A Stone Can Bounce on the Surface of Water: A Conceptual Physics Analysis Study of Students

Authors

Herman Semuel Wattimena , Jamaludin , John Rafafy Batlolona

DOI:

10.29303/jossed.v5i1.9564

Published:

2024-04-30

Issue:

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): April

Keywords:

Conceptual understanding, Physics education, Stone bouncing on water

Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Wattimena, H. S., Jamaludin, J., & Batlolona, J. R. (2024). A Stone Can Bounce on the Surface of Water: A Conceptual Physics Analysis Study of Students. Journal of Science and Science Education, 5(1), 80–87. https://doi.org/10.29303/jossed.v5i1.9564

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract

Throwing a stone on the surface of the water has been a popular hobby for thousands of years, but in recent times, this phenomenon is rarely encountered in physics education. Flat and round stones are the best choice due to their favorable surface area, which creates a rebound when they collide with the water. However, the "magic angle" between the rotating stone and the water must be around 20 degrees to achieve the maximum number of bounces. This is an interesting phenomenon to explore, especially for students in rural areas who often visit rivers or beaches to play. Therefore, this study was conducted to analyze the conceptual understanding of physics students regarding the phenomenon of stones bouncing on the surface of water. This research is a qualitative study that analyzes students' responses through direct questions posed by the teacher. The study was conducted with 20 ninth-grade students at SMP Negeri 81 Maluku Tengah. The findings show that students have a very weak understanding of the physics concepts related to the stone-bouncing phenomenon. They are unable to explain the phenomenon scientifically because they are still influenced by answers based on local and cultural experiences. As a result, the teacher took action by engaging students in direct learning and providing clear explanations of the concepts. Consequently, students' conceptual understanding of physics improved, and they were able to explain the phenomenon scientifically

References

Akhter, N., Khan, A. M., & Naseer Ud Din, M. (2019). High School Students’ Perception of Challenges in Physics Learning and Relevance of Field Dependency. Global Social Sciences Review, 4(2), 336–343. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(iv-ii).43

Alabidi, S., Alarabi, K., Tairab, H., Alamassi, S., & Alsalhi, N. R. (2023). The effect of computer simulations on students’ conceptual and procedural understanding of Newton’s second law of motion. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(5), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13140

Alarbi, K., Halaweh, M., Tairab, H., Alsalhi, N. R., Annamalai, N., & Aldarmaki, F. (2024). Making a revolution in physics learning in high schools with ChatGPT: A case study in UAE. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(9), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14983

Ayasrah, F. T. M., Alarabi, K., Al Mansouri, M., Fattah, H. A. A., & Al-Said, K. (2024). Enhancing secondary school students’ attitudes toward physics by using computer simulations. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(1), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.9.017

Babbs, C. F. (2019). Stone Skipping Physics. The Physics Teacher, 57(5), 278–281. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5098910

Badruldin, N. A., & Alias, S. N. (2022). Level of Conceptual Understanding Among Secondary Students on Topic of Forces and Motion Using Half-Length Force Concept Inventory (HFCI). ICCCM Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(2), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.53797/icccmjssh.v1i2.2.2022

Bao, L., & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics education research for 21st century learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0007-8

Barmby, P., & Defty, N. (2006). Secondary school pupils’ perceptions of physics. Research in Science and Technological Education, 24(2), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140600811585

Bocquet, L. (2003). The physics of stone skipping. American Journal of Physics, 71(2), 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1519232

Bollen, L., Van Kampen, P., Baily, C., Kelly, M., & De Cock, M. (2017). Student difficulties regarding symbolic and graphical representations of vector fields. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020109

Cai, S., Liu, C., Wang, T., Liu, E., & Liang, J. C. (2021). Effects of learning physics using Augmented Reality on students’ self-efficacy and conceptions of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13020

Chen, Z., & Gladding, G. (2014). How to make a good animation: A grounded cognition model of how visual representation design affects the construction of abstract physics knowledge. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010111

Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., & Leonard, W. J. (1997). Solving physics problems with multiple representations. The Physics Teacher, 35(5), 270–275. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2344681

Dumais, N., & Hasni, A. (2009). High school intervention for influenza biology and epidemics/pandemics: Impact on conceptual understanding among adolescents. CBE Life Sciences Education, 8(1), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.08-08-0048

Eshach, H. (2014). Development of a student-centered instrument to assess middle school students conceptual understanding of sound. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010102

Hill, M., Sharma, M. D., & Johnston, H. (2015). How online learning modules can improve the representational fluency and conceptual understanding of university physics students. European Journal of Physics, 36(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/36/4/045019

Huang, K., Ge, X., & Eseryel, D. (2017). Metaconceptually-enhanced simulation-based inquiry: effects on eighth grade students’ conceptual change and science epistemic beliefs. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9462-5

Hung, W., & Jonassen, D. H. (2006). Conceptual understanding of causal reasoning in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1601–1621. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600560902

İnce, E., Güneş, Z. Ö., Yaman, Y., Kırbaşlar, F. G., Yolcu, Ö., & Yolcu, E. (2015). The Effectiveness of the IUVIRLAB on Undergraduate Students’ Understanding of Some Physics Concepts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1785–1792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.382

