TGT Type Cooperative Learning Assisted by Quizizz: Study of Students' Physics Cognitive Abilities on the Material of Motion of Objects
DOI:
10.29303/jossed.v5i2.9608Published:
2024-10-31Downloads
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the effect of the TGT type cooperative learning model assisted by the quizizz application in improving students' physics cognitive abilities in the material of motion of objects. The type of research used in this study is a quantitative descriptive research type. The design used in this study is the One-Group Pretest-Posttest Design. The subjects in this study were 23 people. The data for this study were collected through test and non-test instruments, the test instrument was in the form of an initial test and a final test, while the non-test instrument was in the form of student worksheets and tournament results. The results of the study showed that the initial abilities of students before being taught using the TGT type cooperative learning model assisted by the quizizz application were proven to be in the failing qualification with an achievement score of 24.08. The cognitive abilities of students during the learning process assessed in the LKPD and tournament obtained completeness from all groups that were in the sufficient qualification with an average value of 74.37. The average score of the final test achievement of students was 81.17 where 1 student was in very good qualification, 10 students were in good qualification and 12 other students were in sufficient qualification. Meanwhile, the results of the analysis of the increase in students' cognitive abilities in the N-gain test obtained a value of >0.74. This result was obtained because of the treatment given, with the TGT type cooperative learning model assisted by the quizizz application. Thus it can be concluded that through the use of the TGT type cooperative learning model assisted by the quizizz application in physics learning is complete on the material of motion in objects
Keywords:
Cognitive ability Cooperative TGT Physics learning Motion of objectsReferences
Abednego. (2023). The correlation between student perception and learning motivation: blended learning strategy. AL-ISHLAH: Journal of Education, 15(2), 1338–1346. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i2.
Astri, TPY (2018). Numbered-board quiz with tgt to improve students' science achievement based on learning motivation. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(4), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.452982
Batlolona, J.R. (2024). Misconceptions of physics students on the concept of equilibrium of rigid bodies: a case study of rigid culture. Journal of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Education, 25(1), 87–102.
Berry, T. (2008). Pre-Test Assessment. American Journal of Business Education, 1(1), 19–22.
Craigie, P. (2023). Web-based technology: trials and tribulations of using online quizzes in an EFL course †. Engineering Proceedings, 38(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023038020
de Jong, T., Lazonder, AW, Chinn, CA, Fischer, F., Gobert, J., Hmelo-Silver, CE, Koedinger, KR, Krajcik, JS, Kyza, EA, Linn, MC, Pedaste, M. , Scheiter, K., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2023). Let's talk evidence – The case for combining inquiry-based and direct instruction. Educational Research Review, 39, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100536
Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based educational research in physics. PHYSICAL REVIEW SPECIAL TOPICS - PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 10, 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119
Ealy, J. (2018). Analysis of students' missed organic chemistry quiz questions that emphasize the importance of prior general chemistry knowledge. Education Sciences, 8(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020042
Hake, R.R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Harris, A.D., Bradham, D.D., Baumgarten, M., Zuckerman, I.H., Fink, J.C., & Perencevich, E.N. (2004). The use and interpretation of quasi-experimental studies in infectious diseases. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 38(11), 1586–1591. https://doi.org/10.1086/420936
Jamaludin, J., & Batlolona, J.R. (2021). Analysis of Students' Conceptual Understanding of Physics on the Topic of Static Fluids. Journal of Science Education Research, 7, 6–13. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7ispecialissue.845
Leasa, M. (2024). The Effect of steam project-based learning approach towards student learning motivation: utilization of plastic waste with ecobricks technique. Journal of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Education, 25(2), 512–529.
Leasa, M., & Pelamonia, J. (2024). Emotional literacy and problem-solving skills with PBL model and HPC strategy: Circulatory system concept. Biosphere: Journal of Biology Education, 17(2), 421–433.
Lim, TM, & Yunus, MM (2021). Teachers' perception towards the use of Quizizz in the teaching and learning of English: A systematic review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(11), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116436
Longfield, J. (2009). Discrepant teaching events : using an inquiry stance to address students' misconceptions. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(2), 266–271.
McNeece, C. A., & Thyer, B. A. (2005). Revisiting recent research on social learning theory as an etiological proposition for sexually abusive male adolescents. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 3714(2005), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1300/J394v01n01
Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores. American Journal of Physics, 70(12), 1259–1268. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1514215
Ojediran, IA, Oludipe, D.I., & Ehindero, O.J. (2014). Impact of laboratory-based instructional intervention on the learning outcomes of low performing senior secondary students in physics. Creative Education, 05(04), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.54029
Orhan Göksün, D., & Gürsoy, G. (2019). Comparing success and engagement in gamified learning experiences via Kahoot and Quizizz. Computers and Education, 135, 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.015
Veloo, A., & Chairhany, S. (2013). Fostering students' attitudes and achievement in probability using teams-games-tournaments. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.152
Vrcelj, A., Hoić-Božić, N., & Dlab, M. H. (2023). Use of Gamification in Primary and Secondary Education: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 9(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.9.1.13
Wodarski, J. S., & Feit, M. D. (2011). Adolescent preventive health and team-games-tournaments: Five decades of evidence for an empirically based paradigm. Social Work in Public Health, 26(5), 482–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2011.533561
Zhang, Z., & Crawford, J. (2024). EFL learners' motivation in a gamified formative assessment: The case of Quizizz. Education and Information Technologies, 29(5), 6217–6239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12034-7
Zhorova, I., Kokhanovska, O., Khudenko, O., Osypova, N., & Kuzminska, O. (2022). Teachers' training for the use of digital tools of the formative assessment in the implementation of the concept of the New Ukrainian School. Educational Technology Quarterly, 2022(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.55056/etq.11
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sally E. Untajana, Ashari Bayu P. Dulhasyim, Aprillia F. Telapary, Vantri Pieter Kelelufna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Journal of Science and Science Education, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Journal of Science and Science Education.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
