Learning, 19(1), 65–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09349-8

Veza, I., Sule, A., Putra, N. R., Idris, M., Ghazali, I., Irianto, Pendit, U. C., Mosliano, G., & Arasmatusy. (2022). Virtual Laboratory for Engineering Education: Review of Virtual Laboratory for Students Learning. Engineering Science Letter, 1(02), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.56741/esl.v1i02.138

Wafa, Z., & Jatmiko, B. (2022). Learning Physics with a Free Discovery Model to Improve Critical Thinking Skills of High School Students. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 10(3), 637. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v10i3.5375

Yang, C., Zhang, J., Hu, Y., Yang, X., Chen, M., Shan, M., & Li, L. (2024). The impact of virtual reality on practical skills for students in science and engineering education: A meta-analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00487-2

Zine, O., Errouha, M., Zamzoum, O., Derouich, A., & Talbi, A. (2019). SEITI RMLab: A costless and effective remote measurement laboratory in electrical engineering. The International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education, 56(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020720918775041

Author Biographies

Haeratunisah, Universitas Mataram

Aris Doyan, Universitas Mataram

Muhammad Taufik, Universitas Mataram

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Haeratunisah, Aris Doyan, Muhammad Taufik

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).