Literacy Analysis of Chemistry Teachers on STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Mathematics) Learning Approach in Senior High Schools in West Nusa Tenggara Province
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v10i9.8730Published:
2024-09-25Issue:
Vol. 10 No. 9 (2024): SeptemberKeywords:
Chemistry learning, STEAM approach, Teacher literacyResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
The research was conducted with the following objectives: (1) to determine the literacy ability of chemistry teachers in West Nusa Tenggara Province towards the STEAM leaning approach; (2) knowing the supporting and inhibiting factors of the chemistry teacher's literacy about the STEAM learning approach. The research was conducted at A-accredited Senior High Schools in West Nusa Tenggara Province. The sample selection in this study used a purposive sampling technique with a total of 40 participants in 20 schools. Data collection include open question sheets and interview guidelines. The data analysis technique in this study uses the Miles and Huberman model with data reduction technique, data display, and verification. The result of this study the literacy of state high schools' chemistry teacher in West Nusa Tenggara Province related to the STEAM approach is in the medium category. The supporting factor for the literacy of chemistry teachers in State High Schools in West Nusa Tenggara Province is the existence of professional training and development such as training workshop, MGMP and P4TK. Other supporting factors are professional relationship and the ability to access internet media. The factors that hinder the literacy of chemistry teacher are the lack of training and professional development, the lack of ability to access the internet as an information tool in the search for literature and the limitations of school facilities and infrastructure and time allocation.
References
Ahmadurifai. (2020). Meningkatkan aktivitas dan hasil belajar kimia siswa melalui penerapan model learning cycle. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development, 1(2), 210-220. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4003892
Alpaydin, Y. & Dermili, C. (2022). Educational teory in the 21st. Singapore: Penerbit Palgrave Macmillan.
Al-Azawi, R., Al-Faliti, F., & Al-Blushi, M. (2016). Educational gamification vs. game based learning: comparative study. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 7(4), 131-136. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijimt.2016.7.4.659
Anggraini, F. I., & Huzaifah, S., KM. (2017). Implementasi STEM dalam pembelajaran IPA di sekolah menengah pertama. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA, Palembang, 722-731. https://conference.unsri.ac.id/index.php/semnasipa/article/view/738/355
Annisa, R., Effendi, M. H., & Damris, D. (2019). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa dengan menggunakan model based learning berbasis (science, technology, engineering, arts dan mathematics) pada materi asam dan basa di SMAN 11 kota Jambi. Journal of The Indonesian Society of Integrated Chemistry, 10(2), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.22437/jisic.v10i2.6517.
Asari, A., Kurniawan, T., Ansor, S., Bagus, A., & Putra, N. R. (2019). Kompetensi literasi digital bagi guru dan pelajar di lingkungan sekolah Kabupaten Malang. BIBLIOTIKA: Jurnal Kajian Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 3(2), 98-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um008v3i22019p98-104
Agogo, P.O., & Onda, M. O. (2014). Identification of Students’ perceived difficult concepts in senior secondary school chemistry in oju local governmenrt area of benue state, Nigeria. Global Educational Research Journal, 2(2), 044–049. https://doi.org/ 10.12691/education-5-7-3
Badriyah, N. L., Anekawati, A., & Azizah, L. F. (2020). Application of PjBL with brain-based STEAM approach to improve learning achievement of students. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 6(1) 88-100. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v6i1.29884
Berg, A., Orraryd, D., Pettersson, A. J., & Hultén, M. (2019). Representational challenges in animated chemistry: self-generated animations as a means to encourage students’ reflections on sub-micro processes in laboratory exercises. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(4), 710-737. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8rp00288f
Chen, C. C., & Huang, P. H. (2023). The effects of STEAM-based mobile learning on learning achievement and cognitive load. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 100-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1761838.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Toronto: Penerbit Learning Policy Institute.
Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (2012). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. New York, London: penerbit Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg.
Halim, A. P., & Roshayanti, F. (2021). Analisis potensi penerapan STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, Mathematics) pada kurikulum 2013 bidang studi biologi SMA kelas X. Bioeduca : Journal of Biology Education, 3(2), 146-159. https://doi.org/10.21580/bioeduca.v3i2.6756.
Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: teachers’ perceptions of their interactions with students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(8), 811-826. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00028-7.
Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2017). Professional learning communities: a strategy for school improvement in a global context. School leardership & management, 37(2), 137-157. https://doi.org/10.16922/wje.19.1.2
Hsiao, P. W., & Su, C. H. (2021). A study on the impact of steam education for sustainable development courses and its effects on student motivation and learning. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(7). 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073772
Idin, S. (2020). Research highlight in education and science 2020. Istanbul: Penerbit Isres Publishing.
Irhandayaningsih, A. (2020). Pengukuran literasi digital pada peserta pembelajaran daring di masa pandemi COVID-19. Anuva: Jurnal Kajian Budaya, Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 4(2), 231-240. https://doi.org/10.14710/anuva.4.2.231-240.
Irdalisa,. Amirullah G., & Dirza A. F. (2022). Pelatihan pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran berbasis STEAM bagi guru IPA. Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri, 6(2), 1393-1401. https://doi.org/10.31764/jmm. V6i2.7261.
Iswara, W. H., Muntari, M., & Rahmawati, R. (2021). Identifikasi kesulitan belajar kimia siswa SMA Negeri 1 Narmada selama pandemi covid-19. Chemistry Education Practice, 4(3), 242-249. https://doi.org/10.29303/cep.v4i3.2694.
Johnson, C. C., Peters, B. E. E., & Moore, T. J. (2016). STEM road map: A framework for integrated STEM education. New York: Penerbit Routledge.
Johnson, M., Adams, B. S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2016). NMC Horizon Report: 2016 Higher Education Edition. Austin, texas: Penerbit The New Media Consortium.
Kurniawan, R. Y. (2016). Identifikasi permasalahan pendidikan di Indonesia untuk meningkatkan mutu dan profesionalisme guru. Konferensi Konvensi Nasional Pendidikan Indonesia (KONASPI) VIII Tahun 2016. 1415-1420. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317184069
Kuswidi, I. (2015). Brain-based leaning untuk meningkatkan literasi matematis siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2). 195-202. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v6i2.49
Lestari, D. I., & Kurnia, H. (2023). Implementasi model pembelajaran inovatif untuk meningkatkan kompetensi profesional guru di era digital. JPG : Jurnal Pendidikan Guru, 4(3), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.32832/jpg.v4i3.14252
Liesatyadharma, S., Fernandez, S. E., Jeffina, M., & Udjaja, Y. (2022). Holoreact: Chemistry experiment game with hologram based to enhance learning on senior high school level. Procedia Computer Science, 216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.157.
Lin, Y. H., Lin, H. C. K., Wang, T. H., & Wu, C. H. (2023). Integrating the STEAM-6E model with virtual reality instruction: the contribution to motivation, effectiveness, satisfaction, and creativity of learners with diverse dognitive styles. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(7), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076269
Martins, I., & Bapitista, M. (2024). Teacher professional development in integrated STEAM education: a study on its contribution to the development of the PCK of physics teachers. Education Sciences, 14(2), 1-32. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/educsci14020164.
Masban, B. R. (2021). Pengaruh pembelajaran blended learning di msa pandemi covid-19 terhadap motivasi belajar dan pemahaman konsep peserta didik. Chemistry Education Practice, 4(3). 301-309. https://doi.org/10.29303/cep.v4i3.2583.
Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif. (Edisi terjemahan oleh Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi). Jakarta : Penerbit Universitas Indonesia Press.
Mu’minah, I. H., & Suryaningsih, Y. (2020). Implementasi STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art and Mathematics) dalam pembelajaran abad 21. Bio Education: The Journal of Science and Biology Education, 5(1). 65-73. https://doi.org/10.31949/be.v5i1.2105.
Mustain, I. (2020). Analisis literasi STEM dalam pengembangan pendidikan vokasi: konsepsi pada pendidikan tinggi maritim. Dinamika Bahari, 1(2), 110-115. https://doi.org/10.46484/db.v1i2.19
Nopiansyah, A. N., Winarni, E. W., & Koto, I. (2022). Pengembangan LKPD berbasis Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts And Mathematics (STEAM) kelas VI dalam mata pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (IPA). Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dasar (Kapedas), 1(2). 86-97. https://doi.org/10.33369/kapedas.v1i2.23297.
