Enhancing Primary Students Scientific Literacy Through Virtual Laboratory-Based Digital Learning Packages to Support Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v12i4.14427Published:
2026-05-11Downloads
Abstract
This study aims to develop and evaluate a virtual laboratory–based digital learning package to enhance scientific literacy among elementary school students. The study employed a Research and Development (R&D) approach using the ADDIE model, which includes analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The product was validated by experts in science education, media, and language, and then implemented with fourth-grade students. Data were collected through validation sheets, practicality questionnaires, and pretest–posttest instruments. The findings show that the developed learning package is both valid and practical for classroom use. Students demonstrated a significant improvement in scientific literacy, with an N-gain score of 0.65 (moderate category), particularly in understanding concepts, interpreting data, and relating science to everyday phenomena. The integration of interactive simulations and multimedia elements supported active engagement and meaningful learning experiences. Overall, the virtual laboratory–based digital learning package is effective in improving students’ scientific literacy and shows strong potential to enhance the quality of science instruction in primary education in line with 21st-century learning demands.
Keywords:
ADDIE Digital Learning Tools Scientific Literacy Virtual LaboratoryReferences
Abdjul, T., Odja, A. H., & Nurhayati, N. (2024). Effectiveness of Virtual Laboratory-Based Interactive Learning Media Through a Differentiated Approach to Students’ Scientific Literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(11), 9838–9838. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i11.9253 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i11.9253
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
Alhashem, F., & Alfailakawi, A. (2023). Technology-Enhanced Learning Through Virtual Laboratories in Chemistry Education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13739 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13739
Borg, W. R., & Gall, D. V. (1983). Educational Research. Newyork: Longman.
Branch, R. M., & Varank, İ. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach (Vol. 722). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
Bybee, R., & McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific Literacy and Student Attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 Science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518644 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518644
Cirkony, C., Rickinson, M., Walsh, L., Gleeson, J., Salisbury, M., & Cutler, B. (2022). Reflections on Conducting Rapid Reviews of Educational Research. Educational Research, 64(4), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2022.2120514 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2022.2120514
Dahal, N., Pant, B. P., Luitel, B. C., Khadka, J., Shrestha, I. M., Manandhar, N. K., & Rajbanshi, R. (2023). Development and Evaluation of E-Learning Courses: Validity, Practicality, and Effectiveness. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 17(12), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i12.40317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i12.40317
Delita, F., Berutu, N., & Nofrion, N. (2022). Online Learning: The Effects of Using E-Modules on Self-Efficacy, Motivation and Learning Outcomes. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 23(4), 0–3. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1182760 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1182760
Dewantari, N., & Singgih, S. (2020). Penerapan Literasi Sains dalam Pembelajaran IPA. Indonesian Journal of Natural Science Education (IJNSE), 3(2), 366–371. https://doi.org/10.31002/nse.v3i2.1085 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31002/nse.v3i2.1085
Dewi, S., & Fauziati, E. (2021). Implikasi Teori Vygotsky dalam Pembelajaran Kolaboratif. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 16(2), 77–84.
Dodevska, M., Zdravevski, E., Chorbev, I., Kostoska, M., Branco, F., Coelho, P. J., Pires, I. M., & Lameski, P. (2025). Virtual Reality as a Learning Tool: Evaluating the Use and Effectiveness of Simulation Laboratories in Educational Settings. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 12(July 2024), 101742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101742 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101742
Fisher, R. A. (1925) Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Edinburgh, Scotland: Oliver and Boyd.
Fitri, U., Amini, R., Zulkarnaini, A. P., & Media, A. (2025). The Use of Augmented Reality in Science Learning to Improve Motivation and Understanding of Science Concepts Among Elementary School Students. SCIENCE: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA, 5(1), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.51878/science.v5i1.4732 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51878/science.v5i1.4732
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-Engagement vs. Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.18809 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Hinostroza, J. E., Armstrong-Gallegos, S., & Villafaena, M. (2024). Roles of Digital Technologies in the Implementation of Inquiry-Based Learning (IBL): A Systematic Literature Review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100874 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100874
Januar, E., Gistituati, N., Fitria, Y., Bentri, A., & Muhammadi, M. (2025). EXARIS Model Development: Enhancing Elementary Scientific and Digital Literacy. Educational Process: International Journal, 18, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.18.450 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.18.450
Kembara, M., Rozak, R. W., & Hadian, V. A. (2019). Research-Based Lectures to Improve Students’ 4C (Communication, Collaboration, Critical Thinking, and Creativity) Skills. Proceedings of the Second Conference on Language, Literature, Education, and Culture (ICOLLITE 2018), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.2991/icollite-18.2019.50 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/icollite-18.2019.50
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What Is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303
Lestari, D. P., & Supahar, S. (2020). Students and Teachers’ Necessity Toward Virtual Laboratory as an Instructional Media of 21st Century Science Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012091
Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach: An Interactive Approach. Sage.
Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The Relationship between Mathematics Preparation and Conceptual Learning Gain in Physics: A Possible in Hidden Variable in Diagnostic Pretest Scores. Ames: Department of Physics and Astronomy, Lowa State University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1514215
O’Connor, E., McDonald, F., & Ruggiero, M. (2014). Scaffolding Complex Learning: Integrating 21st Century Thinking, Emerging Technologies, and Dynamic Design and Assessment to Expand Learning and Communication Opportunities. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 43(2), 199–226. https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.43.2.g DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.43.2.g
Pearson, K. (1895) Notes on Regression and Inheritance in the Case of Two Parents. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 58, 240-242. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspl.1895.0041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspl.1895.0041
Pires, C., Cavaco, A., & Vigário, M. (2017). Towards the Definition of Linguistic Metrics for Evaluating Text Readability. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 24(4), 319–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2017.1311448 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2017.1311448
Purnawati, A., & Yakin, N. (2025). Implementasi Kemampuan Literasi Sains dalam Pembelajaran IPA Terintegrasi di Sekolah Dasar. Action Research Journal, 2(2), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.63987/arj.v2i2.204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63987/arj.v2i2.204
Puyt, R. W., Lie, F. B., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2023). The Origins of SWOT Analysis. Long Range Planning, 56(3), 102304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2023.102304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2023.102304
Rahmi, G. (2019). An Investigation of Approaches to Teaching Reading Used by a Teacher in a Junior High School in Bandung. Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2018), 534–541. https://doi.org/10.2991/conaplin-18.2019.315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/conaplin-18.2019.315
Riduwan, M. B. A. (2022). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
Rodríguez-Ardura, I., & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2020). How to Prevent, Detect and Control Common Method Variance in Electronic Commerce Research. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2), I–V. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762020000200101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762020000200101
Sarwar, M. N., Shahzad, A., Ullah, Z., Raza, S., Wasti, S. H., Shrahili, M., Elbatal, I., Kulsoom, S., Qaisar, S., & Nazar, M. F. (2024). Concept Mapping and Conceptual Change Texts: A Constructivist Approach to Address the Misconceptions in Nanoscale Science and Technology. Frontiers in Education, 9(February), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1339957 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1339957
Schmid, M., Brianza, E., Mok, S. Y., & Petko, D. (2024). Running in Circles: A Systematic Review of Reviews on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). Computers and Education, 214(December 2023), 105024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105024
Silverman, D. (2021). Doing Qualitative Research. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036232412.n1
Snow, C. E., & Dibner, K. A. (2016). Science Literacy: Concepts, Contexts, and Consequences. In Science Literacy: Concepts, Contexts, and Consequences. https://doi.org/10.17226/23595 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/23595
Vieira, R. M., & Tenreiro-Vieira, C. (2016). Fostering Scientific Literacy and Critical Thinking in Elementary Science Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(4), 659–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9605-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9605-2
Virtič, M. P. (2022). Teaching Science & Technology: Components of Scientific Literacy and Insight into the Steps of Research. International Journal of Science Education, 44(12), 1916–1931. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2105414 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2105414
Wijaya, S. H., & Astuti, S. (2022). Meta Analisis Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning dan Problem Solving Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3), 3736–3746. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2736 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2736
Yang, R., & Yagi, H. (2024). Evaluating Occupational Values in Japan’s Urban Farming: A Comparison between the Likert Scale and Best-Worst Scaling Methods. Cities, 155(October), 105485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105485 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105485
Yu, S. J., Hsueh, Y. L., Sun, J. C. Y., & Liu, H. Z. (2021). Developing an Intelligent Virtual Reality Interactive System Based on the ADDIE Model for Learning Pour-Over Coffee Brewing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100030
Yuniarti, A., Titin, T., Safarini, F., Rahmadia, I., & Putri, S. (2023). Media Konvensional dan Media Digital dalam Pembelajaran. JUTECH: Journal Education and Technology, 4(2), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.31932/jutech.v4i2.2920 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31932/jutech.v4i2.2920
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ummiatul Fitri, Aissy Putri Zulkarnaini, Gita Rahmi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
