The Importance of Understanding Exponent Number Concept in Science Scope: Students' Abstraction Thinking Level in Problem Solving

Authors

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v10i12.9328

Published:

2024-12-21

Issue:

Vol. 10 No. 12 (2024): In Progress

Keywords:

Abstraction thinking, Exponent numbers, Problem solving, Science

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Faizah, S., Arifin, S., Rufiana, I. S., Rahayuningsih, S., Randy, M. Y., Kamaruddin, N., … Shodikin, A. (2024). The Importance of Understanding Exponent Number Concept in Science Scope: Students’ Abstraction Thinking Level in Problem Solving. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(12), 10238–10244. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i12.9328

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Mathematics is closely related to science because both require the ability to analyze, think logically, and systematically to understand. This study explores students' level of abstraction thinking in understanding the concept of exponent numbers and its implementation in science. This research uses a qualitative approach. The subjects in this study were students of the master's program in basic education. The data collection techniques used were tests and interviews. The results showed differences in identifying exponent numbers in low and high abstraction level students. Low abstraction level students perform problem-solving stages, such as identifying and writing down every information listed in the problem, using mathematical symbolization, performing number operations according to problem understanding, and checking again. Meanwhile, high abstraction level students performed problem-solving stages, such as identifying every piece of information in the problem without writing it on the worksheet, not writing the results of their understanding explicitly on the worksheet, not writing explicitly the model to be used, performing number operations without paying attention to the type of number because they already understood and they made a conclusion. Both level students applied the concept of exponent numbers in science for writing units and density.

References

Abiodun, T. O., Aderibigbe, O. O., Adebola, I. S., & Ayoola, A. A. (2024). Effects of Heuristic Problem-Solving strategies on students’ achievement and retention in Mathematics in Ogun State, Nigeria. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 12(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol12.1.1.2024

Akben, N. (2020). Effects of the problem-posing approach on students’ problem solving skills and metacognitive awareness in science education. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 1143–1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9726-7

Akcanca, N. (2020). An alternative teaching tool in science education: Educational comics. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 7(4), 1550–1570. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1271026

Astuti, Y. P., & Misbahudholam, M. A. (2023). Implementation of the Campus Teaching Program Batch 3 in Building Scientific Literacy in Elementary Schools. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(7), 5140–5149. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.4049

Faizah, S., Nusantara, T., Sudirman, S., & Rahardi, R. (2020). Exploring students’ thinking process in mathematical proof of abstract algebra based on M ason’s framework. Journal for the Education of Gifted, 8(June), 871–884. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.689809

Faizah, S., Nusantara, T., Sudirman, S., & Rahardi, R. (2022). Constructing Students’ Thinking Process through Assimilation and Accommodation Framework. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 14(1), 253–263. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED617981

Faizah, S., & Sudirman, S. (2022). Students’ Thinking Process In Investigating Mathematical Statement. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 178. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i1.4115

Ferrari, P. L. (2003). Abstraction in mathematics (P. R. Soc, trans.). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 358(1435), 1225–1230. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1316

Fitri, N. J., & Syafriani. (2024). Need Analysis for Development of Inquiry-Based STEM Materials to Improve Critical Thinking Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(8), 4599–4605. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i8.7309

Fitriaani, A., Zubaidah, S., Susilo, H., & Al Muhdhar, M. H. (2020). The effects of integrated problem-based learning, predict, observe, explain on problem-solving skills and self-efficacy. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 20(85), 45–64. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ejer/issue/52308/684972

Hamdani, D., Sa’dijah, C., Subanji, S., & Subarinah, S. (2023). Development of ACERA Learning Model Based on Proof Construction Analysis. JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika), 7(3), 560. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v7i3.12354

Hong, J. Y., & Kim, M. K. (2016). Mathematical Abstraction in the Solving of Ill-Structured Problems by Elementary School Students in Korea. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1204a

Kariadinata, R. (2021). Students’ Reflective Abstraction Ability on Linear Algebra Problem Solving and Relationship With Prerequisite Knowledge. Infinity Journal, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v10i1.p1-16

Kereh, C. T., Sabandar, J., & Tjiang, P. C. (2013). Identifikasi Kesulitan Belajar Mahasiswa Dalam Konten Matematika Pada Materi Pendahuluan Fisika Inti. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains Dan Pendidikan Sains VIII, Fakultas Sains Dan Matematika UKSW, 4. Retrieved from https://repository.uksw.edu/handle/123456789/3113