Jonassen, D. H. (2003). Designing Research-Based Instruction for Story Problems. Educational Psychology Review, 15(3), 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024648217919

Kapanadze, M., Javakhishvili, N., & Dzagania, L. (2023). Investigating the relationship between students’ interest in physics and environmental attitudes in Georgia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(8), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13429

Klein, P., Viiri, J., Mozaffari, S., Dengel, A., & Kuhn, J. (2018). Instruction-based clinical eye-tracking study on the visual interpretation of divergence: How do students look at vector field plots? Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010116

Limón, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11(4–5), 357–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00037-2

Lorenzana, A. A., & Roleda, L. S. (2017). Assessment of Students’ Conceptual Understanding in Grade Eight Physics. Presented at the DLSU Research Congress 2017 De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines June 20 to 22, 2017, 1–6.

Malkawi, E., Obaidat, I. M., Qamhieh, N., & Box, P. O. (2013). Investigating the State of Knowledge of the Physics Concepts by UAE University Students. Educational Research, 4(5), 430–436.

Maloney, D. P., O’Kuma, T. L., Hieggelke, C. J., & Van Heuvelen, A. (2001). Surveying students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism. American Journal of Physics, 69(S1), S12–S23. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1371296

Mualem, R., & Eylon, B. S. (2009). Teaching physics in junior high school: Crossing the borders of fear. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760902779014

Munfaridah, N., Avraamidou, L., & Goedhart, M. (2021). The Use of Multiple Representations in Undergraduate Physics Education: What Do we Know and Where Do we Go from Here? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9577

Obafemi, D. T. A., & Onwioduokit, F. A. (2013). Identification of Difficult Concepts in Senior Secondary School Two (SS2) Physics Curriculum in Rivers State, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, 01(05), 2321–2454. www.ajouronline.com

Özdemir, Ö. F. (2015). A qualitative inquiry about students’ conceptualizations of force concept in terms of ontological categories. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 12(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10131a

Peter, G., & Uwamahoro, J. (2023). Effect of Formative Assessment on Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Physics Concepts among Secondary Schools in Ngoma District, Rwanda. East African Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 4(1), 114–119. https://doi.org/10.46606/eajess2023v04i01.0263

Rahman, M. M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for Education and Research: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategies. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 13(9), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095783

Roth, W., & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). Using Vee and Concept Maps in Collaborative Settings: Elementary Education Majors Construct Meaning in Physical Science Courses. School Science and Mathematics, 93(5), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1993.tb12236.x

Saleh, S. (2011). The Level of B . Sc . Ed Students ’ Conceptual Understanding of Newtonian Physics. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 1(3), 249–256.

Shrestha, P. S., Perlman, T. T., & Shaver, S. R. (2023). Addressing Learning Difficulties in Junior High School Physics Education: Insights for Curriculum Development and Teaching Strategies. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Humaniora, 12(2), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.35335/jiph.v12i2.35

Snetinova, M., & Koupilova, Z. (2012). Students’ Difficulties in Solving Physics Problems. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of Doctoral Students - WDS 2012, 93–97.

Truscott, T., Belden, J., & Hurd, R. (2014). Water-skipping stones and spheres. Physics Today, 67(12), 70–71. https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.2631

Ülen, S., & Gerlič, I. (2012). The Conceptual Learning of Physics in Slovenian Secondary Schools. Orga, 45(3), 140–144. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10051-012-0015-3

van der Graaf, J. (2020). Inquiry-Based Learning and Conceptual Change in Balance Beam Understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01621

Vosniadou, S. (2002). ON THE NATURE OF NAIVE PHYSICS. Reconsidering Conceptual Change: Issues in Theory and Practice, 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47637-1

Vosniadou, S., & Ioannides, C. (1998). From conceptual development to science education: A psychological point of view. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1213–1230. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980201004

Williams, C., Stanisstreet, M., Spall, K., Boyes, E., & Dickson, D. (2003). Why aren’t secondary students interested in physics? Physics Education, 38(4), 324–329. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/38/4/306

Wu, C. J., & Liu, C. Y. (2021). Eye-movement study of high- And low-prior-knowledge students’ scientific argumentations with multiple representations. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010125

Zulkiffli, N. S., Mat Fadzil, A. F., Mohd Noor, N. H., Johari, N. A., Othman, E. S., & Ahmad Nazri, N. A. (2024). Exploring The Students’ Difficulties in Physics Subject among Secondary School Students During Learning in Class. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(4), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v14-i4/21199

Zuzovsky, R. (2003). Curriculum as a determinant of learning outcomes - What can be learned from international comparative studies - TIMSS-1999. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 29(4), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-491X(03)90014-9

Author Biographies

Herman Semuel Wattimena, Pattimura University

Jamaludin, Pattimura University

John Rafafy Batlolona, Pattimura University

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Herman Semuel Wattimena, Jamaludin, John Rafafy Batlolona

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Journal of Science and Science Education, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Journal of Science and Science Education.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).