Nurfadilah, S., & Siswanto, J. (2020). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif pada konsep polimer dengan pendekatan STEAM bermuatan ESD siswa SMA Negeri 1 Bantarbolang. Jurnal Penelitian Dalam Bidang Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 14(1), 45-51. https://doi.org/10.26877/mpp.v14i1.5543
Nurhayati, E., Andayani, Y., & Hakim, A. (2021). Pengembangan e-modul kimia berbasis STEM dengan pendekatan etnosains. Chemistry Education Practice, 4(2), 106-112. https://doi.org/10.29303/cep.v4i2.2768.
Nurhidayah, M., Loka, I. N., Haris, M., & Al Idrus, S. W. (2022). Analisis kesulitan belajar dalam pembelajaran menggunakan google classroom dan korelasinya dengan hasil belajar kimia siswa kelas X IPA SMAN 1 Aikmel. Chemistry Education Practice, 5(2), 177-185. https://doi.org/10.29303/cep.v5i2.3642.
Nurlitiani, A. (2017). Pengembangan kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik melalui pendekatan Science,Teknology,Engineering,Art,And Mathematic (STEAM) dalam Poject Based Learning (Skripsi Sarjana). Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia. Diakses dari http://repository.unj.ac.id/25524/
OECD. (2019a). PISA 2018 Assessment and analytical framework. Paris: Penerbit OECD Publishing.
Pekdağ, B. (2010). Alternative methods in learning chemistry: learning with animation, simulation, video and multimedia. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(2), 111-118. https://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/513
Perrotta, C., Featherstone, G., Aston, H., & Houghton, E. (2013). Game-based learning: latest evidence and future directions. Slough UK. National Foundation for Educational Research.
Ramful, A., & Narod, F. B. (2014). Proportional reasoning in the learning of chemistry: Levels of complexity. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(1), 25-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0110-7
Sa’ida, N. (2021). Implementasi model pembelajaran STEAM pada pembelajaran daring. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar : Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Hasil Penelitian, 7(2), 123-128. https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpd.v7n2.p123-128
Shidiq, A. S., Permanasari, A., & Hernani. (2020). Chemistry teacher’s perception toward STEM Learning. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 40-43. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392305.3396901.
Shidiq, A. S., & Yamtinah, S. (2019). Pre-service chemistry teachers’ attitudes and attributes toward the twenty-first century skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4). 1-7. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042014
Sigit, D. V., Ristanto, R. H., & Mufida, S. N. (2022). Integration of project-based e-learning with STEAM: an innovative solution to learn eological concept. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 23-40. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.1532a
Siahaan, A., Akmalia, R., Ray, A. U. M., Sembiring, A. W., & Yunita, E. (2023). Upaya meningkatan mutu pendidikan di Indonesia. Journal on Education, 5(3), 6933-6941. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i3.1480.
Suciari, N. K. D., Lbrohim, L., & Suwono, H. (2021). The impact of PjBL integrated STEAM on students’ communication skills and concept mastery in high school biology learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, Malang-Indonesia 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043395.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mix Methods). Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.
Sudjana, N. (2017). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. Bandung. Penerbit PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Tseng, K. H., Chang, C. C., Lou, S. J., & Chen, W. P. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9160-x.
Uchegbu, R. I., Oguoma, C. C., Elenwoke, U. E., & Ogbuagu, O. E. (2016). Perception of difficult topics in chemistry curriculum by senior secondary school (II) students in imo state. AASCIT Journal of Education, 2(3), 18-23. http://article.aascit.org/file/html/9730743.html
Van Dijk, J., & Hacker, K. (2019). The Digital Divide as a Complex and Dynamic Phenomenon. Information Society, 35(2), 315-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240309487
Widarti, H. R., Rokhim, D. A., & Syafruddin, A. B. (2020). The development of electrolysis cell teaching material based on stem-pjbl approach assisted by learning video: a need analysis. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(3), 309-318. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i3.25199.
Wijaya, A. D. et al. (2015). Implementasi Pembelajaran Berbasis STEAM Pada Kurikulum Indonesia. Proseding Seminar FNasional Fisika Dan Aplikasinya, 85-88. Retrieved from http://portal.phys.unpad.ac.id/senfa2015/proseding/FP-09_Agusta_Danang.pdf
Author Biographies
Annisah Faujiah Miftahul Jannah, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Anti Kolonial Prodjosantoso, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Annisah Faujiah Miftahul Jannah, Anti Kolonial Prodjosantoso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