Krenn, M., Pollice, R., Guo, S. Y., Aldeghi, M., Cervera-Lierta, A., Friederich, P., dos Passos Gomes, G., Häse, F., Jinich, A., Nigam, A., & others. (2022). On scientific understanding with artificial intelligence. Nature Reviews Physics, 4(12), 761–769. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/s42254-022-00518-3

Mutambara, L. H. N., & Tsakeni, M. (2022). Cognitive obstacles in the learning of complex number concepts: A case study of in-service undergraduate physics student-teachers in Zimbabwe. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(10), 2158. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12418

Nakakoji, Y., & Wilson, R. (2020). Interdisciplinary learning in mathematics and science: Transfer of learning for 21st century problem solving at university. Journal of Intelligence, 8(3), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence8030032

Pacheco, C. S., & Herrera, C. I. (2021). A conceptual proposal and operational definitions of the cognitive processes of complex thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100794

Purnomo, E. A., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Junaedi, I., & Agoestanto, A. (2024). Stages of Problem-Solving in Answering HOTS-Based Questions in Differential Calculus Courses. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 15(6), 116–145. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1417849

Retnowati, E., Fathoni, Y., & Chen, O. (2018). Mathematics Problem Solving Skill Acquisition. Learning by Problem Posing or By Problem Solving, 37(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v37i1.18787

Rich, K. M., & Yadav, A. (2020). Applying Levels of Abstraction to Mathematics Word Problems. TechTrends Springer, 64(3), 395–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00479-3

Risdianita, N. (2024). Hubungan Antara Hasil Belajar Matematika Dengan Hasil Belajar Fisika Di SMA Negri 6 Tangerang. Concept: Journal of Social Humanities and Education, 3(2), 302–308. https://doi.org/10.55606/concept.v3i2.1290

Rocha, H., & Babo, A. (2024). Problem-solving and mathematical competence: A look to the relation during the study of Linear Programming. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101461

Sa’adah, N., & Faizah, S. (2022). Analisis Strategi Siswa Kelas IX SMP Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Aljabar. Sigma, 7(2), 95. https://doi.org/10.53712/sigma.v7i2.1294

Sa’adah, N., Faizah, S., Sa’dijah, C., Khabibah, S., & Kurniati, D. (2023). Students’ Mathematical Thinking Process in Algebraic Verification Based. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 15(1). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1391469

Savaş, G., & Yavuzsoy Köse, N. (2023). Pre-service mathematics Teachers abstraction of rotational symmetry. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 3. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202319685

Shodikin, A., Murniasih, T. R., Faizah, S., & Ekawati, D. W. (2023). Students’ Analogical Reasoning in Solving Geometry Problems Viewed from Visualizer’s and Verbalizer’s Cognitive Style. Jurnal Pedagogi Dan Pembelajaran, 6(3), 330–338. Retrieved from https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JP2/article/download/60960/27598/197792

Szabo, Z. K., Körtesi, P., Guncaga, J., Szabo, D., & Neag, R. (2020). Examples of problem-solving strategies in mathematics education supporting the sustainability of 21st-century skills. Sustainability, 12(23), 10113. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310113

Tania, N., Mariani, S., Agoestanto, A., & Susilo, B. E. (2024). Meta-Analysis: The Effect of Mathematical Resilience to Mathematical Problem Solving Ability. SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education), 8(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.35706/sjme.v8i1.10481

Yayuk, E., As’ ari, A. R., & others. (2020). Primary School Students’ Creative Thinking Skills in Mathematics Problem Solving. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 1281–1295. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1262484

Author Biographies

Siti Faizah, Universitas Negeri Malang

Slamet Arifin, Universitas Negeri Malang

Intan Sari Rufiana, Universitas Negeri Malang

Sri Rahayuningsih, Universitas Negeri Malang

Mohammad Yusuf Randy, Universitas Negeri Malang

Nurzatulshima Kamaruddin, Universiti Putra Malaysia

Imam Rofiki, Universitas Negeri Malang

Ali Shodikin, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Siti Faizah, Slamet Arifin, Intan Sari Rufiana, Sri Rahayuningsih, Mohammad Yusuf Randy, Nurzatulshima Kamaruddin, Imam Rofiki, Ali Shodikin

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).